Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports

2024-03-11 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le lun. 11 mars 2024 à 21:53, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : > Jérémy Lal dixit: > > >While I'm very much concerned about architectures and compatibility, > >it seems that for python-cryptography, it's a sinking boat: > >The end of a very discussion dates from february, 2021

Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports

2024-03-11 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le lun. 11 mars 2024 à 20:17, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : > Hi, > > we have still the situation that the current python-cryptography, > having rather heavy rust ecosystem dependencies, cannot be built > on some debian-ports architectures. > > This situation is not likely to go away: > > • some

Re: Debian on Lenovo Chromebook (ARMv8)

2023-03-31 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le jeu. 30 mars 2023 à 23:54, Brian Sammon < debian-arm-l...@brisammon.fastmail.fm> a écrit : > I currently have a Lenovo Duet 5 chromebook (with ARM processor) that runs > debian off an SD Card via USB. > > > The problem is that instead of a normal BIOS or UEFI, thelaptop has the > > nasty

odd difference between two similar armhf build servers

2022-10-10 Thread Jérémy Lal
Hi, Some tests in nodejs test suite consistently fail on "hoiby" but not on "antheil": https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=nodejs=armhf Is there a difference between the two servers that could explain the different results ? Thanks for any hint. Jérémy

Re: Bug#1017961: mozjs102: Fails to build on armel

2022-08-31 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le mer. 31 août 2022 à 03:55, Wookey a écrit : > On 2022-08-25 11:34 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 at 21:42:29 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > > > I don't have a good picture of where this puts us on a scale from "it's > > basically fine" to "armel users will report grave

hung during build on arm-ubc-01

2021-05-07 Thread Jérémy Lal
Hi, a build failure happened while building nodejs: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=nodejs=14.16.1~dfsg-1=arm64 i'm trying to see if there was a real reason besides "external contingencies": - any differences (in instruction set ?) between "arm-ubc-01" and "arm-conova-02" ? - has

Re: nodejs on arm64 now in experimental

2015-09-11 Thread Jérémy Lal
2015-09-11 10:48 GMT+02:00 Edmund Grimley Evans < edmund.grimley.ev...@gmail.com>: > This seems to be the problem on armel: > > configure:o['variables']['arm_fpu'] = 'vfpv2' > > It probably should be "vfp" instead of "vfpv2". A GCC man page says: > >-mfpu=name >-mfpe=number >

Re: libv8 packaging and arm64

2014-09-10 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le mercredi 10 septembre 2014 à 13:28 +0100, Steve McIntyre a écrit : Hi guys, I've been looking through the (shrinking) list of packages that we don't have built yet for arm64 and I can see nodejs and friends are still there. That's likely to be very important for some people wanting to

Re: Dropping armel/ixp4xx

2014-04-14 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le lundi 14 avril 2014 à 02:02 +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit : The ixp4xx kernel is now too big to fit in the flash partitions: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=linuxarch=armelver=3.14-1~exp1stamp=1397151242 I intend to disable this flavour for the next upload of 3.14 and remove

Re: chromium segfaults on startup on armhf

2013-01-26 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:52:00 +, peter green wrote: Anyway I have some bad news. When I try to do an armel build with bfd on my imx board I get. LINK(target) out/Release/chrome /usr/bin/ld.bfd.real: failed to set dynamic section sizes: Memory exhausted collect2: ld returned 1 exit status