Quoting Karl Hegbloom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: base-config
> Version: 2.29
> Severity: normal
>
> Used d-i 2004/06/28 to install in a VMware. All good, up until base-
Which image exactly? Which locale? I'm doing detailed tests of both
sarge_d-i and sid_d-i images and this well known prob
Quoting Jordi Mallach ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: discover1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Attached are the Catalan translations for the program and debconf
> templates.
The programs translation is also slightly outdated. Attached is the
file to be updated
ca.po
Description: application/gettext
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Several fixes have gone into testing, but I still have these issues listed as
> important and unresolved in testing:
>
> - some broken m68k images (fix: mke2fs fix needed; UNKNOWN)
Yep ? The IRC meeting lead to nothing on that topic.
> - broken sparc64
Quoting Jordi Mallach ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: discover1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Attached are the Catalan translations for the program and debconf
> templates.
The debconf translation does not fit templates.pot. Attached is your
file after msgmerge with templates.pot. Can you please updat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 256774 pending
Bug#256774: "tasksel" misspelled in warnings and errors
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
Well, I'm very sure (90% sure) that it was TC1. I know beta4 is up
there now and I remember seeing a TC1 images then a note saying "if
TC1 doesn't work, try beta4" and beta4 images were right below. But
yes, I understand what you're saying.
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:59:51 -0700, Karl Hegbloom <[EMA
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 16:21 -0400, Nathan Widmyer wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:23:46 -0400, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Nathan Widmyer wrote:
> > > I'm trying to install Debian sarge on a hard drive in a USB enclosure.
> > > I got the 110MB sarge image.
> >
> > Which version?
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.03
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
The warning and error functions misspell "tasksel" as "taskel".
The attached patch fixes them.
--
Matt Kraai[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ftbfs.org/
Index: tasksel/tasksel.pl
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:12:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line hardware problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
More information... It may be a console-tools bug (though I'm not
certain) since the same problem occurs (of course) in aptitude and
anything else trying to use the line drawing characters. They are just
not present in the console font being used.
--
Karl Hegbloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To
I've tried two installs with XFS / and no /boot partition. It hangs at
grub-install. When I go to the second console, and kill off the grub
and grub-install script, then run grub by hand and type:
grub> setup (hd0) (hd0,1)
... it succeeds and I can boot the machine with no apparent problems.
I
Package: base-config
Version: 2.29
Severity: normal
Used d-i 2004/06/28 to install in a VMware. All good, up until base-
config. Now I see ae ligatures instead of console line drawing
characters in the border of the debconf widgets (see the attached png).
I don't recall seeing this in the 2004/0
I thought I'd let everyone know that the www.sysresccd.org beta has a
qtparted on it that runs on a framebuffer, and can successfully resize a
Windows XP NTFS partition. Boot the CD, type "run_qtparted". After the
resize, boot XP, and let it fsck the disk. Everything seems to be
working fine!
W
One more observation about the disk paritioner.
If you make a mistake, and there are 2 identical partitions on different
drives, mounted on the same directory, it is not possible to delete the
second instance of this. If the paritiomer is asked to do that, it will
delete the parition on the first d
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 10:36 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> I think that pcmcia-cs should ship with an /etc/pcmcia/network
> script that does nothing by default.
I agree. But how do we provide a smooth upgrade here? Default to the
new behaviour on new installations but ask using debconf during
upgra
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 19:54 -0300, Robin Blondon wrote:
> In the installer, I found that instead of ejecting and reinserting the
> card I can go into the shell and kill and restart cardmgr. The
> intstaller then detected the card after choosing to detect network
> hardware from the installer m
Joey Hess wrote:
Matthijs Melchior wrote:
Debian-installer-version: 20040616 ftp.debian.org
Please tell us the url of the image you downloaded for the install.
I hope this is sufficent info:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/cd/jigdo-area/i386/sarge-i386-1.jigdo
http://cdimag
|| On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:43:32 -0700
|| Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
jk> On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:57:01 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> What is bloking netcfg to going to testing?
jk> 0.70 sucks. Now that we have Thomas Hood on the bandwagon it's been bugfix
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:57:01 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> What is bloking netcfg to going to testing?
0.70 sucks. Now that we have Thomas Hood on the bandwagon it's been bugfix
city here in netcfg land.
--
Joshua Kwan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 22:47, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > 2. pcmcia-cs does not ifup/ifdown interfaces on 16 bit PCMCIA cards
> >by default (which requires a change to pcmcia-cs) and hw-detect
> >lists such interfaces in /etc/network/devhotplug (as now).
>
> Yes. This will be nice since these if
|| On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:51:31 -0400
|| Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
jh> - broken sparc64 module loading (fix: busybox-cvs 20040415-3)
jh>The buybox-cvs fix cannot go in until we've dealt with netcfg. Either we
jh>update netcfg, or we need a newer busyb
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:07:21AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:25:21AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 08:21:18PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > openssh-client-udeb. I didn't package scp because it's straightforward
> > > to do the same thing
Hi, this bug is now filed to netcfg as I understand :)
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 07:45:38PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> The upshot of this for hw-detect and pcmcia-cs is that they have to
> be set up in one of the two following ways.
>
> 1. pcmcia-cs ifups/ifdowns interfaces on 16 bit PCMCIA cards
Joey Hess wrote:
> - broken sparc64 module loading (fix: busybox-cvs 20040415-3)
I meant to write 20040507-1 there.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
It still doesn't work, but with the new zipl-installer.postinst it comes
a lot closer.
netcfg (actually netcfg-static) still doesn't work the first time. What
you have to do is to select IUCV, which generates an error, and then go
back in from the main menu, select option #3 (network config), and
Environment: VmWare
Platform : i386
Kernel : 2.4
Locale : fr_FR
Image : netinst
Priority : high
Result : OK
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: rootskel
Version: 0.78
Tags: patch
Could you please apply the attached patch? This is required for
amd64 to find it's linker.
Kurt
--- debian/rules.orig 2004-06-28 22:05:13.996244951 +0200
+++ debian/rules2004-06-28 22:04:08.413811353 +0200
@@ -26,6 +26,9 @@
dh_testr
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:23:46 -0400, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nathan Widmyer wrote:
> > I'm trying to install Debian sarge on a hard drive in a USB enclosure.
> > I got the 110MB sarge image.
>
> Which version?
>
The date on the file is June 22nd, so thats either the date from t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 256301 lvmcfg
Bug#256301: LVM in Beta 4
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `lvmcfg'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:47:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#256604: fixed in tasksel 2.03
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Accepted:
tasksel_2.03.dsc
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.03.dsc
tasksel_2.03.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.03.tar.gz
tasksel_2.03_i386.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.03_i386.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 256604
Thank you for your contribution to Debi
The first patch I submitted for this did not maintain the order in which
you had attached your DASD, which could lead to problems if you didn't
attach your disks in device address order.
This patch maintains the order in which the DASD was attached. It does
assume four-digit device addresses. Th
Several fixes have gone into testing, but I still have these issues listed as
important and unresolved in testing:
- some broken m68k images (fix: mke2fs fix needed; UNKNOWN)
It's worrying that nobosy seems to know what to do about this.
Can someonme check if just rebuilding the images us
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 256712 discover1-data
Bug#256712: discover-data: should load dmasound_pmac module for Apple Computer Inc.
KeyLargo Mac I/O devices
Bug reassigned from package `discover-data' to `discover1-data'.
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please con
Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, d-i did not autoload the usb-uhci module, which is needed for
> > my USB chipset to be detected (and the hard disk detected subsquently).
> >
> > After "modprobe usb-uhci" in the 2nd console, all went well, and the HD
> > detection found the disk, whi
Moshe Bergman wrote:
> Since I don't have Linux setup yet, I can't give linux output (maybe
> there's similar command for windows?)
>
> But the device is:
>
>
> **Intel® 82801EB I/O Controller Hub 5 (ICH5)**
You can boot something like knoppix and run the lspci and lspci commands
there. A
tasksel_2.03_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
tasksel_2.03.dsc
tasksel_2.03.tar.gz
tasksel_2.03_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hello,
Did you recieve my email from last week? I'm happy to tell you
that you are approved for a home loan with a 1.74% rate.
Your tracking number is # P1 832 772
You must visit the link below in 24 hrs to confirm your details.
http://alstate.ezloanz.info/j8/jwex.php?bks=49
Best Regards,
Dor
Since mail to bug addresses does not reach bug submiters, I am
forwarding Otavio's mail to the bug submitter:
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since your report is old and current Debian Installer solved a lot of
> bugs, is very interesting if you can confirm if this bug can be
> reprodused.
>
Nathan Widmyer wrote:
> I'm trying to install Debian sarge on a hard drive in a USB enclosure.
> I got the 110MB sarge image.
Which version?
> I can boot with either 2.4 or 2.6
> kernel and after I partition the hard drive and when it starts to
> write the base-install data, the busy light on th
Matthijs Melchior wrote:
> Debian-installer-version: 20040616 ftp.debian.org
Please tell us the url of the image you downloaded for the install.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 256600 partman
Bug#256600: install: Formatting of partitions didn't update parition type
Bug reassigned from package `install' to `partman'.
>
End of message, stopping pro
The upshot of this for hw-detect and pcmcia-cs is that they have to
be set up in one of the two following ways.
1. pcmcia-cs ifups/ifdowns interfaces on 16 bit PCMCIA cards
by default (as now) and hw-detect does not list such interfaces
in /etc/network/devhotplug, instead listing them in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 256371 + pending
Bug#256371: discover1: [INTL:uk] Ukrainian debconf templates translation update
Tags were: d-i l10n patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping proce
Package: discover1
Severity: wishlist
Attached are the Catalan translations for the program and debconf
templates.
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 11:31:48AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-27 19:09]:
> > Notice how sda1's row is misaligned because it lacks a 'primary' or
> > 'logical' label. This was confusing to me because I thought that / would
> > not be formatted for som
I'm trying to install Debian sarge on a hard drive in a USB enclosure.
I got the 110MB sarge image. I can boot with either 2.4 or 2.6
kernel and after I partition the hard drive and when it starts to
write the base-install data, the busy light on the drive enclosure
stays on continuously, even af
Accepted:
usb-discover_0.18.dsc
to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_0.18.dsc
usb-discover_0.18.tar.gz
to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_0.18.tar.gz
usb-discover_0.18_all.udeb
to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_0.18_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for yo
usb-discover_0.18_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
usb-discover_0.18.dsc
usb-discover_0.18.tar.gz
usb-discover_0.18_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HeIlo
I have Asus A7N8X-E motherboard with sil SATA and only disk IBM 80GB
SATA. I haven´t instaled debian yet. Debian instalating program can´t
detedt my disk. where can I get module for my SATA or how can I use
newer kernel for instalation
Hello,
Can you please check the current version and update your patch to it?
The program was rewritten so probably you will need retranslate it.
Thanks in advance,
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 590611
> Unfortunately, d-i did not autoload the usb-uhci module, which is needed for
> my USB chipset to be detected (and the hard disk detected subsquently).
>
> After "modprobe usb-uhci" in the 2nd console, all went well, and the HD
> detection found the disk, which partman "saw" as well.
>
> So, I
Hello,
Since we released a new version, if possible, translate this and send
a new patch against it.
Thanks in advance,
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F
Hi Joey,
On 27 Jun, Joey Hess wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Package: Install
>> Version: 20040430 (for i386 architecture)
>
> What images, downloaded from what url? What driver disk did you use?
Download was from ftp.au.debian.org at location
/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/20040
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 256604 + pending
Bug#256604: Can't exec "0"
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
People using VmWare 4.x for Debian Installer tests may want to upgrade
to the latest 4.5.2 version, which is now available for a few days.
It offers a quite useful Boot Menu option in the virtual BIOS which
prevents switchig the boot order in the BIOS settings for switching
from a CD boot to a HD
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HeIlo
I have Asus A7N8X-E motherboard with sil SATA and only disk IBM 80GB SATA. I haven´t
instaled debian yet. Debian instalating program can´t detedt my disk. where can I get
module for my SATA or how can I use newer kernel for instalation or what can I do?
Thanks.
The
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> HeIlo
> I have Asus A7N8X-E motherboard with sil SATA and only disk IBM 80GB SATA. I
> haven?t instaled debian yet. Debian instalating program can?t detedt my disk. where
> can I get module for my SATA or how can I use newer kernel for instalat
Accepted:
affs-modules-2.6.6-power3-di_0.63_powerpc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6/affs-modules-2.6.6-power3-di_0.63_powerpc.udeb
affs-modules-2.6.6-power4-di_0.63_powerpc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6/affs-modules-2.6.6-power4-di_0.63_powerpc.udeb
affs-mod
HeIlo
I have Asus A7N8X-E motherboard with sil SATA and only disk IBM 80GB SATA. I haven´t
instaled debian yet. Debian instalating program can´t detedt my disk. where can I get
module for my SATA or how can I use newer kernel for instalation or what can I do?
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_0.63_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_0.63.dsc
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_0.63.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.6-powerpc-di_0.63_powerpc.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.6-powerpc-di_0.63_powerpc.udeb
nic-extra-m
TODO
* stage 3:
+ Check whether it works properly with hot plugged network
interfaces. That is, stage 3 should not assume that these
interfaces come up at any particular time but should wait
for networking to become available.
* netcfg:
+ Determine whether the primary interf
* Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-27 19:09]:
> Notice how sda1's row is misaligned because it lacks a 'primary' or
> 'logical' label. This was confusing to me because I thought that / would
> not be formatted for some reason until I looked a bit closer.
Any idea why it doesn't show primar
Package: partman-lvm
Severity: important
This was with beta4 installer. Installer didn't let me
create VG using sw RAID partitions. I've done this manually in past
and it works so installer should let me do it becase it's really
nice to have software RAID on which ju have LVM ...
--
To UNSUBSC
Package: discover1
Severity: normal
I just had a USB hard disk for a moment and wanted to test d-i on it.
Unfortunately, d-i did not autoload the usb-uhci module, which is needed for
my USB chipset to be detected (and the hard disk detected subsquently).
After "modprobe usb-uhci" in the 2nd cons
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> severity 239284 important
Bug#239284: After reboot PCMCIA modules should be loaded before the network
Severity set to `important'.
> merge 239284 248071
Bug#239284: After reboot PC
Per Olofsson is right. The "auto" statement in /e/n/i makes
S:S40networking bring up the interface referred to. This is
appropriate for interfaces on built-in hardware whose drivers
are loaded and fully initialized prior to S:S40networking and that
should be ifup'ped at boot and not ifdown'ed unt
Since I don't have Linux setup yet, I can't give linux output (maybe
there's similar command for windows?)
But the device is:
**Intel® 82801EB I/O Controller Hub 5 (ICH5)**
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 08:42:52PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 08:20:35PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> > Version: 1.52
> > Severity: important
>
> This is really version 2.02, tasksel is in deinstall config-files state
> for version 1.52 on the box I ran reportbug on. Sorry
69 matches
Mail list logo
