Quoting Debian Installer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> Accepted:
> kbd-chooser_0.55.dsc
> to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.55.dsc
This new kbd-chooser version incorporates patches for fixing the
keyboard handling in Unicode environment. #251550 : the installer
seems to "freeze" when entering
Accepted:
brltty-modules-2.4.26-itanium-smp-di_0.54_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64/brltty-modules-2.4.26-itanium-smp-di_0.54_ia64.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.26-itanium-smp-di_0.54_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.26-itanium-smp-di_0.54_ia64
Accepted:
network-console_0.0.1.dsc
to pool/main/n/network-console/network-console_0.0.1.dsc
network-console_0.0.1.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/network-console/network-console_0.0.1.tar.gz
network-console_0.0.1_s390.udeb
to pool/main/n/network-console/network-console_0.0.1_s390.udeb
Announcing to [
Accepted:
fat-modules-2.2.25-atari-di_0.60_m68k.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k/fat-modules-2.2.25-atari-di_0.60_m68k.udeb
fat-modules-2.2.25-bvme6000-di_0.60_m68k.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k/fat-modules-2.2.25-bvme6000-di_0.60_m68k.udeb
fat-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.60_m68
Accepted:
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.67_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.67_powerpc.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.67_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-priority_0.67_powerpc.udeb
cdebconf-text-udeb_0.67_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-text-udeb_0.67_pow
cdebconf_0.67_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.67.dsc
cdebconf_0.67.tar.gz
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.67_powerpc.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.67_powerpc.deb
cdebconf_0.67_powerpc.deb
cdebconf-udeb_0.67_powerpc.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.67_powe
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 21:17:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#256954: fixed in cdebconf 0.67
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Rejected: cdrom-detect_0.59_i386.changes: a file with this name already exists in the
Done directory.
Rejected: cdrom-detect_0.59_all.udeb: old version (0.59) in unstable >= new version
(0.59) targeted at unstable.
Rejected: cdrom-detect_0.59_all.udeb: can not overwrite existing copy already in
tag 256954 - patch
thanks
I tested the patch and it didn't fix the bug. Darn.
--
Matt Kraai[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ftbfs.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tag 256954 + patch pending
thanks
The patch does fix the bug. When I first tried to test it, I
replaced the debconf binary instead of the libdebconf.so library.
--
Matt Kraai[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ftbfs.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 12:56:38AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 09:38:13PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> [...]
> > I think the read fails because the other end of the pipe closes
> > because cdebconf crashes because of a bug in
> > question_owner_delete: if the owner that it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 256954 + patch pending
Bug#256954: frees wrong memory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 256954 - patch
Bug#256954: frees wrong memory
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
T
cdrom-detect_0.59_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdrom-detect_0.59.dsc
cdrom-detect_0.59.tar.gz
cdrom-detect_0.59_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Hello,
Resently we sent you an email about mor
t g age r at e going up, just from
last week that ra t e
s went up by 2 point. Its not to
late to lock yourmor tg age r at
e. You can qualifiy to get a
400, 000 at 400 a month. But
please
act fast as the ra
tes will not stay low for
Accepted:
kbd-chooser_0.55.dsc
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.55.dsc
kbd-chooser_0.55.tar.gz
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.55.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_0.55_i386.udeb
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.55_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your cont
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
kbd-chooser_0.55_i386.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the p
kbd-chooser_0.55_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kbd-chooser_0.55.dsc
kbd-chooser_0.55.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_0.55_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 09:38:13PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
[...]
> I think the read fails because the other end of the pipe closes
> because cdebconf crashes because of a bug in
> question_owner_delete: if the owner that it is trying to delete is
> not last one in the list, it frees the owner fiel
m josenhans wrote:
> Install boot loader:[E] Redhat linux partition is missing in
> bootloader. Did not find a way to modify that
>afterwards.
Please send us the content of /var/log/debian-installer/messages and
/var/log/debian-installer/syslog, and I'll see if I
Adam Thornton wrote:
> After doing an "svn up" a couple days ago, I can't build images anymore.
>
> I'm using ftp.us.debian.org as my udeb source. If I have the following
> in sources.list.udeb.local, I can't retrieve network-console:
Someone got ahead of themselves and added network-console to
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Harald Dunkel wrote:
I don't even get that far. After manually loading sata_sil (using
expert26) the Partition Disks menu still does not show any disks.
I had plugged the SATA cable into the wrong socket, so the
disk became /dev/sdb instead of /dev/sda. But nevertheless
/dev/sd
After doing an "svn up" a couple days ago, I can't build images anymore.
I'm using ftp.us.debian.org as my udeb source. If I have the following
in sources.list.udeb.local, I can't retrieve network-console:
deb ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ testing main/debian-installer
deb ftp://ftp.us.debian.
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> There are some typos. Other than that, one problem is that it doesn't
> really talk about anything other than CD images.
Well, I had a look at thisbut indeed the current
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/builds is also about CD
images only.
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:47:46 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FWD: Fixed in NMU of cdrom-detect 0.59
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
So can one of you guys just upload everything you know about
the d-i system directly to my brain so I can get started faster?
(blank stare, blinks, waits expectantly for laughter...)
--
Karl Hegbloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 11:09 -0700, Karl Hegbloom wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 12:22 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > This feature is orthogonal to grub's first stage loader residing on
> > XFS.
> >
> > ext2/3 leave 4KB of empty space before the filesystem actually starts.
> > That makes it p
Accepted:
cdrom-detect_0.59.dsc
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.59.dsc
cdrom-detect_0.59.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.59.tar.gz
cdrom-detect_0.59_all.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.59_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting bugs to se
Accepted:
base-config_2.33.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.33.dsc
base-config_2.33.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.33.tar.gz
base-config_2.33_all.deb
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.33_all.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 256078 256511 2
tag 255128 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:56:58 -0400
Source: cdrom-detect
Binary: cdrom-detect
Architecture: source all
base-config_2.33_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-config_2.33.dsc
base-config_2.33.tar.gz
base-config_2.33_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:02:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#256078: fixed in base-config 2.33
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
cdrom-detect_0.59_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdrom-detect_0.59.dsc
cdrom-detect_0.59.tar.gz
cdrom-detect_0.59_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:02:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#256530: fixed in base-config 2.33
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:02:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#256511: fixed in base-config 2.33
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:02:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#256766: fixed in base-config 2.33
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 255128 + fixed
Bug#255128: cdrom-detect: Bad handling of mount error
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Anyway these do not happen with this new patch. Let's apply.
It's already applied.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reassign 257036 prebaseconfig
merge 257036 257027
thanks
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: base-config
> Version: 2.32
> Severity: important
> Tags: d-i
Merging these bugs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Colin Watson wrote:
> (2) Take the logic from the respective module *_init functions,
> reimplement it in shell by poking about in /proc/device-tree (I've
> looked at the kernel code and believe this is straightforward),
> and probe and register whatever that says will work.
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 257036 prebaseconfig
Bug#257036: base-config: Debcnf priority is no more "high" in Debian Installer 2nd
stage
Bug reassigned from package `base-config' to `prebaseconfig'.
> merge 257036 257027
Bug#257027: Debconf priority is 'Low' at second-
Package: base-config
Version: 2.32
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
During a standard run of Debian Installer 20040629 (and very probably
20040628 also), base-config main menu appears while it shouldn't as the
debconf priority should be high.
As a first analysis, this seems to be due to debconf prio
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 09:12:33PM +0200, Dennis Stampfer wrote:
> > No? I always though user names where limited to 8 characters. I'll try
> > later on my private machine ...
>
> if so, this should be included in the original text (file a bug against
> shadow)
My mistake. User names with
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 12:27:03AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Silo 1.4.6 does not solve the initrd loading problem. (The changelog entry
> was unclear if it should or not.)
>
> The d-i image at
>
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/sparc/20040629/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso
>
Package: prebaseconfig
Severity: important
With the latest floppy images, I installed an i386 machine. Everything
went smooth as usual. The only thing unusual I did was to do some
special partitioning, to leave space for a dual-boot system.
When rebooting into second stage, debconf priority had
Harald Dunkel wrote:
I don't even get that far. After manually loading sata_sil (using
expert26) the Partition Disks menu still does not show any disks.
I had plugged the SATA cable into the wrong socket, so the
disk became /dev/sdb instead of /dev/sda. But nevertheless
/dev/sdb should be shown in
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:46:23AM +0200, sferriol wrote:
> a solution is to create a ldap driver in cdebconf (see debconf), and
> have all answers in a debconf db in external host
>
> sylvain
Thanks for the replys, but I think my problem is a little more complex.
Yes, that helps with the packa
Accepted:
lowmem_0.11.dsc
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_0.11.dsc
lowmem_0.11.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_0.11.tar.gz
lowmem_0.11_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_0.11_all.udeb
lowmemcheck_0.11_i386.udeb
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmemcheck_0.11_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTE
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
lowmemcheck_0.11_i386.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the p
lowmem_0.11_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lowmem_0.11.dsc
lowmem_0.11.tar.gz
lowmem_0.11_all.udeb
lowmemcheck_0.11_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Matt Kraai wrote:
> The first time ethdetect calls db_unregister, the read command
> fails. This prevents it from reading parameters, which prevents
> it from loading the ne module, which prevents the network from
> working, which prevents the installation from succeeding.
>
> I think the read fa
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:32:12 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#256953: fixed in lowmem 0.11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 04:49:24PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Environment: VmWare
for me real hardware
> > Platform : i386
powerpc
> > Kernel : 2.6
2.4
> > Locale : en_US fr_FR
Holger Rauch wrote:
> Hello to all list members,
>
> I'm having trouble getting Debian (Sarge) installed on a Sun Enterprise E450
> with an UltraSPARC-II (248 MHz) CPU. Linux boots and kernel 2.4.26 correctly
> identifies SCSI controller, hard disk, and CDROM. The CDROM drive is a
> TOSHIBE XM5701
Ian Miller wrote:
> It's a fairly generic IDE CD-ROM - a Samsung CDMaster 32E (Model
> SCR-3231). It is connected as Secondary IDE master with nothing else on
> the secondary channel. I get the same symptoms with a Samsung CD-Master
> 40E (Model SC-140) drive on the same machine.
It's having no
Christian Perrier wrote:
tags 256989 pending
thanks
Quoting George Papamichelakis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: discover1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
unfuzied 1 string
ÎÏÎÎ...:-)
ÎÎÏÏÎ ... ;-)
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Environment: VmWare
> Platform : i386
> Kernel : 2.6
> Locale : en_US fr_FR
> Image : netinst
> Priority : high
>
> Result : OK
Not quite OK.
Debconf priority is medium in 2nd stage while I am sure I did nothing
which shoudl h
tags 256989 pending
thanks
Quoting George Papamichelakis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: discover1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch l10n
>
> unfuzied 1 string
ÎÏÎÎ...:-)
Environment: VmWare
Platform : i386
Kernel : 2.6
Locale : en_US
Image : netinst
Priority : high
Result : The line drawing problems with 2.6 installs in stage 2
are back : #256766
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Environment: VmWare
Platform : i386
Kernel : 2.6
Locale : en_US fr_FR
Image : netinst
Priority : high
Result : OK
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Free Ekanayaka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> How do I extract the detected information for setting, say, the
> XkbLayout and XkbModel entries of XF86Config-4?
Check the thread named "Pre-seeding XFree settings for keyboard in
Debian Installer" in this mailing list...a few days ago (and st
Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> (For those who don't follow the thread about preseeding X debconf
> values, I need a way to support both woody, sarge and future releases
> and I need a way to know the current release)
>
> Can I count on /etc/debian_version holding specific and well known
> val
My account was here, but now is not.
Your message, lost, the words forgot.
To contact me now,
I hope you know how,
Otherwise, contact me you will not.
Translation:
This account has been closed and all mail is being rejected.
If this account belonged to a UVM alumnus you may be able to use the
UVM
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 12:19:32PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 07:07:40PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > Initial boot worked:
> >
> > Fine after the increase of the TFTP buffer size ( was #256263 )
> > 2004-06-29 dies with repeating
> > Segment fa
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 07:07:40PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Initial boot worked:
>
> Fine after the increase of the TFTP buffer size ( was #256263 )
> 2004-06-29 dies with repeating
> Segment fault
> Segment fault
> Segment fault
This was a cdebconf bug triggered
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 12:27:03AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Silo 1.4.6 does not solve the initrd loading problem. (The changelog entry
> was unclear if it should or not.)
>
> The d-i image at
>
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/sparc/20040629/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> clone 256738 -1
Bug#256738: rootskel: amd64 support.
Bug 256738 cloned as bug 256998.
> reassign -1 mklibs
Bug#256998: rootskel: amd64 support.
Bug reassigned from package `rootske
Package: discover1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
unfuzied 1 string
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-686
Locale: LANG=el_GR, LC_CTYPE=el_GR
discover1_po_el.po.gz
De
Hi all,
I'd like to use the kbd-chooser package for the custom installer I'm
preparing for A/DeMuDi.
I had a look to the source but I can't figure out how to use it
exactly. Should I simply list it in the udeb_include file?
Moreover it seems to me that the kbd-chooser configures
Hello to all list members,
I'm having trouble getting Debian (Sarge) installed on a Sun Enterprise E450
with an UltraSPARC-II (248 MHz) CPU. Linux boots and kernel 2.4.26 correctly
identifies SCSI controller, hard disk, and CDROM. The CDROM drive is a
TOSHIBE XM5701 (at least that's what I noticed
Joey Hess wrote:
Ian Miller wrote:
Couldn't find standard IDE CD drive - worked fine with old Woody
installer. Beta4 and any other daily images I've tried have same problem.
Please tell us some details about your CD drive, like what model it is,
how it's connected to the ide controller, an
Brian Sutherland a écrit :
Hello all,
I have to do a project requiring an auto-installation and auto
configuration of many machines. I have looked at fai and
autoinstall but am looking for other possibilities as well. Can
d-i do this? or would i be better off taking some pieces of it
and using them
Package: installation-reports
Hello,
Here is another
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: ~luther/d-i/images/netboot/28june2004
uname -a: Linux bahrain 2.4.25-powerpc #1 mer avr 14 15:38:38 CEST 2004 ppc GNU/Linux
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:02:25 +0200
Method: network boot, network install (
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 06:13:57PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> Anaconda does a fine job on Red Hat Linux, and Progeny has ported it to
> Debian.
Anaconda for Debian is very unfinished at the moment -- AFAIK Kickstart is
one of the parts that don't work at all.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: ht
> Sadly speaking, I was able to reproduce (and fixed) this bug again.
> Here is the exact test info:
>
> Environment: VmWare
> Platform:i386
> Kernel: 2.6.6
> Locale: en_US
> Image: sarge_netinst
> Date:2004/06/28
Reproduced here also with sarge_d-i images from 2004
[Karl Hegbloom]
> ... says that ntfsresize is free software, and it sounds like it
> might be possible to call on it from partman. It's certainly worth
> having a look at!
Adding ntfs resize support into libparted would help most installers
and partition systems. If anyone find time to work on t
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 01:40:52AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> It'd be rather nice if the new debian-installer could load the
> therm_adt746x or therm_windtunnel modules, and register them so that
> they're automatically loaded by the installed system.
>
> I can take care of the d-i implementatio
Silo 1.4.6 does not solve the initrd loading problem. (The changelog entry
was unclear if it should or not.)
The d-i image at
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/sparc/20040629/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso
gets in a repeating segmentation fault.
--
Blars Blarson
It'd be rather nice if the new debian-installer could load the
therm_adt746x or therm_windtunnel modules, and register them so that
they're automatically loaded by the installed system.
I can take care of the d-i implementation, but what's the best way to
decide whether the modules are required? A
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 15:32 -0700, Karl Hegbloom wrote:
> I thought I'd let everyone know that the www.sysresccd.org beta has a
> qtparted on it that runs on a framebuffer, and can successfully resize a
> Windows XP NTFS partition.
I found out more about this. Apparently, QTparted uses "ntfsresiz
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:31:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
81 matches
Mail list logo
