if using gold on armel armv6, then you have to compile it yourself, as my
patch for unaligned memory access in binutils-gold 2.23 only got merged
July 17.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15070
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:39 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors
timo.lindf...@iki.fiwrote:
nvm, I guess unstable binutils is up to date
binutils (2.23.52.20130727-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream snapshot.
-- Matthias Klose d...@debian.org Sat, 27 Jul 2013 10:37:11 +0200
binutils (2.23.52.20130722-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream snapshot.
- Fix PR ld/15762,
Gustavo Noronha Silva k...@debian.org writes:
In this case the problem was the OOM killer got ld killed.
Are you using ld.bfd or ld.gold?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hector Oron wrote (ao):
The fundamental cause for the build failure seems to be memory
limitation, while webkit requires all the available RAM in buildd
(1.5GB), is uses all the SWAP (3GB) and final linking stage explodes
only after 3d 14h 13m or so [1]... we could still try to make swap
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
If there's a problem with the buildd's for armel, can we clarify what
the specific problem is and try to get more hardware resources thrown at
it? debian does have some funds, and this is a classic example of what
we should be using them for.
Hello,
2013/8/22 Loïc Minier loic.min...@dooz.org:
FWIW, the Calxeda boxes are armhf and armel capable and make a massive
difference in buildd performance (good SATA I/O, 4G of RAM, SMP); these
aren't exactly cheap (yet?), but I definitely wish Debian armel and
armhf builds all eventually
Em Qui, 2013-08-22 às 09:08 +0300, Timo Juhani Lindfors escreveu:
Gustavo Noronha Silva k...@debian.org writes:
In this case the problem was the OOM killer got ld killed.
Are you using ld.bfd or ld.gold?
Currently the package uses the default, I tend to use binutils-gold on
my personal
Gustavo Noronha Silva k...@debian.org writes:
Currently the package uses the default, I tend to use binutils-gold on
my personal builds.
That explains the memory problem. Is there some technical problem for
using gold also for the official builds?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hey,
armel has been one of the sore points of maintaining WebKit in Debian.
It often fails to build the package because of lack of memory or disk
space. I'm told by my colleague Hector Oron that WebKit's utility for
armel is quite limited, given it's often used headless rather than
providing a
Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
armel has been one of the sore points of maintaining WebKit in Debian.
It often fails to build the package because of lack of memory or disk
space. I'm told by my colleague Hector Oron that WebKit's utility for
armel is quite limited, given it's often used headless
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 04:36:03PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Sounds like the same kind of surely noone uses this rationalization we
always see when going back to see why some package we use got removed
from Debian.
It is always sad to see something dropped from support. :(
I suppose you could
On 08/21/2013 04:36 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
More generally, there is a vast amount of arm systems with displays
attached. Arm was probably used mostly headless 10 years ago, but this
is increasignly not the case, and I was using webkit on arm systems over
5 years ago.
Even if you only want to
Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
Hey,
armel has been one of the sore points of maintaining WebKit in Debian.
It often fails to build the package because of lack of memory or disk
space. I'm told by my colleague Hector Oron that WebKit's utility for
armel is quite limited, given it's often used
Joey Hess wrote:
I suppose you could start by considering both Raspberry Pi users and
Samsung Chromebook users. Neither may use exactly armel, but either
could be affected by this. (Raspian is probably based on armel.)
Raspbian sits somewhere between debian armel and debian armhf though
Hello,
2013/8/21 Joey Hess jo...@debian.org:
Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
armel has been one of the sore points of maintaining WebKit in Debian.
It often fails to build the package because of lack of memory or disk
space. I'm told by my colleague Hector Oron that WebKit's utility for
armel
Hey,
Em Qua, 2013-08-21 às 16:36 -0400, Joey Hess escreveu:
Sounds like the same kind of surely noone uses this rationalization we
always see when going back to see why some package we use got removed
from Debian.
I know nothing about armel honestly, just relaying what I was told,
sorry if
Em Qua, 2013-08-21 às 16:42 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor escreveu:
On 08/21/2013 04:36 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
If there's a problem with the buildd's for armel, can we clarify what
the specific problem is and try to get more hardware resources thrown at
it? debian does have some funds, and this is
17 matches
Mail list logo
