On Oct 5, 2016, at 1:54 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2016-10-01, Rick Thomas wrote:
>> On Jun 5, 2016, at 1:35 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2016-06-05, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
I have the same problem with my Cubox-i 4x4. Is there any progress on
this?
> ...
Are the pa
> On Oct 5, 2016, at 11:57 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On 10/05/2016 10:54 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> I believe it actually requires u-boot to initialize ram timings and
>> various other parameters. You can trick the kernel into using more
>
> Right, the kernel expects the
Hello,
On 10/05/2016 10:54 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> I believe it actually requires u-boot to initialize ram timings and
> various other parameters. You can trick the kernel into using more
Right, the kernel expects the boot loader to initialize RAM. I don't
know about u-boot, but barebox ed
> On Oct 5, 2016, at 1:54 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>
> It would of course be useful to experiment with alternative methods, but
> my guess is getting proper patches into u-boot may likely be the
> simplest approach. It just takes some work.
Anything I can do as a tester to help with that pr
On 2016-10-01, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On Jun 5, 2016, at 1:35 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2016-06-05, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>>> I have the same problem with my Cubox-i 4x4. Is there any progress on
>>> this?
...
>>> Are the patches incorporated into the latest version in experimental?
>>
>
On Jun 5, 2016, at 1:35 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2016-06-05, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>> I have the same problem with my Cubox-i 4x4. Is there any progress on
>> this?
>
> Not the I'm aware of.
>
> Currently, the one-liner I patch just hard-codes a different ram
> configuration. In my
On 2016-06-05, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> I have the same problem with my Cubox-i 4x4. Is there any progress on
> this?
Not the I'm aware of.
Currently, the one-liner I patch just hard-codes a different ram
configuration. In my experience it breaks booting on the cubox-i4pro.
> The version of u-
Vagrant Cascadian writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> On 2016-04-24, Rick Thomas wrote:
>> Any chance I could download a pre-built binary?
>
> Just uploaded u-boot 2016.05-rc2 packages to:
>
> deb http://cascadia.debian.net/~vagrant/debian UNRELEASED main
>
> The u-boot-imx package there w
On 04/26/16 00:51, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Apr 21, 2016, at 11:54 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
I seem to remember that I got roughly the same number (lightly less
than 2.0 GiB) when I booted the manufacturer supplied u-boot and
Ubuntu kernel from the uSD-card that came with it.
Maybe it came with a u
On Apr 21, 2016, at 11:54 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>> I seem to remember that I got roughly the same number (lightly less
>>> than 2.0 GiB) when I booted the manufacturer supplied u-boot and
>>> Ubuntu kernel from the uSD-card that came with it.
>>
>> Maybe it came with a u-boot that didn't
On 2016-04-24, Rick Thomas wrote:
> Any chance I could download a pre-built binary?
Just uploaded u-boot 2016.05-rc2 packages to:
deb http://cascadia.debian.net/~vagrant/debian UNRELEASED main
The u-boot-imx package there worked on my cubox-i4x4, but will almost
certainly hang on a cubox-i4pro
Hello,
On 04/22/2016 08:54 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Apr 21, 2016, at 9:04 AM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>
>> On 2016-04-21, Rick Thomas wrote:
>>> Are you saying that the amount of RAM seen by Debian Linux is
>>> determined by something in u-boot?
>>
>> Yes.
>
> How is this information com
Any chance I could download a pre-built binary? (It’s been a couple of decades
since I actually built any binaries… |-: )
Please forgive my curiosity. I’m trying to understand how this process works…
Do I understand correctly that this is part of the definition of a structure
that contains me
On Apr 21, 2016, at 9:04 AM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2016-04-21, Rick Thomas wrote:
>> Are you saying that the amount of RAM seen by Debian Linux is
>> determined by something in u-boot?
>
> Yes.
How is this information communicated from u-boot to the Linux kernel? I
thought I understo
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:04:38AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> That's how it's worked for me, yes.
>
> There's something about the imx6 that limits it to 3.8GB.
It is Cortex-A9 which is 32bit, and hence it needs a bit of memory range
set aside for I/O, like networking and disk and PCIe and
On 2016-04-21, Rick Thomas wrote:
> Are you saying that the amount of RAM seen by Debian Linux is
> determined by something in u-boot?
Yes.
> But if I were using your patched mainline u-boot, I would get a
> different (larger) number (almost, but not quite, the full 4.0GiB)?
That's how it's wor
[Ooops, the last one got away from me before it was finished!]
On Apr 20, 2016, at 10:26 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> This appears to be a thread forked from a reproducible-builds
> discussion. :)
Yeah… sorry for hijacking the thread… Please forgive my curiosity (:
>
> On 2016-04-20, Rick
On Apr 20, 2016, at 10:26 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> This appears to be a thread forked from a reproducible-builds
> discussion. :)
>
> On 2016-04-20, Rick Thomas wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016, at 06:36 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>>> I was wondering what is the performance of various ar
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 05:17:02PM -0700, Rick Thomas wrote:
> One personal experience that may be relevant:
>
> I ordered a Cubox-i4x4 from NewEgg a few months ago. When it arrived it
> was clearly marked as a 4x4, and in the original shrink-wrap, But it
> only had 2GB of RAM. I notified NewEgg
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016, at 06:36 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I was wondering what is the performance of various armhf boards, for
> package building.
...
> cbxi4a-armhf-rb.debian.net19962365# 4x,4G;
> Cubox-i4x4
> cbxi4pro0-armhf-rb.debian.net 1973
Hi!
I was wondering what is the performance of various armhf boards, for
package building. Of course, the reproducible-builds team have a lot of
stats already. Below I'm sharing the query I used and the results in
case anyone else is interested in this.
Using https://tests.reproducible-builds.o
21 matches
Mail list logo