John Gilmore wrote:
Installation was cooking along fine with the 20040523 CD, until:
Setting up kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-smp-prep (2.4.25-8) ...
Internal Error: (=D) is not a directory!
dpkg: error processing kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-smp-prep (--configure):
subprocess post-installati
Joey Hess wrote:
> According to the log file, os-prober never scans the mounted partitions
> at all. One possibulity would be due to symlinks. os-prober looks in
> /dev/discs for partitoons, and then for each partitoon, if it is listed
> in /proc/mounts, scans it as a mounted partiton. If devfs off
One additional comment. The document itself, in section 1.6, "Getting the
Newest Version of This Document", gives this URL, which does not work:
http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/powerpc/install
That location is called the "official Install Manual pages" by the link.
John
--
To
Quoting Recai Oktas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi,
>
> After all the discussions on this issue, here comes the final patch I
> propose. Note that the proposed code change actually only effects the
> languages having a _declared_ ISO encoding in languagelist.
> APP_CHARSET_MAP is not set for UTF-8
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 251813 www.debian.org
Bug#251813: Sarge install manual not available in an obvious place
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer-manual' to `www.debian.org'.
>
End o
Installation was cooking along fine with the 20040523 CD, until:
[!!] Install the base system
Unable to install the selected kernel
An error was returned while trying to install the kernel into the target system.
Kernel package: 'kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-smp-prep
Folks,
Here is a mini-ISO image I cooked up with SILO rolled back to 1.3.2. Tom
Callaway suggested that I try this because a lot of new stuff related to
initrds changed in 1.4.x.
http://june.voxel.net/~joshk/mini.iso
Tell us what happens! (And wish me luck on finals!)
--
Joshua Kwan
signatur
Package: debian-installer-manual
Version: sarge
The web pages at www.debian.org have links along the left margin for
"Documentation". Unfortunately, all those links lead to "stable" rather
than "testing" documentation, with no option provided to get to the
"testing" documents.
If you actually wa
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (Manty and James, please arrange for the above-mentioned images to be
> kept, and accessible under the name "tc1" with symlinks or whatever.)
Done on my side.
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
From: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: daily Installation Manuals autobuild ?
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 18:33:06 +0200
Cc: John Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Monday 10
From: Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: John Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: daily Installation Manuals autobuild ? was Re: Bug#248067: Installation
manual says Ctrl-Alt-Del will shut down PPC system
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 16:56:41 +020
On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 21:15, Pierre Dagenais wrote:
> Do you need help for the french translation of the installation manual?
>
> Pierre Dagenais
You should contact the debian-l10n-french team. Please
check http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-french/
--
" In this life we are Kings or Pawns. Emp
Andrew Pollock wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 11:06:16PM +, W. Borgert wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 06:35:41PM -0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * W. Borgert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-30 18:40]:
> > /usr/sbin/mkinitrd: RAID support requires raidtools2
> > Failed to create initrd image.
>
>
Do you need help for the french translation of the installation manual?
Pierre Dagenais
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
After all the discussions on this issue, here comes the final patch I
propose. Note that the proposed code change actually only effects the
languages having a _declared_ ISO encoding in languagelist.
APP_CHARSET_MAP is not set for UTF-8 (which is also the case in the old
code using the S
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 11:06:16PM +, W. Borgert wrote:
> On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 06:35:41PM -0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * W. Borgert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-30 18:40]:
> > > /usr/sbin/mkinitrd: RAID support requires raidtools2
> > > Failed to create initrd image.
> >
> > root on RA
According to the log file, os-prober never scans the mounted partitions
at all. One possibulity would be due to symlinks. os-prober looks in
/dev/discs for partitoons, and then for each partitoon, if it is listed
in /proc/mounts, scans it as a mounted partiton. If devfs offers another
path to the p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> retitle 251794 [rc1] sometimes fails to detect mounted OSes
Bug#251794: Installation report: partman problems (regression)
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 251794 os-prober
Bug#251794: Installation report: partman problems (regression)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `os-prober'.
> tags 251794 d-i
Bug#25
Today's CD build and the d-i images build of the 28th are the test
candidate images. This silly name means that it's the candidate to be
the release candidate if it tests out ok. So please test it everywhere.
I think it's as good or better as any of the past betas on i386, with no
known errata, bu
Am 2004-05-26 10:16:01, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>hi my name is lou , I bought this copy of linux debian I'm having some
>problems . I CAN'T GET IT TO PASS to do anhting else please help , I'm new to
>this program, but always wanted to try it because of all the good things I've
>herd about l
* W. Borgert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-30 23:06]:
> Does somebody have the bug number or at least the name of the
> package the bug is filed against? Because I'm keen to do a complete
> RAID1 install, I would like to test again as soon as the bug is
> closed. TIA!
Hmm, I think I mixed things
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 11:44:27PM +0200, Dennis Stampfer wrote:
> Hey translators,
>
> 1st-stage translation status pages moved to
> http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/1st-stage/
> (updated every 4h)
>
> The "old" pages at
> http://people.debian.org/~barbier/d-i/l10n/
> will
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 06:35:41PM -0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * W. Borgert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-30 18:40]:
> > /usr/sbin/mkinitrd: RAID support requires raidtools2
> > Failed to create initrd image.
>
> root on RAID is currently not supported, due to the bug you just saw.
> With newer
* W. Borgert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-30 18:40]:
> Now, with the multiple RAID1 devices, I could install the
> base system partly, but dpkg couldn't install kernel 2.4 nor
> 2.6:
>
> /usr/sbin/mkinitrd: RAID support requires raidtools2
> Failed to create initrd image.
root on RAID is currentl
Accepted:
base-config_2.25.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.25.dsc
base-config_2.25.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.25.tar.gz
base-config_2.25_all.deb
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.25_all.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 250354 251531
Your message dated Sun, 30 May 2004 16:02:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#250354: fixed in base-config 2.25
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 30 May 2004 16:02:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#251531: fixed in base-config 2.25
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
base-config_2.25_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-config_2.25.dsc
base-config_2.25.tar.gz
base-config_2.25_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Accepted:
discover1-udeb_1.5-10_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.5-10_i386.udeb
discover1_1.5-10.diff.gz
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-10.diff.gz
discover1_1.5-10.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-10.dsc
discover1_1.5-10_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/discover
Your message dated Sun, 30 May 2004 15:32:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#251113: fixed in discover1 1.5-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 30 May 2004 15:32:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#249300: fixed in discover1 1.5-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 30 May 2004 15:32:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#247358: fixed in discover1 1.5-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 30 May 2004 15:32:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#247296: fixed in discover1 1.5-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 30 May 2004 15:32:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#243310: fixed in discover1 1.5-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 30 May 2004 15:32:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#242358: fixed in discover1 1.5-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 30 May 2004 15:32:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244381: fixed in discover1 1.5-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 30 May 2004 15:32:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#237880: fixed in discover1 1.5-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 30 May 2004 15:32:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244868: fixed in discover1 1.5-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 30 May 2004 15:32:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#246817: fixed in discover1 1.5-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 30 May 2004 15:32:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#249448: fixed in discover1 1.5-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 30 May 2004 15:32:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#248647: fixed in discover1 1.5-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 30 May 2004 15:32:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#249449: fixed in discover1 1.5-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 30 May 2004 15:32:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#249901: fixed in discover1 1.5-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 30 May 2004 15:32:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#251675: fixed in discover1 1.5-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
discover1_1.5-10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover1_1.5-10.dsc
discover1_1.5-10.diff.gz
discover1-udeb_1.5-10_i386.udeb
discover1_1.5-10_i386.deb
libdiscover1_1.5-10_i386.deb
libdiscover1-dev_1.5-10_i386.deb
libdiscover1-pic_1.5-10_i386.deb
Accepted:
partman-jfs_2.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-jfs/partman-jfs_2.dsc
partman-jfs_2.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-jfs/partman-jfs_2.tar.gz
partman-jfs_2_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-jfs/partman-jfs_2_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Unfortunately, I cannot yet change the subject line :-(
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 11:58:53AM -0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> When you create a RAID device, you'll see something like this:
>
> RAID1 #1 - 8 GB
> #1 primary8 GB
Yes, I got that:
RAID1 device #0 - 0.1 GB Software
partman-jfs_2_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-jfs_2.dsc
partman-jfs_2.tar.gz
partman-jfs_2_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
ddetect_0.100_i386.changes isn't signed with PGP/GnuPG
Removing ddetect_0.100_i386.changes, but keeping its associated files for now.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
Final uname -a:
Date:
Method:
Machine:
Processor: Dual Pentium II 450
Memory: 768MB
Root Device:
Root Size/partition table: <
/dev/hda1 approx 10 percent of 25GB used ext3 /
/dev/hda2 1GB
Quoting David Nusinow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi all,
> discover1 is in need of an upload. There's a ton of translation
> fixes, the /media mount point fix for cdroms, and a pretty big fix to
> prevent segfaults on alpha. Would someone please sponsor the upload I've
> put together? It's located
Hi all,
discover1 is in need of an upload. There's a ton of translation
fixes, the /media mount point fix for cdroms, and a pretty big fix to
prevent segfaults on alpha. Would someone please sponsor the upload I've
put together? It's located at http://www.tufts.edu/~dnusin01/discover/
Thank you
Rejected: Unknown distribution `UNRELEASED'.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 243857 d-i
Bug#243857: problem with 2 cds if one is not a d-i cd
Tags were: d-i
Tags added: d-i
> # os-prober fixes it
> # partman uses standard names too now
> reassign 243857 cdrom-detect
Bug#243857: problem with 2 cds if one is not a d-i cd
Bug
Your message dated Sun, 30 May 2004 14:35:35 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sun, 30 May 2004 14:36:51 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closeing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Sun, 30 May 2004 14:34:08 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sun, 30 May 2004 14:39:44 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
ddetect_0.100_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ddetect_0.100.dsc
ddetect_0.100.tar.gz
hw-detect_0.100_all.udeb
ethdetect_0.100_all.udeb
hw-detect-full_0.100_all.udeb
archdetect_0.100_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UN
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 249766 pcmcia-cs
Bug#249766: PCMCIA 3c589B ethernet card NOT DETECTED
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `pcmcia-cs'.
>
End of message, stopping process
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 250768 installation-reports
Bug#250768: Error in sparc Beta 4 installer for Sarge
Warning: Unknown package 'beta'
Warning: Unknown package '4'
Warning: Unknown package 'deb
reassign 250323 kernel
thanks
* Vincent McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-30 14:24]:
> I was testing on a Dell Latitude CPiA A366XT, with bios version A01,
> the same hardware as in bug 247704.
>
> As before, the symlinks in /cdrom/dists did not work, causing
> installation to fail.
>
> The
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 250323 kernel
Bug#250323: (no subject)
Bug#220529: sarge installer disc, beta1, missing symlinks
Bug#247704: installation-reports: failure (sarge-netinst-i386 beta4)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kernel'.
> thanks
Stop
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 10:26:33AM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
> This is to load the bridge support so discover can scan for devices on the
> bridge? It looks decidedly dodgy. Why only on 2.6? What is this magic number;
> Isn't there a clean fix for this, such as running discover again after
> loading
* Vincent McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-30 14:24]:
>
> I was testing on a Dell Latitude CPiA A366XT, with bios version A01,
> the same hardware as in bug 247704.
>
> As before, the symlinks in /cdrom/dists did not work, causing
> installation to fail.
> The cd was tested in other laptops
> That begs the question: How much experience with Linux and in
> particular, with installing Linux do you have?
I am an experienced GNU/Linux user but this was my first time
running the new Debian installer.
--
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 220529 installation-reports
Bug#220529: sarge installer disc, beta1, missing symlinks
Bug reassigned from package `debian-cd' to `installation-reports'.
> merge 220529 250323
Bug#220529: sarge installer disc, beta1, missing symlinks
Bug#250323
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 250323 247704
Bug#247704: installation-reports: failure (sarge-netinst-i386 beta4)
Bug#250323: (no subject)
Merged 247704 250323.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
* Pete Shinners <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-28 21:39]:
> >The NVidia driver is the proprietary one, right? Was XFree86 properly
> >configured with the free driver?
>
> Actually the XFree config failed to start. It created a file with the
> "nv" driver.
I suppose you don't have a copy anymore of
reassign 251524 mdcfg
thanks
* Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-28 18:49]:
> I know the partman menu is changing, so I hope this report gets there
> before the templates get translated.
>
> The LVM and RAID options have to be NOT there until you have actually
> selected a LVM or R
reassign 251526 grub-installer,lilo-installer
thanks
I'm reassigning this bug to grub and lilo installer so it's not
forgotten, but it's probably a feature request for anna. Although it
might be possible for grub-installer to check for a special file and
if it exists just pass the bucket on to li
* Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-28 19:07]:
> If the user selects XFS for the root file system, the installer warns
> that it will not work with grub. Which is actually true, I've tested it
> twice and it didn't work :).
>
> I think that a safer approach would be that if the use
Hi Martin,
I am a bit of a neophyte in these matters but I do not think I can use a CD
image because I do not have a CD burner.
That is why I use floppies.
Would that defeat the experiment?
Thanks.
Original Message
Subject: Re: Package: installation-reports
Date: Tue, 25 May 200
* Shaul Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-29 18:39]:
> That URL is of no use to me because I can't burn CDs. Am I right that
> there are no floppy images there? The best I can do is test d-i
> floppies. Yet I couldn't find any floppies for the current d-i. With the
Can you use the floppies from
* Olivier Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-29 09:22]:
> I am a bit of a neophyte in these matters but I do not think I can use a CD
> image because I do not have a CD burner.
> That is why I use floppies.
> Would that defeat the experiment?
No, not at all. Please use the floppy images from
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 251524 mdcfg
Bug#251524: Partman options
Bug reassigned from package `partman' to `mdcfg'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs data
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 251526 grub-installer,lilo-installer
Bug#251526: If XFS selected for / then fallback to Lilo
Bug reassigned from package `grub-installer' to `grub-installer,lilo-installer'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
Just to acknowledge...
I should be able to do the download and run some tests later this
weekend.
Regarding the lspci command, the AHA1542 is not a PCI board. It's
an ISA, non-PNP board. It does have a boot ROM, and floppy installers up to
Red Hat 6.2 and Libranet 2.7 work
* Jack Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-29 16:18]:
> Regarding the lspci command, the AHA1542 is not a PCI board. It's
> an ISA, non-PNP board. It does have a boot ROM, and floppy installers up to
Oh, right. We don't support automatic detection of ISA cards. So I'm
afraid you'll have
* Pieter van der Eems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-30 15:07]:
> I'll try and find the time to test these images, but I can't garantee it
> :-(
>
> However, the last time I tried the debian-installer (beta 4 I think) I
> had none of the problems mentioned above. I couldn't test it on the same
> mac
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 19:45, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-03 02:10]:
> > > The install procedure kept going back to the menu option to detect
> > > Debian-install-cd (I wanted
> > > a network install). Which ever I did I always got an error message that no
> > > cd
* rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-29 22:01]:
> Which do you recommend? Net install, business card install, full install?
I'd use the net inst image.
> Neither PPP nor PPPOE, I have ADSL via ethernet to my router. Static IP.
But how is ADSL configured? Do you need PPP over Ethernet for it, o
Martin,
Thank you for responding to my email.
Which do you recommend? Net install, business card install, full install?
Which image/iso?
Neither PPP nor PPPOE, I have ADSL via ethernet to my router. Static IP.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
rick.
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* rick <[EMAIL PROT
* W. Borgert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-30 11:32]:
> /sbin/tune2fs: Not a directory while while trying to open /dev/md/0/part1
> Couldn't find valid file system superblock.
When you create a RAID device, you'll see something like this:
RAID1 #1 - 8 GB
#1 primary8 GB
What
> unless I can incorporate db2latex-xsl-generated code into existing
> TeTeX code, it's a no go.
With db2latex-xsl, you have your own "driver" XSL
stylesheet, that sets all variables etc. E.g. to use the
stylesheet of your publisher.
> Why, can DocBook do the screenshots?
:-) Not better than La
[Please continue to CC me!]
also sprach W. Borgert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.05.30.1615 +0200]:
> The outcome was that I had to use an emulator, such as bochs or
> qemu. Because of real-world-work, I didn't try. If it's possible
> to run the emulator in an xterm, you might be able to copy the
>
On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 22:28, Joey Hess wrote:
> Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> > Was the w2k partition NTFS or FAT32?
> >
> > Mine is a FAT32 win98 partition. Partman mounts this just fine. If I do
> > this, however, the described problem occurs.
>
> This was a ntfs partition. It does show that the
I asked the same question here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/04/msg01355.html
The outcome was that I had to use an emulator, such as bochs
or qemu. Because of real-world-work, I didn't try. If it's
possible to run the emulator in an xterm, you might be able
to copy the screen contents
[Please CC me on replies!]
For a book that I am currently writing, I would love to include
a walkthrough of the new installer. The question is: how can I make
screenshots in the best possible way? The book is typeset in TeTeX,
and I could use something like UML or VMWare to obtain the
screenshots,
I'm unsure of the following code you recently added to he-detect:
# Load yenta_socket on 2.6 kernels, if hardware is available, so that
# discover will see Cardbus cards.
if [ -d /sys/bus/pci/devices ] && grep -q 0x060700 \
/sys/bus/pci/devices/*/class && \
! lsmod | grep -q ^yenta
I use boot.img, root.img, net-drivers.img from the
sarge-i386-netinst.iso of 2004-05-29.
HW: mid-1990s laptop (486DX4+SL 100MHz, 24MB RAM, 520MB HD)
with floppy disk, PCMCIA-net, VGA colour graphics, sound,
serial and parallel port, but no USB/CD-ROM/firewire.
Whether in simple or in expert mode,
tags 251675 pending
thanks
Quoting Peter Mann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: discover1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch l10n
>
> attached file is updated Slovak translation
Commited.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 251675 pending
Bug#251675: [INTL:sk] discover1 - Slovak translation update
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> Was the w2k partition NTFS or FAT32?
>
> Mine is a FAT32 win98 partition. Partman mounts this just fine. If I do
> this, however, the described problem occurs.
This was a ntfs partition. It does show that the code works though and
there is no difference how the partiti
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 01:08:54PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> The images are also included on the daily netinst CD iso's.
Ah yes, under ./install/floppies/, cool, thanks!
Cheers, WB
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the sarge-i386-netinst.iso of 2004-05-28, a RAID1
install fails for me. I said the installer to use both
disks (hda 8.4 and hdb 8.6 GB in size, maybe that is the
problem?). I let the installer automatically partition the
RAID device (all in one partition) and get the error
message:
[!!] Par
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 09:51:48AM +, W. Borgert wrote:
> Are there floppy images (boot.img, root.img, and
> net-drivers.img) for i386, that are newer than 2004-04-29?
> Maybe daily builds? I like to test them, but don't want to
> hunt yesterdays fixed bugs.
You can find links to the daily bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 30 May 2004 11:51, W. Borgert wrote:
> Are there floppy images (boot.img, root.img, and
> net-drivers.img) for i386, that are newer than 2004-04-29?
> Maybe daily builds? I like to test them, but don't want to
> hunt yesterdays fixed bugs.
Hi,
At 30 May 04 07:44:18 GMT,
Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> > We just tried an installation with windows 2k server and manually
> > mounted it to /target/dos during the instalation (partman does not seem
> > to let windows partitoons be mounted), and it still detected it and
> > worked ok.
>
> Was
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
