On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 20:44 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 07:43:18AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:49 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:20:53PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wookey
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:19:26AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 20:44 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 07:43:18AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:49 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:20:53PM +0100, Ian
Antonio Terceiro wrote:
I had to force gcc-4.6 some time ago because building with gcc-4.7 (the
default at the time IIRC) caused segmentation faults. Looking at newer
comments at the corresponding bug logs (#674541) there are suggestions
about gcc flags that fix the issue, so I tried them here
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
The debian-port arm64 rebootstrap is progressing nicely, and we just
passed 4200 source packages built, with another few hundred
pending. There are now 2 buildds running.
awesome
Thus I'd love it if anyone else could help go
suggestion, wookey: i'd love to help... but obviously with no
hardware that's kinda hard: is there a clear set of instructions
somewhere - a wiki page for example - on how to debootstrap an arm64
qemu so that even if it's dead slow it's still possible to help out?
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:49 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:20:53PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wookey wrote:
Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
from you. Below is the list of languages we believe
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 07:43:18AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:49 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:20:53PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wookey wrote:
Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd
[Dropping d-devel]
On 15-05-14 03:10, Wookey wrote:
Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
from you. Below is the list of languages we believe still need porting to
arm64:
Anyone who is interested in doing this work, or just has some idea of
how much work is
Hi All,
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 19:31 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
[Dropping d-devel]
On 15-05-14 03:10, Wookey wrote:
Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
from you. Below is the list of languages we believe still need porting to
arm64:
Anyone who is
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wookey wrote:
Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
from you. Below is the list of languages we believe still need porting to
arm64:
Ruby wasn't on the list, is that under control?
Ruby seems to be at the bottom of the build-dep
Am 15.05.2014 20:35, schrieb Abou Al Montacir:
Hi All,
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 19:31 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
[Dropping d-devel]
On 15-05-14 03:10, Wookey wrote:
Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
from you. Below is the list of languages we believe still
W dniu 15.05.2014 21:20, Ian Campbell pisze:
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wookey wrote:
Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
from you. Below is the list of languages we believe still need porting to
arm64:
Ruby wasn't on the list, is that under control?
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 21:45 +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
W dniu 15.05.2014 21:20, Ian Campbell pisze:
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wookey wrote:
Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
from you. Below is the list of languages we believe still need
W dniu 15.05.2014 22:29, Ian Campbell pisze:
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 21:45 +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
W dniu 15.05.2014 21:20, Ian Campbell pisze:
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wookey wrote:
Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
from you. Below is the
Le jeudi 15 mai 2014 à 02:10 +0100, Wookey a écrit :
Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
from you. Below is the list of languages we believe still need porting to
arm64:
Julia
Note that currently Julia is only available on i386/amd64 (so no
armel/armhf for
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 02:10:39AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
GHCi (ghc is done, but not ghci - is this hard?)
This is hard. You need either an LLVM-based port or a native code
generator, and in either case I think you need some linker support in
GHC. Both of these are serious compiler engineer
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:20:53PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wookey wrote:
Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
from you. Below is the list of languages we believe still need porting to
arm64:
Ruby wasn't on the list, is
Antonio Terceiro wrote:
The code is ported, but starting at 1.9 Ruby needs an existing Ruby
interpreter to build. Ruby 1.8 needs only gcc-4.6 ... which needs
patchutils. So we got ourselves a loop there.
I would think that during bootstrapping core packages like gcc and
patchutils would be
+++ peter green [2014-05-16 03:43 +0100]:
Antonio Terceiro wrote:
The code is ported, but starting at 1.9 Ruby needs an existing Ruby
interpreter to build. Ruby 1.8 needs only gcc-4.6 ... which needs
patchutils. So we got ourselves a loop there.
I would think that during bootstrapping core
The debian-port arm64 rebootstrap is progressing nicely, and we just
passed 4200 source packages built, with another few hundred
pending. There are now 2 buildds running.
In the course of that 344 have failed to build, (see
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/architecture.php?a=arm64suite=sid
Wookey wrote:
The debian-port arm64 rebootstrap is progressing nicely, and we just
passed 4200 source packages built, with another few hundred
pending. There are now 2 buildds running.
Cool, have you seen any news on when we might actually be able to buy
the stuff (which afaict is a
+++ peter green [2014-05-15 03:29 +0100]:
Wookey wrote:
The debian-port arm64 rebootstrap is progressing nicely, and we just
passed 4200 source packages built, with another few hundred
pending. There are now 2 buildds running.
Cool, have you seen any news on when we might actually be able to
22 matches
Mail list logo
