On 2004-02-23, Ian Neubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to load it up on my laptop and it consistently hangs at
'Detecting
hardware / 95% / Skipping unavailable module 'ide-floppy' for 'Linux
IDE
floppy'.
Is this a known bug?
Steps:
-Boot from cd just by hitting enter
-English
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:14:53 +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
+ * Joshua Kwan
+- iconv all the .po files to UTF-8 to silence unifont building.
The right fix is to add a debian/po/output file, just done.
OK. So should I revert the .po files to the way they were?
--
Joshua Kwan
--
To
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
17. feb. 2004, gluck.debian.org
uname -a:
Linux koala 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
Date:
20. feb. 2004
Method:
Netinst from ftp.fi.debian.org using my other pc as proxy (squid), booted
off 100mb cd-image
Well I saw http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/; mentioned somewhere
and netinst/i386/ seemed the relevant sub-directory hierarchy under that
for what I wanted.
That used to be the old place for things, but we have reorganized things
around and now it is not, I had left symlinks in place
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004-02-23,
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: The result of running uname -a on a shell prompt
Date: 2004-02-23
Method: Booted from CD
Machine: Gateway Solo 5150 with PCMCIA
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 05:26:47AM +, Seb Tennant wrote:
Hi all.
I've read that it is a good idea for the 'root' partition to be small
and bootable, i.e., for it to only include /bin, /dev, /etc, /lib,
/mnt, /root and /sbin. Presumably, as these directories contain
predominantly
Package: debian-installer
Version: N/A; reported 2004-02-24
Severity: important
Installation using sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso downloaded from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/powerpc/20040223/
can't start kbd-chooser.
When starting kbd-chooser on the command line on tty2 and
+++ Karsten Merker [04-02-24 09:31 +0100]:
ah, hello Karsten - got home eventually then? How's the ankle? :-)
Generally it can work on a serial console, but there are still several
bugs:
- you have to select US/English, choosing another language like French
or German will cause a
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 05:26:47AM +, Seb Tennant wrote:
I've read that it is a good idea for the 'root' partition to be small
and bootable, i.e., for it to only include /bin, /dev, /etc, /lib,
/mnt, /root and /sbin. Presumably, as these directories contain
predominantly static files,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 233168 base-installer
Bug#233168: Subject: debootstrap: does not work twice (/usr/bin/awk already exist and
debootstap failed.)
Bug reassigned from package `debootstrap' to `base-installer'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Package: debian-installer
Version: N/A; reported 2004-02-24
Severity: wishlist
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/cvs/debian-installer/doc/INSTALLATION-HOWTO
doesn't mention how to make your system boot from CD, it just says:
... and make your system boot from CD.
For powerpc it should say something
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 233168
Bug#233168: Subject: debootstrap: does not work twice (/usr/bin/awk already exist and
debootstap failed.)
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Package: debian-installer
Version: d-i beta2 on powerpc
Severity: normal
Automatic partition doesn't create the 800K boot partition, so there
is an error message after the base install.
When returning to manual configuration, you can't edit partitions,
because the automatic partitioner uses
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 08:39:13PM -0600, John Buttery wrote:
IMO the biggest feature that distinguishes distributions is the
package management.
Or perhaps more the _packaging_. Debian has lots and lots of software
packaged, most of which is of extremely good quality. The Debian policy is
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 08:39:23PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
In light of Colin's post[1] to debian-devel-announce, we need to make
plans for the 15th March deadline that he has set. That is 3 weeks from
today.
In three weeks, we can certianly get another beta (or perhaps release
candidate)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 24 Feb 04 01:39:23 GMT,
Joey Hess wrote:
- BIDI support (for Arabic)
Well, this is one of i18n TODO.
Others TODO I know are:
- - update shadow package (Bug#227237 and others). NMU?
- - cfdisk-udeb (util-linux package) utf-8 support.
Hello
being a newbie I have a very basic question about your minni isos. Do I need all four
or just one of them? I'd like to install Debian on an Athlon 2000+
THank you for your help
Andrew
__
Extra-Konto: 2,50 %* Zinsen
Package: base-config
Version: 2.12
Severity: normal
Tags: l10n
When using locale el_GR.UTF-8, all the strings are truncated up to a
certain column. It doesn't matter whether I run this from normal
console, jfbterm or an X term, it's always the same. The messages are
uncomprehensible since a lot
I vote for the first image on http://sloth.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i-logos/
with the sixth image as runner-up.
--
.O. Hans Fugal| De gustibus non disputandum est.
..O http://hans.fugal.net | Debian, vim, mutt, ruby, text, gpg
OOO| WindowMaker, gaim, UTF-8,
+++ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04-02-23 18:53 +]:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 05:49:57PM +, Wookey wrote:
+++ Peter Naulls [04-02-23 13:07 +]:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's time to get debian-installer ported to arm; all the
I vote for the first image on http://sloth.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i-logos/
with the sixth image as runner-up.
Me for the 3rd one, I think it shows a debian futuristic, something that seems to be
projected to the future. Good idea to express the innovations within the new d-u,
isn't?
SteX
SteX
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 08:55, Wookey wrote:
D-B people - Is the above still true? ARM currently has (approximately) one
kernel per machine. Even just supporting the existing supported stuff and
things that have enough resources for installing Debian to be a vaguely
sensible thing to do (which
May as well post one of these, too. =)
Nightly builds are happening so sparc32-tftp, sparc64-tftp, and
miniiso. These don't generally work, though.
#232720 is our major blocker for tftpbooting, there's a patch in the BTS
that the maintainer is reviewing (Thanks James!)
That bug will also
+++ Jeff Bailey [04-02-24 09:19 -0500]:
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 08:55, Wookey wrote:
D-B people - Is the above still true? ARM currently has (approximately) one
kernel per machine. Even just supporting the existing supported stuff and
things that have enough resources for installing Debian
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 02 17 2004 / From the Debian website
uname -a: The result of running uname -a on a shell prompt
Date: 02 20 2004
Method: I downloaded the big installer iso ( the net one). Inserted the CD into the laptop, reboot with the key c preset and the
On Feb 24, 2004, at 8:57 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I vote for the first image on http://sloth.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i-logos/
with the sixth image as runner-up.
Me for the 3rd one, I think it shows a debian futuristic, something
that seems to be projected to the future. Good idea to express the
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 09:24:35PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
Atari and mvme147 should have netboot targets.
I'm using the term netboot inconsistently on m68k. Ya'll tell me if it
should be changed. Amiga, atari, and mac cannot be tftp booted. So the
netboot
Just my vote:
1. mark selby
2. mark riedesel (klowner)
3. andrea mottola
Vit Kotrla
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Get daily builds working.
Currently working: alpha, i386, ia64, m68k, sparc
Hppa's daily build has been down since the 17th.
Mips needs a daily build.
Powerpc's daily build is failing.
Hi-
WRT the recent message that the best place to download testing images
is here:
I vote for the moonish one, here:
http://sloth.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i-logos/deb_boot_02-1.png
by Volkan YAZICI
It points to a future when the astronauts are running debian while they
work in their moon base :)
Erik
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/i386/current/sarge-i386-netins
t.iso 23-Feb-2004 13:50 107M
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.24-1-386 #1 Wed Feb 18 19:44:56 ESD 2004 i686
unknown
Date: Feb 24, 800am
Method: Netinst cdrom
Package: base-config
Version: 2.12
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #234529
This looks like a duplicate of bug #232426 in whiptail package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux
Package: debian-installer
Version: N/A; reported 2004-02-24
Severity: wishlist
When booting from CD you don't have enough time to read about the
boot options 'install', 'install-safe', 'expert' and 'expert-safe'.
Of course you can press a key to stop booting the default entry, but
maybe this
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 09:34:06AM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote:
I also remember (was it Thomas? Blars? hmmm...) mentioning that the
fdisk udeb wasn't getting loaded for some reason. I'm hoping that the
whole partman thing will make this silently go away before we get there.
in fact, there is no
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Beta 2
uname -a: not available, see below
Date: 2004-02-24 15:00
Method: CD-Boot, installed from CD, additional packages installed from http mirror
Machine: Gericom Notebook
Processor: AMD K6-2
Memory: 64 MB
Root Device: IDE
Root
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 04:22:34PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
I also remember (was it Thomas? Blars? hmmm...) mentioning that the
fdisk udeb wasn't getting loaded for some reason. I'm hoping that the
whole partman thing will make this silently go away before we get there.
in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
tags 228518 + pending
Bug#228518: partitioner: [PATCH] sparc.sh for sparc system
Tags were: d-i patch
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Erik Dykema wrote:
Would it be possible to consolidate the downloading sites in such a
way that all the necessary images could be downloaded from the same place?
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ports-status is prominantly
linked to from the main d-i web page.
--
see
Hans Fugal wrote:
I vote for the first image on http://sloth.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i-logos/
with the sixth image as runner-up.
If I am allowed to vote, then
http://sloth.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i-logos/deb_boot_02-1.png
would be my favourite.
Regards
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Denis Barbier wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 07:29:23PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
[...]
Failing that, your b) looks not too bad. One thing that makes it easier
is that due to svn's different versioning method, we only need to record
one number, the current revision of the whole repository
yes me to i like it
Le mar 24/02/2004 16:34, Erik Dykema a crit :
I vote for the moonish one, here:
http://sloth.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i-logos/deb_boot_02-1.png
by Volkan YAZICI
It points to a future when the astronauts are running debian while they
work in their moon base :)
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 08:21:18AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 04:22:34PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
I also remember (was it Thomas? Blars? hmmm...) mentioning that the
fdisk udeb wasn't getting loaded for some reason. I'm hoping that the
whole partman
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386.netinst.iso from
uname -a: Linux cs101srv 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 unkown
Date: 2/23/04 to 2/24/04
Method: Boot from CD using ISO
Machine:
Processor: Dual Pentium III 1 Ghz, Intel stl2 mb
Memory: 1GB
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 08:39:13PM -0600, John Buttery wrote:
IMO the biggest feature that distinguishes distributions is the
package management. I mean, it's the same kernel, the same core
software bundled with it for the most part, stored in the same places
(mostly, depending on how
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
So you'd rather call these floppy?
I'll note that i386 can boot off floppy, whereas amiga and mac
cannot. Would another target name be clearer?
I don't care much one way or the other. So far everything will fit on
a floppy, but I hadn't much been paying
Thomas Arendsen Hein wrote:
Package: debian-installer
Version: N/A; reported 2004-02-24
Severity: wishlist
When booting from CD you don't have enough time to read about the
boot options 'install', 'install-safe', 'expert' and 'expert-safe'.
Of course you can press a key to stop booting
Matt Kraai:
How about making anna configure packages that do not have menu
items?
I think that is a good idea. Only problem I can anticipate is that if
something w/o a menu item depended on something with a menu item, it
might fail to configure, but obviously nothing in current d-i has the
Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
Joey, should I be building the cds and dvds against sid for now?
Any other changes?
If we can only build one set, they should be built against sid's d-i for
now, I think.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi all.
As the person who started this thread it's about time I responded! First of all, though it hardly matters, my machine is a G4 desktop, not a laptop. I have overcome my partitioning problems and have seemingly successfully employed the Debian Installer twice now.
The first time I did it
Magnus Ekdahl wrote:
* When one finds a bug report containing only one issue I assume its
correct just to reassign it to its respective package? An alternative
line of thought would be to collect all installation-reports in one
place, hence every bug needs to be cloned.
Since we're not
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 12:16:41PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
So you'd rather call these floppy?
I'll note that i386 can boot off floppy, whereas amiga and mac
cannot. Would another target name be clearer?
I don't care much one way or the other. So far
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 12:16:41PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
So you'd rather call these floppy?
I'll note that i386 can boot off floppy, whereas amiga and mac
cannot. Would another target name be clearer?
I don't care much one way or the other. So far
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 11:26:06AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 08:21:18AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 04:22:34PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
I also remember (was it Thomas? Blars? hmmm...) mentioning that the
fdisk udeb wasn't getting
The machine is a Fujitsu Lifebook 420D. Debian was installed successfully
and works with the 2.4 bootfloopy kernel. But when I installed the 2.4.18
kernel, the machine restarts right after grub tries to load it. I thought
it might have be a lilo problem, but installed grub thinking
it might fix
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 07:14:50PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 11:26:06AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 08:21:18AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 04:22:34PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
I also remember (was it Thomas?
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 12:58:23PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 07:14:50PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 11:26:06AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 08:21:18AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 04:22:34PM +0100,
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
You don't. In both cases, you need to download an image, boot the native
OS, start a kernel loader which will put the image up as a RAMdisk, and
go from there. The difference is that the CD-ROM image will get its
udebs from CDROM, whereas the network image will work with
If we can only build one set, they should be built against sid's d-i for
now, I think.
We could build against the two, but it takes a really long time to build
because of jigdo, so I think it is better to build just for the one we wan't
people to test, besides, if we provide several, people
languagechooser_1.13_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
languagechooser_1.13.dsc
languagechooser_1.13.tar.gz
languagechooser_1.13_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Feb 19, 2004, at 3:46 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:39:02AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:04:49AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:46:53AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
BusyBox tar cannot handle archives built with the latest version
of
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: ftp.debian.org Datum auch der 22.02.2004
uname -a: 2.4.24
Date: 22.2.2004
Method: Von DVD gebootet und nicht installieren können, da es ein kreislauf ist ohne zu
installiern. Bis Partizunieren funktioniert es, dann kann man die menues zwar
Accepted:
languagechooser_1.13.dsc
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.13.dsc
languagechooser_1.13.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.13.tar.gz
languagechooser_1.13_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.13_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 01:51:38PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
You don't. In both cases, you need to download an image, boot the native
OS, start a kernel loader which will put the image up as a RAMdisk, and
go from there. The difference is that the CD-ROM image will get
base-config_2.13_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-config_2.13.dsc
base-config_2.13.tar.gz
base-config_2.13_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 11:51:14PM -0800, Joshua Kwan wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:14:53 +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
+ * Joshua Kwan
+- iconv all the .po files to UTF-8 to silence unifont building.
The right fix is to add a debian/po/output file, just done.
OK. So should I
Hi-
A while back there was a lot of talk about automating installations,
and in many places it was claimed that it actually worked. Does anyone
have instructions for how to actually do it?
For example, if I wanted to automate a network install, and I had done
the homework, including:
Accepted:
base-config_2.13.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.13.dsc
base-config_2.13.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.13.tar.gz
base-config_2.13_all.deb
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.13_all.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 232547 233135
Hello!
I'm sorry to annoy the people, who think this topic is redundant, but
nevertheless, I've just updated my small script for updating
translations changelogs. It is positioned in the scripts/ directory in
the debian-installer CVS tree.
New since the last release is the output of the script,
I'm at a loss for words due to my own ignorance but I'm not sure what
to do at this point.
I've compiled the 2.6.3 kernel by "make mrproper, make xconfig (saved
.config), make-kpkg --revision=custom1.0 kernel_image modues_image.
The process runs thru w/ a few errors as listed below:
I've
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:28:50 -0500
Barry Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the status on this bug? I tried to install again on
02/22 and
still got the failure at perl-base, even using the 02/21 daily. I
don't understand how people are still able to test the installer if
I just fixed a thinko in nobootloader, which causes it to always fail.
Please upload the new version.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:32:09 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#233995: fixed in base-config 2.13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:32:09 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#233262: fixed in base-config 2.13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:32:08 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#232547: fixed in base-config 2.13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:32:08 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#233135: fixed in base-config 2.13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Feb 24, 2004, at 3:53 PM, Glenn McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:28:50 -0500
Barry Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the status on this bug? I tried to install again on
02/22 and
still got the failure at perl-base, even using the 02/21 daily. I
don't understand
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:51:18PM -0500, Erik Dykema wrote:
Hi-
A while back there was a lot of talk about automating installations,
and in many places it was claimed that it actually worked. Does anyone
have instructions for how to actually do it?
For example, if I wanted to
reassign 226471 lilo-installer
thanks
I think it can be marked as closed but I leave it under your
consideration.
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: lilo
Version: 1:22.2-3
Severity: important
Default lilo.conf found in a Woody system has a broken LinuxOLD entry. It
refers
Hi,
For some days now, I've been trying to complete a successful
installation of Sid into a VMware box, with the 20040209 version of
the debian installer boot floppies.
However, every install I try eventually bombs out at the installing
base system stage, with an error The debootstrap program
Hello all,
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-02-24 02:39]:
| - Get daily builds working.
| Currently working: alpha, i386, ia64, m68k, sparc
| Hppa's daily build has been down since the 17th.
I'm working on this issue. Since we have switched to the new
build-system hppa doesn't
I have run into difficulty trying to install Debian
GNU/Linux 3.Or2 i386 from Linux Central. While trying to install the base system
I first get:
warning
file:/instmnt/pool/main/n/nano/nano_1.0.6-3_i386.deb was corrupt
then:
error Couldn't download nano
Then I am returned to the screen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 226471 lilo-installer
Bug#226471: lilo: default lilo.conf has broken LinuxOLD entry
Bug reassigned from package `lilo' to `lilo-installer'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Daniel R. Sparks
Hy-Tec
Business Equipment
266 Dundee Ave.
Elgin, IL 60120
(847) 741-4595
dasparkss@sbcglobal.net
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 01:51:38PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
You don't. In both cases, you need to download an image, boot the native
OS, start a kernel loader which will put the image up as a RAMdisk, and
go from there. The difference is
I'm at a loss for words due to my own ignorance but I'm not sure what to
do at this point.
I've compiled the 2.6.3 kernel by make mrproper, make xconfig (saved
.config), make-kpkg --revision=custom1.0 kernel_image modues_image.
The process runs thru w/ a few errors as listed below:
/I've
Dimitry Andric wrote:
For some days now, I've been trying to complete a successful
installation of Sid into a VMware box, with the 20040209 version of
the debian installer boot floppies.
Upgrade. This was fixed in busybox some days ago, but not back on the
9th!
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
tags 232071 + pending
thanks
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 06:05:19PM +0100, Miroslav Kure wrote:
I did two more test installs (with 20040209 iso) and, as expected,
this problem also affects other ISO-8859-2 languages (I tried Slovak
and Polish).
Miroslav, I just committed a fix for termwrap, could
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 232071 + pending
Bug#232071: base-config: Output messed up with ISO-8859-2 locales
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
* Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-02-24 13:15:08 +0100]:
Or perhaps more the _packaging_. Debian has lots and lots of software
packaged, most of which is of extremely good quality. The Debian
policy is IMO a lot more important than using a specific package
system.
Yeah, I was
Package: countrychooser
Severity: normal
During installation in French, the fr_FR locale is selected whereas
it is set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in languagechooser. As #232049 is fixed, a
workaround is to set this default locale to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in languagechooser (and of course add ISO-8859-15
---
Lawrence Lee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hills.ccsf.edu/~llee32/index.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What about compiling in CONFIG_IDEDISK_STROKE? I wouldn't think that
it would hurt anything and it is required on older systems.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wrote:
It seems that debootstrap from unstable is already aware of the
libdevmapper1.00 dependency. See
Hi-
Thanks for the links to the other automatic installation packages.
Looking at what they do, they confirm that what I think I want to do is
use the actual debian-installer, as suggested where you wrote:
1) Manual install.
2) Save the answers from the debconf database into a file.
3) Put the
Tang Shan Hong Yuan Valve Industry Co. is located in Tangshan, Hebei province,
China,
140 kilometers southeast to Beijing. Hebei province is famous for the Hometown of
Casting.
Our factory is mainly in wafer butterfly valve, lug butterfly valve, flanged
butterfly valve,
wafer check
Erik Dykema wrote:
Hi-
Thanks for the links to the other automatic installation packages.
Looking at what they do, they confirm that what I think I want to do is
use the actual debian-installer, as suggested where you wrote:
1) Manual install.
2) Save the answers from the debconf
ddetect_0.68_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ddetect_0.68.dsc
ddetect_0.68.tar.gz
hw-detect_0.68_all.udeb
ethdetect_0.68_all.udeb
hw-detect-full_0.68_all.udeb
archdetect_0.68_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 11:26:49PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
For some days now, I've been trying to complete a successful
installation of Sid into a VMware box, with the 20040209 version of
the debian installer boot floppies.
However, every install I try eventually bombs out at the
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 02:28:50PM -0500, Barry Hawkins wrote:
What is the status on this bug? I tried to install again on 02/22
and still got the failure at perl-base, even using the 02/21 daily. I
don't understand how people are still able to test the installer if
this is
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:08:30PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
I just fixed a thinko in nobootloader, which causes it to always fail.
Please upload the new version.
Done.
--
Matt Kraai[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ftbfs.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
nobootloader_0.0.6_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
nobootloader_0.0.6.dsc
nobootloader_0.0.6.tar.gz
nobootloader_0.0.6_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
