Your message dated Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:19:19 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280842: Installer Report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:16:34 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280845: Debian Installation Report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:01:31 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280810: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
> In two words:
> - nearly no problem for installation and configuration,
> - a major problem after a short usage time.
Unfortunately, given the problem description, it does not really
belong to Debian Installer scope. It's very likely to be related to X
as you mentionedand the D-I team is n
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.09_hppa.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_1.09_hppa.udeb
rootskel-locale_1.09_hppa.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-locale_1.09_hppa.udeb
rootskel_1.09.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.09.dsc
rootskel_1.09.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/root
rootskel_1.09_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_1.09.dsc
rootskel_1.09.tar.gz
rootskel_1.09_hppa.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.09_hppa.udeb
rootskel-locale_1.09_hppa.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Accepted:
tasksel_2.15.dsc
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.15.dsc
tasksel_2.15.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.15.tar.gz
tasksel_2.15_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.15_all.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 275890 276031
Thank you for your contribution to
Your message dated Fri, 12 Nov 2004 00:17:02 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#275890: fixed in tasksel 2.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 12 Nov 2004 00:17:02 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#276031: fixed in tasksel 2.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
tasksel_2.15_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
tasksel_2.15.dsc
tasksel_2.15.tar.gz
tasksel_2.15_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hello,
I just recently purchased a copy of Debian to experiment with as an OS. I
would like to know if their were a downloadable copy of the installation
manual I could have as opposed to spidering the manual from the website?
thank you in advance
John T.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://home.tiscali.nl/isildur/d-i/log/en.log
===
If you would prefer this
Hello,
I just recently purchased a copy of Debian to experiment with as an OS. I
would like to know if their were a downloadable copy of the installation
manual I could have as opposed to spidering the manual from the website?
thank you in advance
John T.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Obtained on 9 Nov 2004 from
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
Full URL downloaded:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/i386/pre-rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux toshi 2.6.8-1-386 #1
Package: partman
Version: 60
[version number is a guess]
Hi:
I am trying the Sarge RC2 netinst CD to migrate a computer to Debian
from RH. The partitioning is fine as is and I prefer to only have to
do the backup if I can, not be forced to backup and move data back.
First issue, it becomes a pa
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-netinst.iso (daily build 10-11-04)
uname -a:
Linux localhost 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Thu Oct 7 02:21:16 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 11-11-04 6pm
Method: Installed from sarge snapshot CD's (08-11-04), booted from
Geert Stappers wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 04:36:41PM -0500, Daniel F. Dickinson wrote:
Okay, I'm try an anonymous subversion checkout
svn co svn://svn.debian.org/d-i/trunk debian-installer
and it creates the debian-installer/.svn directory and that's it. I'm
not sure if this is a problem with
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/i386/pre-rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Nov 5, 2004
uname -a:
Linux cerrunos 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:24:46 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Nov 7, 2004, 8pm
Method: Booted off pre-rc2 neti
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 04:36:41PM -0500, Daniel F. Dickinson wrote:
> Okay, I'm try an anonymous subversion checkout
> svn co svn://svn.debian.org/d-i/trunk debian-installer
> and it creates the debian-installer/.svn directory and that's it. I'm
> not sure if this is a problem with svn.debian.or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 11 November 2004 21:00, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > There are several open issues that should be dealt with post RC2:
> > - As now AT keymaps are also offered for USB keyboards, the current
> > titles for the arch and keymap selection dial
Okay, I'm try an anonymous subversion checkout
svn co svn://svn.debian.org/d-i/trunk debian-installer
and it creates the debian-installer/.svn directory and that's it. I'm
not sure if this is a problem with svn.debian.org or if its a subversion
issue (including my use of) so I'm asking, is anyon
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: October 27, 2004, from Belgacom mirror (Belgium)
uname -a: Linux Shirka 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Mon Sep 13 23:29:55 EDT 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: October 27, 2004
Method: net install, installation boot from CD
Machine: GMT Net
Processor: PIII Celero
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004-11-06 -
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/i386/pre-rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux cee 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:24:46 UTC 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-11-06 1pm PST
Method: I used the sarge net-ins
> There are several open issues that should be dealt with post RC2:
> - As now AT keymaps are also offered for USB keyboards, the current titles
> for the arch and keymap selection dialogs for AT can be confusing.
> - The usb-mac-* keymaps are inconsistent: the us/uk keymaps are actually
> AT k
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 280122 normal
Bug#280122: Translations for mac/usb keyboards are confusing
Severity set to `normal'.
> retitle 280122 Selection of USB-kbds needs rewrite; dialogs misleading
Bug#280122: Translations for mac/usb keyboards are confusing
Changed
severity 280122 normal
retitle 280122 Selection of USB-kbds needs rewrite; dialogs misleading
submitter 280122 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
On Sunday 07 November 2004 13:22, Fabrice LORRAIN wrote:
> Booting with linux26 + french language + France gives the Macintosh USB
> keyboard menu, which is wrong
Frans Pop wrote:
Hello Fabrice,
On Monday 08 November 2004 21:49, you wrote:
Nop, works for 2.4 not for 2.6. I just got a choice for USB keyboard
with 2.6.
Thank you very much for your quick response. Unfortunately I can't test
the image myself very much as I don't have the hardware.
Took me mor
maks attems wrote:
> well but succesfull lilo install could again reset debconf to higher.
It does..
> sorry for getting in details for whom i don't know the consequences,
> reformulate wishlist (hope it makes it clearer):
> * get an easy prompt to select lilo without having to change debconf
>
Your message dated Thu, 11 Nov 2004 13:02:02 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#249142: fixed in partman-auto 40
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Accepted:
partman-auto_40.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_40.dsc
partman-auto_40.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_40.tar.gz
partman-auto_40_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_40_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 249142
Thank
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Joey Hess wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> > * hint on howto choose your partition in partman.
> > first time users stumble..
> > list not evident as list in the template.
>
> "Select a partition to modify its settings". Problem is not that we
> don't give a hint, but
partman-auto_40_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto_40.dsc
partman-auto_40.tar.gz
partman-auto_40_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
maximilian attems wrote:
> * hint on howto choose your partition in partman.
> first time users stumble..
> list not evident as list in the template.
"Select a partition to modify its settings". Problem is not that we
don't give a hint, but that users do not read.
The real fix of course is to
Package: preseed
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i
It would be useful for testing if I could preseed values w/o setting
their seen flags. Then I could use the installer interactively, but have
all the defaults I prefer.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (5
Your message dated Thu, 11 Nov 2004 17:32:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fwd: Re: Bug#275222: Successful installation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Accepted:
base-config_2.58.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.58.dsc
base-config_2.58.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.58.tar.gz
base-config_2.58_all.deb
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.58_all.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribu
Accepted:
base-config_2.53.4.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.53.4.dsc
base-config_2.53.4.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.53.4.tar.gz
base-config_2.53.4_all.deb
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.53.4_all.deb
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Joey Hess wrote:
> fdisk-udeb
> Like its source util-linux, this has a different version for
> s390 in unstable and testing than any other arch.
Correction, util-linux is in sync. The fdisk-udeb situtation is that
it's no longer built for s390, so should be removed from unstable and
te
1 Description of the test
a) Short description of the test user
The male user is a 35 year old theoretical physics professor.
He is also the system administrator of this physics institute.
b) Short description of the test setup
Netinstall CD on quick university lan with no proxy, static network
Your message dated Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:30:49 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280729:
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
base-config_2.53.4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-config_2.53.4.dsc
base-config_2.53.4.tar.gz
base-config_2.53.4_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
base-config_2.58_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-config_2.58.dsc
base-config_2.58.tar.gz
base-config_2.58_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Some udebs have a newer version in sarge from their source package. This
is a leftover from the bad old days when I didn't check source versions
of udebs whose source didn't build debs; I'm more careful now. The
significant ones are:
colo-udeb 1.14-1 vs colo 1.10-1
colo is frozen
t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 08 November 2004 00:02, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> My only comment would be about a /.aptitude directory with an empty
> config file. Why is it there? Why is it in the root directory? I never
> use aptitude, but if it has to create a dire
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: netinstall 11. november
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20041110/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a:
Linux axion 2.4.27-1-686 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:28:00 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date:
Thu Nov 11 16:06:58 CET
Sven Luther wrote:
> As said on irc, i believe that the problem is twofold here, that is there are
> two parted bugs/features that influence this :
>
> o parted has a bug showing large partitions, du to it using an int and not a
> larger kind of value. I have a patch for this, and it will go
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 10/11/2004, debian.org
uname -a: N/A
Date: 11/11/2004
Method: Sarge NetInstaller CD
Machine: AMD64, nforce3-Ultra (MSI K8N Neo2)
Processor: AMD64 3500+ S939
Memory: 1024 DDR400 OCZ
Root Device: Seagate Barracuda on nforce3 SATA 1
Root Size/par
I was back pretty early and you were correct, I had received the link in my
inbox. http://www.yourrealworkscenter.com/info.html
You can download console games & full CD albums, dvd's and stuff. I saw 3 CD's
I dont have yet so I grabbed those.
You should see how many they have in there - its cra
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/i386/pre-rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Last-Modified: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:19:37 GMT
uname -a: Linux defun 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:24:46 UTC 20
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 01:16:29AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> On sparc, partman-auto can only partition existing free space, it's not
> capable of repartitioning a whole disk. Indeed, it does not even present
> that as an option, and if it's preseeded to partition a whole disk
> anyway, we see why:
Your message dated Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:20:10 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#275628: #275628 success, at last
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
This report can be closed!
The installer now supports this hardware. The only trick to installation
is to power cycle immediately before booting off the cdrom.
Full report below.
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: netinst 20041015, from
http://cdimage.debia
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 05:21:04PM -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Aug 11, 2004, at 3:44 PM, Sven Luther wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 03:12:49PM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote:
> >>Here are a few practical suggestions:
> >>
> >>Has anyone looked at "inside Macintosh" or some of the other early Mac
This was sent to the wrong bug number..:-)
Daniel, you can ignore thisthe comment is not related to a bug in
aptitude, but a bug in discover1-data. Thankfully, I'm subscribed to
both PTS..:-)
The real bug is 279959.
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> 08:55 < bubulle> joshk: any
It's been a long time, but have you had a chance to try the installer
again?
Unfortunately not, sorry. The customers server had to be put in
production and I don't have any equal machine. I'm sorry... ;-(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
55 matches
Mail list logo
