peter green wrote:
Steve McIntyre wrote:
if we're happy that they're stable and supportable.
Having had a 2GB nitrogen6x running as a raspbian buildd for a while I
would consider it stable and supportable. We did have some crashes
on both the nitrogen6x and the wandboard quad caused by
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:11 PM, peter green plugw...@p10link.net wrote:
peter green wrote:
Steve McIntyre wrote:
if we're happy that they're stable and supportable.
Having had a 2GB nitrogen6x running as a raspbian buildd for a while I
would consider it stable and supportable. We did
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:23:55 +
Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
Arm64 kit will be even more expensive/unobtanium for a while.
Although I expect the situation to be very different laster next year.
We can schedule a reevaluation of getting server class hardware next
year then. Until then
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:37:15PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:23:55 +
Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
[...]
Or Wanda or the Nitrogen6x we've just kindly been offered.
Or those, yes. One of the issues is getting boards with more RAM than
the current
Thanks Ricardo,
On 11/15/2013 06:18 AM, Ricardo Mones wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:37:15PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:23:55 +
Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
[...]
Or Wanda or the Nitrogen6x we've just kindly been offered.
Or those, yes. One of
I think we need to bash out some criteria for deciding during the
mini-debconf. i.e deciding how we decide (or just make a decision if
possible).
Better to decide now rather than wait for the perfect solution next
year (which might have other problems other than price). Better is
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:50:33 +0200
Riku Voipio riku.voi...@iki.fi wrote:
Wearing my armel buildd maintainer hat, I don't feel the same urgency
as you seem to have - perhaps that's because the armel buildd'd are
less ram-starved than the locos?
Yeah, you're spoiled, iirc, one buildd has 3GB of
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:14:32 -0700
Eric Nelson eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com wrote:
Surely it adds something to the final price tag but seems the
Nitrogen6X boards can be easily upgraded to 2GB:
http://boundarydevices.com/products/2gb-ddr3-upgrade-for-nitrogen6x/
So maybe
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 05:50:33PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
One thing I'd like to avoid is growing the diversity of buildd's we
have. If we have many different buildd hardware, each of buildd
classes needs different kind of maintainence. So when add a new type
of hw for buildd's, it should go in
Hi Konstantinos,
On 11/15/2013 09:33 AM, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:14:32 -0700
Eric Nelson eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com wrote:
Surely it adds something to the final price tag but seems the
Nitrogen6X boards can be easily upgraded to 2GB:
Hello,
2013/11/15 Konstantinos Margaritis mar...@freevec.org:
Riku Voipio riku.voi...@iki.fi wrote:
Wearing my armel buildd maintainer hat, I don't feel the same urgency
as you seem to have - perhaps that's because the armel buildd'd are
less ram-starved than the locos?
Yeah, you're
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 20:23:58 +0100
Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com wrote:
To add up more options, we received a donation offer from OpenBlocks
people as well, those machines have an ArmadaXP SoC and have miniPCI
slot to extend hardware up to 3GB RAM. Nobuhiro and Thomas Petazzoni
have been
Hello,
2013/11/15 Konstantinos Margaritis mar...@freevec.org:
On the other side of things, Boston guys are aware of our interests
and they need to do some internal discussion and maybe allocate some
budget for special price or donation, I'll come back with more once
they let us know. Also,
Steve McIntyre wrote:
if we're happy that they're stable and supportable.
Having had a 2GB nitrogen6x running as a raspbian buildd for a while I
would consider it stable and supportable. We did have some crashes on
both the nitrogen6x and the wandboard quad caused by the eglibc
testsuite
Thanks for the details Peter,
On 11/15/2013 06:03 PM, peter green wrote:
Steve McIntyre wrote:
if we're happy that they're stable and supportable.
Having had a 2GB nitrogen6x running as a raspbian buildd for a while I
would consider it stable and supportable. We did have some crashes on
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:03 PM, peter green plugw...@p10link.net wrote:
Steve McIntyre wrote:
if we're happy that they're stable and supportable.
Having had a 2GB nitrogen6x running as a raspbian buildd for a while I would
consider it stable and supportable. We did have some crashes on
(resending for the 3rd time to the list, for some reason my emails only
appear on the list only if I sign them)
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:21:00 +
peter green plugw...@p10link.net wrote:
Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
So, my counter-proposal to that is that we get instead some cheap
easy to
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
So, my counter-proposal to that is that we get instead some cheap easy
to replace boards like the Arndale [4] or the Odroid-XU [5]. Personally
I'd prefer the XU as it's better equipped, but I'd go with either
choice if people
Hi all,
Here is some food for thought for the minidebconf that starts tomorrow
in Cambridge [1]. Unfortunately I will not make it there, though I wish
I did, but I'm in the process of job searching at the moment[2] and
could not afford the expense.
Anyway, since I got nothing close to a proper
19 matches
Mail list logo
