Re: affordable arm boards with plenty of ram.

2016-05-19 Thread Wookey
+++ Lennart Sorensen [2016-05-19 10:02 -0400]: > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 08:23:03AM -0400, Nigel Sollars wrote: > > The imx.6 4xA9 is about as good as your gunna get for the budget. > > > The hikey is within budget and has 8 A53 cores (so 64bit) but only 1GB > ram, and no SATA and USB2 only. If

Re: Arm board for a router

2016-05-19 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2016-05-19, Pshem Kowalczyk wrote: > I'm looking for a board that's debian-supported that could be used in > med-spec router ('on-a-stick' setup) > The only real requirement is throughput of the on-board network card. These two are fairly similar in specs, and should handle more traffic:

Re: affordable arm boards with plenty of ram.

2016-05-19 Thread Alan Corey
Analog or pulse-width control of the fan could make it variable speed. On 5/19/16, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2016-05-19, Lennart Sorensen wrote: >> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:35:15AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >>> BeagleBoard-X15: >>> price: not yet available,

Re: affordable arm boards with plenty of ram.

2016-05-19 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2016-05-19, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:35:15AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> BeagleBoard-X15: >> price: not yet available, estimated ~US$239 >> kernel: 4.6.x, currently needs custom kernel with compiled-in sata >> cpu: dual-core cortex-a15 (TI AM57xx) >>

Arm board for a router

2016-05-19 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
Hi, I'm looking for a board that's debian-supported that could be used in med-spec router ('on-a-stick' setup) The only real requirement is throughput of the on-board network card. ATM I use cubietruck and it works well (and it's rock solid), but it maxes out around 170-180Mb/s (not enough CPU

Re: affordable arm boards with plenty of ram.

2016-05-19 Thread peter green
On 19/05/16 17:25, Phil Endecott wrote: peter green writes: As much ram as possible. Plenty of CPU power would be nice. A good storage interface (in order of preference SATA is better than USB3 which is better than USB2). Support in Debian kernels would be nice.

Re: affordable arm boards with plenty of ram.

2016-05-19 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:35:15AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2016-05-19, peter green wrote: > > I'm looking for an arm board/box to add to my collection of buildboxes. > > > > Critera (in roughly descending order of importance): > > > > Reasonablly affordable (upper limit ~£200) > > As

Re: affordable arm boards with plenty of ram.

2016-05-19 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2016-05-19, peter green wrote: > I'm looking for an arm board/box to add to my collection of buildboxes. > > Critera (in roughly descending order of importance): > > Reasonablly affordable (upper limit ~£200) > As much ram as possible. > Plenty of CPU power would be nice. > A good storage

Re: affordable arm boards with plenty of ram.

2016-05-19 Thread Phil Endecott
peter green p10link.net> writes: > As much ram as possible. > Plenty of CPU power would be nice. > A good storage interface (in order of preference SATA is better than > USB3 which is better than USB2). > Support in Debian kernels would be nice. > arm64 support would be nice. This is what we've

Re: [llvm-dev] llvm-toolchain-3.8 on lower arm targets, specifically Debian armel and Raspbian.

2016-05-19 Thread peter green
On 18/05/16 04:50, Tim Northover wrote: If you don't need/want the various Sanitizer runtimes (e.g. you don't support sanitizers or already have versions provided with GCC) then it's as easy as not downloading compiler-rt or removing it from the projects/ directory before running CMake. The

Re: affordable arm boards with plenty of ram.

2016-05-19 Thread John Holland
> On 19.05.2016, at 13:43, peter green wrote: > > I'm looking for an arm board/box to add to my collection of buildboxes. > > Critera (in roughly descending order of importance): > > Reasonablly affordable (upper limit ~£200) > As much ram as possible. > Plenty of CPU

Re: affordable arm boards with plenty of ram.

2016-05-19 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 08:23:03AM -0400, Nigel Sollars wrote: > The imx.6 4xA9 is about as good as your gunna get for the budget. Well I did pick up the armdale octa which is 4xA15 (plus 4 not usable A7s) for $200us a year or two ago. It does not have support in the Debian kernel as far as I

affordable arm boards with plenty of ram.

2016-05-19 Thread peter green
I'm looking for an arm board/box to add to my collection of buildboxes. Critera (in roughly descending order of importance): Reasonablly affordable (upper limit ~£200) As much ram as possible. Plenty of CPU power would be nice. A good storage interface (in order of preference SATA is better