Re: orion5x housekeeping

Dear Roger. On 2016-03-02 06:57, Roger Shimizu wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Rogério Brito wrote: >> Dear Martin and others, >> >> On 2015-12-31 00:51, Martin Michlmayr wrote: >>> I was looking at debian-installer and thought it would be good to see >>> if there are

Re: orion5x housekeeping

Hi, People. On 2016-03-02 02:06, Rogério Brito wrote: >> * Buffalo Kurobox Pro: I know various Debian people had these. Are >> people still using these devices? Is Debian working? Is the >> installer working? > > I can confirm that the Kurobox Pro is working fine with testing, with > kernels

Re: orion5x housekeeping

Dear Martin and others, On 2015-12-31 00:51, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > I was looking at debian-installer and thought it would be good to see > if there are maintainers (and if not, at least users) for the orion5x > devices we supposedly support. Right. > Looking at debian-installer, I see

Re: orion5x housekeeping

Hello Roger, On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 23:08:46 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > BTW. I notice there's device-tree support in kirkwood folder. > I'm going to give device-tree support for LS-GL, so I'll try to make > device-tree support for orion5x device-tree. I'd be happy to

Re: orion5x housekeeping

On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Buffalo Linkstation Pro/Live: no idea > * Buffalo Linkstation Live V3 (LS-CHL): no idea. Any comments? > > Roger mentioned u-boot restrictions on the size of the kernel that we > broke. Does that apply to all

Re: orion5x housekeeping

* Rick Thomas [2016-01-03 00:31]: > I have a fairly big cupboard as well. Mine happens to have a > matched pair of SheevaPlugs. Let me know if I can be of any help. I want to give a shoutout to Rick who has tested the daily debian-installer image on SheevaPlug as well as

Re: orion5x housekeeping

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Roger Shimizu [2016-01-08 00:36]: >> For the failure of kernel 4.4, I think it's related to Bug#809476. >> The patch inside Bug#809476 is only for QNAP box, however I didn't >> figure out how to

Re: orion5x housekeeping

* Roger Shimizu [2016-01-08 00:36]: > For the failure of kernel 4.4, I think it's related to Bug#809476. > The patch inside Bug#809476 is only for QNAP box, however I didn't > figure out how to fix for LS-WTGL. Can you post the u-boot boot variables and the dmesg. Maybe

Re: orion5x housekeeping

On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote: > I suggest to create a wiki page for this purpose. > The wiki may contain the following info: > ... I created one PoC wiki page: - https://wiki.debian.org/rosh/PortingStatusForDebianInstaller I think in this way it

Re: orion5x housekeeping

On Jan 2, 2016, at 10:21 PM, Chris Moore wrote: > Hi Martin, > > Le 02/01/2016 20:36, Martin Michlmayr a écrit : >> By the way, I'm still getting emails from NSLU2 users from time to time and >> there's nobody in Debian left who cares about this device. I think we also >> need

Re: orion5x housekeeping

Happy 2016 new year folks! Sorry for the late reply. I'm just back from vacation. > 1) Linkstation: these were added by various people over the years but > I don't think we had a formal maintainer in a long time. Roger > Shimizu put in some effort recently but I'm not sure which devices he > has

Re: orion5x housekeeping

On Wed, 2015-12-30 at 18:51 -0800, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > I was looking at debian-installer and thought it would be good to see > if there are maintainers (and if not, at least users) for the orion5x > devices we supposedly support. I wonder if, for armel generally (or even arm* generally), we

Re: orion5x housekeeping

* Ian Campbell [2016-01-02 10:26]: > I wonder if, for armel generally (or even arm* generally), we should > take a leaf out of the u-boot package's book[0] and require a specific > person from the community to agree to be listed as a tester for any > platform we intend to

Re: orion5x housekeeping

* Karsten Merker [2016-01-02 13:23]: > As a personal note: I am happy for everybody who uses d-i to install > a proper Debian instead of using a pre-made installation in the form > of an SD-card image that some unknown entitiy on the internet has > uploaded to some

Re: orion5x housekeeping

Hi Martin, Le 02/01/2016 20:36, Martin Michlmayr a écrit : By the way, I'm still getting emails from NSLU2 users from time to time and there's nobody in Debian left who cares about this device. I think we also need a hardware deprecation mechanism, so we tell users in advance that support is

Re: orion5x housekeeping

On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 08:43 -0800, Martin Michlmayr wrote: >  > > * Buffalo LinkStation Pro Duo (LS-WTGL) > > Mine still has the stock firmware. > > I didn't even know that it was supported by the mainline kernel. > > But I just checked and support was added recently in 4.3 :) > > Roger Shimizu

Re: orion5x housekeeping

(switching to my U-Boot mail account, just subscribed on D-A) Hello Ian, On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 12:25:22 +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 08:43 -0800, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > >  > > > * Buffalo LinkStation Pro Duo (LS-WTGL) > > > Mine still has the stock

Re: orion5x housekeeping

Hi Martin, Le 31/12/2015 03:51, Martin Michlmayr a écrit : I was looking at debian-installer and thought it would be good to see if there are maintainers (and if not, at least users) for the orion5x devices we supposedly support. I have two orion5x based devices relegated to the cupboard :-

Re: orion5x housekeeping

Hi, Le Thu, 31 Dec 2015 11:27:49 +0100 Chris Moore a écrit: > Hi Martin, > > Le 31/12/2015 03:51, Martin Michlmayr a écrit : > > I was looking at debian-installer and thought it would be good to > > see if there are maintainers (and if not, at least users) for the > > orion5x

Re: orion5x housekeeping

* Mike Thompson [2015-12-30 19:17]: > I just installed Debian Jessie on two HP MV2120's I use for backup systems > at my house in the past week. Jessie came up perfectly fine. Thanks, that's good to hear. For some reason, while other devices have some kind of breakage all

Re: orion5x housekeeping

On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > Hopefully Debian can be maintained on the HP MV2120 into the future... > > It would be great if you (or someone else on this list) could test the > stretch/unstable installer/kernel from time to time. Since everything

Re: orion5x housekeeping

* Chris Moore [2015-12-31 11:27]: > I have two orion5x based devices relegated to the cupboard :- > > * LaCie Ethernet Disk mini V2 > Albert Aribaud and I ported the 2.6.28 Linux kernel to this. > However I have not tested any kernels since the DT conversion in 3.16. > IIRC mine

orion5x housekeeping

I was looking at debian-installer and thought it would be good to see if there are maintainers (and if not, at least users) for the orion5x devices we supposedly support. I see 3 classes of devices: 1) Linkstation: these were added by various people over the years but I don't think we had a

Re: orion5x housekeeping

On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > 2) HP Media Vault mv2120: this used to work fine and had users but I > haven't heard anything recently. Any users? > I just installed Debian Jessie on two HP MV2120's I use for backup systems at my house in the past