lure:
> : TestIO_Console#test_noecho2
> [/«PKGBUILDDIR»/test/io/console/test_io_console.rb:133]:
> : <"b\r\n"> expected but was
> : <"b">.
> :
> : 15844 tests, 2224961 assertions, 1 failures, 0 errors, 78 skips
> :
> : ruby -v: ruby 2.3.1p112 (20
Current Failures:
[armel, mips, mipsel, mips64el, powerpcspe, sparc64]
TestArray#test_permutation_stack_error
[/«PKGBUILDDIR»/test/ruby/test_array.rb:1826]:
pid XXX killed by SIGTERM (signal 15)
(On mips/mipsel: SIGABRT (signal 6))
[mipsel]
TestNum2int#test_num2int
[/«PKGBUILDDIR»/
Christian Hofstaedtler (2014-04-07):
> * Cyril Brulebois [140406 15:51]:
> [ shuffling your message a bit ]
> > since this upload[1],
> > 1. http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/ruby-defaults/news/20140330T152352Z.html
>
> dns323-firmware-tools depends on ruby1.9.1 but t
* Cyril Brulebois [140406 15:51]:
[ shuffling your message a bit ]
> since this upload[1],
> 1. http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/ruby-defaults/news/20140330T152352Z.html
dns323-firmware-tools depends on ruby1.9.1 but then just uses
/usr/bin/ruby in the shebang, rendering the dependenc
valid multibyte escape: /^\x55\xAA(.{7})\0\x55\xAA$/
| make[2]: *** [dns-323] Error 1
1. http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/ruby-defaults/news/20140330T152352Z.html
Before that upload, I see traces of failures in the logs, but it appears
that didn't stop the build:
| mkdns323fw -k ./tmp/orion5x_netwo
Christian Hofstaedtler (2014-01-15):
> Package: dns323-firmware-tools
> Version: 0.3-2
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> your package "dns323-firmware-tools" depends on an obsolete version of
> the ruby interpreter: ruby1.8.
>
> The Debian R
Dear ARM porters,
dns323-firmware-tools - a dependency of debian-installer - currently
requires Ruby 1.8. As Ruby 1.8 is scheduled to go away soon, I
kindly ask that a porter takes care of updating it for Ruby 1.9/2.0.
AFAIK, upstream has released a new version which should work on 1.9.
I'
Dear armhf porters,
I need some help from you to solve a ruby-ffi FTBFS on armhf. The source
builds, but several unit tests fail, and they are all related to float
pointing numbers.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=656809
I am attaching a simple test script that reveals the
Hello Lennart,
2011/12/5 Lennart Sorensen :
> I tried adding armhf to the list of archs needing -fno-tree-sra, and it
> made no difference at all. Exact same crash in the same place.
Yes, that matches my tests. Thanks very much for trying.
--
Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 01:35:40PM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:37:34AM +, Hector Oron wrote:
> > Lennart, could you try to rebuild on armhf, we are trying to bootstrap
> > armhf in
> > official main and contrib Debian archive, but build seems to hang:
> >
> > S
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:37:34AM +, Hector Oron wrote:
> Lennart, could you try to rebuild on armhf, we are trying to bootstrap armhf
> in
> official main and contrib Debian archive, but build seems to hang:
>
> See
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ruby1.9.1&arch=armhf&ver=
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:37:34AM +, Hector Oron wrote:
> Hello Lennart,
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:08:29AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:48:34PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > Ruby 1.9.3 is going to be released in september
Hello Lennart,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:08:29AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:48:34PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Ruby 1.9.3 is going to be released in september, and is a candidate for
> > the default ruby version in wheezy. A snapshot
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:48:34PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Ruby 1.9.3 is going to be released in september, and is a candidate for
> the default ruby version in wheezy. A snapshot is available in
> experimental. Now is an ideal time to work on porting issues and get the
> fixe
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.3 is going to be released in september, and is a candidate for
the default ruby version in wheezy. A snapshot is available in
experimental. Now is an ideal time to work on porting issues and get the
fixes integrated upstream. Ruby has a fairly large test suite, which
makes finding
Hello
i'm quite a newbie in debian, but i use to deploy webservers (ruby on
rails) on ubuntu server.
I want to install a athome server with ftp, jabber, mail-imap- and ruby on
rails services on a cortex a8 computer like this one
https://www.genesi-usa.com/store/details/5
512 Mo RAM
D
Hi
I'm trying to get ruby rails on to my slug. I installed ruby and
rubygems and run "gem install rails --remote" gem goobles up about 70mb
of memory space while it bulk updates it's source index more or less
sending the SLUG into a screeching halt.
Anyone having any exp
Hi
I'm trying to get ruby rails on to my slug. I installed ruby and
rubygems and run "gem install rails --remote" gem goobles up about 70mb
of memory space while it bulk updates it's source index more or less
sending the SLUG into a screeching halt.
Anyone having any exp
Philip Blundell wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Adam C Powell IV writes:
> >Is anyone else having this problem? If not, any clues as to what might be
> >going
> >wrong? If nobody else is having this problem, I really don't want to file an
> >important bug against gnupg...
>
> Yes, it w
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Adam C Powell IV writes:
>Is anyone else having this problem? If not, any clues as to what might be
>going
>wrong? If nobody else is having this problem, I really don't want to file an
>important bug against gnupg...
Yes, it was certainly broken last time I tried
Philip Blundell wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Naulls writes:
> >Done. What's next? :-)
>
> Well, looking at the dep-wait rollcall, there are a lot of packages stuck
> waiting for libsdl-mixer-dev, libmysqlclient10-dev, libgnomeprint-dev and
> libgtk1.2-dev(1.2.8-1); also, virtual
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Naulls writes:
>Done. What's next? :-)
Well, looking at the dep-wait rollcall, there are a lot of packages stuck
waiting for libsdl-mixer-dev, libmysqlclient10-dev, libgnomeprint-dev and
libgtk1.2-dev(1.2.8-1); also, virtually the whole of KDE is waiting fo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Naulls wrote:
> >Yes, that certainly seems to have fixed it - it's build the rest of it
> >now, and the values it's returing are sensible.
>
> Great. Would you file a bug report?
Done. What's next? :-)
Peter Naulls wrote:
>Yes, that certainly seems to have fixed it - it's build the rest of it
>now, and the values it's returing are sensible.
Great. Would you file a bug report?
Thanks
p.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ># if defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(__alpha__) && !defined(__APPLE__)
> >VALUE *stack_end = __builtin_frame_address(0);
> ># else
>
> That should probably be `... && !defined(__arm__)'. Actually,
> __built
># if defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(__alpha__) && !defined(__APPLE__)
>VALUE *stack_end = __builtin_frame_address(0);
># else
That should probably be `... && !defined(__arm__)'. Actually,
__builtin_frame_address(0) is just about OK, but the similar code in gc.c that
does __builtin_frame_add
[1]: Leaving directory
> `/home/buildd/build/ruby-1.6.2/build-tree/ruby-1.6.2'
Looks like it's trying to find the stack for garbage collection in
eval.c:
--
#ifdef DJGPP
static int STACK_LEVEL_MAX = 65535;
#else
#ifdef __human68k__
extern int _stacksize;
# define STACK_LEVEL_MAX (_
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This package has been failing to build for a while. Anybody want to
> investigate?
[ruby]
I'm taking a look no
)
from ./mkconfig.rb:29:in `foreach'
from ./mkconfig.rb:29
make[1]: *** [rbconfig.rb] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/buildd/build/ruby-1.6.2/build-tree/ruby-1.6.2'
make: *** [debian/stampdir/build] Error 2
29 matches
Mail list logo
