On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:30:20AM +0200, Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote:
> Hello!
>
> What's up with the repositories? I check out my templates & co. from the
> "normal" svn with my alioth account and I get old templates - for example,
> base-installer's template is dated "POT-Creation-Date: 2004-05-
For what it's worth, I get the same thing reported earlier when trying
this image on my Ultra 5:
NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0.
RAMDISK: Couldn't find valid RAM disk image starting at 0.
Freeing initrd memory: 1442 freed
cramfs: wrong magic
sh-2021: reiserfs_read_super: can n
Andrew,
On Mon, 17 May 2004 12:20:57 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> udhcpc: script /usr/share/udhcpc/default/script failed: No such file or
> directory
I discovered that a funky dep on the netinst ISOs made it not install
dhcp-client-udeb because busybox-cvs was already installed; however, it no
Package: discover1
Version: 1.5-9
Severity: normal
I use Linux kernel 2.6 which supports my TV card, but discover
doesn't detect it.
I must manually run: modprobe bttv card=42
I believe, it would be wise if the disc
tags 249300 pending
thanks
Quoting Nikolai Prokoschenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: discover1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch l10n
>
> Please include the attached translations in the next upload. This time
> these are complete.
Commited
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 249300 pending
Bug#249300: discover1: [INTL:ru] Another, this time complete, Russian translation
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
Quoting Danilo Piazzalunga ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Subject: shadow: [INTL:it] Italian debconf translation update
> Package: shadow
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: l10n
>
> Please *do* update the Italian debconf translation for the shadow package. It
> has been submitted about a month ago (bug #243586
Quoting Nikolai Prokoschenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hello!
>
> What's up with the repositories? I check out my templates & co. from the
> "normal" svn with my alioth account and I get old templates - for example,
> base-installer's template is dated "POT-Creation-Date: 2004-05-04
> 23:35-0400\n",
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
FYI, I'm creating alternative X configuration tool inspired from Knoppix.
This is consisted by some packages.
* tettei-xconfig (X configuration tool)
* kudzu-mini (simple Kudzu, device detection. you can use kudzu
package also instead of this)
Your message dated Mon, 17 May 2004 00:17:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#239121: fixed in netcfg 0.64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Mon, 17 May 2004 00:17:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#249363: fixed in netcfg 0.64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Mon, 17 May 2004 00:17:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#248636: fixed in netcfg 0.64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Mon, 17 May 2004 00:17:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#247751: fixed in netcfg 0.64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Mon, 17 May 2004 00:17:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#21: fixed in netcfg 0.64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Mon, 17 May 2004 00:17:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#236533: fixed in netcfg 0.64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Mon, 17 May 2004 00:17:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#239121: fixed in netcfg 0.64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Mon, 17 May 2004 00:17:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#227722: fixed in netcfg 0.64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Mon, 17 May 2004 00:17:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#236533: fixed in netcfg 0.64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Mon, 17 May 2004 00:17:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244819: fixed in netcfg 0.64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_0.64_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.64_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.64_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.64_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.64.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.64.dsc
netcfg_0.64.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.64.tar.gz
netcfg_0.6
Your message dated Mon, 17 May 2004 00:17:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244901: fixed in netcfg 0.64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Mon, 17 May 2004 00:17:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#247178: fixed in netcfg 0.64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Title: Turnkey
constantinople scandalous capacitance embryology angry brinkmanship sesame marrowbone inapproachable contumacy transduction postmark downspout concurring yelp boyle conspicuous seacoast clump anabel harold take craftsman postmen cinderella advisee casey eventide oswald
netcfg_0.64_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_0.64.dsc
netcfg_0.64.tar.gz
netcfg_0.64_i386.udeb
netcfg-dhcp_0.64_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.64_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Selma Rodgers,*
The [EMAIL PROTECTED] will all0w you to receive
all the [EMAIL PROTECTED] that you 0rder with your remote contr0l,@
payperviews,XXX-movies,sp0rt events,special-events%,RND_SYB
http://www.9002hosting.com/cable/
phyllis ,gonzalez
,background ,giuseppe .
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
##This is not commercial email.##
Attention! - A user has just begun the process of sharing opinions and experiences
about you via our online community.
This email message is not commercial email.
This email message was sent to you as a direct result of the actions of a user at our
we
Welsh,
Govenment don't want me to sell
UndergroundCD !Check Your spouse and staff
Investigate Your Own CREDIT-HISTORY
hacking someone PC!
Disappear in your city
bannedcd2004
http://www.9002hosting.com/cd/
grippe,response was based.
感染附件的收件者(Recipient of the infected attachment)： 李靜蘭\Inbox
訊息的主旨(Subject of the message)： Re: does it?
[EMAIL PROTECTED](One or more attachments were deleted)。
附件 information.scr 目前為已刪除 其原因如下：
發現了病毒 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<>
On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 07:17:58PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > After this I typed "df" in the console just to see what was happening and I
> > saw that I got about 100 000TB in hard drive and about 6 000TB in an shm
> > partition !!
> When you type "df", you get 1K blocks. So 10 wou
Dear Sirs,
Nice to contact with you! we have your name over
the internet.
I am venturing to write you this email for
introducing our company as one of the professional exporters of car audio in China.
I am Terrie Chen, sales representative from Zhuhai
Astro-win Im
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 10:56:41AM +1200, Allen Unueco wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> >On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 01:22:11AM +1200, Allen Unueco wrote:
> >>With both versions I can't switch to any other virtual consoles. I have
> >>a newer 15" PowerBook G4 and I have been using the 'fn' key but
> >
Bowling,
Govenment don't want me to sell
UndergroundCD !Check Your spouse and staff
Investigate Your Own CREDIT-HISTORY
hacking someone PC!
Disappear in your city
bannedcd2004
http://www.9002hosting.com/cd/
wishful,on the ground.
Ups, forgot the subject. Here it is.
--
regards Jens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
(Using daily build from the 15th)
DHCP fails, get the "DHCP didn't work, sometimes it's slow, wanna try it
again or not" message.
Tried it again a few times. No joy.
Logs showed:
udhcpc: script /usr/share/udhcpc/default/script failed: No such file or
directory
Andrew
signature.asc
Descr
Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 10:56:41AM +1200, Allen Unueco wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 01:22:11AM +1200, Allen Unueco wrote:
With 09/05 I can get all the way to installing the base system when I
get an error about there not being able to fine the kernel-insta
Hi,
Partman seems to be a bit busted (i386, powerpc)
(daily build from the 15th)
Current partition table is:
IDE1
#1 primary 60G ntfs
#2 primary 500Mext3
#3 primary 60G LVM
If I select #2, the menu choices are:
Usage method: dont_use
Done set
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta4/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux ernst 2.4.25-1-386 #2 Wed Apr 14 19:38:08 EST 2004 i686
unknown
Date: Sun May 16 23:30:39 CEST 2004
Method: expert26 vga=7
TSA spokesman Dennis Murphy said the government doesn't plan to store passenger information, except for potential terrorists. He said the issue isn't whether people can see their data but if they can redress errors.
Using sexuality as a tool is tricky and confusing for women, and the documen
Accepted:
partman-auto_20.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_20.dsc
partman-auto_20.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_20.tar.gz
partman-auto_20_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_20_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting bugs to severity fixed
Title: Turnkey
clairvoyant homework drier wellington adjoint feed upcome debit hereditary rooseveltian moduli stile granville zealot shinto airmen looseleaf
sims leachate kramer latus disposable bribe company monticello southampton chlorinate cayley aristocratic salesgirl sn
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 244100 + fixed
Bug#244100: Cobalt and Netwinder need ext2 -r0 boot partition
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Accepted:
bugreporter-udeb_0.26.dsc
to pool/main/b/bugreporter-udeb/bugreporter-udeb_0.26.dsc
bugreporter-udeb_0.26.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/bugreporter-udeb/bugreporter-udeb_0.26.tar.gz
bugreporter-udeb_0.26_all.udeb
to pool/main/b/bugreporter-udeb/bugreporter-udeb_0.26_all.udeb
Announcing to
partman-auto_20_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto_20.dsc
partman-auto_20.tar.gz
partman-auto_20_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
tag 244100 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 01:54:03 +0100
Source: partman-auto
Binary: partman-auto
Architecture: source all
Just for reference, this is what partman created on a 2 gig drive with
the recipes:
> #1 primary 100.0 MB B f ext2r0 /boot
> #5 logical1.7 GB f ext3 /
> #6 logical 121.2 MB f swap swap
and:
> #1 pri
bugreporter-udeb_0.26_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
bugreporter-udeb_0.26.dsc
bugreporter-udeb_0.26.tar.gz
bugreporter-udeb_0.26_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 249363 pending
Bug#249363: netcfg: missing amd64 support.
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 237395 - pending
Bug#237395: DHCP is used automatically
Tags were: pending wontfix d-i
Bug#239431: Non-expert installs should allow static network interface in DHCP
environmen
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 10:56:41AM +1200, Allen Unueco wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> >On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 01:22:11AM +1200, Allen Unueco wrote:
> >>With 09/05 I can get all the way to installing the base system when I
> >>get an error about there not being able to fine the kernel-install
> >
Get easy money! http://members.lycos.co.uk/lancer131/1/
---
God; when he intended hereafter to give us himself?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 01:22:11AM +1200, Allen Unueco wrote:
With 09/05 I can get all the way to installing the base system when I
get an error about there not being able to fine the kernel-install package.
Can you quote the exact error, please?
In a box labeled "[!!] Install
Sullivan,
Govenment don't want me to sell
UndergroundCD !Check Your spouse and staff
Investigate Your Own CREDIT-HISTORY
hacking someone PC!
Disappear in your city
bannedcd2004
http://www.9002hosting.com/cd/
aquila,for a long.
Hello!
What's up with the repositories? I check out my templates & co. from the
"normal" svn with my alioth account and I get old templates - for example,
base-installer's template is dated "POT-Creation-Date: 2004-05-04
23:35-0400\n", whereas the one Denis Barbier has on his page is from 16th
May
On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 07:04:27PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Eugeniy Meshcheryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 20:32]:
> > >>After system boot failed with the following messages on console:
> > >>No volume groups found
> > >>/scripts/ext3-add-journal.sh: 32: arith: syntax error: "0x"
>
Package: kbd-chooser
Version: 0.52
Tags: patch
Could you please add amd64 to the arch list in the control file?
Kurt
--- debian/control (revision 15517)
+++ debian/control (working copy)
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.16), libdebian-installer4-dev,
po-debconf (>= 0
Accepted:
partman-ext2r0_0.01.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-ext2r0/partman-ext2r0_0.01.dsc
partman-ext2r0_0.01.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-ext2r0/partman-ext2r0_0.01.tar.gz
partman-ext2r0_0.01_arm.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-ext2r0/partman-ext2r0_0.01_arm.udeb
partman-ext2r0_0.01_mipsel.udeb
Package: netcfg
Version: 0.63
Tags: patch
Could you please add amd64 to the arch list in the control file?
Kurt
--- debian/control.orig 2004-05-16 21:47:44.371480377 +
+++ debian/control 2004-05-16 21:48:02.951181690 +
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Package: netcfg
XC-Package-Type: udeb
-Archi
Package: grub-installer
Version: 0.46
Tags: patch
Could you please add amd64 to the arch list in the control for?
--- debian/control.orig 2004-05-16 21:39:19.849049893 +
+++ debian/control 2004-05-16 21:34:40.594713056 +
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
Package: grub-inst
* Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 23:31]:
> Would someone commit the change?
Done, thanks.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Currently http://www.nl.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/svn
does not tell that the anonymous SVN repository moved to
port 3691.
The attached patch, against the webwml CVS module,
updates the webpage. ( session with a editor is probably faster )
Would someone commit the change?
Cheers
G
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
LS,
When installing Debian 3.0 using the debian installer-based floppies on
an old Compaq server, the Compaq RAID controller was recognized, but the
kernel module supporting it wasn't loaded by the installer.
As workaround I switched to another console
A friend is sending you on a surprise date.
Click Here Now to Confirm or Reschedule:
http://breaksmyheart.com/confirm/?oc=50791249
Don't want these notifications?
http://breaksmyheart.com/remove/?oc=50791249
nmallhomologous communicate estimate rather resistible ardency
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/i386/20040514/
uname -a: Linux (none)
Date: 2004-05-15 15:44 (+1)
Method: CD image
Machine: Compaq Proliant 1600
Processor: 2xP2 450MHz
Memory: 512MB
Root Device: SCSI - Smartarray2
Root Size/part
* Mark Haidar (Fyren) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 16:09]:
> The install went very smoothly in general. Definitely better than the
> last time I installed Debian in 2001. The only question I was asked
> that I didn't feel was accompanied by adequate information was whether
> to install xdm
Package: discover1
Version: 1.5-9
Severity: normal
After the installation of 2.6 kernel the mouse stopped working.
I must manually run: modprobe mousedev
I believe, it would be wise if the discover program loaded the mousedev
module automatically if the mouse device is connected to the computer
On Sunday 16 May 2004 21:45, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * B. Peccatte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 21:41]:
> > No there isn't
> > Theres is format, don't format, use as swap, and don't use.
>
> Strange. Which version of debian-installer did you use? Which
> install image?
The one on ftp.crihan
No, its on my laptop witch does not have a floppy drive or a cd-writer, so i
can't get it to my pc from which i wrote the report. All i can say is, that
lots of modules complained about missing dependencies but ignored them with
the message "as requested". I guess thats because the installer has to
I just found out, that the same error had been reported in beta3 (and was
marked as done):
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/03/msg05553.html
They fixed it in beta3 (that one worked fine), but I guess the bug is back in
beta4.
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
* David Appel
On Sun, 16 May 2004, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Mika Bostr|m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 22:17]:
> > When going through the installer again, I eventually hit the partition
> > selections. -> Manual partition -> I can see the existing partition
> > setup with mountpoints, sizes and filesystem
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Used
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040515/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
at around midnight EST May 16th
uname -a: Linux bob 2.6.5-1-386 #2 Fri Apr 30 20:13:30 EST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 1:00 AM EST May 16th
Method:
* Mika Bostr|m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 23:09]:
> http://jumi.lut.fi/~bostik/debian-installer-shots/
>
> As can be seen, with a pre-existing partition table and filesystems,
> the partitioning system does not allow to change partition or mountpoint
> attributes. The menu should contai
On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 10:26:05PM +0300, Mika Bostr|m wrote:
> > There is absolutely no security benefit to noexec /tmp whatsoever.
>
> I know. It's trivial to call binaries through /lib/ld-linux.so and
> scripts via the actual shell. Any kind of attacker would circumvent the
> flag in about tw
* B. Peccatte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 21:41]:
> No there isn't
> Theres is format, don't format, use as swap, and don't use.
Strange. Which version of debian-installer did you use? Which
install image?
> > When you type "df", you get 1K blocks. So 10 would be 100 MB.
> > Can you s
On Sunday 16 May 2004 20:17, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * B. Peccatte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 19:20]:
> > Then its comes to partitionning, first the help on lvm isn't
> > translated in french
>
> Which help do you mean?
The one named partitioning drives with partman.
> > Then I couldn't in
* Mika Bostr|m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 22:17]:
> When going through the installer again, I eventually hit the partition
> selections. -> Manual partition -> I can see the existing partition
> setup with mountpoints, sizes and filesystems. -> Select any of the
> partitions for editing and
On Sun, 16 May 2004, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > That was the first bug with partitioning. Solution would be to call
> > the second stage installer always with /bin/sh, not trying to execute it
> > directly.
>
> Thanks for spotting this. base-config (or whatever it is that is
> executing stuff
On Sun, 16 May 2004, Joey Hess wrote:
> Mika Bostrom wrote:
> > As marked with '**' above, there are certain issues with partitioning.
> > First, it is not exactly intuitive - the rest of the install is.
> > Secondly, a person doing a relatively secure install will find himself
> > shot on the fo
reassign 249305 partman
retitle Don't offer noexec option for /tmp
thanks
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 16:00]:
> Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Thanks for spotting this. base-config (or whatever it is that is
> > executing stuff in /tmp) should either not do that, or partman should
>
* Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 20:11]:
> As to being offered DEC, USB and AT keyboards: are USB and AT possible
> on decstations ? (eg can you get PCI cards for decstations?) if not, can
No.
> I identify decstations by subarch, and eliminate those options?
DECstations are m
Sun, 16 May 2004 15:03:48 -0500
The First Gove.rnment Mo'rtgage Program. Under a new bil1,
we have aspecial budget to help you and
your family. A lot of privileges available.
0nly 200 spots 0pen left
App1y here
avgqnhx qdxcgo wnltbain zyfozd laddgjd ckogmdzp- tfxenhh ojjaoen-
iexzv dafeeugg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 249305 installation-reports
Bug#249305: Debian-installer, beta-4
Bug reassigned from package `partman' to `installation-reports'.
> reassign 249322 partman
Bug#249322: Don't execute stuff in /tmp directly
Bug reassigned from package `base-conf
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 249305 partman
Bug#249305: Debian-installer, beta-4
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'.
> retitle Don't offer noexec option for /tmp
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> thanks
Stopping processing
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Thanks for spotting this. base-config (or whatever it is that is
> executing stuff in /tmp) should either not do that, or partman should
> not offer the noexec flag for /tmp if that's not possible.
That would be base-config, debconf, probably lots of other things.
base-c
David Appel wrote:
> Debian-installer-version: Sarge Beta4 Daily Build 16.05.2004
"Beta4 Daily Build" is a contractition in terms. What is the URL of the
image you downloaded?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
DÃ Domh, 2004-05-16 ag 16:24 +0100, scrÃobh Martin Michlmayr:
> * Karsten Merker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-15 16:17]:
> > Keyboard selection: [E] Kbd-Chooser only presents PC keymaps by default.
> > Pressing ESC brings one back to the main menu.
> >
clone 249311 -1
reassign -1 lilo-installer
retitle -1 Doesn't handle root on LVM
thanks
> lilo-installer's postinst contains the following:
>
> prefix=$(echo "$bootfs_devfs" | sed 's/\(\/dev\/[a-z]\+\).*/\1/')
> disc_offered_devfs=$(find $prefix -name disc | head -n 1)
> disc_offered=$(mapdevfs "
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 249311 -1
Bug#249311: lvm on root problems, please run vgmknodes
Bug 249311 cloned as bug 249330.
> reassign -1 lilo-installer
Bug#249330: lvm on root problems, please run vgmknodes
Bug reassigned from package `lvmcfg' to `lilo-installer'.
> ret
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Eugeniy Meshcheryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 21:11]:
This is a bug in lilo-installer. It should not find for 'disc' device if
partition is LVM LV. It should not also try to install lilo to LVM LV
but, only to one of the disc devices or partition (not LVM LV).
H
Mika Bostrom wrote:
> As marked with '**' above, there are certain issues with partitioning.
> First, it is not exactly intuitive - the rest of the install is.
> Secondly, a person doing a relatively secure install will find himself
> shot on the foot. I chose mount options for /tmp: nodev,nosuid
* David Appel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 20:01]:
> I get the following error (in dbootstrap.log) when trying to install the
> base-system:
Do you have the complete dbootstrap.log file?
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
Bruce Carter,%
The [EMAIL PROTECTED] will all0w you to receive
all the [EMAIL PROTECTED] that you 0rder with your remote contr0l,|
payperviews,XXX-movies,sp0rt events,special-events%,RND_SYB
http://www.9002hosting.com/cable/
become ,burr
,cathedra ,tree .
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
* steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 10:29]:
> Here is the log file.
Does someone see what's wrong?
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* B. Peccatte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 19:20]:
> Then its comes to partitionning, first the help on lvm isn't
> translated in french
Which help do you mean?
> Then I couldn't install in lvm because I couldn't find any way to
> create a physical volume. I chose to partition the disk by hand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> since there is no dhcp on the net, dhcp failed; the installer did
> not offer me the manual config instead, but tried to access the debian
> mirror. back in the main menu, typing in the ip address the interface
> was not configured. switched to the console and configured
clone 249305 -1 -2
reassign -1 base-config
retitle -1 Don't execute stuff in /tmp directly
severity -1 wishlist
reassign -2 debian-cd
retitle -2 offer rescue option
severity -2 wishlist
thanks
* Mika Bostrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 19:11]:
> As marked with '**' above, there are certain i
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> The GRUB installation is where I started to get concerned again. First
> it failed to detect Windows and said something along the lines of "It
> appears Debian is the only OS on the system. In that case, you should
> install GRUB on the Master Boot Record." According to
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Eugeniy Meshcheryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 20:32]:
Hmm, this doesn't seem LVM related at all. Do you also get this when
root is not on LVM?
Code that set this variables tries to detect disc device with given
partition device. I did not get this when root is no
* Eugeniy Meshcheryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 21:11]:
> This is a bug in lilo-installer. It should not find for 'disc' device if
> partition is LVM LV. It should not also try to install lilo to LVM LV
> but, only to one of the disc devices or partition (not LVM LV).
Hold on, what was d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 249305 -1 -2
Bug#249305: Debian-installer, beta-4
Bug 249305 cloned as bugs 249322-249323.
> reassign -1 base-config
Bug#249322: Debian-installer, beta-4
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-config'.
> retitle -1 Don't exe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 249313 "B. Peccatte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#249313: [d-i-alpha] debian-installer report
Changed Bug submitter from Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to "B. Peccatte"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
