I was finally able to install Debian GNU/Linux with the "linux26"
method.
It turned out that the installer had an issue with my partition table. I
simply wiped it out and cfdisk'd a new partition layout. After that, the
installation went very smooth. I did not encountered any issue.
Unfortunate
> the links http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ under "Documentation"
> to the d-i-FAQ and the wiki, which both point to the wiki, are outdated - I
> guess because of the recent update of the wiki, so I also don't really know
> whether to fix the webpage or the wiki-webservers rewrite
--- The message cannot be delivered to the following address. ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Mailbox unknown or not accepting mail.
550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown
Reporting-MTA: WFM_Email_Gateway@wholefoods.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;davidhulbert@wholefoodsmarket.com
Action: failed
Stat
Your message dated Wed, 12 Jan 2005 01:53:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#289918:
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:57:03 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#289377: Debian Installation Report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
* Joey Hess wrote:
> Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > Updated alpha packages were accepted a few hours ago.
>
> Do you or maybe vorlon plan to rebuild linux-kernel-di-alpha with
> them?
I'll update the package tomorrow.
Norbert
I've checked in a change to cdebconf adding an X_SETBACKTITLE command.
In the newt frontend, this has the effect of drawing text in the top
left-hand corner of the screen, in the same way that Perl debconf writes
"Debian Configuration" in the top left-hand corner. (At the moment it's
not implemente
Hello folks,
Today you received a wrong mail talking about a upload. Sorry for
that. I forgot to change the maintainer field before upload it to my
dak installation.
Really sorry :(
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sat, January 8, 2005 23:17, Joey Hess said:
> Joey Hess wrote:
>> No, this seems to be unconnected to lvm and be a general oversight. We
>> do take care to load ide-cd always and even ide-detect/ide-generic,
>> which is enough to get ide cds working on otherwise fully scsi systems,
>> but on mix
Aceito :
grub-installer_1.06.debian-br-cdd.1.dsc
to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_1.06.debian-br-cdd.1.dsc
grub-installer_1.06.debian-br-cdd.1.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_1.06.debian-br-cdd.1.tar.gz
grub-installer_1.06.debian-br-cdd.1_i386.udeb
to pool/mai
Thank you for looking into this issue.
What you describe is what I was trying to do. Did not quite understand
the basic concepts of RAID I guess, but now I think I get it.
What I did:
I marked the newly created RAID0 volume and pressed enter, and I got a
question if I wanted to create a new parti
Accepted:
partman-basicfilesystems_37.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_37.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_37.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_37.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_37_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfil
Hi,
the links http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ under "Documentation"
to the d-i-FAQ and the wiki, which both point to the wiki, are outdated - I
guess because of the recent update of the wiki, so I also don't really know
whether to fix the webpage or the wiki-webservers rewrite con
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Jan 11, 2005, from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux mu 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:24:46 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 01/11/2005 14:00:00
Method: netinst CD, RC2 releas
partman-basicfilesystems_37_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-basicfilesystems_37.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_37.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_37_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-2-itanium-smp-di_1.1_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-2-itanium-smp-di_1.1_ia64.udeb
ext3-modules-2.6.8-2-itanium-smp-di_1.1_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6/ext3-modules-2.6.8-2-itanium-smp-di_1.1_
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-2-sparc32-di_0.05_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-2-sparc32-di_0.05_sparc.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-2-sparc64-di_0.05_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-2-sparc64-di_
Steve Langasek wrote:
> For 2.4, this requires i2c, kernel-latest-2.4-i386, linux-wlan-ng,
> lm-sensors, and oprofile-source to be ready to go at the same time with
> packages built against the new ABI. Of these, oprofile-source has had a
> recent upload, but has only out-of-date modules (none bui
Accepted:
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.74_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.74_powerpc.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.74_all.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-priority_0.74_all.udeb
cdebconf-text-udeb_0.74_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-text-udeb_0.74_powerpc.ude
cdebconf_0.74_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.74.dsc
cdebconf_0.74.tar.gz
cdebconf-priority_0.74_all.udeb
cdebconf_0.74_powerpc.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.74_powerpc.deb
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.74_powerpc.deb
cdebconf-udeb_0.74_powerpc.
On Tuesday 11 January 2005 11:54, Christian Perrier wrote:
> For *very very* nasty errors (such as a bad spelling error which would
> make every single Bulgarian user laugh loudly), you may request for an
> update and get a chance that someone takes care of it.
For Dutch I have done several spelli
Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> Updated alpha packages were accepted a few hours ago.
Do you or maybe vorlon plan to rebuild linux-kernel-di-alpha with them?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 10 January 2005 11:35, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> I've added this information but restructured it a bit. It should be
> available in the next webwml run so please verify it in 6-8 hours.
Thanks for doing the update Javier.
I see you left the info for Woody's manual. I can s
Quoting Ognyan Kulev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Specifically for the Bulgarian translation, there aren't any major
> problems that I'm aware of :-) There were some inconsistencies in the
> translation of the 2nd level but I have to refresh my experience with
> debian-installer before complaining a
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 06:45:00AM -0800, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
> "Sven" == Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Sven> On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 08:50:48PM -0800, Shyamal Prasad
> Sven> wrote:
>
> >> I created a partition with type Linux_LVM and name LVM_Test
> >> using m
Christian Perrier wrote:
RC3 or whatever it will be called will be based on the sarge
branch. So, indeed, as far as Bulgarian is concerned, you're already
complete.
However, if you have fixes to the translations, you should commit them
to the sarge branch. Please note, however that no systematic up
On Tuesday 11 January 2005 17:23, Philippe Batailler wrote:
> Why lowest or highest?
Because if you set prio medium, messages with priority medium _or_ high
_or_ critical will be displayed.
Or, all messages with a lower priority then the one set will be
suppressed.
pgpyCbV6ACZe0.pgp
Descripti
reopen 288981
thanks
On 05-Jan-11 07:18, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #288981: busybox-cvs: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): conflicting types for
> 'build_bl_tree',
> which was filed against the busybox-cvs package.
>
> It has been clos
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
« Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
« > Riccardo Fabris pointed out an error in boot-installer/parameters.xml.
« > The attached patch shoud fix the problem. If you agree, I will apply it.
« >
« > -This parameter settings will set the lowest priority of messages
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 288981
Bug#288981: busybox-cvs: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): conflicting types for
'build_bl_tree'
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:07:39 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 4.34-10 (which is in both sarge and sid)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
"Sven" == Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sven> On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 08:50:48PM -0800, Shyamal Prasad
Sven> wrote:
>> I created a partition with type Linux_LVM and name LVM_Test
>> using mac-fdisk. I put an ext3 file system on the partition so
>> I could fsck/mo
> Use the --initrd option with the make-kpkg command.
Thanks, I finally got time to try that, but it wasn't the whole fix. Even
though I selected everything in the lvm/raid section when configuring the
kernel, dpkg (really mkinitrd) would fail to create the initrd.img when
installing the kernel
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2005-01-09
uname -a: N/A
Date: 2005-01-10
Method:
Burnt Installer to CD, booted from CD, chose country keyboard etc,
proceeded to disc configuration, chose default (All files in one
partition) and when writing changes to disc, formatting sta
Quoting Ognyan Kulev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Joey Hess wrote:
> >Before we can release d-i rc3
>
> Will translation updates be allowed for RC3? If yes (I hope), what's the
> time frame and to which branch they should go in?
RC3 or whatever it will be called will be based on the sarge
branch. So,
Joey Hess wrote:
Before we can release d-i rc3
Will translation updates be allowed for RC3? If yes (I hope), what's the time
frame and to which branch they should go in?
Regards,
ogi
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 08:50:48PM -0800, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
>
> "Michael" == Michael Schmitz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Michael> s/MockOS/MacOS/g
>
> Michael> to anything but Apple_Bootstrap, Apple_HFS,
> Michael> Apple_UNIX_SVR2 or Apple_Free. If you're sure (or
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 10:12:59AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > What is "quite a few" changes here? I thought the next d-i release was
> > > going to be bugfixes and kernel updates only?
> > I think Christian really meant "quite few" (i.e. "no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 11/01/2005 main debian page
uname -a: Linux locutus 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:24:46 UTC 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 11/01/2005
Method: Boot by cd network installer image, direct connection to the
Quoting Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > What is "quite a few" changes here? I thought the next d-i release was
> > going to be bugfixes and kernel updates only?
>
> I think Christian really meant "quite few" (i.e. "not many") rather than
> "quite a few" (i.e. "several") here.
Bingo. I hav
* Joey Hess wrote:
> As far as I know, no other arches except amd64 (not tracking that)
> are updated.
Updated alpha packages were accepted a few hours ago.
Norbert
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
uname -a:
Date: <2004-12-09>
Method:
I tried to install sarge on a computer with a "fire gl1" video card, but the
install menus, were not readable, I can see them, but its not possible to
read them...
Mit freundlichem Gruss
BRENNION Sé
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 04:24:27PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Before we can release d-i rc3 we need all the kernels updated with at
> least some security fixes, notably the ones that change the kernel
> module ABI, and we need to update things to reflect the new kernel
> "abiname". Here's my underst
Joey Hess wrote:
<>Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
-This parameter settings will set the lowest priority of messages
+This parameter settings will set the highest priority of messages
Since "this parameter settings" is bad English too, I've committed a
rewritten varient.
Thanks, this was our guess too.
45 matches
Mail list logo
