Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 260093 partman-auto
Bug#260093: debian-installer installation-report AlphaStation 500/333
Bug reassigned from package `aboot-installer' to `partman-auto'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bu
reassign 260093 partman-auto
thanks
I just noticed this was still an outstanding bug assigned to
aboot-installer. The remaining problems in this bug report, described
below, seem to be caused by partman-auto, not by aboot-installer.
Reassigned accordingly.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern p
aboot-installer_0.0.17_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
aboot-installer_0.0.17.dsc
aboot-installer_0.0.17.tar.gz
aboot-installer_0.0.17_alpha.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
Accepted:
aboot-installer_0.0.17.dsc
to pool/main/a/aboot-installer/aboot-installer_0.0.17.dsc
aboot-installer_0.0.17.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/aboot-installer/aboot-installer_0.0.17.tar.gz
aboot-installer_0.0.17_alpha.udeb
to pool/main/a/aboot-installer/aboot-installer_0.0.17_alpha.udeb
Announc
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 11:11:49PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, September 29, 2004, at 01:30 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >>>However... There is one important thing missing from the boot
> >>>disks. Specifically, the "System" file is zero length. This is
> >>>true of b
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 12:27:24AM +, Ericka Dorning wrote:
> WHO IN THE WORLD SENT ME THIS?
Most, if not all, viruses today forge the email address they appear to
be coming from; if you want to know who sent you this mail, have a look
at the mail's headers and contact the administrators of th
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 11:05:31PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I guess the minimum size is not properly detected, and no error is
> shown on failure.
Yes. There is a code that tries to parse the output of
ntfsresize -f -i DEVICE_NAME
but it didn't work and partman falls back on some very minima
> Thanks for applying it. There are some translations that need to be
> updated, especially with regard to "RAID1"->"RAID5" in the appropriate
> locations, as well as the one sentence I added about needing at least 3
> active raid5 partitions (if that requirement is at all meaningful). I
> hope the
Package: partman-lvm
Severity: normal
Tags: l10n
I found a bug: 3 strings which aren't translated. Two just don't use the
existing translation and one doesn't have a string to translate. All are
in the LVM.
You can see in the screenshots that the word leave is in English instead
of Hebrew. I doub
> Thanks for your quick answer and fix. BTW, did you check all
> languagechooser's locales are exactly provided by debian glibc
> locales?
Countrychooser does this work (or is supposed to do it). The final
locale is compared against the SUPPORTED file (countrychooser embarks
a copy of it as the
Am Di, 28. Sep 2004, 12:05:31 -0400 schrieb Joey Hess:
> As bast I can tell, the patch in this bug does not change the behavior
> of rootskel. I cannot apply patches without an explanation of the bug
> that the patch fixes, and there is no explaination of why the changes in
> this patch are useful.
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 22:39, Ian L wrote:
> asus a7n8x motherboard with onboard nforce nic and 2nd intel pro 100
> S nic.
>
> tried the latest sarge netinst from
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/sarg
>e-i386-netinst.iso (on the 27th)
>
> tried the 2.4 and
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 02:12:07PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> At 30 Sep 04 03:47:02 GMT,
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > - make this an arch any package, and vary the dependencies to pull in
> >ntfstools-udeb on architectures that are likely to have ntfs partitions
>
> I found ntfstools-udeb
Hi Rick,
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 02:32:56AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> Do you mean the 2.6 floppy disks? I haven't been able to get them
> to work. The 2.6 "boot" floppy (the "ofonlyboot" floppy as well)
> starts reading OK but ends with the screen colors inverted and
> hangs. It never ej
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
|On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 12:13:56PM -0400, Ralph Crongeyer wrote:
|
|>Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
|>
|>>Hi Ralph
|>>
|>>In order to resolv the bug you reported on discover1, I need the output
|>>of "discover --device cdrom". I suspec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
|On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 12:25:58PM -0400, Ralph Crongeyer wrote:
|
|>Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
|>
|>>Hi
|>>
|>>Sorry to already bother you again...
|>>
|>>There is a patch in the Debian BTS which fixes a bug similar to the one
|>>
Subject: install: keympap problem in Gnome 2.6
Package: install
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Installation of Sarge on a PC with the new installer. Always this
problem with keymap refusing to be loaded: azerty is changed to qwerty.
So again dpkg-reconfigure xse
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 04:33:11PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> #> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #>
> #> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> #> > reassign 274144 kernel
> #> Bug#274144: in
Just to add to this information,
I received the same error with the RC1 installer containing the base
system (100mb iso). This was on a Dell PowerEdge 2550.
The lines before the error message on vc/3 said:
Insmod /path/to/sd_mod.ko
No matching physical volumes found
No volume groups found
Readin
Package: discover1
Version: N/A; reported 2004-09-30
Severity: normal
Tags: patch l10n
Please commit the attached po file. thanks.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux haydn 2.4.27-rc5+skas3+acl #1 SMP Wed Aug 4 07:33:14 EDT 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_C
* Joseph Vidal Rosset [2004-09-30 13:34:46+0200]
> Subject: install: keympap problem in Gnome 2.6
> Package: install
> Severity: important
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
> Installation of Sarge on a PC with the new installer. Always this
> problem with keymap refusing to be lo
discover1_po_he.po
Description: Binary data
Hi Joey,
I repeated the process on another machine, and it came
out alright. I suppose I had an entry in
/boot/grub/menu.lst left over from a previous
installation, and the installer just left it there.
So, no bug this time :)
Sorry about the loss of time.
Thanks,
Alex.
--- Joey Hess <[EMAIL P
Kenshi Muto wrote:
> I found ntfstools-udeb hadn't been entered in testing yet.
> Does it need hint by RM's hand and need to append debian-cd task file?
>
> (off topic, I hope localization-config will be included in tc2 CD
> image also :-) )
I expect that tc2 will look identical to today's daily
Alex Fernandez wrote:
> I repeated the process on another machine, and it came
> out alright. I suppose I had an entry in
> /boot/grub/menu.lst left over from a previous
> installation, and the installer just left it there.
> So, no bug this time :)
That could happen if you had a kernel that was l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> reassign 274203 lvmcfg
Bug#274203: I18N bugs in partmat-lvm
Bug reassigned from package `partman-lvm' to `lvmcfg'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
--- Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That could happen if you had a kernel that was left
> on an unformatted
> partition after the boot process. Do you have such a
> partition?
That's right. I have /boot, /, /home and others. For
the re-installation, I re-formatted just /.
A possible compla
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 19:39, Joey Hess wrote:
> All the efi labels are now reasonable, although I do notice that in the
> list of partition types, it has "Use the partition as a EFI boot
> partition". It would be more consistent with the rest of the list to
> just have "EFI boot partition"
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 273975 debian-installer
Bug#273975: debian-installer: Provide prebuilt nbi for etherboot
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer-manual' to `debian-installer'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> Yes. There is a code that tries to parse the output of
>
> ntfsresize -f -i DEVICE_NAME
>
> but it didn't work and partman falls back on some very minimal size. If
> you still have this Win partition can you send me the output of this
> command. I want to be sure that
After a false start today because a late changes which resetted all
counters, the status of D-I level 1 translation is the following:
13 complete languages:
bg, da, fr, he, ja,
ko, lt, nn, pl, pt_BT,
ru, sk, zh_TW
30 languages are complete for level2
The status page had some glitches today as
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: RC1 (sarge-powerpc 2.6.8 kernel)
uname -a: Linux ppc 2.6.8-powerpc #1 Fri Aug 27 18:02:26 CEST 2004 ppc GNU/Linux
Date: 20040930 3:13 UTC
Method: Boot floopies downloaded from
http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 274239 pending
Bug#274239: discover1: [INTL:he] updated Hebrew translation
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
tags 274239 pending
thanks
File commited
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
partman-partitioning_30_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-partitioning_30.dsc
partman-partitioning_30.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_30_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
Accepted:
partman-partitioning_30.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_30.dsc
partman-partitioning_30.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_30.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_30_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Anton,
Just for comparison, here's what I get if I run that command on my laptop.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo ntfsresize -f -i /dev/hda1
ntfsresize v1.9.0
NTFS volume version: 3.1
Cluster size : 4096 bytes
Current volume size: 10001904128 b
Adobe Acrobat 6.0 Professional - 100.00
Adobe Photoshop 7.0 - 60.00
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition - 200.00
Adobe PageMaker 7.0 - 60.00
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition - 200.00
Visual Studio.Net Enterprise Architecht - 200.00
Adobe Photoshop CS - 80.00
Microsoft Money 200
partman-efi_4_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-efi_4.dsc
partman-efi_4.tar.gz
partman-efi_4_ia64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 10:33:07AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > reassign 273975 debian-installer
> Bug#273975: debian-installer: Provide prebuilt nbi for etherboot
> Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer-manual' to `debian-inst
Accepted:
partman-efi_4.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-efi/partman-efi_4.dsc
partman-efi_4.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-efi/partman-efi_4.tar.gz
partman-efi_4_ia64.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-efi/partman-efi_4_ia64.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to Debian
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 07:13:56PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > That's possible ... suggestions for naming of the common class? I'd been
> > thinking the new classes were small enough not to matter too much.
> >
> > Maybe some magic could go into Debconf::Element::Noninteracti
Martin Schulze wrote:
> One problem remains. During the installation a medium priority
> question (console-tools/archs) is displayed which lists all possible
> keyboard types for mipsel (AT, LK, USB) but has the default set to AT.
>
> The problem is that this question is only displayed when the u
Oi
Existe alguem do Brasil??
nelson.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|| On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:42:22 -0400
|| Nelson Grana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ng> Oi
ng>Existe alguem do Brasil??
Sim, existe porem essa lista deve ser mantida em ingles.
Yes, exist but this mailing list should be keep in english.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
Hi,
(about the woody cd sets...)
I hope I'm at the right address...
I installed debian on a pb5300cs with success. (on external scsi
disk...)
The only thing I need to do is somewhere delete the contents of the
new-powermac folder and replace it with the contents of the powermac
folder. That's bec
On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 05:18, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 11:11:49PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> > Now, is the loss under 2.6 of the HFS ".finderinfo" and ".resource"
> > pseudo-directories a bug, or a feature?
>
> You probably need to load the hfs+ driver ?
>
> If that doesn't
Recai Oktas a écrit :
* Joseph Vidal Rosset [2004-09-30 13:34:46+0200]
Subject: install: keympap problem in Gnome 2.6
Package: install
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Installation of Sarge on a PC with the new installer. Always this
problem with keymap refusin
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
It seems to me that the manual partitioning method does not give me as
full control over the partitioning process as I would like to have.
I am installing a PC using debian-installer RC-1.
I come to the partitioning, and choose manual partitioning.
I e
At 05:17 AM 9/30/2004, you wrote:
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 22:39, Ian L wrote:
> asus a7n8x motherboard with onboard nforce nic and 2nd intel pro 100
> S nic.
>
> tried the latest sarge netinst from
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/sarg
>e-i386-netinst.iso (o
Asbjørn Sæbø wrote:
> I expect to find something that gives me total control of the partitiong
> process, something along the lines of cfdisk.
> Instead I find a partitioning program that does not give me the level of
> control and overview over the partitioning that cfdisk does.
Can you give an
discover1_1.7.1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover1_1.7.1.dsc
discover1_1.7.1.tar.gz
discover1_1.7.1_i386.deb
libdiscover1_1.7.1_i386.deb
libdiscover1-dev_1.7.1_i386.deb
libdiscover1-pic_1.7.1_i386.deb
discover1-udeb_1.7.1_i386.udeb
Greetin
Your message dated Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:17:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#274239: fixed in discover1 1.7.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Accepted:
discover1-udeb_1.7.1_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.7.1_i386.udeb
discover1_1.7.1.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.7.1.dsc
discover1_1.7.1.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.7.1.tar.gz
discover1_1.7.1_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/discover1/discove
Martin Schulze wrote:
[snip]
> > We could simply declare no preferred keyboard for the mipsel
> > architecture (beware, there's __mips__ for both mips and mipsel, and
> > __MIPSEL__ for only mipsel). This would require the dialog to be
> > displayed, though, for the user to be able to select the k
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 255103 normal
Bug#255103: no /media/cdrom? directories
Bug#268255: cdrom symlinks not created
Bug#270290: Discover1 won't create /media/cdrom0 directory?
Bug#270674: Discover1 won't create /media/cdrom0 directory?
Bug#273824: installation repor
Package: anna
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
In lowmem level 2, anna presents a list of udebs, which does not include
partman-ext3. And partman-ext3 is not loaded at all, though the kernel
udeb with the ext3 module is. This leaves partman only able to do ext2
by default. Reiserfs and other filesyst
severity 255103 normal
tags 255103 -patch
Thanks
With the upload of discover 1.7.1 the default is not to mangle with
cdrom mount points. This makes this bug (which affects only some
machines) no longer release critical.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Joey Hess wrote,
> One weird thing. It told me the minimum size was 3.2 gb, but if I typed
> in exactly that, it said "too small size". I changed it to 3.3 and it
> was ok. Rounding error? The actual minimum, according to ntfsresize, is
> 3231584256 bytes.
man ntfsresize:
ntfsresize con
Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> man ntfsresize:
>
>ntfsresize conforms to the SI, ATA, IEEE standards and
>the disk manufacturers by using k=10^3, M=10^6 and G=10^9.
>
> fdisk, cfdisk, reiser_reiserfs use the same decimal units and parted was
> supposed to be converted too 2 years a
Colin Watson wrote:
> OK, let's try this, moving the common show() code into
> Debconf::Element::Noninteractive:
>
> http://patches.ubuntulinux.org/patches/debconf.238301.v2.diff
>
> Tested with debootstrap, same changes. I'll probably put this version
> into Ubuntu for now at least.
Feel free
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: amd64 netboot 9/27/2004
uname -a: Linux arno 2.6.8-4-amd64-k8 #1 Mon Sep 20 20:04:07 CEST 2004 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Date: 9/29/2004
Method:
Netboot with
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 sid main contrib non-
pre-rc2 is released. I assembled this release using the daily image
builds and the sid_d-i CD builds, so if you run one of these builds,
please take care not to delete the build that's linked to from the web
site for pre-rc2. If you'd like to copy that build to a pre-rc2
directory to make it harder
Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> If I understand you right, you want to say that partman rounded down the
> value, so there is bug in partman. This is what you wrote:
>
> "It told me the minimum size was 3.2 gb"
>
> but you didn't explain who is "it". Partman or ntfsresize? Ntfsresize
> tells t
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> Partman looks at the part of the ntfsresize output that gives a value in
> bytes. That value was, like I said, output as exactly 3231584256 bytes,
> correctly as far as I can tell. No matter what you call a k M or G, a
> byte is a byte.
If I understand y
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/i386/current/sarge-i386-netinst.iso>
uname -a:
Date:
Method:
How did you install?
Booted sarge install cd.
What did you boot off?
The cd, address above.
If network inst
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Joey Hess wrote:
> Of course since your current interface encourages grepping ntfsresize's
> output, it's unlikely that the user will see it at all. Especially if
> there's a GUI involved.
GUI's started to grep for things then I added the WARNING's to the code.
So, what woul
On Monday 30 August 2004 12:23, Jim Lieb wrote:
> > Package: partman-efi
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: d-i
Close: 268554
This bug has been fixed by a combination of various partman core changes
and the latest patch to partman-efi. I could not reproduce this symptom
in the current version. If n
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://home.tiscali.nl/isildur/d-i/log/en.log
===
If you would prefer this
Package: partman-efi
Close: 270746
This bug is fixed with the same patch as fixes #268555.
Please close.
Jim
On Wednesday 08 September 2004 18:21, Joey Hess wrote:
> Package: partman-efi
> Severity: normal
> Tags: d-i
>
> This is how partman displays my partition table after automatic
> partition
This problem no longer occurs because the missing kernel module
problem in the kernel package has been fixed which eliminates
the elilo error on installs. Therefore, this is no longer a show stopper.
There seems to be a minor issue remaining on 2.6.8 kernels.
Although the elilo-installer runs cor
Your message dated Fri, 1 Oct 2004 00:30:49 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FWD: Re: Bug#270746: the display of the efi boot partition is
uninformative
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Jim Lieb wrote:
> Close: 268554
>
> This bug has been fixed by a combination of various partman core changes
> and the latest patch to partman-efi. I could not reproduce this symptom
> in the current version. If no one else can reproduce it, please close this
> bug.
I can still reproduce this:
19 complete languages:
bg, ca, da, fi, fr,
he, hr, ja, ko, lt,
nn, pl, pt_BR, ru, sk,
sq, tr, uk, zh_TW
15 nearly complete (over 95%)
ar, cs, de, el, es,
eu, id, nb, ro, sl,
sv, zh_CN, it, nl, hu
5 in good shape (over 70%)
cy, sq, bs, gl, fa
1 partial (<70%)
lv
6 "prospective" (will not b
Quoting GOTO Masanori ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > One step will be added so that, from the language/country combination,
> > the user will be able to choose among all valid locales. That step
> > will be medium priority so only expert installs will see it. Others
> > will get the charset/modifier def
Package: countrychooser
Severity: serious
Version: sid d-i 20040930 (= same as tc2?)
Hi,
When I choose Japanese for install language, countrychooser returns
error silently.
Here is IRC log with Christian Perrier.
15:11 kmuto: what is broken?
15:12 >kmuto< could you try to choice Japane
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 04:33:47PM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 05:18, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 11:11:49PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> > > Now, is the loss under 2.6 of the HFS ".finderinfo" and ".resource"
> > > pseudo-directories a bug, or a feature?
77 matches
Mail list logo
