Ali ASLANDAS wrote:
hi,
i made a custom initrd for debian installation cd, but after cd boot,
mounted file systems is not as i expected.
and df out look like this
rootfs 102400 9432 92968 9% /
tmpfs 102400 9432 92968 9% /
i cannot find a way to get rid of rootfs, it must not
> If the exim4 maintainers don't have for an upload to fix this library
> dependency right now, I'm willing to NMU. Also, the libgnutls11
> maintainer has also been in an NMUing mood lately, and would probably be
> equally as willing if he's available. :-)
Adding the fix for 273505 (Ukrainian tr
> Adding the fix for 273505 (Ukrainian translation, the only pending
> translation ATM) would be deeply appreciated by the i18n team
I notified the translators for the few missing languages that they
have a very short window for sending translations.
Do not wait for them. I told them they hav
yes, i have an pivot_root block in "init" , i guess i have to give more
information, sorry
corresponding isolinux.cfg line
DEFAULT /install/vmlinuz
APPEND vga=normal initrd=/install/initrd.gz ramdisk_size=10240
root=/dev/rd/0 init=/linuxrc devfs=mount,dall rw
here is the "init" file
#!/bin/sh -
peter green wrote:
> what about changing the 486 emulation kernel patch so that it completely
> disables itself on non 386 processors
Did you read the patch? I thougth that was already the case from how
it is invoked.
> this way it would only have security issues on pure 386 which wouldn't be
>
Hello,
When grub-installer is modified, how should it be tested?
I can imagion these scenarios:
A: grub-installer udeb in the initial ramdisk
Build a udeb, place it in the initrd.
B: manual udeb install
Place the udeb on a http server,
wget it, and `udpkg -i` it
C: use a personal archive
Le mardi 05 octobre 2004 Ã 18:20 +0930, Michael Gratton a Ãcrit :
> > Too bad this isn't done by default.
> >
> > > * add a line to /etc/discover.conf to prevent discover from
> > > installing the equivalent OSS modules
> >
>
> Yeah, alsa-base installs /etc/hotplug/blacklist.d/alsa
Hi,
what about automatic root pw setting?
In Joey's preseed.cfg [0] I reed:
# To preseed the root password, you have to put it in the clear in this
# file. That is not a very good idea, use caution!
# (XXX: In fact, this won't work, because passwd clears the settings
# before asking for a root p
On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 20:49:22 -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> looks like initrd is slightly too big?
>
>It sure is. We need some debian-cd firepower here. Manty, can you
>s/8192/16384/ in all the silo.conf files in debian-cd?
I had a look into the silo.conf of that iso. I found no
size statement for t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 274364 -1
Bug#274364: broken USB2 keyboard support in d-i pre-rc2
Bug 274364 cloned as bug 274991.
> reassign -1 usb-discover
Bug#274991: broken USB2 keyboard support in d-i pre-rc2
Bug reassigned from package `kbd-chooser' to `usb-discover'.
>
> #passwd passwd/root-passwordpassword r00tme
> #passwd passwd/root-password-again password r00tme
>
> has this been fixed?
No, this is #271407. It's likely that no more update to shadow will
happen until sarge release unless someone convinces the rel
Hello,
I think that the "ADSL/PPPOE (SpeedTouch 530)" problem should be added to
the errata for pre-rc2 as a known problem:
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/errata#pre-rc2
This problem has been reported several times it seems, and just for the
record here are 2 bugs that show it:
http
> Using the rc1 installer if I booted with
> "expert26 debian-installer/probe/usb=false" and selected the PS-2
> keyboard option I was able to use the keyboard fine and complete the
> installation, but that option doesn't make any difference using the
> pre-rc2 installer.
It appears this workaroun
The change below seems to have broken the use of "debian-installer/probe/usb"
as a boot parameter.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/projects/d-i/svn/packages/usb-discover/debian$ svn log templates
r14303 | joeyh | 2004-04-24 02:07:33 +0200 (Sat, 24 Apr 2004) | 2 lines
* Joey Hess
- Fix apparently innoc
|--==> Christian Perrier writes:
>>#passwd passwd/root-passwordpassword r00tme
>>#passwd passwd/root-password-again password r00tme
>>
>>has this been fixed?
CP> No, this is #271407. It's likely that no more update to shadow will
CP> happen unt
> Ok thanks for you hints.
>
> Is there a way to get the Unix login name that the user chosen using
> debconf? I'd like to use it to set gdm's autologin. E.g. :
>
> . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
>
> db_get passwd/username
>
> if [ -n "$RET" ]; then
> sed -i "s,^AutomaticL
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 03 Oct 2004
uname -a: Linux 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Mon Sep 13 23:29:55 EDT 2004 i586 GNU/Linux
(I installed with 2.4.x kernel, then switched to 2.6 after instalation)
Date: 03 Oct 2004
Method: Network install from business card image (the >100M
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 12:41:35PM +0200, Fernando Rodriguez Sela wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
>
> Debian-installer-version:
> (http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/cd-images/debian-weekly/i386/)
> uname -a: Linux mangiacaprini 2.4.27-speakup #1 Thu Aug 19 21:46:14
> CEST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
> Date
Your message dated Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:52:01 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing Bug#274028: Critical Remarks
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:29:01PM -0700, Brian Laflum wrote:
> I just tried the netinst CD image from:
> http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
>
> When I got to the stage of installing GRUB, I chose to
> install on fd0. It failed,
and with which error message?
> and all I could do was g
Josselin Mouette a Ãcrit :
Le mardi 05 octobre 2004 Ã 18:20 +0930, Michael Gratton a Ãcrit :
Too bad this isn't done by default.
* add a line to /etc/discover.conf to prevent discover from
installing the equivalent OSS modules
Yeah, alsa-base installs /etc/hotplug/bla
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 274486 debian-installer-manual
Bug#274486: preseed: looks need to rewrite debconf/frontend before reboot
Bug reassigned from package `preseed' to `debian-installer-manual'.
> thanks mate
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
reassign 274486 debian-installer-manual
thanks mate
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 12:26:38PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> There's really no value in preseeing debconf/frontend to newt (perhaps
> to text, which will be handled ok I think). Can we fix this bug by just
> updating the manual to not suggest u
Hi,
would it at least be possible to add some comments and commented-out
commands to /etc/discover.conf to point users/admins how to disable OSS
in favour of ALSA?
Needless to say that sound setup seems to still suck big time for Sarge,
see e.g. http://lists.debian.org/debian-gtk-gnome/2004/10/ms
Your message dated Tue, 5 Oct 2004 14:34:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#274486: preseed: looks need to rewrite debconf/frontend before
reboot
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 2004-09-30 pre-RC2, i386 netinst CD from
http://www.dk.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
uname -a:
Date: 2004-10-05
Method: Boot from CD.
Machine: Dell PowerEdge 1400SC
Processor: Xeon 1000MHz Pentium III (Coppermine)
Me
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 12:48:21AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> Joey and/or Sven,
Rick, i am currently traveling;, and very busy, so it would be best to try to
do the fix yourself, or to get someone else to do it with you.
Mmm, i had a quick look, and it seems that your IDE controller doesn't a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> tags 274933 pending
Bug#274933: tasksel: When test scripts exit 2 the task is not marked
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pleas
I continue to try installing on this Dell Poweredge 1400SC.
If I use
boot: linux
it finds the SCSI hard disk. Have not yet tried further, but I suppose
the install would work with this kernel.
--
Tapio Lehtonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG public key from http://www.iki.fi/Tapio.Lehtonen
signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 275020 cdrom-retriever
Bug#275020: hardwired "stable" suite in cdrom-retrivier
Warning: Unknown package 'installer'
Bug reassigned from package `installer' to `cdrom-retriever'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: built on 20040801 /
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/i386/pre-rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux Knoppix 2.4.27 #2 SMP Mo Aug 9 00:39:37 CEST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Sunday Out 02 20:50 GMT 2004
Method: Used net
Hi,
I'm new to the list so I'll say Hi to everyone before I get started.
First off I have a ppc 6360 that once upon a time, I installed netbsd
on. I removed macos completely and I''v got myself into a bit of a
pickle.
It seems that I set the bootvars to boot-auto (or whatever the exact
synta
usb-discover_1.01_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
usb-discover_1.01.dsc
usb-discover_1.01.tar.gz
usb-discover_1.01_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Accepted:
usb-discover_1.01.dsc
to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_1.01.dsc
usb-discover_1.01.tar.gz
to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_1.01.tar.gz
usb-discover_1.01_all.udeb
to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_1.01_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 2749
I am using the 20041004 netinst cd image.
I have been testing daily netinst iso for sarge.
I wish to use the preseed file.
I make my manual install once and generated it with this command line:
debconf-get-selections --installer > file
debconf-get-selections >> file
Then i would to replicat
Your message dated Tue, 05 Oct 2004 11:17:08 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#274991: fixed in usb-discover 1.01
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
|--==> Colin Watson writes:
CW> reassign 275020 cdrom-retriever
CW> thanks
CW> On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 04:29:33PM +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>>Package: installer
>>Severity: important
>>Tags: patch
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>the installer fails to retrieve the Packages.gz and Release fil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am using the 20041004 netinst cd image.
> I have been testing daily netinst iso for sarge.
> I wish to use the preseed file.
> I make my manual install once and generated it with this command line:
>
>debconf-get-selections --installer > file
>debconf-get-selec
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
pre-rc2 from
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/pre-rc2/netboot/
uname -a:
Linux debian 2.6.8-1-686-smp #1 SMP Mon Sep 13 23:02:39 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date:
Tue Oct 5 17:46:42 CEST 2004
Method:
Frederik Dannemare wrote:
On Saturday 02 October 2004 22:29, lorenzo gherdovich wrote: > Frederik Dannemare
wrote:
I cannot install debian sarge on Sun Fire Blade 100x using PXE.
[...]
>> The machine looks to be freezed.
Blame on me...
I needed console=ttyS0,9600n8
... and pre-rc2 in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 275049 installation-reports
Bug#275049: installer of sarge
Warning: Unknown package 'installer'
Bug reassigned from package `installer' to `installation-reports'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
On (05/10/04 10:25), Jason Pirok wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to the list so I'll say Hi to everyone before I get started.
>
> First off I have a ppc 6360 that once upon a time, I installed netbsd
> on. I removed macos completely and I''v got myself into a bit of a
> pickle.
>
> It seems that I
languagechooser_1.35_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
languagechooser_1.35.dsc
languagechooser_1.35.tar.gz
languagechooser_1.35_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
Message d'origine
>Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:01:39 -0400
>De: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Copie à: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sujet: Re: preseed file failed to load
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I am using the 20041004 netinst cd image.
>> I have been testing daily netinst
Your message dated Tue, 05 Oct 2004 13:02:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#274441: fixed in languagechooser 1.35
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Accepted:
languagechooser_1.35.dsc
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.35.dsc
languagechooser_1.35.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.35.tar.gz
languagechooser_1.35_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.35_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PR
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
I am atempting to install Sarge using the access floppies from
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/floppy/access dated
10-04-2004. The install starts ok, but the installer installs the
kernel image for my processor instead of the spea
Made some progress with the linux26 installation.
Apparently the apt-get methods or kernel do not like something in my
firewall (FreeBSD3, ipfilter, ipnat). Once I put the system outside the
firewall apt-get works. The odd thing is that it worked without any
problems on the same system/ip/firewa
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 03:29:10PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Mmm, i had a quick look, and it seems that your IDE controller doesn't appear
> in lspci output, so it is either not there, or not a pci device. In any case,
> maybe you should contact gaudenz or colin watson about this. the dmesg outpt
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 07:12:34PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> De: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> In both case i get a failed to load preseed file.
> >
> >Your preseed file is corrupt. Send a copy of it to this list and I might
> >be able to tell you why. Or tr
Hi,
I had several problems during install with RC1 (my questions in
272626 went unanswered :-( ), but the problem that makes me think
I have to start over is the 130MB partition the installer chose
for my root partition. This was on a 160GB disk. I figured at
the time that perhaps there was s
Christian Perrier wrote:
> No severe problem on i18n/l10n side. The biggest one is and will
> remain the inability to change the language in the middle of an
> install (this ends in an unsupported locale).
>
> The bad countrychooser problem has been solved by Frans and I just
> have a minor fix wa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Now i don't undestand how my file could be corrupt since i did not change anything
> in it.
>
> I just did :
> -debconf-get-selections --installer > file
> -copy it to a floppy
> -and finally launch the installer
It does seem to be word wrapped. Also, I don't recom
Geert Stappers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When grub-installer is modified, how should it be tested?
>
> I can imagion these scenarios:
>
>
> A: grub-installer udeb in the initial ramdisk
>
> Build a udeb, place it in the initrd.
>
>
> B: manual udeb install
>
> Place the udeb on a http server,
> w
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I wonder why discover is installed at all. Having only hotplug works
> perfectly for hardware detection, and this one doesn't load unneeded OSS
> modules.
>
> Can anyone from the Debian boot team please explain why discover1 is
> installed by default while it is that brok
(deadline Oct 6th 16:00 UTC)
Macedonian is now 100%. Unfortunately, we cannot risk adding it to
D-I, otherwise we're risking a too big increase in some parts size.
Similarly, Vietnamese had a big bump up to 66%.
Hungarian should be complete as should be Welsh. Others such as
Bosnian, Galician, P
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 274958 debian-cd
Bug#274958: sparc64: current businesscard completely broken
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `debian-cd'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 273343 partman
Bug#273343: [sparc64][netboot] RAID/LVM failure, partman changing partition table
types behind your back
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
>
> Try restting the PRAM at boot time. As you boot hold down
> Cmd+Option+P+R
>
> Wait until the startup chime is heard two or three times and then
> release or try the open firmware combination again.
>
> HTH
>
> Clive
Thanks for the input Clive, for some reason that key combination isn't
w
Panquekas wrote:
> I used KNOPPIX that is Debian Based but the knoppix use an emulation
> of SCSI for my SATA drive.. and the module was ide_scsi but I'll
> prossed to further information.
The ide-scsi module is not in itself capable of driving your hardware.
There must be a regular ide module loa
Package: kbd-chooser
Version: 1.02
If there are errors in includes in kmap files, kbd-chooser will segfault in
function yyparse() in loadkeys.y.
Instead of segfaulting, kbd-chooser should provide a decent error message.
(Note: AFAICT the segfault does _not_ happen if kbd-chooser is compiled wit
Package: kbd-chooser
Version: 1.02
Selecting the AT-keyboard layout for 'Lithuanian' on i386 fails with error
message: 'kbd-chooser: cannot open file lt'.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tapio Lehtonen wrote:
> I boot with linux26. Boot works from IDE CD, kernel module for Adaptec
> SCSI is chosen. Hard disk is SCSI. But installer fails to find the
> SCSI drive. I installed this same machine with RC1, then it worked.
It seems to me the kernel module most not be seeing or working w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> reassign 275075 base-installer
Bug#275075: installation-reports: fails to install the speakup kernel image
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-installer'.
>
En
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 275033 kbd-chooser
Bug#275033: Installation report (part 2)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kbd-chooser'.
> retitle 275033 Segfault when selecting the Portuguese USB-keyboard
Bug#275033: Installation report (part 2)
Chan
The last status was indeed H-20h and not H-36h, of course.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kenny Hitt wrote:
> I am atempting to install Sarge using the access floppies from
> http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/floppy/access dated
> 10-04-2004. The install starts ok, but the installer installs the
> kernel image for my processor instead of the speakup kernel image. This
>
reassign 275033 kbd-chooser
retitle 275033 Segfault when selecting the Portuguese USB-keyboard
thanks
Selecting the USB-keyboard layout for 'Portuguese' on i386 fails with a
segfault.
Cause is an error in the include statements in:
/usr/share/keymaps/i386/quertz/mac-usb-pt-latin1.kmap
The inc
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: sarge_d-i/i386/20041004/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux linux 2.6.4-03-NeTraverse-i686-UP-4GB #1 Sat Jul 3 00:04:45 UTC 2004
i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
Date: 10-05-04
Method: Boot from CD
Machine: Gateway 700 Select Desktop
Processor:A
On Oct 5, 2004, at 2:57 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 03:29:10PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Mmm, i had a quick look, and it seems that your IDE controller
doesn't appear
in lspci output, so it is either not there, or not a pci device. In
any case,
maybe you should contact gaudenz
base-installer_1.10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_1.10.dsc
base-installer_1.10.tar.gz
base-installer_1.10_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
lorenzo gherdovich wrote:
> Appending console=ttyS0,9600n8 is *mandatory* :)
Do you think this was well enough documented? Probably not..
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Oct 5, 2004, at 3:09 PM, Matt Bonner wrote:
I assume at this point, I have to wipe the disk and reinstall,
but if anyone knows of a way to resize the partitions, that would
be great.
That's what I would do in your circumstances. In any case, resizing a
partition (even when possible because the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 275089 partman
Bug#275089: sarge-i386-netinst: bug report
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'.
> retitle 275089 Partman recognizes disk but not existing partitions
Bug#275089: sarge-i386-netinst: bug report
Changed
Accepted:
base-installer_1.10.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.10.dsc
base-installer_1.10.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.10.tar.gz
base-installer_1.10_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.10_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Your message dated Tue, 05 Oct 2004 17:17:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#275075: fixed in base-installer 1.10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sanitize the ifdef TEST maze in ethtool-lite.c.
Is this patch tested? This seems very shady:
> if (edata.data)
> {
> -#ifdef TEST
> - printf("%s is connected.\n", iface);
> -#else
> di_info("%s is connected.\n", iface);
>
Gerd Knops wrote:
> Made some progress with the linux26 installation.
>
> Apparently the apt-get methods or kernel do not like something in my
> firewall (FreeBSD3, ipfilter, ipnat). Once I put the system outside the
> firewall apt-get works. The odd thing is that it worked without any
> proble
Package: netcfg
Severity: normal
Aparently netcfg has a -V option. This is bloat, the same info is
available in a different place in /var/lib/dpkg/status.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.
Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> I propose to split the debian-tasks.desc file in several
> parts:
>
> * lang-tasks.desc:for language related tasks which get
>automatically installed or excluded
>
> * server-tasks.desc: for server related tasks (Mail server,
>
autopartkit_1.04_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
autopartkit_1.04.dsc
autopartkit_1.04.tar.gz
autopartkit_1.04_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> severity 275096 minor
Bug#275096: -V is bloat
Severity set to `minor'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
Joshua,
>Herbert, do you have time to try the miniiso image?
I just tried the 2.4 miniiso dated 04-OCT-2004 (only first stage),
and it installs fine.
Thank you for your help
Herbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
tag 275020 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 17:26:11 -0400
Source: cdrom-retriever
Binary: cdrom-retriever load-cdrom
Archite
Accepted:
autopartkit_1.04.dsc
to pool/main/a/autopartkit/autopartkit_1.04.dsc
autopartkit_1.04.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/autopartkit/autopartkit_1.04.tar.gz
autopartkit_1.04_i386.udeb
to pool/main/a/autopartkit/autopartkit_1.04_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your cont
cdrom-retriever_1.02_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdrom-retriever_1.02.dsc
cdrom-retriever_1.02.tar.gz
cdrom-retriever_1.02_all.udeb
load-cdrom_1.02_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
kbd-chooser_1.03_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kbd-chooser_1.03.dsc
kbd-chooser_1.03.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_1.03_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 275020 + fixed
Bug#275020: hardwired "stable" suite in cdrom-retrivier
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
prebaseconfig_1.02_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
prebaseconfig_1.02.dsc
prebaseconfig_1.02.tar.gz
prebaseconfig_1.02_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
|--==> Joey Hess writes:
JH> [1 ]
JH> Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>>I propose to split the debian-tasks.desc file in several
>>parts:
>>
>>* lang-tasks.desc:for language related tasks which get
>>automatically installed or excluded
>>
>>* server-tasks.desc: for server related ta
Accepted:
cdrom-retriever_1.02.dsc
to pool/main/c/cdrom-retriever/cdrom-retriever_1.02.dsc
cdrom-retriever_1.02.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/cdrom-retriever/cdrom-retriever_1.02.tar.gz
cdrom-retriever_1.02_all.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdrom-retriever/cdrom-retriever_1.02_all.udeb
load-cdrom_1.02_all.ude
Accepted:
kbd-chooser_1.03.dsc
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_1.03.dsc
kbd-chooser_1.03.tar.gz
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_1.03.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_1.03_i386.udeb
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_1.03_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your cont
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
kbd-chooser_1.03_i386.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the p
Your message dated Tue, 5 Oct 2004 18:34:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FWD: Fixed in NMU of cdrom-retriever 1.02
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Accepted:
prebaseconfig_1.02.dsc
to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_1.02.dsc
prebaseconfig_1.02.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_1.02.tar.gz
prebaseconfig_1.02_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_1.02_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank y
Package: hw-detect
Forwarding since I don't have time or ability to work on this, and we
have a partial patch.
- Forwarded message from Per Olofsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Per Olofsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 22:14:06 +0200
To: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subjec
Hi,
--- Rick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 5, 2004, at 3:09 PM, Matt Bonner wrote:
>
> >
> > I assume at this point, I have to wipe the disk and reinstall,
> > but if anyone knows of a way to resize the partitions, that would
> > be great.
> >
>
> That's what I would do in your cir
Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> So what do you suggest me to do if I want to keep all the automatic
> language related tasks and get rid of Desktop, Mail server, etc?
>
> Should I copy all the language related file to my custom task list and
> divert debian-tasks.desc entirely?
>
> I don't like this
Matt Bonner wrote:
> It does. I still think it's weird that the basic mode wouldn't let
> me adjust the partition sizes. Is there any important limit to the
> size of the first partition? This is a fairly generic Athlon PC w/
> Award BIOS...
It probably won't let you resize the first partition
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 07:57:20PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 03:29:10PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Mmm, i had a quick look, and it seems that your IDE controller doesn't appear
> > in lspci output, so it is either not there, or not a pci device. In any case,
> > maybe
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
