On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 02:24, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 01:54:09AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Thursday, August 19, 2004, at 12:08 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Thursday, August 19, 2004, at 05:00 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
happy floppy disk reading noises.
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 24 August 2004, York University
uname -a: Linux touch 2.6.7-1-386 #1 Thu Jul 8 05:08:04 EDT 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: noon 24 August 2004
Method: How did you install? net install
What did you boot off?
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 04:27:50PM -0700, Jim Lieb wrote:
This patch adds menu support to the CD install for ia64. It supplies
the following:
This patch doesn't apply - it tries to modify build/boot/ia64/elilo-cd.conf,
which doesn't exist - can you double check post another?
--
To
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 01:57:22AM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote:
On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 02:24, Sven Luther wrote:
While I'm asking, does anyone know how to tell the Macintosh Open
Firmware monitor to set the terminal speed. I'm thinking that if
the Linux Kernel wants 19200, then it would
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 03:02:03 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#262182: fixed in elilo-installer 0.0.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 267321 wontfix
Bug#267321: creates broken config (hostname -f, FQDN is localhost.localdomain)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
elilo-installer_0.0.6_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
elilo-installer_0.0.6.dsc
elilo-installer_0.0.6.tar.gz
elilo-installer_0.0.6_ia64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
tags 267321 wontfix
thanks
I have discussed this matter with Joshua Kwan and we agree that it is
best to leave the installer as it is for now.
Please follow up to #267321.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
d-i made the following /etc/hosts entry:
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost qube
Even though DHCP found my domain (cyrius.com), it is not mentioned
anywhere. Now hostname produces qube whereas hostname -f gives
localhost.localdomain. I think this
Accepted:
elilo-installer_0.0.6.dsc
to pool/main/e/elilo-installer/elilo-installer_0.0.6.dsc
elilo-installer_0.0.6.tar.gz
to pool/main/e/elilo-installer/elilo-installer_0.0.6.tar.gz
elilo-installer_0.0.6_ia64.udeb
to pool/main/e/elilo-installer/elilo-installer_0.0.6_ia64.udeb
Announcing to
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 10:06:42AM -0400, Russell Hires wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all...
I just would like to say that I'm annoyed with the way that you have the
installer instructions set up: they refer to woody stuff rather than the
updated
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 07:40:17PM +0100, peter green wrote:
cobd0 alias=hda--empty 1500 meg image
cobd1 -- initrd from boot.img (decompressed)
ram 64 megs (allocated to colinux host machine has 480)
tap adaptor with windows bridgeing
Could you provide some description of what colinux is ?
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 09:58:37PM -0700, Trevor Harrison wrote:
I am not a subscriber, so please bcc me the reply (please do put me in the
to or cc field since I don't want my e-mail address widely spread around).
Will try to do the right thing. Please don't respond to me directly but to the
also sprach Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.08.25.0935 +0200]:
Add the following line to /etc/resolv.conf:
domaincyrius.com
Please let me know whether or not this solves your problem. If it does
then we can modify your DHCP client program and/or resolvconf to get
this line
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 04:17:15 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#266641: fixed in netcfg 1.01
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 04:17:15 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#261460: fixed in netcfg 1.01
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 04:17:15 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#261460: fixed in netcfg 1.01
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 04:17:15 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#261460: fixed in netcfg 1.01
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 04:17:15 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#261460: fixed in netcfg 1.01
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 04:17:15 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#261471: fixed in netcfg 1.01
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 04:17:15 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#264476: fixed in netcfg 1.01
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 04:17:15 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#261460: fixed in netcfg 1.01
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
netcfg_1.01_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_1.01.dsc
netcfg_1.01.tar.gz
netcfg_1.01_i386.udeb
netcfg-dhcp_1.01_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_1.01_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_1.01_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_1.01_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_1.01_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_1.01_i386.udeb
netcfg_1.01.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.01.dsc
netcfg_1.01.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.01.tar.gz
=_NextPart_000_%RND_NUM_N.U
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Marching down to their boats on the shore.
Visit =F5ur site to =E3ccess the l=E3rgest database of the web of
h=F5t married l=E3dies looking for fun than =E3ny =F5thers s=ECtes on
the net.
I wrote:
Add the following line to /etc/resolv.conf:
domaincyrius.com
With this line in place you should see:
$ hostname --fqdn
qube.cyrius.com
Note that for this to work you need to have this in /etc/nsswitch.conf:
hosts: dns files
And for _this_ to work without
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: yesterday,
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a:
Linux ebbjw 2.4.26-1-686 #1 Thu Jul 22 13:00:49 JST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: today
Method: How did you install?
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 10:11:49AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
o Using the miboot floppies from :
2.6 : http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc/floppy
(currently broken)
2.4 : http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc-small/floppy
Has anyone been
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/rc1/images/floppy/
uname -a: Linux debu 2.4.26-1-686 #1 Thu Jul 22 13:00:49 JST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-08-24
Method: Booted from floppy and installed via network.
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Once you have filled out this report, mail it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Retrieved and burned to CD on 20 Aug 2004.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
last week I had the opportunity to do a quick test of d-i on a few sparc
and powerpc machines at my former workplace.
Here is how it went on a Sun Netra 1125
Sun Ultra 60 UPA/PCI (2 X UltraSPARC-II 296MHz), No Keyboard
OpenBoot 3.17, 1536 MB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 25 August 2004 14:21, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
[ snip ]
Then I tried the RC1 netinst again, and it actually booted into the
installer, without giving me the before-mentioned kernel panic (?)
Forgot to say that this time it spewed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
last week I had the opportunity to do a quick test of d-i on a few sparc
and powerpc machines at my former workplace.
Here is how it went on a Sun Fire V100
Sun Fire V100 (UltraSPARC-IIe 548MHz), No Keyboard
OpenBoot 4.0, 256 MB memory
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: rc1
uname -a: Linux mac 2.6.7-powerpc #1 Sat Jul 10 03:47:45 CEST 2004 ppc GNU/Linux
Date: Wed Aug 25 22:32:11 EST 2004
Method: netinst CD
Machine: PowerBook G4
Processor: PowerPC G4
Memory: 512M
Root Device: IDE /dev/hda
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 259914 debian-installer
Bug#259914: sparc - Fujitsu MAP3367NC should be predefined in list
Bug reassigned from package `partman' to `debian-installer'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
reassign 259914 debian-installer
thanks
I don't understand this bug and I don't know what to do with it, so I am
reassigning it to debian-installer.
Anton Zinoviev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
last week I had the opportunity to do a quick test of d-i on a few sparc
and powerpc machines at my former workplace.
Here is how it went on a IBM RS/6000 B50
It really did not go well at all. I tried two different B50s, but both
gave me
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i386 unknown
Date: 2004-Aug-25
Method: Booted CD image on a VMWare ESX server as a
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Built monolithic_2.6 for amd64 (gcc-3.4)
using svn revision #19897
uname -a: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-amd64-generic-di_0.13_amd64.udeb
(yes, I know its not the output of uname -a)
Date: Aug 25 13:42:35
Method: boot via USB stick,
Hello Osamu
attached are another round of tests, using
http://people.debian.org/~osamu/pub/sarge-i386-netinst-bug.iso,
md5 f01dbaea95c0d8627951ab788c56e3d3
The hardware is the same d600 and cpia laptops as my previous tests.
The cdrom drive detection succeeded.
It takes seems to take a
Hi!
I'm seeing a rather strange problem with RC1 and kernel 2.4:
The new installation reboots after exactly 80 seconds.
This does only happen with kernel 2.4, it works fine with kernel 2.6.
I could reproduce this with both standard and expert installation.
$ lspci
:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel
Following some wisdom I've google(TM)d out there, I tried installing ALSA
on the laptop (see the original posting on the bug thread for the specs).
Sound works out of the box, except that it doesn't survive apm
suspend/resume (i.e. after it happens, no app can open /dev/dsp,
gets a device busy
Yes, I mean 2.4 kernel...do I need to install new version of kernel in order
to
detect the NIC of ICH5-base system? Please let me know the correct way to
approach
this.
Thanks,
Sengen
-Original Message-
From: Sven Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 12:14 AM
I was reinstalling my laptop yesterday and ran into this problem. I
found that replacing all the xfs_freeze stuff with a single call of
'sync;sync;sync' would not cause the deadlock.
Perhaps it is sufficient to freeze, then unfreeze the filesystem?
--
Joshua Kwan
signature.asc
Description:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 09:43:09AM -0700, Sengen Prasomsouk wrote:
Yes, I mean 2.4 kernel...do I need to install new version of kernel in order
to
detect the NIC of ICH5-base system? Please let me know the correct way to
approach
this.
Forget about woody, and try sarge and debian-installer
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: release candidate 1
uname -a: Linux poison 2.4.26-1-k7 #1 Thu Jul 22 13:24:02 JST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: August 24, 2004, around 3PM Pacific
Method: business card CD, network, linux.csua.berkeley.edu, not proxied
Machine: custom
Thanks, I will try that. Not sure which one to use
rc1 or the test version? Any suggestion on which one
would support ICH5-base system?
Appreciate You Help,
Sengen
-Original Message-
From: Sven Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 9:26 AM
To: Sengen
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 11:18:59AM -0700, Sengen Prasomsouk wrote:
Thanks, I will try that. Not sure which one to use
rc1 or the test version? Any suggestion on which one
would support ICH5-base system?
rc1 should be fine. Try the 2.6 version first. Best would be the netinst iso.
If you
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 11:17:55PM +1000, Vincent McIntyre wrote:
Hello Osamu
attached are another round of tests, using
http://people.debian.org/~osamu/pub/sarge-i386-netinst-bug.iso,
md5 f01dbaea95c0d8627951ab788c56e3d3
The hardware is the same d600 and cpia laptops as my previous
[Willi Mann]
I'm seeing a rather strange problem with RC1 and kernel 2.4:
The new installation reboots after exactly 80 seconds.
This sounds like some kind of kernel watchdog trigger a reboot. I've
seen it for some via kernel module, but there might be some other
kernel modules doing this as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Em Qua 25 Ago 2004 10:12, Frederik Dannemare escreveu:
Hi,
...
I will not be able to test again on a B50 for some time, unfortunately,
but let me know if you want me to try a different way of booting it (or
other suggestions) the next time, I get
This sounds like some kind of kernel watchdog trigger a reboot. I've
seen it for some via kernel module, but there might be some other
kernel modules doing this as well.
It might be easier for some to debug this if you provide the 'lspci
-n' output as well.
$ lspci -n # executed with 2.6
Hi,
Sorry to bother you again, I just downloaded the rc1 which labeled
sarge-i386-netinst.iso. I burned it into a CD, but for some reasons it's
NOT bootable. Did I miss out on anything or do need to copy other programs
to make it bootable?
Thanks for you help,
Sengen
-Original Message-
* Willi Mann [2004-08-25 22:15:39+0200]
This sounds like some kind of kernel watchdog trigger a reboot. I've
seen it for some via kernel module, but there might be some other
kernel modules doing this as well.
It might be easier for some to debug this if you provide the 'lspci
-n' output
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040824/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux generationq 2.6.7-1-386 #1 Thu Jul 8 05:08:04 EDT 2004
i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-08-25
Method: Netinstall with netinstall-image,
Based on discussions on the debian-kernel list[1], I'd like to propose
that we use 2.4.27 as the 2.4 kernel for all architectures with 2.4 kernels
in sarge. The strongest arguments for 2.4.27, as opposed to 2.4.26 were noted
by tbm [3].
All 2.4 architectures have 2.4.27 kernel images built.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There are actually three ways to boot the oldworld pmacs :
o Using BootX you just need the vmlinux and initrd.gz from :
2.6 :
http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc/netboot/ 2.4 :
- Forwarded message from Greg Madden [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Greg Madden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:45:19 -0800
To: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#264708: lspci -n
Organization: Precision Air Balance, Inc.
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
On Monday 09 August 2004
netcfg_1.01_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_1.01_sparc.udeb
netcfg-dhcp_1.01_sparc.udeb
netcfg-static_1.01_sparc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Rejected: netcfg_1.01_sparc.changes: a file with this name already exists in the
Accepted directory.
Rejected: netcfg-dhcp_1.01_sparc.udeb file already exists in the Accepted directory.
Rejected: netcfg-static_1.01_sparc.udeb file already exists in the Accepted directory.
Rejected:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 01:50:55PM -0700, Sengen Prasomsouk wrote:
Hi,
Sorry to bother you again, I just downloaded the rc1 which labeled
sarge-i386-netinst.iso. I burned it into a CD, but for some reasons it's
NOT bootable. Did I miss out on anything or do need to copy other programs
to
Package:installation
Severity:normal
Actually, this is more of an inconsistency than a bug. I tried to
install Debian on my computer two different times (since the first time
didn't work). The first time, I booted my computer using CD 2, and the
second time I booted from CD 1. The options
On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 06:59, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 10:11:49AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
o Using the miboot floppies from :
2.6 : http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc/floppy
(currently broken)
2.4 :
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 12:22:38AM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote:
On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 06:59, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 10:11:49AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
o Using the miboot floppies from :
2.6 :
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 01:50:55PM -0700, Sengen Prasomsouk wrote:
Hi,
Sorry to bother you again, I just downloaded the rc1 which labeled
sarge-i386-netinst.iso. I burned it into a CD, but for some reasons it's
NOT bootable. Did I miss out on anything or do need to copy other programs
to
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 07:17:43PM -0400, Russell Hires wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There are actually three ways to boot the oldworld pmacs :
o Using BootX you just need the vmlinux and initrd.gz from :
2.6 :
Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 12:22:38AM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote:
On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 06:59, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
Any ideas why these daily builds are broken every day?
I just tried the 2.4 floppy images. What Wouter says is correct. I'm
going to go over the
67 matches
Mail list logo
