debian-installer_20031223_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer_20031223.dsc
debian-installer_20031223.tar.gz
debian-installer-demo_20031223_i386.deb
debian-installer-images_20031223_i386.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
While loading some udeb from the cd_drivers floppy, I got error messages
about "Unknown localised field" scrawled accross the console. I can get
the same by running debconf-loadtemplate, and the errors look like this:
Unknown localised field:
Description-it.BLAH: BLAH
Etc etc. Isn't this stuff su
Your message dated Wed, 24 Dec 2003 00:25:42 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line all netcfg packages depend on ethernet-card-detection
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 212143 pending
Bug#212143: selected hostname is not retained after reboot
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
(new) affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-di_0.20_powerpc.udeb extra debian-installer
Amiga filesystem support
This package contains the Amiga filesystem module for the Linux kernel.
(new) affs-modules-2.4.22-small-di_0.20_powerpc.udeb extra debian-installer
Amiga filesystem support
This package contains
Hello i don't know if you guys are the actual people that i should be
e-mailing with this question but i'll give it a shot.
I have an old laptop that i would like to put linux on. I would like to just
use the vanilla-3.0.23-mini.iso file but the laptop doesn't have a cd drive
so i can't copy tha
linux-kernel-di_0.20_source+i386+alpha+m68k+mips+mipsel+powerpc.changes uploaded
successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di_0.20.dsc
linux-kernel-di_0.20.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.22-1-386-di_0.20_i386.udeb
nic-modules-2.4.22-1-386-di_0.20_i386.udeb
nic-extra-modules-2
Your message dated Wed, 24 Dec 2003 00:32:28 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line similar change was made by joeyh
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 224645 discover
Bug#224645: netcfg wishlists, udhcpc|pump, intend /etc/network/interfaces
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `discover'.
> severity 224645 normal
Bug#224645: netcfg wishlists, udhcpc|pump, intend /etc/network
Your message dated Tue, 23 Dec 2003 22:02:06 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#224663: fixed in netcfg 0.37
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
tags 212143 pending
Thanks
Am Die, den 23.12.2003 schrieb Martin Michlmayr um 14:18:
> * Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-21 12:10]:
> > Am Sam, den 20.12.2003 schrieb Martin Michlmayr um 21:40:
> > > Note that in addition to /etc/hostname, the name should also be put in
> > > /etc/ma
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 224663 pending d-i
Bug#224663: please use UDHCPC instead of PUMP
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending, d-i
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
reassign 224645 discover
severity 224645 normal
retitle 224645 do not sort modules before loading
Thanks
Am Die, den 23.12.2003 schrieb Martin Michlmayr um 11:03:
> * Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-21 12:10]:
> > > After boot, eth0 and eth1 suddenly changed! I told debian-installer
Joey Hess wrote:
> LOCPATH=./tmp/floppy/tree/usr/lib/locale LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 reduce-font
> /usr/src/unifont.bdf < all-floppy.utf > unifont-reduced-floppy.bdf.tmp
> setlocale: C.UTF-8
> FYI: MB_CUR_MAX/MB_LEN_MAX: 6/16
> error -1 at position 61960 (bytes: 16 Used chars: 446 (61960 processed)
>
> I r
Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_0.37_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.37_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.37_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.37_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.37.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.37.dsc
netcfg_0.37.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.37.tar.gz
netcfg_0.3
netcfg_0.37_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_0.37.dsc
netcfg_0.37.tar.gz
netcfg_0.37_i386.udeb
netcfg-dhcp_0.37_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.37_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Am Die, den 23.12.2003 schrieb Martin Michlmayr um 09:10:
I think if you configure a static IP address, the DHCP menu will stop
complaining. At least that's what I did when pump failed and then I
could continue. Alternatively, remove /sbin/pump before DHCP is
called, and
Your message dated Wed, 24 Dec 2003 00:48:19 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line netcfg questions now have a more logical order
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
LOCPATH=./tmp/floppy/tree/usr/lib/locale LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 reduce-font
/usr/src/unifont.bdf < all-floppy.utf > unifont-reduced-floppy.bdf.tmp
setlocale: C.UTF-8
FYI: MB_CUR_MAX/MB_LEN_MAX: 6/16
error -1 at position 61960 (bytes: 16 Used chars: 446 (61960 processed)
I remember seeing this a while ago
Harald Dunkel wrote:
> - after booting the CD in my SCSI drive I have to reinsert it
> in an USB drive, cause the aic7xxx driver has been dropped
> from initrd due to size constraints. Joey told me that this
> is work in progress.
This should be fixed in tomorrow or the next day's images.
>
Sven Luther wrote:
> Saddly, it is as i have feared, that the package will be accpepted on
> the eve of me going out for christmas and being offline until monday the
> 29. But well, this is the disorganized way debian works, and we have to
> make do.
>
> So, i will try to fix this evening and tomo
Matt Kraai wrote:
> debootstrap is broken due to bug 224676, so we shouldn't release
> the second beta until it is fixed.
That's now fixed, right? Thanks for the fast work!
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi pere
Why did you assign #186594 to netcfg? IMHO it should be closed or
reassigned to boot-floppies.
Gaudenz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Am Die, den 23.12.2003 schrieb Joey Hess um 06:05:
>
> > 4. Reorganise the tree to something that makes more sense, such as:
> > toplevel/
> > debian-installer/
> > build/
> > doc/
> > de
Gleydson Mazioli da Silva wrote:
vesafb also works fine for my Desknote sis630 videoboard.
Joey, could be something related with IRQ for videoboard disabled on your laptop setup?!?
No. The IRQ is irrelevant.
Thomas
--
Thomas Winischhofer
Vienna/Austria
thomas AT winischhofer DOT net htt
Your message dated Wed, 24 Dec 2003 00:46:40 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line DHCP now only takes 10s
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
Your message dated Wed, 24 Dec 2003 00:24:32 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line hostname is now retained after reboot
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
severity 220188 wishlist
retitle 220188 netcfg: include ppp/modem configuration
Thanks
As the "DHCP taking very long" problem is now solved in the latest
netcfg package I'm downgrading this bug to wishlist for a PPP/modem
configuration option in netcfg.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 220188 wishlist
Bug#220188: netcfg: should be smarter with dial-up connections
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> retitle 220188 netcfg: include ppp/modem configuration
Bug#220188: netcfg: should be smarter with dial-up connections
Changed Bug titl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 182446 does not create /etc/mailname
Bug#182446: does not create /etc/hostname
Changed Bug title.
> severity 182446 wishlist
Bug#182446: does not create /etc/mailname
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 03:08:46PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Perhaps something like
>
> We could not obtain an IP address from the network
> through DHCP. DHCP is a system to automatically obtain IP addresses
> from a central server on your network. Sometimes, DHCP servers are
> slow, so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-23 21:57, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> If anyone want to help us (and please do) please check
> http://www.debianpt.org/~marco/diport/resultados.html and tell us what
> files for translation are missing in this list. That would improve our
>
Your message dated Tue, 23 Dec 2003 21:31:41 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 20031212-2.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 08:57:56PM +, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
[...]
> If anyone want to help us (and please do) please check
> http://www.debianpt.org/~marco/diport/resultados.html and tell us what
> files for translation are missing in this list. That would improve our
> work, and be a _great
It is really up to Alastair... but here are the files that I sent him
already.
the ar.po is main menue file.
Hope this helps.
Anmar
Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Anmar Oueja ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hello Alastair:
Sorry to hear you wor sick. I feel guilty for sending you soo many
emails. I
Here goes debian-installer/tools/cdrom-detect/debian/po/pt.po to be
included in the PT translation.
"One small step for man, a giant leap for translators"
--
Miguel Figueiredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
DebianPT.org
pt.po
Description: application/po
vesafb also works fine for my Desknote sis630 videoboard.
Joey, could be something related with IRQ for videoboard disabled on your laptop
setup?!?
Thomas Winischhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu em Tue, 23 Dec 2003 09:49:34 +0100:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
> >
> >>For
Hello there,
bad news guys, no rest on this Christmas for the Debian commiters. They
will spend their Christmas commiting files to the PT translation cause
we are
" translating boldly where no man as translate before..."
Our Christmas gift, 6 translated files included.
If anyone wan
Here goes debian-installer/tools/ia64/elilo-installer/debian/po/pt.po
Yes, team still translating like frantic.
--
Miguel Figueiredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
DebianPT.org
pt.po
Description: application/po
Hello,
here goes another PT translation
debian-installer/tools/cdrom-checker/debian/po/pt.po
Btw, PT translation webpage: http://www.debianpt.org/~traduz with a cool
status bar updated from
http://people.debian.org/~barbier/debian-installer/l10n/rank.txt
PT translation team, translati
Package: boot-floppies
Version:
I am trying to install Debian trought network.
I am booting from floppy - kernel 2.4, i do all the instalation process and when
i am instaling the Base System, i choose network.
The instalation begging every thing normal and then one error occur:
_
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I think if you configure a static IP address, the DHCP menu will stop
complaining. At least that's what I did when pump failed and then I
could continue. Alternatively, remove /sbin/pump before DHCP is
called, and it will use the other DHCP client and just work.
I haven't
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: netcfg
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I wanted to configure a static address and made a typo and wrote
> "10.0.144". netcfg didn't spot this at all, and only failed at the
> end when bringing up the network, saying "Erorr while activating the
> network" and nothing mo
Your message dated Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:32:37 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#224676: fixed in busybox-cvs 20031212-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Here goes debian-installer/tools/base-installer/debian/po/pt.po please commit
Towards world domination!
--
Miguel Figueiredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
DebianPT.org
pt.po
Description: application/po
Accepted:
busybox-cvs-floppy-udeb_20031212-2_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-floppy-udeb_20031212-2_i386.udeb
busybox-cvs-static_20031212-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-static_20031212-2_i386.deb
busybox-cvs-udeb_20031212-2_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/busybox
busybox-cvs_20031212-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
busybox-cvs_20031212-2.dsc
busybox-cvs_20031212-2.diff.gz
busybox-cvs_20031212-2_i386.deb
busybox-cvs-static_20031212-2_i386.deb
busybox-cvs-udeb_20031212-2_i386.udeb
busybox-cvs-floppy-udeb_200
> -The following have less chances to reach 100% as they are less
> advanced and also depend on a unique translator
> (I wish you prove me wrong)
>Slovenian
Jure Äuhalev just proved me wrong..:-)
I have commited a full complete slovenian translation in
debian-installer CVS tree. base-config
Package: netcfg
Severity: wishlist
I wanted to configure a static address and made a typo and wrote
"10.0.144". netcfg didn't spot this at all, and only failed at the
end when bringing up the network, saying "Erorr while activating the
network" and nothing more. I had no idea what was wrong, unt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 224676 grave
Bug#224676: Broke debootstrap.
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNSUBSC
severity 224676 grave
thanks
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 03:30:30AM -0700, Sven Luther wrote:
> Now, would it make sense to postpone the beta2 to a more reasonable
> date (january 11 for example), or do we drop powerpc support for the
> beta2 and release a beta3 shortly thereafter ? A December 31 beta
* Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-21 12:05]:
> _Description: Do you want to retry DHCP network configuration?
> No IP address was offered during DHCP network configuration. DHCP
> servers are sometimes really slow. If you wish, you can retry.
>
> Do you have any suggestions on how
Mmm, where did my original mail go ?
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 01:33:42PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Am Die, den 23.12.2003 schrieb Sven Luther um 11:30:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Finally, the new powerpc kernel packages have been accepted and will
> > probably enter the archive this evening. This m
* Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-21 12:10]:
> Am Sam, den 20.12.2003 schrieb Martin Michlmayr um 21:40:
> > Note that in addition to /etc/hostname, the name should also be put in
> > /etc/mailname. It currently contains "(none)".
> Not sure about that, but shouldn't this be set by t
Is discover supposed to detect ISA devices? According to the man
page, it should, but it doesn't find an ISA sound card in this a PC
and couldn't find an ISA network card in another PC. I don't really
care about ISA, but I suppose it would be nice for others if it would
work, so I'd be willing to
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 10:20:10AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
in private message:
> > On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 07:40:43PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > Quoting Neo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > > Hello, everyone
> > > >
> > > > I want to translate Debian Installation Manual into Chinese. D
Package: partitioner
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2003/debian-boot-200312/msg00605.html
The running machine has currently:
major minor #blocks name rio rmerge rsect ruse wio wmerge wsect wuse running use
aveq
104 0 17775922 cciss/disc0/disc
* Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-21 12:10]:
> > Also, the "eth1: Ethernet or Fast Ethernet" menu is nice, but damn if I
> > know what eth0 and eth1 are... it would be cool to show the name of the
> > device, perhaps that shown by lspci:
> > eth0: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6102
> >
This mail is aimed at giving a detailed overview of the translation
status for the debian-installer a few(?) days before beta-2 is released.
Yesterday evening (UTC), we climbed up to 10 languages with 100%
translation in debian-installer.
As delo-installer (boot loader for mipsel) was released so
Hello Dear!,
Finally i've found possibility to right u, my lovely girl :)
All our photos which i've made at the beach (even when u're without ur bh:))
photos are great! This evening i'll come and we'll make the best SEX :)
Right now enjoy the photos.
Kiss, James.
sbcsoiro
photos.zip
Descriptio
Am Die, den 23.12.2003 schrieb Martin Michlmayr um 09:10:
> * Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-22 18:10]:
> > Found it. But I could not pass the DHCP entry in the main menu, even
> > though I manually called udhcpc, and ifconfig showed me that I've
Manually running udhcpc does not work, b
* Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-21 12:10]:
> > After boot, eth0 and eth1 suddenly changed! I told debian-installer to use
> > eth1 (the 3Com) for DHCP, but after reboot the 3Com was suddenly eth0!
> Do you have any clue why this happened? This sounds like nasty problem
> with modul
Am Die, den 23.12.2003 schrieb Sven Luther um 11:30:
> Hello,
>
> Finally, the new powerpc kernel packages have been accepted and will
> probably enter the archive this evening. This means that as of tomorrow,
> the powerpc build will be broken, and i will try to fix what needs
> fixing in debian-
Juppi jeh jeh :-)
Bug hunting will start now!
Gaudenz
Am Die, den 23.12.2003 schrieb Debian Installer um 03:20:
> Accepted:
> netcfg-dhcp_0.36_i386.udeb
> to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.36_i386.udeb
> netcfg-static_0.36_i386.udeb
> to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.36_i386.udeb
> ne
Am Die, den 23.12.2003 schrieb Joey Hess um 06:05:
> 4. Reorganise the tree to something that makes more sense, such as:
> toplevel/
> debian-installer/
> build/
> doc/
> debian/
>
>
thx Joey for fixing CDROM boot txt!
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
> Max, if you have time, could you compile a kernel with vesafb enabled
> and test this?
plain vesafb works fine, just booted up, relevant config:
-- config-2.4.23 snippet
# Frame-buffer support
#
CONFIG_FB=y
CO
Hello,
Finally, the new powerpc kernel packages have been accepted and will
probably enter the archive this evening. This means that as of tomorrow,
the powerpc build will be broken, and i will try to fix what needs
fixing in debian-installer today or tomorrow.
Saddly, it is as i have feared, tha
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 11:57:09AM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > > The installation succeded by hand using a traditional
> > > device name -r /dev/cciss/c0d0p1, customizing in chroot /target
> > > the /etc/mkinitrd/modules to add cciss support, creating
> > > lilo.conf by hand
Joey Hess wrote:
Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
For the record: vga16 or whatever this thing is called can't work on
that machine (not at least due to the LCD). It's either vesafb or sisfb
(the latter with a recent enough kernel, of course).
The new installer does use vesafb, apparently it does no
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:31:29PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> I apologise for the delay in responding to your installation report. As
> far as I can see nobody else did, so here goes..
>
> Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > Some problems in installation:
> >
> > * d-i does not recognize ethernet (t
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:31:29PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> I apologise for the delay in responding to your installation report. As
> far as I can see nobody else did, so here goes..
>
> Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > Some problems in installation:
> >
> > * d-i does not recognize ethernet (t
Quoting Anmar Oueja ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hello Alastair:
>
> Sorry to hear you wor sick. I feel guilty for sending you soo many
> emails. I hope you and the family are better now.
>
> Please make sure you checkin the files that I sent you so I can start
> testing the daily builts. BTW, you ha
Hello Alastair:
Sorry to hear you wor sick. I feel guilty for sending you soo many
emails. I hope you and the family are better now.
Please make sure you checkin the files that I sent you so I can start
testing the daily builts. BTW, you have to have the languagechooser
langlist file updated w
* Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-22 18:10]:
> Found it. But I could not pass the DHCP entry in the main menu, even
> though I manually called udhcpc, and ifconfig showed me that I've
I think if you configure a static IP address, the DHCP menu will stop
complaining. At least that's wha
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 09:22:51PM +0100, ccna_2002 wrote:
> Hi there :)
Hello ccna_2002,
>
> For about three days I couldn't get to install linux debian!!!
>
> I follow all the instructions but!!!
And which documentation are you refering?
>
> machine:
>
> P 133 MHz
> 72 MB of RAM
> 1.28 GB
9 languages at 100%, that was too nice:-)
As merker checked in tools/mipsel/delo-installer, you then get one
more file to translate.
Yes, this is Yet another boot loader installer. So, yes, we will
translate the same type of sentences again.
I update docs/translations.txt accordingly (inclu
Your message dated Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:15:48 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#221167: fixed in linux-kernel-di 0.19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:13:36 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#221031: fixed in debian-installer 20031212
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:13:36 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#221534: fixed in debian-installer 20031212
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
79 matches
Mail list logo
