Re: things to do (WAS: arm64, ppc64el, mips64el: please provide ready-to-use VM images)

2015-11-10 Thread Wookey
+++ Daniel Neis [2015-11-10 12:53 -0200]: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Wookey wrote: > Hello, everybody > > thanks for the responses! > > This list shows a pile of general arm64/arch-update bugs that > > still need uploading or fixing: > > >

Re: things to do (WAS: arm64, ppc64el, mips64el: please provide ready-to-use VM images)

2015-11-10 Thread Daniel Neis
Hello, everybody thanks for the responses! Looking at the list of Important Bugs with Patches for the arm64 archtecture, let's say we pick one like this that is for nautilus-share package: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726302 It would help if I can setup the qemu, download

things to do (WAS: arm64, ppc64el, mips64el: please provide ready-to-use VM images)

2015-11-10 Thread Edmund Grimley Evans
Daniel Neis: > Linaro recently launched a "port & enhance" contest to port several > free softwares to the arm64 platform. Perhaps that was a year ago. Dates are not mentioned prominently. As you pointed out, the software list is out of date. >

Re: things to do (WAS: arm64, ppc64el, mips64el: please provide ready-to-use VM images)

2015-11-10 Thread Wookey
+++ Edmund Grimley Evans [2015-11-10 10:08 +]: > > Does anyone else have any suggestions? Looking through the 'Auto-not-for-us' list: https://buildd.debian.org/status/architecture.php?a=arm64=sid might well reveal things that are not being built on arm64 for no good reason other than

arm64, ppc64el, mips64el: please provide ready-to-use VM images

2015-11-09 Thread Daniel Neis
Hello, this is my first email to this list and I am here mainly because Linaro recently launched a "port & enhance" contest to port several free softwares to the arm64 platform. The list is at: http://performance.linaro.org/find/ They also compiled a tutorial, how to, or getting started guide

arm64, ppc64el, mips64el: please provide ready-to-use VM images

2014-10-16 Thread Antonio Terceiro
[I am not subscribed to any of these lists; please Cc: me on replies] As main maintainer of ruby-ffi, I have been receiving patches to add support for the new Debian architectures, testing them myself on the porter boxes, applying them and forwarding them upstream. However, upstream developers