> Anywhere under /boot would do, wouldn't it? Debian and Ubuntu seem to be
> the main ones which use /usr or /lib.
Ubuntu was looking to move to /boot/dtb-$(uname -r) (mirroring
fedora's location)
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2014-August/048015.html
But later reverted it:
http
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 09:01:46PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> It appears not :-/
> Thinking about it some more we don't really need this for the sort of
> default boot script I was thinking about, just a dtb -> dtb-$uname
> symlink to match the vmlinuz/initrd.img ones is sufficient given the
> a
On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 12:02 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 07:31:32PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 00:17 +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
>
> > (bit of an aside)
> > > diff --git a/build/boot/arm/bootscr.mainline_common
> > > b/build/boot/arm/bootscr.ma
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 07:31:32PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 00:17 +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
> (bit of an aside)
> > diff --git a/build/boot/arm/bootscr.mainline_common
> > b/build/boot/arm/bootscr.mainline_common
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000..268eeba
> >
On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 00:17 +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
(bit of an aside)
> diff --git a/build/boot/arm/bootscr.mainline_common
> b/build/boot/arm/bootscr.mainline_common
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..268eeba
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/build/boot/arm/bootscr.mainline_common
This be a goo
On 2014-09-21 17:17:23 -0500, Karsten Merker wrote:
> I believe that on armhf systems a tarball makes more sense than
> a disk image for the following reasons:
Thanks for working on this!
> - We do not install a boot sector on armhf but just a u-boot
> script. This is a normal file which can
6 matches
Mail list logo
