Re: quinn-diff

2001-02-23 Thread Philip Blundell
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, James Troup writes: >Err, perhaps I'm missing the obvious, but last time I checked, arm was >supported? Sorry, I was obviously still asleep when I wrote that. I meant non-US, not arm. p.

Re: quinn-diff

2001-02-23 Thread James Troup
Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >I'm looking into setting up a quinn-diff somewhere on armlinux.org, > >as that seems to be common practice. If this isn't going to be > >helpful, stop me. > > I don't think that would buy us much; w

Re: quinn-diff

2001-02-23 Thread Philip Blundell
>I'm looking into setting up a quinn-diff somewhere on armlinux.org, >as that seems to be common practice. If this isn't going to be >helpful, stop me. I don't think that would buy us much; we aren't being seriously hampered by quinn problems at the moment. Bet

quinn-diff

2001-02-22 Thread Chris Rutter
I'm looking into setting up a quinn-diff somewhere on armlinux.org, as that seems to be common practice. If this isn't going to be helpful, stop me. c.