Re: Help with testing u-boot!

2022-12-29 Thread gene heskett
On 12/29/22 05:06, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: On 2022-12-29, gene heskett wrote: On 12/28/22 19:17, Diederik de Haas wrote: On Thursday, 29 December 2022 00:21:05 CET Vagrant Cascadian wrote: debian stable (2021.01*), testing (2022.04*), unstable (2022.10*) and experimental (2023.01-rc*) ... B

Re: armbian for arm64's is 99% debian testing for arm64's.

2022-12-29 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Thursday, 29 December 2022 04:29:02 CET Paul Wise wrote: > > Armbian != Debian. > > While that is true, it seems that Armbian is an overlay derivative, > which means that they just use Debian binaries for most packages, While that is also true, Armbian does make their own kernel, with custom

Re: Bug#1016963: Help with testing u-boot!

2022-12-29 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Thursday, 29 December 2022 04:33:51 CET Rick Thomas wrote: > Rebooting while watching the serial console output says "U-Boot SPL > 2016.05-rc2+dfsg0~20160423~1-1 (Apr 24 2016 - 04:24:21)" So the firmware > does not correspond to what aptitude says. The main difference with your other Cubox-

Re: Help with testing u-boot!

2022-12-29 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2022-12-29, Diederik de Haas wrote: > On Thursday, 29 December 2022 00:21:05 CET Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> debian stable (2021.01*), testing (2022.04*), unstable (2022.10*) >> and experimental (2023.01-rc*) >> >> # arm64 >> ... >> rock64-rk3328 > > I don't recall ever having issues with u-boot

Re: Help with testing u-boot!

2022-12-29 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2022-12-29, gene heskett wrote: > On 12/28/22 19:17, Diederik de Haas wrote: >> On Thursday, 29 December 2022 00:21:05 CET Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >>> debian stable (2021.01*), testing (2022.04*), unstable (2022.10*) >>> and experimental (2023.01-rc*) ... > But a bpi m5 makes no attempt to boot