Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 259876 wishlist
Bug#259876: netcfg doesn't ask for manual settings
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> merge 259876 237395
Bug#237395: netcfg: Please give choice of whether to try DHCP
Bug#259876: netcfg doesn't ask for manual settings
Bug#239431: n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 258545 quik-installer
Bug#258545: OldWorld PowerMac netinst daily CD 2004/07/08 success (mostly)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `quik-installer'.
> retitle 258545 failed to work on old-world mac
Bug#258545: OldWorld Powe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 258541 discover
Bug#258541: Kernel 2.6 OldWorld PowerMac netinst daily CD 2004/07/08 fails toinstall
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `discover'.
> retitle 258541 discover segfaults on powerpc
Bug#258541: Kernel 2.6 OldWor
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 258834 partman
Bug#258834: failed installation on Compaq Presario 1260 laptop
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'.
> retitle 258834 failed to create partitions
Bug#258834: failed installation on Compaq Presario 1260
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 01:19:32 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Debian Installer - ATI/Prism driver issues
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 258908 partman
Bug#258908: Kernel 2.6 OldWorld PowerMac sid_d-i businesscard daily CD 2004/07/11
fails installing "unstable"
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'.
> tags 258908 d-i
Bug#258908: Kernel 2.6 OldWorld Po
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 01:02:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package: installation-reports: r8169 module broken
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 258916 dhcp-client
Bug#258916: sparc ultra-30 install success with sid daily
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `dhcp-client'.
> retitle 258916 dhcp fails first time during debian-installer
Bug#258916: sparc ultra-30 install
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 258919 silo
Bug#258919: ultra30 sid d-i daily failure
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `silo'.
> retitle 258919 silo works with 768MB fails with 256MB
Bug#258919: ultra30 sid d-i daily failure
Changed Bug title.
> tags 25
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 258984 -1
Bug#258984: Package: installation-reports: r8169 module broken
Bug 258984 cloned as bug 259892.
> reassign -1 kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386
Bug#259892: Package: installation-reports: r8169 module broken
Bug reassigned from package `instal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 259264 cdrom-detect
Bug#259264: Install does not detect CDROM
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `cdrom-detect'.
> tags 259264 d-i
Bug#259264: Install does not detect CDROM
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
> stop
Sto
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 259297 grub-installer
Bug#259297: installation-report: Adaptec 2120S w/RAID5... installer fails to install
grub
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `grub-installer'.
> tags 259297 d-i
Bug#259297: installation-report: Adapte
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 00:41:46 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 259374 lvmcfg
Bug#259374: Install report
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `lvmcfg'.
> retitle 259374 no place to specify mount point and filesystem type
Bug#259374: Install report
Changed Bug title.
> tags 259374 d-i
Bug#
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 259451 -1
Bug#259451: Package: installation-reports
Bug 259451 cloned as bug 259888.
> reassign -1 discover
Bug#259888: Package: installation-reports
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `discover'.
> retitle -1 isa soundcard (s
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 00:17:34 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 00:19:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Debian Installer Report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 00:30:17 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line install errors
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 259535 -1
Bug#259535: install errros
Bug 259535 cloned as bug 259885.
> reassign -1 kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386
Bug#259885: install errros
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386'.
> retitle -1 tekram dc-39
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 259876 netcfg
Bug#259876: Installer Report
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `netcfg'.
> retitle 259876 netcfg doesn't ask for manual settings
Bug#259876: Installer Report
Changed Bug title.
> tags 259876 d-i
Bug#259876: n
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040716/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux pitr.localdomain.bogus 2.6.6-1-k7 #1 Wed May 12 18:19:40
EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: July 16, 2004
Method: Net Install
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jul 2004 20:53:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Debian Installer - Installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 259831 -1
Bug#259831: Debian Installer - Installation report
Bug 259831 cloned as bug 259867.
> reassign -1 kbd-chooser
Bug#259867: Debian Installer - Installation report
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kbd-chooser'.
> ret
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jul 2004 20:15:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Debian Installation Report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Joel,
On Thursday 15 July 2004 13:57, Joel Soete wrote:
> Hello Frederik,
>
[ snip ]
> RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0<[*]
> Freeing initrd memory: 1814k freed
> VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem).
> Mounted devfs on /dev
> V
I was able to compile a 64 kernel debian package. The steps:
1)apply the attached patches to dpkg and kernel-package, compile and install
2)install a cross-compiler (use http://kegel.com/crosstool/)
3)apt-get install kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.7 (don't know if it is necessary)
4)
export INITRD_OK=1
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:55:02 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line verified fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
Joey Hess wrote:
John Summerfield wrote:
What do you want users to actually test? I'd have thought a
three-month-old beta a little long in the tooth for testing.
I think the web site is perfectly clear on this, so I'll just quote it.
If you just need an installation that works, we recommen
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:37:43 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 20040715 sarge-i386-netinst.iso
From http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040715/
uname -a: Linux mork 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-07-16 2:28pm PST
Method: CD-ROM install
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 249593 netcfg
Bug#249593: Package: installation-reports
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `netcfg'.
> retitle 249593 No DHCP client found during network configuration
Bug#249593: Package: installation-reports
Changed Bug ti
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 249650 partman
Bug#249650: installation report (beta4, success)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'.
> retitle 249650 Dealing with partitions in combination with motherboard limitations
Bug#249650: installation repo
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jul 2004 23:00:44 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Thanks you for your installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jul 2004 22:53:11 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing due to mistake
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 253197 base-installer
Bug#253197: installation bug
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-installer'.
> retitle 253197 incorrect kernel selected (PIV vs AMD)
Bug#253197: installation bug
Changed Bug title.
> tag 253197 mo
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jul 2004 22:43:26 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Thank you for your report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jul 2004 22:36:02 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 252978 -1
Bug#252978: (no subject)
Bug 252978 cloned as bug 259844.
> reassign 252978 base-config
Bug#252978: (no subject)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-config'.
> retitle 252978 When rebooting after d-i installatio
George Karaolides <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Set up devfs, devfsd and install lvm10
I'm curious to know why you chose lvm10 when lvm2 is available?
Especially since 2.6 doesn't support lvm1 as far as I know, and there
are patches for lvm2 for 2.4.x
--
John L. Fjellstad
web: http://www.fjells
This problem did not reappear with the daily builds I tested recently
so I assume that this bug is solved.
I think this bug should be closed.
Kind regards
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.05
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Nice to see that the task-dependency thing was fixed :) Here are two
additions to the swedish-desktop task. I can add them myself if you
give me SVN access.
--
Pelle
diff -urN tasksel-2.05/tasks/swedish-desktop
tasksel-2.05-swedeskto
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: daily build 15.7.2004
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer
Date: 16.7.2004 8:00 pm CET
Method: CD-Image (110 MB, i386 version)
Machine: Compaq Armada 3500
Processor:Pentium II - 366 MHz
cat /proc/cpuinfo shows
processor : 0
vendor_
> Well, hrm, I don't really know then. It's quite a strange error. Are
> you sure it depends on which build you use?
>
> --
> Pelle
>
Yes, it depends on the build I use. But with all the daily builds of
debian installer I recently used, this problem didn't come up again.
So I think this bug can be
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:52:29 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#192793: close?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jul 2004 21:48:48 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Thank you
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 259301 -1
Bug#259301: Installation successful expect for some small problems
Bug 259301 cloned as bug 259825.
> reassign -1 grub-installer
Bug#259825: Installation successful expect for some small problems
Bug reassigned from package `installatio
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jul 2004 21:28:31 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Thank you for your installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Sven Luther wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 11:45:38AM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote:
> > On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 11:07, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 10:55:36AM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote:
> > > > Last night I downloaded and installed on my test-machine [beige G3
> > > > mini-towe
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 06:20:28PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Environment: VmWare
> Platform : i386
> Kernel : 2.4
> Locale : ar_EG
> Image : netinst
> Priority : high
> Result : OK. Pretty strange, the debconf priority bug is not here
> anymore. Well, mayb
Can this bug be closed?
Thanks,
Justin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 04:17:41PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > When several ethernet devices are available, the name of the device is
> > not a reliable way to identify it. For example, when booting d-i on my
> > laptop, the firewire port was detected as eth0 and the 100
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 11:45:38AM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 11:07, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 10:55:36AM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote:
> > > H...
> > >
> > > I have had a different experience.
> > >
> > > Last night I downloaded and installed on my te
John Summerfield wrote:
> What do you want users to actually test? I'd have thought a
> three-month-old beta a little long in the tooth for testing.
I think the web site is perfectly clear on this, so I'll just quote it.
If you just need an installation that works, we recommend you use beta4
of
Per Olofsson wrote:
> I have now made another version of pcmcia-cs. Apart from having
> integrated the suggestions from Osamu, I have also switched
> debian/rules to using debhelper and added automatic detection of
> special resource settings using dmidecode. There is no support for
> this detectio
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 11:07, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 10:55:36AM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote:
> > H...
> >
> > I have had a different experience.
> >
> > Last night I downloaded and installed on my test-machine [beige G3
> > mini-tower (OldWorld)] using the 2.6.7 kernel from
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 04:17:41PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> When several ethernet devices are available, the name of the device is
> not a reliable way to identify it. For example, when booting d-i on my
> laptop, the firewire port was detected as eth0 and the 100baseT one was
> detected as
H...
I have had a different experience.
Last night I downloaded and installed on my test-machine [beige G3
mini-tower (OldWorld)] using the 2.6.7 kernel from:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/powerpc/20040715/sarge-powerpc-businesscard.iso
Everything went precisely acc
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 09:17, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> This could be solved by identifying adapters by their MAC address;
And won't work in the general case for guest LANs under z/VM on S/390:
virtual QDIO devices do not, prior to z/VM 4.4, have unique MAC
addresses, as they're purely Layer 3. In
> product="$(dmi_get 'System Information' 'Product Name')"
IBM tend to put the 7-character model id in "Product Name", with the
(more useful) model name under "Version" - for example:
DMI type 1, 25 bytes.
System Information
Manufacturer: IBM
Produc
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 10:55:36AM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote:
> H...
>
> I have had a different experience.
>
> Last night I downloaded and installed on my test-machine [beige G3
> mini-tower (OldWorld)] using the 2.6.7 kernel from:
Well that was yesterday, this is today, a different build.
Package: netcfg
Version: 0.71
Severity: normal
When several ethernet devices are available, the name of the device is
not a reliable way to identify it. For example, when booting d-i on my
laptop, the firewire port was detected as eth0 and the 100baseT one was
detected as eth1. At the time of rebo
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 05:25, John Summerfield wrote:>
> The problem I had was after the first boot. I regard what happens _before_ then a
> separate problem.
>
> What do folk on zSeries do?
Well, I understand that work is progressing on migrating the ssh key and
server from the network-console s
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 01:11, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> At 16 Jul 04 05:00:22 GMT,
> John Summerfield wrote:
> > Is there any good reason ssh is _not_ installed?
>
> ssh is "standard" priority. If you don't skip tasksel, ssh will be
> installed as default.
Does not selecting anything in tasksel count a
Frans Pop wrote:
> Could you post or mail a copy of the coding you used to set the resource
> settings (the rules you are using).
> I'm interested to see how general or specific you've made them.
Sure. Some of them might be a little too general, but I hope not. I
wanted to make it easy to convert
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 20040630
(http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/)
uname -a: Linux rigel 2.4.26-1-686 #1 Sat May 1 18:04:05 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 20040630
Method: Boot from CD-ROM, installed packages from network from ftp2.de.debian
Frans Pop wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 16 July 2004 07:00, John Summerfield wrote:
Is there any good reason ssh is _not_ installed?
There is a ssh-client component for d-i in the making
that will allow you to use ssh while the installation
is running (e.g.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 16 July 2004 07:00, John Summerfield wrote:
> Is there any good reason ssh is _not_ installed?
>
There is a ssh-client component for d-i in the making
that will allow you to use ssh while the installation
is running (e.g. to get logfiles of
We are a national mor tg
age len der service who
specializesin helping people
like you get the lo-ans you need to:
* Pay off .b i lls and stop .cre di tors from calling
* Make those long needed home improvem en ts
* .R e f inance your home at a better .ra
t e
* Get .cas h out for nearly
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 10:33:14AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> > reassign 236487 kernel
> Bug#236487: keyboard does not work on dell dimension 8250
> Bug reassign
At 16 Jul 04 07:58:07 GMT,
Clive Menzies wrote:
> On (16/07/04 15:11), Kenshi Muto wrote:
> > To: John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > From: Kenshi Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:11:35 +0900
> > Subject: Re: ssh
> >
> > At 16 Jul 04 05:00:22 GM
Clive Menzies wrote:
On (16/07/04 15:11), Kenshi Muto wrote:
To: John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Kenshi Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:11:35 +0900
Subject: Re: ssh
At 16 Jul 04 05:00:22 GMT,
John Summerfield wrote:
Is there any good reaso
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Did you ever get anywhere on this tail problem? Can you still reproduce
> it?
>
> One possibility is something is creating a new /var/log/messages.
> busybox tail will not follow to new files. I saw this once when a broken
> anna re-installed the rootskel ud
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 09:38:38AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As of today, all installs of the 2.6 powerpc d-i fail.
>
> netboot with sid .udebs and .debs
>
> => broken due to ppp/libpcap0.8 mess.
>
> netboot with sarge .udebs and .debs
>
> => broken because even if w
On (16/07/04 15:11), Kenshi Muto wrote:
> To: John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Kenshi Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:11:35 +0900
> Subject: Re: ssh
>
> At 16 Jul 04 05:00:22 GMT,
> John Summerfield wrote:
> > Is there any good reason ssh is
salve
H-G-H stimulates an increase in the production of H-G-H.
http://www.home.hghgoldproduct.com
Clinical results based on trials show the following amazing results**:
88% muscle mass enhancement
84% higher energy levels
81-83% expanded exercise tolerance/endurance
81% increased muscle mass
78% i
Hello,
As of today, all installs of the 2.6 powerpc d-i fail.
netboot with sid .udebs and .debs
=> broken due to ppp/libpcap0.8 mess.
netboot with sarge .udebs and .debs
=> broken because even if we install with 2.6.7 kernel,
there are no 2.6.7 module .udebs in sarge.
So
[John Summerfield]
> I've fallen in love with smartmontools. I think it should be on every
> Linux box that has disk drives.
>
> For those unfamiliar with it, it monitors the health of disk drives
> (SCSI and ATA, SATA support coming), and can warn of impending failure
> in time to get your dat
[John Summerfield]
> After my minimal install, I find some ports open to the public. I don't
> think they should be open by default to anyone.
>
> They're all in the inetd package, any my preference is to have all inet
> services disabled by default.
I agree totally. We close these services i
78 matches
Mail list logo
