Installed and confirmed working. Great news!
--
Josh Bullock
Hi!
SBCL currently FTBFS[0][1] on armhf. THis is due to some changes in the
environment (I can build the current version in the environment from the
time of the last successfull armhf build and *cannot* build the "old"
sbcl in today's unstable). I'm willing to cooperate in debugging this
problem b
Le dimanche 06 novembre 2016 à 09:25 +0800, Paul Wise a écrit :
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
>
> > Either way, I think it's critical that we seriously take a look at this
> > and enable llvmpipe if it doesn't bring significant drawbacks.
>
> FTR, it looks like llvm
On 06/11/2016 10:19, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 09:59:20AM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> I've tried a rebuild on harris with pic_code set to true for arm. The build
>> succeeded and all tests passed fine. Do you want to run more tests or should
>> I upload this change?
>
> Please
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 09:59:20AM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02/11/2016 03:22, Ximin Luo wrote:
> >
> > let emit_load_symbol_addr dst s = if !Clflags.pic_code then begin [..] end
> > else if !arch > ARMv6 && not !Clflags.dlcode && !fastcode_flag then begin `
> > movw{emit_re
Hi,
On 02/11/2016 03:22, Ximin Luo wrote:
>
> let emit_load_symbol_addr dst s = if !Clflags.pic_code then begin [..] end
> else if !arch > ARMv6 && not !Clflags.dlcode && !fastcode_flag then begin `
> movw {emit_reg dst}, #:lower16:{emit_symbol s}\n`; ` movt{emit_reg dst},
> #:upper16:{emit_
6 matches
Mail list logo