On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 00:40 +0900, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Marc Brockschmidt [2009-08-16 14:40]:
> | ada?
>
> According to Martin Guy, there has been some progress with Ada
> upstream: http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2009/08/msg00047.html
For the record Ada on armv5tel-linux with the late
On 8/29/09, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Gordon Farquharson [2009-08-27 09:33]:
> > Is anybody planning on implementing a scheme to migrate from arm
> > installations to armel, e.g. http://wiki.debian.org/ArchTakeover?
> Riku was working on this but I'm not sure it got anywhere.
Another way to d
* Gordon Farquharson [2009-08-27 09:33]:
> Is anybody planning on implementing a scheme to migrate from arm
> installations to armel, e.g. http://wiki.debian.org/ArchTakeover?
> Should this be a goal for squeeze because we are dropping arm?
Riku was working on this but I'm not sure it got anywher
Hi Martin
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:27, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Marc Brockschmidt [2009-08-16 14:40]:
>> Do you have any big changes planned? How much time would they take, and
>> what consequences are there for the rest of the project?
>>
>> How many "big" transitions will the upcoming chan
On 8/26/09, peter green wrote:
> From what i've heared gpc and fpc are far from compatible, I don't have
> personal experiance with gpc though.
Yes, that is the impression I got from various people whose programs
only compile with fpc
M
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists
Free Pascal compiler, a.k.a. fp-compiler. Exists in sid for arm, i386,
amd64 and powerpc. Requires itself to compile itself and contains
cpu-specific code generators: the arm one may or may not work
unmodified on armel. Porting it means cross-compiling it
Or using a binary from upstream as the
I looked at this in spring 2008.
>From http://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiProblems#fpc
---
fpc
Free Pascal compiler, a.k.a. fp-compiler. Exists in sid for arm, i386,
amd64 and powerpc. Requires itself to compile itself and contains
cpu-specific code generators: the arm one may or may not w
Quoting peter green :
free pascal needs bootstrapping.
I started trying with roughly the following recipie (note: these should
be equivilent to what I did but I also went down a lot of dead ends,
did things in a less sensible order etc)
And when I asked about that error (on #fpc on freeno
>free pascal needs bootstrapping.
I started trying with roughly the following recipie (note: these should
be equivilent to what I did but I also went down a lot of dead ends, did
things in a less sensible order etc)
wget
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/arm-linux-2.2.2/fpc-2.2.2.arm-lin
On 23.08.2009 17:40, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Marc Brockschmidt [2009-08-16 14:40]:
How many "big" transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When should those
happen? Can we do something to make them easier?
I asked the Debian ARM list about the status and got the following
responses.
Co
* Marc Brockschmidt [2009-08-16 14:40]:
> How many "big" transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When should those
> happen? Can we do something to make them easier?
I asked the Debian ARM list about the status and got the following
responses.
Colin Tuckley mentioned "a few things which are
* Rick Thomas [2009-08-19 12:18]:
> Is there any plan to support the OpenRD Client machine?
It's something I'm interested in but a) I'm currenly on holidays and
b) I don't actually have the hardware. Maybe someone else is
interested in working on adding support.
In the meantime, I backported th
* Wookey [2009-08-19 13:07]:
> I wonder if there is value in someone archiving lenny arm somewhere as
> it may remain useful for a surprisingly long time to people who have
> not migrated old hardware (after lenny oldstable has been removed
> from the Debian archive). Does this already happen some
On Aug 22, 2009, at 5:25 AM, Asier wrote:
On Miércoles, 19 de Agosto de 2009 12:42:39 Riku Voipio escribió:
I'd like to throw the ball back to our ARM port users - what are
missing
from Debian ARM port?
Oh, I think that for NSLU2 owners >64 MB RAM support would be
*great*, but
that's a
On Miércoles, 19 de Agosto de 2009 12:42:39 Riku Voipio escribió:
> I'd like to throw the ball back to our ARM port users - what are missing
> from Debian ARM port?
Oh, I think that for NSLU2 owners >64 MB RAM support would be *great*, but
that's a kernel development process :-(
Bye
--
Asier
* Riku Voipio [2009-08-19 13:42]:
> As mentioned elsewhere on the thread, the biggest deal is getting
> openmoko supprted. But I believe it's more of a kernel and d-i team
> issue than ARM port issue.
Personally, I think support for new devices/platforms is nice to have
but not RC.
--
Martin Mic
On Aug 19, 2009, at 6:42 AM, Riku Voipio wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 08:27:32AM -1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Marc Brockschmidt [2009-08-16 14:40]:
Do you have any big changes planned? How much time would they
take, and
what consequences are there for the rest of the project?
How m
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 02:34:35PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Riku Voipio wrote:
> > As mentioned elsewhere on the thread, the biggest deal is getting
> > openmoko supprted. But I believe it's more of a kernel and d-i team
> > issue than ARM port issue.
>
> Eh, support for new hardware is not imple
Hello,
2009/8/19 Riku Voipio :
> I'd like to throw the ball back to our ARM port users - what are missing
> from Debian ARM port?
I am missing an optimized eglibc for small systems (for example, -Os),
i have commented such thing to debian-eglibc people (aurel) and he
asked for porters providing b
Wookey wrote:
> I wonder if there is value in someone archiving lenny arm somewhere as
> it may remain useful for a surprisingly long time to people who have
> not migrated old hardware (after lenny oldstable has been removed
> from the Debian archive). Does this already happen somewhere anyway?
h
+++ Martin Michlmayr [2009-08-18 08:58 -1000]:
> * Martin Guy [2009-08-18 19:38]:
> > Just checking, as I'm outside the Debian ARM inner circle...
> >
> > Is the arm port being dropped in squeeze in favour of armel as planned?
>
> Yes.
Presumably the old arm port will hang around in oldstable f
Riku Voipio wrote:
> As mentioned elsewhere on the thread, the biggest deal is getting
> openmoko supprted. But I believe it's more of a kernel and d-i team
> issue than ARM port issue.
Eh, support for new hardware is not implemented by the D-I team, but by
porters. Of course, we welcome porters
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 08:27:32AM -1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Marc Brockschmidt [2009-08-16 14:40]:
> > Do you have any big changes planned? How much time would they take, and
> > what consequences are there for the rest of the project?
> > How many "big" transitions will the upcoming cha
On 8/18/09, Colin Tuckley wrote:
> ada?
An arm-linux-gnueabi native gnat-4,4 toolchain has appeared
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-08/msg00282.html
Just needs someone to apply the patches to the debisn gcc-4.4 and
bootstrap the thing
Untested, but hey!
M
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
Hi
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 08:27:32AM -1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Marc Brockschmidt [2009-08-16 14:40]:
> > Do you have any big changes planned? How much time would they take, and
> > what consequences are there for the rest of the project?
> >
> > How many "big" transitions will the upco
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Marc Brockschmidt [2009-08-16 14:40]:
>> Do you have any big changes planned? How much time would they take, and
>> what consequences are there for the rest of the project?
>>
>> How many "big" transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When should those
>> happen? Ca
* Martin Guy [2009-08-18 19:38]:
> Just checking, as I'm outside the Debian ARM inner circle...
>
> Is the arm port being dropped in squeeze in favour of armel as planned?
Yes.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
On 8/18/09, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Do we have anything to report here? IMHO, any release date will work
> fine for the ARM port since there are no major issues or transitions.
Just checking, as I'm outside the Debian ARM inner circle...
Is the arm port being dropped in squeeze in favour of
* Marc Brockschmidt [2009-08-16 14:40]:
> Do you have any big changes planned? How much time would they take, and
> what consequences are there for the rest of the project?
>
> How many "big" transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When should those
> happen? Can we do something to make them
Heya,
As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing
Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in December
2009, and some developers have noted that their planned changes wouldn't be
possible in this time frame. So, to find out when releasing would wo
30 matches
Mail list logo
