On 12/29/22 05:06, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
On 2022-12-29, gene heskett wrote:
On 12/28/22 19:17, Diederik de Haas wrote:
On Thursday, 29 December 2022 00:21:05 CET Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
debian stable (2021.01*), testing (2022.04*), unstable (2022.10*)
and experimental (2023.01-rc*)
...
B
On Thursday, 29 December 2022 04:29:02 CET Paul Wise wrote:
> > Armbian != Debian.
>
> While that is true, it seems that Armbian is an overlay derivative,
> which means that they just use Debian binaries for most packages,
While that is also true, Armbian does make their own kernel, with custom
On Thursday, 29 December 2022 04:33:51 CET Rick Thomas wrote:
> Rebooting while watching the serial console output says "U-Boot SPL
> 2016.05-rc2+dfsg0~20160423~1-1 (Apr 24 2016 - 04:24:21)" So the firmware
> does not correspond to what aptitude says.
The main difference with your other Cubox-
On 2022-12-29, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Thursday, 29 December 2022 00:21:05 CET Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> debian stable (2021.01*), testing (2022.04*), unstable (2022.10*)
>> and experimental (2023.01-rc*)
>>
>> # arm64
>> ...
>> rock64-rk3328
>
> I don't recall ever having issues with u-boot
On 2022-12-29, gene heskett wrote:
> On 12/28/22 19:17, Diederik de Haas wrote:
>> On Thursday, 29 December 2022 00:21:05 CET Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> debian stable (2021.01*), testing (2022.04*), unstable (2022.10*)
>>> and experimental (2023.01-rc*)
...
> But a bpi m5 makes no attempt to boot
5 matches
Mail list logo