Re: libgnomedb2 built three weeks ago isn't in the archive!

2002-08-06 Thread Adam C Powell IV
James Troup wrote: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I'll look into the problem but expecting a response in under 24 hours isn't realistic. Okay, I was a bit too impatient, sorry. Or not, since you've already done your evil by hand upload. Congratulations, now there's no point in me even t

Re: libgnomedb2 built three weeks ago isn't in the archive!

2002-08-06 Thread James Troup
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'll look into the problem but expecting a response in under 24 > hours isn't realistic. Or not, since you've already done your evil by hand upload. Congratulations, now there's no point in me even trying to look. Blah. BTW, if you're going to do stuff l

Re: libgnomedb2 built three weeks ago isn't in the archive!

2002-08-06 Thread James Troup
Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmm, with no reply, and no sign of the autobuilt package in > incoming, I think I'll go ahead and upload this and glade-2 which I > just built. Err, please don't. You're just making things worse in the long run; packages are meant to auto-build, and

Re: libgnomedb2 built three weeks ago isn't in the archive!

2002-08-06 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Adam C Powell IV wrote: Hi, glade-2 won't build on ARM because of a missing build-dep, but even with that, it doesn't work because the libgnomedb2-dev version is too old. Version 0.8.190 is in the archive, even though 0.8.192-1 was successfully autobuilt on July 16. Any ideas on why the excess

libgnomedb2 built three weeks ago isn't in the archive!

2002-08-06 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hi, glade-2 won't build on ARM because of a missing build-dep, but even with that, it doesn't work because the libgnomedb2-dev version is too old. Version 0.8.190 is in the archive, even though 0.8.192-1 was successfully autobuilt on July 16. Any ideas on why the excessive delay? See bug 15527