i'm doing an EOMA68-A33 CPU Card which will cost $5600 to complete the
layout and 5 samples. i can cover that cost over a couple of months,
so it is going ahead, and first (working) 5 samples should be done and
received by Dec 2014.
if there is anyone who would like to buy either one of the 5
On Thursday 04 September 2014 08:01 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Set up a chroot using just Raspbian binaries, and build/develop in
that. It should be possible to do things directly on the Wheezy
system, but you'd have to very careful to make sure no v7-only code
gets into your binaries and that's
On 2014-09-05 06:38, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 07:02 -0400, Li, Peng wrote:
Thanks for looking into this. Here's output.
Strange, that all looks like I would expect so I'm not sure why it
isn't
working.
I've got a dmesg for the non-working case in the thread but could you
Hi Aurelien!
I just noticed that there seems to be something wrong with
packages.debian.org regarding sh4. Many packages are not
listed there as available even though they are built and
installed.
For example, src:glibc, has been fully built on sh4, yet:
https://packages.debian.org/sid/libc6
Hi folks,
I believe the existing debian-ports setup (as an exploder pointing to
all the different port lists) is not working well at all. It's a
confusing setup to many people, which leads to lots of cross-list
noise that's probably not warranted. Some of the traffic is also
clearly meant to be
Hello,
I recently read [1] about the new Debian architecture aarch64.
I maintain a small tool linuxinfo, which checks for the architecture
and prints some system information.
It would be kind if you could check on aarch64 [2] if linuxinfo works
and produces sensible output. I basically added
Hi,
On 05/09/14 18:39, Steve McIntyre wrote:
* Remove the confusion: turn debian-ports into a separate *normal*
mailing list, announce it and let people subscribe to it [...]
That sounds perfect IMHO. It could be used for general discussion about
porting, upcoming new ports, or any ports
On 05/09/14 18:04, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
For example, src:glibc, has been fully built on sh4, yet:
yamato:~# apt-cache policy libc6
libc6:
Installed: 2.19-9
Candidate: 2.19-9
Version table:
*** 2.19-9 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
I can only find arch:all packages
Steven Chamberlain dixit:
On 05/09/14 18:39, Steve McIntyre wrote:
* Remove the confusion: turn debian-ports into a separate *normal*
mailing list, announce it and let people subscribe to it [...]
That sounds perfect IMHO. It could be used for general discussion about
porting, upcoming
Qtbase-opensource-src 5.3.1+dfsg-6 failed to build on arm64 (both
debian-ports and debian official) with the following error
g++ -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--no-undefined -Wl,-e,qt_core_boilerplate -Wl,-O1 -shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions
10 matches
Mail list logo
