Bug#240842: pcmcia network config failed

Frederik Dannemare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Much has changed with the installer since March, and I believe the > pcmcia issue you mention has been dealt with since then, so I would very > much appreciate it, if you could find time to download and test > the latest[1] cd image and let me know

Bug#262568: installation-reports: [sparc64] [20040731] [netinst] installation failed

package installation-reports severity 262568 normal thanks * Erinn Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004:07:31 15:25 -0400]: > At the end of the installation, during "Finishing the installation", I get > this error: > > 75% > Saving installation logs to /var/log/debian-in

Processed: Re: installation-reports: [sparc64] [20040731] [netinst] installation failed

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package installation-reports Ignoring bugs not assigned to: installation-reports > severity 262568 normal Bug#262568: installation-reports: [sparc64] [20040731] [netinst] installation failed Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping p

Bug#262568: installation-reports: [sparc64] [20040731] [netinst] installation failed

Package: installation-reports Severity: important Debian-installer-version: Daily build from: http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-sparc/current/images/sparc64/netboot/ Date: Sat Jul 31 15:16:44 EDT 2004 Method: serial tftp netboot Machine: Sun Ultra1, 167mhz, 2.1gb Base

Bug#262549: installation-reports

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: beta4 from http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta4/sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: 2.6.5-1-386 Date: 07/31/04 14h about Method: I copy the iso on a disk and boot on it. I have a LAN (= a gateway connected on the

Bug#261929: Can't use tasksel to install multi l10n tasks

During the installation process, tasksel is shown and not aptitude. Aptitude can be reached, but is described as an expert only tool. I don't expect the normal user to use aptitude. But I do expect him to be able to install multi l10n tasks. > Lior Kaplan wrote: >> Since the change of how tasksel

tasksel_2.09_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: tasksel_2.09.dsc to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.09.dsc tasksel_2.09.tar.gz to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.09.tar.gz tasksel_2.09_all.deb to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.09_all.deb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Processing of tasksel_2.09_i386.changes

tasksel_2.09_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tasksel_2.09.dsc tasksel_2.09.tar.gz tasksel_2.09_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Re: Bug#262344: debian-installer: Please add gnutls11 and gcrypt11 packages

On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 05:35:21PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Hi, > > Steve Langasek: > > Because libgcrypt11 is available in sarge already, I've made this change > > in an NMU of debootstrap, so you should be able to upload opencdk8 with > > the new dependency without breaking anything. > >

Bug#261929: Can't use tasksel to install multi l10n tasks

Lior Kaplan wrote: > Since the change of how tasksel selects l10n tasks, there ins't any > option to install multi l10n related tasks. For example Hebrew & > Russion support. Also, there isn't any way to install support of one > language while using another. You're supposed to use aptitude to do t

Re: still no c,h,s

yazdzik wrote: > Dear boot friends, > I still cannot do the following at first screen: > > expert26 hd=7296,255,63 > > and end up with the right geometry in the partion section. When I choose, > show c,h,s information, it still gives the info based upon the 16 sectors. > > Am I doing someth

Re: cardmgr start message during base install (extra packages)

Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Here is a patch to divert start-stop-daemon. Mostly unsteded, but > half of it is cut-n-paste from my upgrade-testing script. And here's an (untested) patch which also adds policy-rc.d support. Furthermore it corrects a problem in your patch: it runs cleanup code if a

Bug#262531: reassign to partman-target

reassign 262531 partman-target retitle 262531 LVM LVs should be mounted as /dev// thanks LVM logical volumes should be named /dev// for lvm tools. Now fstab entries for LVM LVs are written as /dev/mapper/- this brokes lilo-installer with root on LVM. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE

Processed: reassign to partman-target

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 262531 partman-target Bug#262531: installation-reports: failed, root on LVM Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman-target'. > retitle 262531 LVM LVs should be mounted as /dev// Bug#262531: installation-reports: failed,

Re: Bug#262344: debian-installer: Please add gnutls11 and gcrypt11 packages

Hi, Steve Langasek: > Because libgcrypt11 is available in sarge already, I've made this change > in an NMU of debootstrap, so you should be able to upload opencdk8 with > the new dependency without breaking anything. > $ cd debootstrap-0.2.41-0.1 $ find . -type f|xargs grep gcrypt11 $ Not yet,

Processed: clone and reassign to lilo-installer

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 262531 -1 Bug#262531: installation-reports: failed, root on LVM Bug 262531 cloned as bug 262532. > reassign -1 lilo-installer Bug#262532: installation-reports: failed, root on LVM Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `lilo-instal

Bug#262531: installation-reports: failed, root on LVM

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: built from svn, today uname -a: i386 Date: Method: netboot Machine: Processor: Memory: Root Device: LVM LV Root Size/partition table: Output of lspci: Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW:

Bug#262186: marked as done (vmelilo-installer must call apt-install vmelilo)

Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2004 10:17:18 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#262186: fixed in vmelilo-installer 1.4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

vmelilo-installer_1.4_m68k.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: vmelilo-installer_1.4.dsc to pool/main/v/vmelilo-installer/vmelilo-installer_1.4.dsc vmelilo-installer_1.4.tar.gz to pool/main/v/vmelilo-installer/vmelilo-installer_1.4.tar.gz vmelilo-installer_1.4_m68k.udeb to pool/main/v/vmelilo-installer/vmelilo-installer_1.4_m68k.udeb Announcin

Processing of vmelilo-installer_1.4_m68k.changes

vmelilo-installer_1.4_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: vmelilo-installer_1.4.dsc vmelilo-installer_1.4.tar.gz vmelilo-installer_1.4_m68k.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "

Important News

Dear LowPrice-Soft Client! My name "Kibitz U. Sacristy", and I work at Popular-Software representation. You are is so essential to me! You spend your money and your time at our office, and I would like to show you that our company have finished modernization of software range. Our firm want r

Bug#262344: debian-installer: Please add gnutls11 and gcrypt11 packages

On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 01:39:35PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-31 12:51]: > > Well, todays unstable install fails because libgnutls11 depends on > > libgcrypt11, which will not be installed. > > A fix for this is in incoming. Yeah, have seen since.

Bug#262344: debian-installer: Please add gnutls11 and gcrypt11 packages

* Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-31 12:51]: > Well, todays unstable install fails because libgnutls11 depends on > libgcrypt11, which will not be installed. A fix for this is in incoming. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subje

Bug#262270: marked as done (failed to use sed from installed system w/o chrooting into it)

Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2004 07:17:17 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#262270: fixed in nobootloader 0.0.18 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

nobootloader_0.0.18_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: nobootloader_0.0.18.dsc to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_0.0.18.dsc nobootloader_0.0.18.tar.gz to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_0.0.18.tar.gz nobootloader_0.0.18_all.udeb to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_0.0.18_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closin

Processing of nobootloader_0.0.18_powerpc.changes

nobootloader_0.0.18_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: nobootloader_0.0.18.dsc nobootloader_0.0.18.tar.gz nobootloader_0.0.18_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubs

Re: Bug#262344: debian-installer: Please add gnutls11 and gcrypt11 packages

On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 09:26:50PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Martin Michlmayr: > > libgnutls11 was added to debootstrap a few days ago (10 and 11 are > > installed), > Really? It's not even in testing yet, was not built on all arches until > today, and somebody (vorlon*) told me it needs t

Bug#262344: debian-installer: Please add gnutls11 and gcrypt11 packages

On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 09:26:50PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Hi, > > Martin Michlmayr: > > > > libgnutls11 was added to debootstrap a few days ago (10 and 11 are > > installed), > > Really? It's not even in testing yet, was not built on all arches until > today, and somebody (vorlon*) tol

Re: Processed: reassign 262270 to nobootloader ...

On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 02:33:05PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > > reassign 262270 nobootloader > Bug#262270: Installation Report (AMD64) > Bug reassigned from pack

Bug#241630: all boot methods fail during boot

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Submitter's mail address unreachable. Leaving report open for now... - -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 ht

Bug#242308: pcmcia networking does not come up on boot after install

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >Comments/Problems: >During the initial setup, the pcmcia wireless card was correctly >configured. > >After each reboot, I have to perform a >ifdown eth0 >then a >ifup eth0 >in order to connect to my network. >(Same trouble as installation reports 241

Bug#241790: marked as done ([i386] [20040402] [netinst] success with some problems)

Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2004 11:23:29 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Processed: Bug#241790: success with some problems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#241637: ide not available

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, first and foremost: thank you for your bug report. I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you reported some problems back in April, I would very much appreciate it, i

Bug#241516: marked as done ([powerpc] [20040330] [netinst] partial success on Oldworld powermac)

Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2004 10:52:04 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#241516: partial success on Oldworld powermac has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#241630: all boot methods fail during boot

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, first and foremost: thank you for your bug report. I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you reported some problems back in April, I would very much appreciate it, i

aboot-installer_0.0.15_alpha.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: aboot-installer_0.0.15.dsc to pool/main/a/aboot-installer/aboot-installer_0.0.15.dsc aboot-installer_0.0.15.tar.gz to pool/main/a/aboot-installer/aboot-installer_0.0.15.tar.gz aboot-installer_0.0.15_alpha.udeb to pool/main/a/aboot-installer/aboot-installer_0.0.15_alpha.udeb Announc

Processing of aboot-installer_0.0.15_alpha.changes

aboot-installer_0.0.15_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: aboot-installer_0.0.15.dsc aboot-installer_0.0.15.tar.gz aboot-installer_0.0.15_alpha.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subjec