Re: Installability of desktops on arm64

2014-09-19 Thread peter green
Ok time for an update. I tested installability in two chroots, one with both -ports and official sources and the other with only official sources. mate-desktop-environment: installable in an environment with both official and ports repos. Not installable in an environment with only official re

Re: Installability of desktops on arm64

2014-09-11 Thread peter green
Michael Cree wrote: On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:26:43PM +0100, peter green wrote: Andreas Henriksson wrote: This should give the rest of GNOME a chance to build now... Unfortunately we aren't there yet. Currently installability of gnome-core is blocked by the chain (note: this i

Re: Installability of desktops on arm64

2014-09-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 03:06:03AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Verified to build with gcc 4.8 and workarounds for the above on changsha. Ignore the gcc 4.8 bit, was needed until it got properly fixed and I forgot to edit it out when sending. Works also with gcc 4.9 now. Regards, Rene

Re: Installability of desktops on arm64

2014-09-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 02:22:29AM +0100, Wookey wrote: > Libreoffice needs major porting work (in their equivalent of > libffi). That will get done, but is not a priority for anyone yet. (It So, during DebConf RH finished their port and I've been able to backport it[1] The archive misses so

Re: Installability of desktops on arm64

2014-09-03 Thread Michael Cree
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:26:43PM +0100, peter green wrote: > Andreas Henriksson wrote: > >This should give the rest of GNOME a chance to build now... > Unfortunately we aren't there yet. > > Currently installability of gnome-core is blocked by the chain > (note: this is probablly not the only bl

Re: Installability of desktops on arm64

2014-09-03 Thread peter green
Andreas Henriksson wrote: Hello! Fwiw, the uhttpmock testsuite failure was catching a real problem in libsoup2.4-1 on arm64. The libsoup2.4-1 package was missing its dependency on glib-networking which made it non-functional, which was caught by the uhttpmock testsuite. (I guess this was done in

Re: Installability of desktops on arm64

2014-08-17 Thread Wookey
+++ Andreas Henriksson [2014-08-17 22:22 +0200]: > Hello! > > Fwiw, the uhttpmock testsuite failure was catching a real problem > in libsoup2.4-1 on arm64. > The libsoup2.4-1 package was missing its dependency on glib-networking > which made it non-functional, which was caught by the uhttpmock tes

Re: Installability of desktops on arm64

2014-08-17 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello! Fwiw, the uhttpmock testsuite failure was catching a real problem in libsoup2.4-1 on arm64. The libsoup2.4-1 package was missing its dependency on glib-networking which made it non-functional, which was caught by the uhttpmock testsuite. (I guess this was done in a porter upload to break a

Re: Installability of desktops on arm64

2014-08-10 Thread peter green
Wookey wrote: +++ peter green [2014-07-19 19:59 +0100]: I decided to take a look at what desktops/windows managers were/were not installable on arm64. Results mate-desktop-environment: took some pushing but is now installable. lxde: blocked by https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b

Re: Installability of desktops on arm64

2014-08-09 Thread Wookey
+++ peter green [2014-07-19 19:59 +0100]: > I decided to take a look at what desktops/windows managers were/were > not installable on arm64. Results > > mate-desktop-environment: took some pushing but is now installable. > > lxde: blocked by > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753

Re: Installability of desktops on arm64

2014-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 09:15:03AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > > arm32 (and ABI-specific, calling conventions, etc.) code to also > > > work with amd64. > > [...] > > > See apt-get source libreoffice, > > > bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_arm. > > > > Given arm64 probably won't be in je

Re: Installability of desktops on arm64

2014-07-28 Thread Neil Williams
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 10:05:55 +0200 Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 08:07:57AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > And I would actually be surprised it would work without porting the > > arm32 (and ABI-specific, calling conventions, etc.) code to also > > work with amd64. > [...] > >

Re: Installability of desktops on arm64

2014-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 08:07:57AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > And I would actually be surprised it would work without porting the arm32 > (and ABI-specific, calling conventions, etc.) code to also work with amd64. [...] > See apt-get source libreoffice, bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_arm. G

Re: Installability of desktops on arm64

2014-07-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 07:59:11PM +0100, peter green wrote: > gnome: in addition to other problems mentioned above blocked by > missing libreoffice. Debian libreoffice package doesn't even try to > build on arm64 (not in architecture list afaict). Ubuntu has > libreoffice on arm64 but their v

Installability of desktops on arm64

2014-07-19 Thread peter green
I decided to take a look at what desktops/windows managers were/were not installable on arm64. Results mate-desktop-environment: took some pushing but is now installable. lxde: blocked by https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753778 , appears to be some sort of race condition in t