clone 252551 -1
reassign -1 grub-installer
retitle -1 Should allow creating a boot floppy
severity -1 wishlist
tags 252551 moreinfo
thanks
Quoting Jack Carroll ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: installation-reports
>
> Debian-installer-version: Beta-4 20040528 floppy images
Sounds confusing to me
> Very nice to see it cleanly install on this laptop. The Woody installer had
> no end of problems working, though mostly due to unsupported hardware and
> too old kernels.
>
> I'm having issues with discover starting ifplugd... but I'll figure that
> out.
>
> Very happy with d-i, well done guy
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jun 2004 06:55:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#252440: installation-reports: Install report of beta4 on ThinkPad
X22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 252551 -1
Bug#252551: Multiple SCSI bugs, etc, worked around, succeeded
Bug 252551 cloned as bug 252562.
> reassign -1 grub-installer
Bug#252562: Multiple SCSI bugs, etc, worked around, succeeded
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports'
Quoting Andreas Tille ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I can ensure you that the bug is *not* fixed in the daily build
> from today!
OK ? thank you so much for your detailed report and typing all these
boring things manually.. I'm pretty sure the Sparc people will have an
idea of what happens here..the
Quoting Archive Administrator ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> ddetect_0.100_i386.changes couldn't be processed for 48 hours and is now deleted
> All files it mentions are also removed:
> ddetect_0.100.dsc, ddetect_0.100.tar.gz, hw-detect_0.100_all.udeb,
> ethdetect_0.100_all.udeb, hw-detect-full_0.100_al
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> I'm going to run the script manually over the next couple of weeks to further
> test it. If it proves stable, I will put it in a cron job that I will
> probably run every other day at about 0200 UTC.
Is it possible possible having this script post t
Hello Karl and Sam,
During Debconf4, there has been some discussions within the d-i team
and some maintainers of Custom Debian Distributions (mostly
Skolelinux) about the status of the Debian package for shadow.
As you have obviously noticed, I have NMU'ed the package four times
last month, mostl
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
hw-detect-full_0.100_all.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says
optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and t
Accepted:
archdetect_0.100_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/archdetect_0.100_i386.udeb
ddetect_0.100.dsc
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.100.dsc
ddetect_0.100.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.100.tar.gz
ethdetect_0.100_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_0.100_all.udeb
hw-det
Your message dated Fri, 04 Jun 2004 00:47:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#251089: fixed in ddetect 0.100
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 04 Jun 2004 00:47:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#233497: fixed in ddetect 0.100
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 04 Jun 2004 00:47:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#233497: fixed in ddetect 0.100
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 04 Jun 2004 00:47:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#233497: fixed in ddetect 0.100
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 04 Jun 2004 00:47:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#233497: fixed in ddetect 0.100
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
ddetect_0.100_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ddetect_0.100.dsc
ddetect_0.100.tar.gz
hw-detect_0.100_all.udeb
ethdetect_0.100_all.udeb
hw-detect-full_0.100_all.udeb
archdetect_0.100_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UN
Accepted:
discover1-udeb_1.5-12_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.5-12_i386.udeb
discover1_1.5-12.diff.gz
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-12.diff.gz
discover1_1.5-12.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-12.dsc
discover1_1.5-12_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/discover
Your message dated Fri, 04 Jun 2004 00:02:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#252218: fixed in discover1 1.5-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Fri, 04 Jun 2004 00:02:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#251957: fixed in discover1 1.5-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 20:11, Peter Lieverdink wrote:
> > That's because quik and miboot are deemed by the Debains to be
> > politically incorrect.
>
> Hmm, but quick *is* installed by the installer, out of the main
> archives.
>
I guess I could be wrong about quik (or maybe the political correc
On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 20:11, Peter Lieverdink wrote:
> I wonder if it would be useful for the installer to display a big, red,
> blinking screen on oldworld Macs, informing the user that a minimal
> MacOS install would be a Real Good Idea[tm].
I agree it would be nice, but how? If you can't boot
Your message dated Fri, 04 Jun 2004 00:02:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#252180: fixed in discover1 1.5-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
discover1_1.5-12_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover1_1.5-12.dsc
discover1_1.5-12.diff.gz
discover1-udeb_1.5-12_i386.udeb
discover1_1.5-12_i386.deb
libdiscover1_1.5-12_i386.deb
libdiscover1-dev_1.5-12_i386.deb
libdiscover1-pic_1.5-12_i386.deb
Package:Install
Initial install from cdrom dated 3-15-2004
Updated 06-03-2004 using dselect.
Issue: CDROM unavailable since initial install. Eject button will not open
cdrom after POC hardware test.
All else seems to be working great.
lspci and lsmod at bottom of dmesg report:
Linux version 2.4.2
Is d-i even using the -pic lib? Since I'm supremely lazy, if it's not
being used I'd just as soon remove the thing than debug it.
- David (supremely lazy) Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Beta-4 20040528 floppy images
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i586
unknown
Date: 5/30/2004, 5/31/2004
Method: Network
What did you boot off? Floppies
If network install, from where?
Lynn,}
Need affordable but reliable web hosting for only $5/month?
-800 MB Disk Space
-Unlimited email accounts
-FREE Shopping Cart... and much more!
Please contact us to take advantage of this new offer at
http://www.clickhostdeals.com
afghan
ddetect_0.100_i386.changes couldn't be processed for 48 hours and is now deleted
All files it mentions are also removed:
ddetect_0.100.dsc, ddetect_0.100.tar.gz, hw-detect_0.100_all.udeb,
ethdetect_0.100_all.udeb, hw-detect-full_0.100_all.udeb, archdetect_0.100_i386.udeb
Greetings,
You
Package: installation-reports
In response to your earlier suggestions & questions:
- yes, I did try the linux26 option; same result: after the CD boots,
there's the choose language screen, the choose keyboard layout screen, then
the detect & mount CD loop begins. (this is with the "new" installe
Package: lilo-installer
Version: 0.45
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source
Please add amd64 to the architecture list
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-amd64
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 05:05, Rick_Thomas wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 05:57, Peter Lieverdink wrote:
> > Package: debian-installer
> > Severity: important
> >
> > The beta4 and tc1 ppc iso images don't have a bootable floppy image for
> > oldworld PPC macs that cannot boot off the CD.
> >
> > A
I've managed to solve the "** can't synthesize root hub events" message with
the 2.6.5 kernel; all that was needed was installation of package usbutils.
The other issues are still valid.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 11:52:58PM +0200, Thorsten Schaefer wrote:
> I've done about six further installations. Everytime the Xircom PCMCIA
> network card (REM56G-100) is used, the network card worked during the
> initial installation process, didn't work after the first reboot (so during
> the ins
Самое эффективное средство защиты от бродячих и агрессивных собак.
http://www.DAZER2.ru/?rgQkXTA
(095) 258-0083
различные сроки: иногда в начале августа, иногда
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 20:41 -0400, Jim Bray wrote:
> I tried this on the old Toshiba. It still hangs in the usual place, at
> 'Starting PC Card Services', with
> a 2.4 kernel. However, it works fine with linux26, making it past two
> instances 'Starting etc.'
There is a description of what to
I tried this on the old Toshiba. It still hangs in the usual place, at
'Starting PC Card Services', with
a 2.4 kernel. However, it works fine with linux26, making it past two
instances 'Starting etc.'
Jim
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Jim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-08 22:33]:
Same thing w
I've just tried this sarge installer built :
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/tc1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
On Mon, 24 May 2004 18:14:28 +0100
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Maxime GEORGE-BOURREAU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-02 23:59]:
> > 1. Initial boot scre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
I've written a script on one of my servers that:
- - checks for what languages there have been changes in SVN;
- - rebuilds the manual (html) for these languages (all architectures);
- - uploads language/architecture combinations that were
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 23:52 +0200, Thorsten Schaefer wrote:
> I've done about six further installations. Everytime the Xircom PCMCIA
> network card (REM56G-100) is used, the network card worked during the
> initial installation process, didn't work after the first reboot (so during
> the installa
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 15:42 -0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Massimiliano La Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-24 17:28]:
> > Comments/Problems:My PCMCIA NE2k-compatible ethernet card was not found
> > and not configured.
> > i've already used it in linux with debian woody and knoppix.
>
> Pe
On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 18:43, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 02:33:11PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
> > > reassign 251277 libiw27
> > Bug#251277: plip0 is not a wireless network interface
> > Bug reassigned from package `netcfg' to `libiw27'.
>
> Since I don't have a
do you say anything?
Paulo
Palmeira
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've done about six further installations. Everytime the Xircom PCMCIA
network card (REM56G-100) is used, the network card worked during the
initial installation process, didn't work after the first reboot (so during
the installation part that follows) and after all following reboots works.
To veri
Package: mklibs
Version: unknown - version grabbed by systemimager in CVS and latest
stable
Problem: when building packages, the local ld_file is not grabbed.
Solution: upstream seems to be correct @
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/m/mklibs/. Alternatively,
the below & attached patch (s
BTW, because there was an answer to the previous mail with subject:
"Make tc1 more visible?"
I can ensure you that the bug is *not* fixed in the daily build
from today!
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Andreas Tille wrote:
> TCP: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0
> cramfs: wrong magic
> sh-202
G E TY O U R U N I V E R S I T Y D I P L O M A
Do you want a prosperous future, increased earning power more money and the respect of
all?
Call this number: 1 775 490 9881 (24 hours)
There are no required tests, classes, books, or interviews!
Get a Bachelors, Masters, MBA, GED
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 12:50:25PM -0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * W. Borgert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-31 12:13]:
> > GRUB message on vt3:
> > /dev/md0 does not have any corresponding BIOS drive.
> > LILO:
> > An installation step failed. (...)
> > failing step is: Install the LILO boot load
I'm heving problems with the make build_hd-media on di
building, heare what comes:
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
E: Couldn't find package
socket-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di
make[3]: *** [stamps/get_udebs-hd-media-stamp] Error
100
make[2]: *** [dest/hd-media/vmlinu
>> Unfortunately, I could not get the graphics card working
>> for the version of XFree86 (4.3.0.dfsg.1-1) currently in sarge. It's a PCI
>> Diamond Multimedia Stealth 64 Video 2001 Series card with 1MB ram, which
>> has a S3 Trio 64V+ chipset. I tried S3, VESA & VGA drivers, but the best I
>> cou
On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 05:57, Peter Lieverdink wrote:
> Package: debian-installer
> Severity: important
>
> The beta4 and tc1 ppc iso images don't have a bootable floppy image for
> oldworld PPC macs that cannot boot off the CD.
>
> Additionally, the installer is unable to actually make these Mac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 02 June 2004 22:53, Stefano Canepa wrote:
> this is to inform all of you that I just started the translation of the
> installation manual to Italian. I did not modified build.sh sript as I
> do not committed any real translation. Is
reassign 252425 man-db
tags 252425 - sid
thanks
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 07:54:14PM +1000, Peter Lieverdink wrote:
> Package: debian-installer
> Severity: important
> Tags: sid
>
> This report pertains to the beta4 and tc1 versions of the
> debian-installer as run on a ppc.
>
> The 'dpkg --config
Yes, it works. Thank you.
Linda
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Linda Markowsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-02 20:50]:
> > I booted the notebook using the installer CD and pressed Enter
> > a few times to select English. The program appeared to hang while trying
> > to detect the
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 07:57:56PM +1000, Peter Lieverdink wrote:
> Package: debian-installer
> Severity: important
>
> The beta4 and tc1 ppc iso images don't have a bootable floppy image for
> oldworld PPC macs that cannot boot off the CD.
Correct. This is known, but pretty hard to fix since miB
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 252425 man-db
Bug#252425: man-db causes install to fail
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `man-db'.
> tags 252425 - sid
Bug#252425: man-db causes install to fail
Tags were: sid
Tags removed: sid
> thanks
Stopping processing he
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Debian-installer-version: beta4 CD-ROM + base
uname -a: Linux hactar 2.4.25-1-386 #2 Wed Apr 14 19:38:08 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Thu Jun 3 13:52:52 BST 2004
Method: Installed base from CD, then upgraded via http
Machine: IBM ThinkPad X22
Proces
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 03:45:29PM -0400, David Boyes wrote:
> > - ssh (the support is finished in the glibc cvs and openssh package),
> > this needs the possibility to restart cdebconf.
> ??? woody had ssh, and things haven't changed much for that. Maybe I'm
> misunderstanding what's needed here
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important
The beta4 and tc1 ppc iso images don't have a bootable floppy image for
oldworld PPC macs that cannot boot off the CD.
Additionally, the installer is unable to actually make these Macs
bootable from HD. I've had no luck with manually configuring 'QUIK
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important
Tags: sid
This report pertains to the beta4 and tc1 versions of the
debian-installer as run on a ppc.
The 'dpkg --configure man-db' step fails in the installation, which
causes the 'Install base system' step to fail. My work-around was to use
console
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Peter wrote:
> What is this tcl version btw?
The login screen says:
Sun Ultra 5/10 UPA/PCI (UltraSPARC-IIi 333MHz), Keyboard Present
OpenBoot 3.15, 256 MB memory installed, Serial #10648638
After pressing -A I tried:
ok probe-ide
Device 0 ( Primary Mast
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:51:56 +0200, "W. Borgert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Moreover it would be nice to have a tool which builds a minimum
>> Debian mirror with just the packages needed by debootstrap and
>> the most important udebs. I think that this way we could use
>> d
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 23:39 +0200, Thorsten Schaefer wrote:
> I did not install any additional packages/tasks after the first boot. The
> network card worked fine on all following boots.
Hrm, strange. Maybe base-config did something.
> I'll do another installation in a few days in a dhcp enviro
62 matches
Mail list logo
