Re: buildd reliability

2023-04-16 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2023-04-10 14:36, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2023-03-30 19:59, Wookey wrote: > > Some enquiries tell me that both these machines types are reliable > > (although the mustangs are slow) at OBS and Yocto, so they can be OK, > > but there is certainly much faster kit available now (Ampere Altra). >

Re: buildd reliability

2023-04-14 Thread peter green
On 30/03/2023 19:59, Wookey wrote: OK. I'll see what can be done. I see Altra servers are from $7000-$53000 on https://store.avantek.co.uk/arm-servers.html. What does DSA consider 'decent'? I guess we'd prefer the resilience of a couple of reasonable machines over one ridiculously manly one. A b

Re: buildd reliability

2023-04-11 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
W dniu 10.04.2023 o 14:36, Aurelien Jarno pisze: On 2023-03-30 19:59, Wookey wrote: My guess is that all the Conova machine are Mustangs, and the UBC machines are emags? Is that right? Unfortunately we don't have a lot of informations about the Conova machines, that is conova-node01 and cono

Re: buildd reliability

2023-04-10 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2023-03-30 19:59, Wookey wrote: > On 2023-03-26 12:25 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > The 3 arm64 boards running at ARM are pretty fine, we do not have any > > issues with them, however they start to be old. > > > > On the other hand we have many issues with the Ampere servers hosted at > >

Re: buildd reliability

2023-03-30 Thread Wookey
On 2023-03-26 12:25 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > The 3 arm64 boards running at ARM are pretty fine, we do not have any > issues with them, however they start to be old. > > On the other hand we have many issues with the Ampere servers hosted at > UBC and the Applied Micro servers hosted at Cono

Re: buildd reliability, was: Is an ARM computer a good choice? Which one?

2023-03-26 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi, Let me answer that with both my wanna-build and DSA hats. On 2023-03-25 12:19, Wookey wrote: > On 2023-03-25 13:46 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-03-23 at 23:33 +, Wookey wrote: > > > > > The arm64 servers debian uses for buildds are fine. > > > > DSA often complain on #debian

Re: buildd reliability, was: Is an ARM computer a good choice? Which one?

2023-03-25 Thread Wookey
On 2023-03-25 13:46 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, 2023-03-23 at 23:33 +, Wookey wrote: > > > The arm64 servers debian uses for buildds are fine. > > DSA often complain on #debian-admin about how flaky they are and often > have to reset them, there were a few jokes about rebooting from cro