On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:13 AM Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> Arnd Bergmann dixit:
>
> >The way the FPU type gets selected in gcc changed with recent versions,
> >this was intentional and won't be reverted but it did break packages that
> >used the old method.
>
> Hmph.
>
> >In most cases, it's
Arnd Bergmann dixit:
>The way the FPU type gets selected in gcc changed with recent versions,
>this was intentional and won't be reverted but it did break packages that
>used the old method.
Hmph.
>In most cases, it's sufficient to pass
>-march=armv7-a+fp instead of -march=armv7-a to pick the
Arnd Bergmann dixit:
>I tried cross-building it myself now and found the same issue with
>an older arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-11, which invokes the assembler as
>
>/usr/lib/gcc-cross/arm-linux-gnueabihf/11/../../../../arm-linux-gnueabihf/bin/as
>-v -march=armv7-a -mfloat-abi=hard -meabi=5 -o
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 8:00 PM Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> Arnd Bergmann dixit:
>
> >-march=armv7-a+fp instead of -march=armv7-a to pick the right
>
> “instead of”
>
> We pass nothing there, and we need a solution (or two distinct
> ones) for armel and armhf.
I tried cross-building it myself now
On 2022-08-17 17:28:08 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> tags 1017538 + help
> forwarded 1017538 https://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2022/07/msg00041.html
> thanks
>
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> instead of filing a bug with the information we already have…
>
> >arm/__longjmp.S: Assembler messages:
>
Arnd Bergmann dixit:
>-march=armv7-a+fp instead of -march=armv7-a to pick the right
“instead of”
We pass nothing there, and we need a solution (or two distinct
ones) for armel and armhf.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
[...] if maybe ext3fs wasn't a better pick, or jfs, or maybe reiserfs, oh but
what
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 7:28 PM Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> tags 1017538 + help
> forwarded 1017538 https://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2022/07/msg00041.html
> thanks
>
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> instead of filing a bug with the information we already have…
>
> >arm/__longjmp.S: Assembler messages:
>
tags 1017538 + help
forwarded 1017538 https://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2022/07/msg00041.html
thanks
Hi Sebastian,
instead of filing a bug with the information we already have…
>arm/__longjmp.S: Assembler messages:
>arm/__longjmp.S:9: Error: selected processor does not support `vldm
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 10:29 PM Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> Thanks for chiming in.
>
> At this point, it is really up to the maintainers to decide whether
> the maintenance burden is worth it. The code itself seems pretty
> uncontroversial afaict.
>
> Might other distros be in a similar situation?
9 matches
Mail list logo
