Cartuchos compatíveis EPSON e Canon. Excelentes preços e condições. CONFIRA!!!

2003-07-30 Thread Planet Office
PLANET OFFICE COMERCIAL LTDA. Cartuchos compatíveis EPSON® e CANON®SMART JET Nós da Planet Office queremos ter você como nosso parceiro. Nós somos importadores e representantes do maior fabricante de cartuchos compatíveis para impressoras na China. Por este motivo, pode

Re: The new ordering of newt frontend buttons

2003-07-30 Thread Dale Amon
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 01:18:38PM +0200, Martin Sj?gren wrote: > > Also, in some languages, eg. Irish (Gaeilge), my second language, > > there are no words for yes/no! (Instead you have to phrase things > > in terms of something like, "Do you want me to partition your > > disk? ", and make sure y

Re: d-i and iBooks

2003-07-30 Thread Geert Stappers
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 09:52:57PM +0200, Thorsten Sauter wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have strange problems with the latest cvs checkout of d-i and creating > a cdrom image. > > If I use the default d-i kernel for ppc's the system boots from cdrom > and the simply "hang" after initializing of the a

d-i and iBooks

2003-07-30 Thread Thorsten Sauter
Hi all, I have strange problems with the latest cvs checkout of d-i and creating a cdrom image. If I use the default d-i kernel for ppc's the system boots from cdrom and the simply "hang" after initializing of the adb keyboard. Using my own kernel (with the same yaboot.conf) options, the system

Bug#203539: autopartkit: Unable to create swap volume on LVM

2003-07-30 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Package: autopartkit Version: 0.52 Severity: wishlist The current autopartkit is unable to create a swap "partition on LVM. It is hardcoded to create ext3 filesystems. It should be able to create swap as well. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Re: New d-i debcamp in a few months?

2003-07-30 Thread Thorsten Sauter
* Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-30 00:40]: | Thursday 2003-09-25 to Sunday 2003-09-28 | | Oldenburg Linux Developers Meeting, south-west of Bremen/Hamburg, | might be a nice place to have it. sounds good for me. Bye Thorsten -- Thorsten Sauter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Debconf vs. graphical installer

2003-07-30 Thread Giuseppe Sacco
Il mer, 2003-07-30 alle 18:52, Emile van Bergen ha scritto: [...] > > if (load(guimodule)) > >guimodule.doall(mycallbacks) > > else > >cdebconf fallback > > > > I like this idea but I am very new to the installer, so take it as a > > hint. > > I really hate this idea, as it creates a prog

Re: Debconf vs. graphical installer

2003-07-30 Thread Emile van Bergen
Hi, On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:21:37PM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > Il mer, 2003-07-30 alle 17:47, Emile van Bergen ha scritto: > ... > > These are still sufficiently abstract for use on character terminals as > > well as frame buffers, but allow you to build higher level widgets > > (partition

Re: Debconf vs. graphical installer

2003-07-30 Thread Giuseppe Sacco
Il mer, 2003-07-30 alle 17:47, Emile van Bergen ha scritto: ... > These are still sufficiently abstract for use on character terminals as > well as frame buffers, but allow you to build higher level widgets > (partition selectors) independently from the rendering backend. This is the point: I thin

Re: Debconf vs. graphical installer

2003-07-30 Thread Emile van Bergen
Hi, On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 04:47:17PM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > Il mer, 2003-07-30 alle 13:46, Sebastian Ley ha scritto: > > * Sebastian Ley wrote: > > > > > here we go to add some discussion on the never ending topic of a > > > graphical installer. The current implementation of the gtk-fr

Bug#195910: marked as done (grub-installer: dutch translation)

2003-07-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2003 17:32:01 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line grub-installer: dutch translation has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Trying make the Sarge CDs go bootable

2003-07-30 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi! Today I upgraded cd creation stuff on gluck and rebuilt the i386 images, this weekend all other arches will be rebuilt, so if somebody wants to have a look at the i386 images and try to see if something is wrong, it would be great. The main changes are that I'm now using debootstrap 0.2.2 and

Re: Iterating over the debconf answers using cdebconf?

2003-07-30 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Petter Reinholdtsen | How should I implement this code (currently using perl and debconf) if | I want it to work with cdebconf? [...] | Anyone know? I want to pass on some debconf values from d-i/cdebconf | to debconf in the installed system. something like /** * @file debconf-dumpdb.c *

Re: Debconf vs. graphical installer

2003-07-30 Thread Giuseppe Sacco
Il mer, 2003-07-30 alle 13:46, Sebastian Ley ha scritto: > * Sebastian Ley wrote: > > > here we go to add some discussion on the never ending topic of a > > graphical installer. The current implementation of the gtk-frontend > > for cdebconf is highly unsatisfactory. Because of the limited debconf

Re: The new ordering of newt frontend buttons

2003-07-30 Thread Joey Hess
Alastair McKinstry wrote: > Agreed on both points; I will make the changes. > > On a wider point, I disklike the boolean method in general. > Yes/No dialogs are deprecated in UI design in favour of more explicit > verbs : eg. . In some of the d-i > code, showingis redundant: whats the differ

Bug#180753: marked as done (base-installer: should show progress bar when installing)

2003-07-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:02:08 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#180753: fixed in base-installer 0.025 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

main-menu_0.036_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-07-30 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: main-menu_0.036.dsc to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.036.dsc main-menu_0.036.tar.gz to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.036.tar.gz main-menu_0.036_i386.udeb to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.036_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to

cdrom-checker_0.06_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-07-30 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cdrom-checker_0.06.dsc to pool/main/c/cdrom-checker/cdrom-checker_0.06.dsc cdrom-checker_0.06.tar.gz to pool/main/c/cdrom-checker/cdrom-checker_0.06.tar.gz cdrom-checker_0.06_i386.udeb to pool/main/c/cdrom-checker/cdrom-checker_0.06_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank

base-installer_0.025_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-07-30 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: base-installer_0.025.dsc to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.025.dsc base-installer_0.025.tar.gz to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.025.tar.gz base-installer_0.025_i386.udeb to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.025_i386.udeb kernel-installer_0.025_a

ddetect_0.36_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-07-30 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: ddetect_0.36.dsc to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.36.dsc ddetect_0.36.tar.gz to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.36.tar.gz ethdetect_0.36_all.udeb to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_0.36_all.udeb hw-detect-full_0.36_all.udeb to pool/main/d/ddetect/hw-detect-full_0.36_all.udeb hw-detec

grub-installer_0.0.13_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-07-30 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: grub-installer_0.0.13.dsc to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.0.13.dsc grub-installer_0.0.13.tar.gz to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.0.13.tar.gz grub-installer_0.0.13_i386.udeb to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.0.13_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMA

Re: Debconf vs. graphical installer

2003-07-30 Thread Sebastian Ley
* Sebastian Ley wrote: > here we go to add some discussion on the never ending topic of a > graphical installer. The current implementation of the gtk-frontend > for cdebconf is highly unsatisfactory. Because of the limited debconf > capabilities it is a mere question asker which is not what one w

Re: [installer@ftp-master.debian.org: e2fsprogs override disparity]

2003-07-30 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 09:19:59AM +0200, Martin Sj?gren wrote: > ons 2003-07-30 klockan 08.02 skrev Alastair McKinstry: > > udebs of priority >= standard are automatically loaded by d-i. > > e2fsprogs-udeb should have a priority of standard, to ensure that > > mkfs.ext[23] are present; IMHO the ov

Re: cvs commit todebian-installer/tools/cdebconf/src/modules/frontend/newt by mckinstry

2003-07-30 Thread Martin Sjögren
fre 2003-07-25 klockan 09.51 skrev Alastair McKinstry: > On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 08:49, Martin Sjögren wrote: > > fre 2003-07-25 klockan 00.15 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > Update of > > > /cvs/debian-boot/debian-installer/tools/cdebconf/src/modules/frontend/newt > > > In directory gluck:/tmp/cvs-s

Re: New d-i debcamp in a few months?

2003-07-30 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Sven Luther] > I had already planned to visit the Oldenburg meeting, so this would > be fine for me. I was just told that the Oldenburg location have better facilities, and that Martin Schulze managed to find a sponsor for the meeting as well. All in all, I believe the Oldenburg location is the

Re: The new ordering of newt frontend buttons

2003-07-30 Thread Martin Sjögren
ons 2003-07-30 klockan 10.51 skrev Alastair McKinstry: > Agreed on both points; I will make the changes. > > On a wider point, I disklike the boolean method in general. > Yes/No dialogs are deprecated in UI design in favour of more explicit > verbs : eg. . In some of the d-i > code, showingi

Re: Iterating over the debconf answers using cdebconf?

2003-07-30 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Martin Sjögren] >> Anyone know? I want to pass on some debconf values from >> d-i/cdebconf to debconf in the installed system. > > Are you sure it's a good idea to simply copy everything to the target > system? Wouldn't it be better to only copy specific things, in a smart > way? Preferrably mod

Re: Iterating over the debconf answers using cdebconf?

2003-07-30 Thread Martin Sjögren
tis 2003-07-29 klockan 11.54 skrev Petter Reinholdtsen: > > How should I implement this code (currently using perl and debconf) if > I want it to work with cdebconf? > > #!/usr/bin/perl -w > use strict; > use warnings; > use Debconf::Db; > use Debconf::Template; > use Debconf::Questio

Re: New d-i debcamp in a few months?

2003-07-30 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 12:40:00AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > I've created a web page with the information I got at the moment. It > is in d-i CVS, > http://people.debian.org/~pere/debian-installer/di-debcamp-2003-1.html>. > > 12 people have expressed their interest in going to a d-i

Re: The new ordering of newt frontend buttons

2003-07-30 Thread Alastair McKinstry
Agreed on both points; I will make the changes. On a wider point, I disklike the boolean method in general. Yes/No dialogs are deprecated in UI design in favour of more explicit verbs : eg. . In some of the d-i code, showingis redundant: whats the difference between and ? However its hard

The new ordering of newt frontend buttons

2003-07-30 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Alastair McKinstry] > Several people at debcamp commented that they should be the other way > round, as people are used to the left button being "back", from > browsers. However I agree that should be easy to reach: it > should be the next button after the entry on the cycle list in most > dialog

Re: Do not translate the templates in rootskel

2003-07-30 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Denis Barbier] > dh_installdebconf is not called from debian/rules, the > debian/templates file is processed by > debian/templates-build.pl $(ARCH) < debian/templates > > debian/rootskel/DEBIAN/templates > So you can change debian/templates file name to whatever you want > (but output file nam

Processed: Fixed in CVS

2003-07-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 203334 +pending Bug#203334: cdebconf-udeb: Impossible to set priority unless cdebconf-priority is installed There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 203449 +pending Bug#203449: cdebconf_0.39(alpha/unstable): incorrectly ordered build-de

Re: cvs commit to debian-installer/tools/base-installer/debian bypere

2003-07-30 Thread Martin Sjögren
ons 2003-07-30 klockan 09.53 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >* Martin Sjögren > - Implement progress bar thingy. (Closes: #180753) > - This requires a new version of debootstrap, do NOT upload! > + This requires version >= 0.2.1 of debootstrap, do NOT upload! Well, now that 0.2.1 is

Bug#203449: cdebconf_0.39(alpha/unstable): incorrectly ordered build-depends

2003-07-30 Thread Martin Sjögren
ons 2003-07-30 klockan 09.15 skrev Ryan Murray: > You must list the build-depend that you want the buildds to build against first > in |'d build-depends. As libnewt-utf8-dev is no longer in the archive, this > causes cdebconf to fail to build on the autobuilders. Thanks. Fixed in CVS. Upload will

Bug#203449: cdebconf_0.39(alpha/unstable): incorrectly ordered build-depends

2003-07-30 Thread Ryan Murray
Package: cdebconf Version: 0.39 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of cdebconf_0.39 on lully by sbuild/alpha 1.170.3 > Build started at 20030728-0328 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: dpkg-dev (>

Re: [installer@ftp-master.debian.org: e2fsprogs override disparity]

2003-07-30 Thread Martin Sjögren
ons 2003-07-30 klockan 08.02 skrev Alastair McKinstry: > udebs of priority >= standard are automatically loaded by d-i. > e2fsprogs-udeb should have a priority of standard, to ensure that > mkfs.ext[23] are present; IMHO the override file should be > corrected or we won't be able to make a filesyst