On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 01:58:34AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
Rick Thomas wrote:
Is it possible the objcopy is corrupting it?
This is indeed a possibility.
I will disable this again for the 2.4 floppies, and we will see tomorrow what
happens.
That said,
I'm playing with one of my toys: I have a Laptop drive, and I'm booting
all the installers I can lay my hands on to see what can't find it.
d-i does (I think it's the April beta), but calling it SCSI is going
to cause confusion, esp with any new to Linux.
I like the fact you give some info
merge 268815 265085
thanks
Quoting Recai Oktas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
* Håvard Korsvoll [2004-08-29 12:19:41+0200]
I have tried a installation in norwegian bokmaal on a i386 system.
Started installation in export mode and looked around in different
menus to check translation. I changed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 263156 +patch
Bug#263156: debian-installer: Missing SCSI modules on powerpc
Tags were: d-i
Tags added: patch
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
--- kernel/linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6/modules/powerpc/scsi-modules.orig
2004-08-30 08:22:41.0 +0200
+++ kernel/linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6/modules/powerpc/scsi-modules 2004-08-30
08:31:02.0 +0200
@@ -14,3 +14,4 @@
drivers/scsi/sg.o
drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Ok, Sven, i got your kernel booting on the OF prep machine, with the
daily netboot image (btw, now the other ppc (PPCBug) does not work...).
It boots quite well, switches from serial to console once the video card
(matrox millenium) has been
Hi!
I think the partman packages finaly have the shape/features I'd like
them to have in sarge. (I am not uploading them only because my
internet connection at present is limited to my cell phone.) The only
missing feature is the Storage server recipe.
The Storage server recipe should be
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
The current PowerPC kernel-image packages, i.e. revision 2.6.8-3,
contain a built-in command line that enables most PReP systems to boot
unattended from hard disk. It would be nice if the command line was
correct for the installation images as
On Friday 27 August 2004 19:31, Joey Hess wrote:
Package: partman-efi
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
I have an efi partition already from a previous, failed install.
Partman sees it and shows the type as EFI boot partition. It seems
to be activated in partman, but on exit partman-efi complains
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 02:18:04PM -0400, Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr] wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Toni,
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 08:25:29AM -0400, Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr]
wrote:
Reboot failed because kernel 2.6.6-1-generic has
Joey Hess wrote:
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-27 14:26]:
I suspect the only (remaining?) problem with LVM is putting /boot on
lvm, which probably still does not work with grub. Apparently the initrd
problems are fixed, so we should indeed change that
partman-xfs_17_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-xfs_17.dsc
partman-xfs_17.tar.gz
partman-xfs_17_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
rootskel_0.91_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_0.91.dsc
rootskel_0.91.tar.gz
rootskel_0.91_i386.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_0.91_i386.udeb
rootskel-locale_0.91_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_0.91_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_0.91_i386.udeb
rootskel-locale_0.91_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-locale_0.91_i386.udeb
rootskel_0.91.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.91.dsc
rootskel_0.91.tar.gz
to
Accepted:
partman-xfs_17.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_17.dsc
partman-xfs_17.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_17.tar.gz
partman-xfs_17_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_17_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
reassign 268434 discover1-data
Bug#268434: no usb in 2.6 at install time
Bug reassigned from package `usb-discover' to `discover1-data'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
On Monday 30 August 2004 12:57, Joey Hess wrote:
Jim Lieb wrote:
On Friday 27 August 2004 19:03, Joey Hess wrote:
Package: elilo-installer
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i
It would be nicer if elilo-installer could run mapdevfs on the
partition name(s) before displaying them in
Michael Stone wrote:
I can't get that until next week. Is the info from the d-i
hardware-summary useful?
info: /bin/report-hw: /proc/bus/pci/devices: 00e8 8086265815
ff81
Jim Lieb wrote:
On Friday 27 August 2004 19:03, Joey Hess wrote:
Package: elilo-installer
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i
It would be nicer if elilo-installer could run mapdevfs on the
partition name(s) before displaying them in elilo-installer/bootpart.
Since bootpart is mapdevfsed
usb-discover_0.21_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
usb-discover_0.21.dsc
usb-discover_0.21.tar.gz
usb-discover_0.21_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Accepted:
usb-discover_0.21.dsc
to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_0.21.dsc
usb-discover_0.21.tar.gz
to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_0.21.tar.gz
usb-discover_0.21_all.udeb
to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_0.21_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for
Steve Langasek wrote:
xx Installation is complete, so it is time to boot into your new Debian x
xx system. Make sure to remove the installation media (CD-ROM, x
xx floppies), so that your system boots from the disk to which Debianx
xx was installed.
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
(28-Aug-2004 23:38)
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
(28-Aug-2004 23:40)
uname -a: Linux
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040828/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
uname -a: Linux kwai 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16;31:24 EST 2004 i686
unknown
Date: Mon Aug 30, 1800 CST
Method: Booted from businesscard.iso
Your message dated Mon, 30 Aug 2004 15:19:15 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 17 August 2004, http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/powerpc/rc1/sarge-powerpc netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux oldworld 2.4.25-powerpc #1 mer avr 14 15:38:38 CEST 2004 ppc GNU/Linus
Date: Tues 24 August, 1500
Method: Used
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-netinst.iso, Aug. 26, 2004
uname -a: 2.4.26-1-386
Date: Aug. 26, 2004
Method: boot from cd-r from sarge-i386-netinst.iso,
http://ftp.jp.debian.org/debian/ testing main
via proxy cache.kpu-m.ac.jp:3128
Machine: NEC
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 2004-08-25 version of the i386 business
card.iso from http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/
uname -a: Linux fendi 2.4.27-1-686 #1 Sun Aug 15 01:13:41 UTC 2004
i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-08-27, 23:00
On Monday, August 30, 2004, at 04:41 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 08:23:28AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 01:58:34AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
Rick Thomas wrote:
Is it possible the objcopy is corrupting it?
This is indeed a possibility.
I
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 01:41:32AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Monday, August 30, 2004, at 04:41 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 08:23:28AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 01:58:34AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
Rick Thomas wrote:
Is it
30 matches
Mail list logo
