On Tuesday, 25 October 2022 14:34:12 CEST Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > and entirely based on the kernel patches that are added on top of mainline
> > as well as the configuration.
The patch set may be more substantial then I initially thought.
In 2015 I asked plugwash the general procedure to make
On Tuesday, 25 October 2022 12:01:01 CEST Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > I have a Zero W running Debian's armel kernel and I find that device to be
> > annoyingly slow.
> > I also have a RPi 1 running raspbian.org's 4.9 kernel, which is a special
> > kernel build by plugwash and compiled like the rest
On Tuesday, 25 October 2022 11:33:40 CEST Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > IIUC, for the kernel, either compiler should be fine. The
> > documentation[0] for compiling the RPi Zero kernel seems to bear this
> > out - it even uses the "CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf-". If you've
> > got access to the
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022, at 11:15, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Tuesday, 25 October 2022 10:02:09 CEST Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>> Debian armel runs fine without recompilation at a slight penalty.
>
> It is exactly this 'slight penalty' that I want to verify.
>
> I have a Zero W running Debian's
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022, at 00:03, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> Diederik de Haas writes:
>
>> But it can be that I'm looking at this problem all wrong and/or have some
>> tunnel vision towards building a cross compiler.
>> That is an important reason for making this ML thread.
>
> IIUC, for the kernel,
On Tuesday, 25 October 2022 10:02:09 CEST Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> Debian armel runs fine without recompilation at a slight penalty.
It is exactly this 'slight penalty' that I want to verify.
I have a Zero W running Debian's armel kernel and I find that device to be
annoyingly slow.
I also
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 09:12:06AM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> W dniu 25.10.2022 o 00:03, Punit Agrawal pisze:
>
> > IIUC, for the kernel, either compiler should be fine. The
> > documentation[0] for compiling the RPi Zero kernel seems to bear this
> > out - it even uses the
W dniu 25.10.2022 o 00:03, Punit Agrawal pisze:
IIUC, for the kernel, either compiler should be fine. The
documentation[0] for compiling the RPi Zero kernel seems to bear this
out - it even uses the "CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf-". If you've
got access to the hardware it should be easy to
Diederik de Haas writes:
> On maandag 24 oktober 2022 11:16:42 CEST Punit Agrawal wrote:
>> I am probably missing some context but I wanted to point to the armel
>> cross compiler in Debian - gcc-arm-linux-gnueabi. Is there some reason
>> to build the cross-compiler yourself?
>
> I don't want to
On maandag 24 oktober 2022 11:16:42 CEST Punit Agrawal wrote:
> I am probably missing some context but I wanted to point to the armel
> cross compiler in Debian - gcc-arm-linux-gnueabi. Is there some reason
> to build the cross-compiler yourself?
I don't want to build for armel, but for
Diederik de Haas writes:
> Hi,
>
> Debian provides a kernel for Raspberry Pi Zero (W) and 1, but that targets
> the armel architecture. I want to compile a/the Debian kernel that does use
> the
> HW capabilities of the RPi 0/1, similarly to how raspbian.org recompiles
> the Debian packages.
On 10/23/22 16:31, Diederik de Haas wrote:
Hi,
Debian provides a kernel for Raspberry Pi Zero (W) and 1, but that targets
the armel architecture. I want to compile a/the Debian kernel that does use the
HW capabilities of the RPi 0/1, similarly to how raspbian.org recompiles
the Debian packages.
Hi,
Debian provides a kernel for Raspberry Pi Zero (W) and 1, but that targets
the armel architecture. I want to compile a/the Debian kernel that does use the
HW capabilities of the RPi 0/1, similarly to how raspbian.org recompiles
the Debian packages. Except AFAIK the Debian kernel.
I know that
13 matches
Mail list logo
