Re: using kernels bigger than 1966080 bytes on the nslug with slugimage

2009-02-11 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi, On Di, 2009-02-10 at 16:34 -0800, Marc Singer wrote: as soon as i switch to 16 blocks (2097152 bytes which is needed for the above kernel size) apex gets stuck at copying the kernel, after a day of digging top to bottom through slugimage and apex i still dont understand why this

Re: using kernels bigger than 1966080 bytes on the nslug with slugimage

2009-02-11 Thread Marc Singer
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 02:36:20PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2009, Marc Singer wrote: I responded to L. Minier with the suggestion that you move the load address for the kernel to something after APEX. Try 0x0100. You could also change the VMA address for APEX to be

Re: using kernels bigger than 1966080 bytes on the nslug with slugimage

2009-02-11 Thread Marc Singer
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 05:04:20PM +0100, Oliver Grawert wrote: hi, On Di, 2009-02-10 at 16:34 -0800, Marc Singer wrote: as soon as i switch to 16 blocks (2097152 bytes which is needed for the above kernel size) apex gets stuck at copying the kernel, after a day of digging top to bottom

Re: using kernels bigger than 1966080 bytes on the nslug with slugimage

2009-02-10 Thread Marc Singer
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:10:43AM +0100, Oliver Grawert wrote: hi, i have a weird problem trying to build a d-i-nslu2.bin image with slugimage that is supposed to carry a kernel binary of a size of 1978300 bytes ... as i understand by looking at the d-i code that generates di-nslu2.bin