On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:49 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:20:53PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > > Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
> > > from you. Below is the list of languages we
I could turn off my system from Lxpanel. After which I installed Cairo dock
and removed lxpanel. Shut down menu from the application launcher in the
dock performs no action.
Regards,
Divya Subramanian
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Divya
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Divya Subramanian wrote:
> I checked it but no such packages are removed.
Seems I was mistaken, I thought you were talking about a hardware button.
> Where does the shut down button from application menu mapsto ?
That depends on the software in question. At a gu
+++ peter green [2014-05-16 03:43 +0100]:
> Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> >The code is ported, but starting at 1.9 Ruby needs an existing Ruby
> >interpreter to build. Ruby 1.8 needs only gcc-4.6 ... which needs
> >patchutils. So we got ourselves a loop there.
> I would think that during bootstrapping
Antonio Terceiro wrote:
The code is ported, but starting at 1.9 Ruby needs an existing Ruby
interpreter to build. Ruby 1.8 needs only gcc-4.6 ... which needs
patchutils. So we got ourselves a loop there.
I would think that during bootstrapping core packages like gcc and
patchutils would be cr
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:20:53PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
> > from you. Below is the list of languages we believe still need porting to
> > arm64:
>
> Ruby wasn't on the l
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 02:10:39AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> GHCi (ghc is done, but not ghci - is this hard?)
This is hard. You need either an LLVM-based port or a native code
generator, and in either case I think you need some linker support in
GHC. Both of these are serious compiler engineer proj
Le jeudi 15 mai 2014 à 02:10 +0100, Wookey a écrit :
> Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
> from you. Below is the list of languages we believe still need porting to
> arm64:
> Julia
Note that currently Julia is only available on i386/amd64 (so no
armel/armhf for
W dniu 15.05.2014 22:29, Ian Campbell pisze:
> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 21:45 +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>> W dniu 15.05.2014 21:20, Ian Campbell pisze:
>>> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wookey wrote:
Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
from you. Bel
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 21:45 +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> W dniu 15.05.2014 21:20, Ian Campbell pisze:
> > On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> >> Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
> >> from you. Below is the list of languages we believe still nee
W dniu 15.05.2014 21:20, Ian Campbell pisze:
> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wookey wrote:
>> Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
>> from you. Below is the list of languages we believe still need porting to
>> arm64:
>
> Ruby wasn't on the list, is that under c
Am 15.05.2014 20:35, schrieb Abou Al Montacir:
> Hi All,
>
> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 19:31 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> [Dropping d-devel]
>>
>> On 15-05-14 03:10, Wookey wrote:
>>> Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
>>> from you. Below is the list of languages we bel
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
> from you. Below is the list of languages we believe still need porting to
> arm64:
Ruby wasn't on the list, is that under control?
Ruby seems to be at the bottom of the build-d
Hi All,
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 19:31 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> [Dropping d-devel]
>
> On 15-05-14 03:10, Wookey wrote:
> > Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
> > from you. Below is the list of languages we believe still need porting to
> > arm64:
> >
> > Anyone
[Dropping d-devel]
On 15-05-14 03:10, Wookey wrote:
> Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
> from you. Below is the list of languages we believe still need porting to
> arm64:
>
> Anyone who is interested in doing this work, or just has some idea of
> how much work
I checked it but no such packages are removed.
Is there any other way to do so ?
Where does the shut down button from application menu mapsto ?
Regards,
Divya Subramanian
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> Sounds like you installed systemd and are running that. systemd
>
On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 19:16 +0200, Alexander Pohl wrote:
> Ideally, one would have to supply an u-boot version which has the Grub
> API enabled and then to chain load Grub from there,
Ideally perhaps but in reality there are various issues with running
grub on u-boot (the u-boot API is pretty brok
Sounds like you installed systemd and are running that. systemd
supports `systemctl poweroff`, `init 0` and `shutdown -h now` as
shutdown methods.
I suggest you look at the apt history (/var/log/apt/history.log) and
try to figure out if any hardware-specific packages were removed. For
example on a
Hi, dear mips and arm porters,
intrig...@debian.org wrote (03 May 2014 11:05:09 GMT) :
> since April 2010 (1.1.221-6), libgtk2-perl sometimes fails to build on
> the armhf, mips and mipsel architectures, due to a failing test
> (t/GtkCellRenderer.t). I did not find any similar failure on other
> a
Hi all,
I am working on porting debian wheezy to a13-olinuxino board. I am using
LXDE as desktop environment, openbox as windows manager. Shut Down button
doesn't work after I installed cairo-dock.
Earlier I had SysVinit as service manager, after which I have installed
systemd. From the terminal
20 matches
Mail list logo
