On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 01:04, Rick_Thomas wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 17:57, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Friday 10 September 2004 23:04, Rick Thomas wrote:
> > > When it asked, I chose the
> > > uchicago mirror as usual, and it loaded the installer-components
> > > list (I think -- I didn't get the e
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 09:28:47PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> Geert Stappers wrote:
> > Where I find a recent version?
> > Restarting the daily builds may also help ;-)
>
> Sure. You're just not looking in the right place..
>
> http://june.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i/images/daily
Okay, I found it.
IM
On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 17:57, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 10 September 2004 23:04, Rick Thomas wrote:
> > When it asked, I chose the
> > uchicago mirror as usual, and it loaded the installer-components
> > list (I think -- I didn't get the exact words) after which it
> > *again* complained about no
Package: netcfg
Version: 1.00
Followup-For: Bug #262624
Hi,
I've formalised some hacking that I did with aj a couple of weekends ago
into a patch. It compiles, and I've tested the functionality of the
patch in a separate program, but I haven't tested netcfg with the patch,
because whilst I can bu
It'd be nice if reportbug had made it more obvious that attaching the patch
had failed...
--
linux.conf.au 2005 - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - Birthplace of Tux
April 18th to 23rd - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - LINUX
Canberra, Australia - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ -Ge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> tags 262624 + patch
Bug#262624: netcfg: WEP key set to --00 rather than to correct value
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Geert Stappers wrote:
Where I find a recent version?
Restarting the daily builds may also help ;-)
Sure. You're just not looking in the right place..
http://june.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i/images/daily
--
Joshua Kwan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 05:11:36PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/discover1-1.6.5$ sudo discover --enable-all -f "%V
> %M\n" video
> Password:
> Sigma Designs, Inc. REALmagic Hollywood Plus DVD Decoder
> ATI Technologies, Inc. 3D Rage Pro AGP 1X/2X
Well, this is weird, beca
This report should be merged with 268945. He reported the same
symptoms I did with a Radeon video board. It looks like this installer bug
is specific to Radeon boards. One possible fix is to eliminate all video
mode switching within debian-installer, except for tests of XF86Config-4
file
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> package discover1-data discover1-data discover1-data-udeb
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: discover1-data-udeb discover1-data
> tags 269654 + pending
Bug#269654: loads wrong module for
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 09:22:57AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> m68k 2.2.25/2.4.27 2.2.25/2.4.26 [4]
> [4] m68k build not using new udebs, or is it? The common-kernels file has
> 2.4.27, but the other .cfgs mention 2.4.26. Mess..
Sorry for the mess. I haven't removed all the old stuff from
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: SARGE official netinst snapshot 20040429.
uname -a: Linux hal 2.6.3-1-386 #2 Tue Feb 24 20:20:23 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 27 Aug 2004
Method: CDROM boot, Network install from ftp.dk.debian.org
Machine: Chaintech 7NJS
On Friday 10 September 2004 23:04, Rick Thomas wrote:
> When it asked, I chose the
> uchicago mirror as usual, and it loaded the installer-components
> list (I think -- I didn't get the exact words) after which it
> *again* complained about not finding any kernel modules! I told it
> to continue a
Joey Hess wrote:
sferriol wrote:
i have a problem with anna when you are in lowmem
because it displays to user a list of packages to install
but if you use net-install, just before partman, anna will display all
packages it founds in the mirror even packages used for a cd-install
Packages
Package: ddetect
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
plip (and parport_pc) is a network module which needs parameters before
loading. I think it is not the only one.
But during last install for testing d-i, i made a mistake in parameters
=> impossible to go back and succeed to display another time the mod
On Thursday, September 9, 2004, at 12:45 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, at 09:18 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, at 05:18 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
Please try again with todays floppies,
and if it doesn't fix the problem, we need to investigate what
dr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nikolai,
I noticed the new translation.
I have tested that your translation builds OK (and it does, after fixing one
small mistake in ru/boot-new/boot-new.xml).
I have added Russian to the list of languages to be build (this is done on one
of
Accepted:
debian-installer-utils_1.05.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.05.dsc
debian-installer-utils_1.05.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.05.tar.gz
di-utils-bootfloppy_1.05_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils
debian-installer-utils_1.05_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer-utils_1.05.dsc
debian-installer-utils_1.05.tar.gz
di-utils-reboot_1.05_all.udeb
di-utils-exit-installer_1.05_all.udeb
di-utils_1.05_all.udeb
di-utils-terminfo_1.05_all.udeb
Here's the new patch. I've made some other changes to make the use of
variables a bit more consistent.
I've corrected the timings. They are now consistent with a i386 netinst CD
installation using the 2.6 kernel.
Joey: could you check and commit it?
I have tested the new script during an actua
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 03:07:14PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been bitten by bug #267428, silo 1.4.8 fails to boot 2.4.26 on an Ultra 5.
>
> So I was looking for a more recent version then RC1 netbooting sparc64.
>
> What see from http://people.debian.org/~jbailey/d-i/sparc
Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_1.02_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_1.02_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_1.02_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_1.02_i386.udeb
netcfg_1.02.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.02.dsc
netcfg_1.02.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.02.tar.gz
netcfg_1.0
Your message dated Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:32:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#269236: fixed in netcfg 1.02
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:32:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#269081: fixed in netcfg 1.02
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
netcfg_1.02_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_1.02.dsc
netcfg_1.02.tar.gz
netcfg_1.02_i386.udeb
netcfg-dhcp_1.02_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_1.02_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some comments on the patch from #debian-boot pasted below.
I will update the patch and submit a new version.
[16:14:00] fjp hopes joeyh didn't miss my patch for base-installer because of
his list problems ;-)
[16:17:59] fjp: at first glance, doesn't this increase the amount of
space given on t
On Friday 10 September 2004 10:36, Luk Claes wrote:
> Christian Perrier wrote:
> | Guys and girls,
> |
> | http://bugs.debian.org/270809 (a d-i installation report) seems to
> | contain a lot of suggestions for the Dutch translation of the Debian
> | Installer.
>
> Cc to bug as I don't think so (se
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.00_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_1.00_i386.udeb
rootskel-locale_1.00_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-locale_1.00_i386.udeb
rootskel_1.00.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.00.dsc
rootskel_1.00.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/root
Rejected: debian-installer-utils_1.04_i386.changes: a file with this name already
exists in the Done directory.
Rejected: di-utils-bootfloppy_1.04_i386.udeb: old version (1.04) in unstable >= new
version (1.04) targeted at unstable.
Rejected: di-utils-bootfloppy_1.04_i386.udeb: can not overwrite
Tim Wootton wrote:
> debian-installer nightly build from 08 Sep
> when attempting an automated build using the preseed file a dialog is
> displayed like:
>
> [!! Partition Disks ]
>
> The answer to this question has been preseeded. If you see this
> template, you've foun
[Bartosz Fenski]
> I would use dfs (apt-get install dfsbuild) for that.
> Just patch tasksel for your needs, and rest should be easy with dfs.
There are hooks in tasksel now to get it to present custom tasks.
Check the debian-edu source for info on how to do it. I do not
believe it is necessary a
debian-installer-utils_1.04_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer-utils_1.04.dsc
debian-installer-utils_1.04.tar.gz
di-utils-reboot_1.04_all.udeb
di-utils-exit-installer_1.04_all.udeb
di-utils_1.04_all.udeb
di-utils-terminfo_1.04_all.udeb
rootskel_1.00_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_1.00.dsc
rootskel_1.00.tar.gz
rootskel_1.00_i386.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.00_i386.udeb
rootskel-locale_1.00_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 12:41:53PM -0300, Luís Guilherme Fernandes Pereira wrote:
> We here at the centre want to make a GNU/Linux distro with all of our
> software. My idea was to make a Debian Instalation CD with
> debian-installer, with some basic server packages (like apache, php4,
> mysql, pos
|| On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 18:08:54 +0200
|| Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
cp> Quoting Luís Guilherme Fernandes Pereira ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> Hello, all
<...>
>> We here at the centre want to make a GNU/Linux distro with all of our
>> software. My idea was to make a Debian Instalatio
[Luís Guilherme Fernandes Pereira]
> The result would be a like-standard Debian instalation, with some
> differences: the software contained in CD1 and a new option in Tasksel
> (marked by default if it's possible) named like "CCUEC Software".
I'm not sure if the tasksel method is documented yet.
Quoting Luís Guilherme Fernandes Pereira ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hello, all
>
> my name is Luis, and I'm from Brazil. I make packages (mostly deb and
> rpm) for the Centre of Computing of the State University of Campinas.
> I'm new to the list(s), so I'm presenting myself. I apologize, in
> advance
Hello, all
my name is Luis, and I'm from Brazil. I make packages (mostly deb and
rpm) for the Centre of Computing of the State University of Campinas.
I'm new to the list(s), so I'm presenting myself. I apologize, in
advance, for my poor English.
I'm sending this email to both lists (debian-boot
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: sarge-hppa-businesscard 20040909
uname -a: Linux reseau 2.4.26-32-smp #1 SMP Tue Aug 24 20:39:01 CEST 2004 parisc
GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-09-10 around 13:00 UTC
Method: Downloaded ISO of above, burned to CD-RW, booted. Mirror was
ftp.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 09:22:57AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I wondered what was the status of switching d-i to the 2.4.27 and 2.6.8
Thanks for folllowing up on this.
> arch linux-kernel-di build/configrootskel base-installer
> i386 2.4.27/2.6.82.4.27/2.6.8/2.4.26 [1] 2.
I wondered what was the status of switching d-i to the 2.4.27 and 2.6.8
kernels, so I prepared this table. The four sets of kernel versions are
those used by linux-kernel-di to produce udebs, the version set in
build/config to use those udebs for the installer boot images, the fallback
value set fo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> tags 270993 - experimental
Bug#270993: debian-installer: Customisable basefile installation
Tags were: experimental
Tags removed: experimental
>
End of message, stopping processing he
'lo.
I just tried to do a graphical install on an hppa C3600 and failed,
probably due to the hppa images being 2 weeks out of date. Jeff
has already taken care of that.
The problem I'd like to discuss is cursor keys. If I try to use them
(USB keyboard), strange things happen. Switching to a s
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
Tags: experimental
It would be very nice if the installed basefiles could be customised
before installing starts. A whole bunch of them, ie Exim4, are unneeded
(by me). After installation completes I now have to start uninstalling
them again. In Woody a
I'm running debian sarge and trying to make a grub boot floppy for a
new cross-installation of sarge from my old disk (sda, sarge,
kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4) to a new scsi disk added to the scsi bus (sdc,
sarge, kernel 2.6.7-1). The sdc1 root partition is flagged as
boot. I'm using reiserfs on both hard
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 09:14:15AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 08:13:36PM -0400, Russell Hires wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 09:09, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > What a major pain! This was sooo much easier to when it was woody. To start
> > > > with, I'll have to submit so
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:02:21 +0200
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > | Anyway, hope this will help you in maintaining the Dutch
> > | translation. The reference to the translation being "too polite"
> > or| not enough vlaams (should this mean that vlaams is rude...?)
> > sounded|
Package: base-installer
Version: 1.05
Severity: wishlist
The attached patch improves the information provided by d-i during
base-installation:
- During both kernel installation and installation of extra packages,
the package being installed is shown and the progress bar is advanced
after each
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 20040907 from www.debian.org
uname -a: Linux tmp 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:24:46 UTC 2004 i586 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-09-09
Method: boot from the floppy (smart boot manager from the installer CD),
network install from
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (101, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB
debian-installer nightly build from 08 Sep
when attempting an aut
Hello list,
it seems to me as if there has happend a mistake regarding the links to the
hppa-iso images in the ports status table. "RC1" in the businesscard-column
links to the netinst-image and vice versa.
BTW: I tried both RC1 images on a HP 712/60, but unfortunately without
success: The netins
> | Anyway, hope this will help you in maintaining the Dutch
> | translation. The reference to the translation being "too polite" or
> | not enough vlaams (should this mean that vlaams is rude...?) sounded
> | very funny to me.
>
> No, he thinks the translation is Flemish (because of selecting Be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Perrier wrote:
| Guys and girls,
|
| http://bugs.debian.org/270809 (a d-i installation report) seems to
| contain a lot of suggestions for the Dutch translation of the Debian
| Installer.
Cc to bug as I don't think so (see further).
| This mai
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 11:53:22PM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> When installing from rc1 or from day build of 2004-08-26, the Hebrew messages on the
> third console (TTY3) are seen backwards due to lack of BiDi support. The Bidi
> support was already added to the sLang package in order to display
First stage. libfribidi0 might be installed, but isn't in use for the
third console.
Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Lior Kaplan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I doubled check - there are localized string on the third console.
Hebrew can be solved easily with usage of libfribidi... (package name:
libfri
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 08:13:36PM -0400, Russell Hires wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 09:09, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > What a major pain! This was sooo much easier to when it was woody. To start
> > > with, I'll have to submit some info on installing w/ BootX
> > > for the other hapless souls out
Accepted:
elilo-installer_0.0.7.dsc
to pool/main/e/elilo-installer/elilo-installer_0.0.7.dsc
elilo-installer_0.0.7.tar.gz
to pool/main/e/elilo-installer/elilo-installer_0.0.7.tar.gz
elilo-installer_0.0.7_ia64.udeb
to pool/main/e/elilo-installer/elilo-installer_0.0.7_ia64.udeb
Announcing to [
Your message dated Fri, 10 Sep 2004 02:47:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#270934: fixed in elilo-installer 0.0.7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
58 matches
Mail list logo
