You have added to the subscriber list of:
debian-boot@lists.debian.org
the following mail address:
archive@mail-archive.com
By default, copies of your own submissions will be returned.
For more information about Debian mailing lists
(such as the code of conduct), please see
Your message dated Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:34:44 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353044: udev + lvm issue after install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 10:12:05PM +0100, Christian Beutenmueller wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
>
> Boot method: CD
> Image version: Debian Testing Netinst 14.02.2006
> Date: 15.02.2006
Thank you for reporting. You have allready recieved an E-mail that the issues
meanwhile are
fixe
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 03:07:49PM +0100, Davide Viti wrote:
> This evening I'll put what follows into practice (i.e. new test iso
> image).
just done it: you can grab it from [1]
> 3) It's also possible to strip the following (random) glyphs not
> used in the g-i (there are certainly others):
base-installer_1.46_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_1.46.dsc
base-installer_1.46.tar.gz
base-installer_1.46_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 10:07:07PM +0100, Davide Viti wrote: I forgot
to mention that I also uploaded the xml map [1] of the glyphs included
in the ttf files included with the iso.
Columns are:
FreeSansBold.ttf
FreeSansOblique.ttf
FreeSans.ttf
ae_AlMohanad.ttf
ja.ttf
ko.ttf
zh.ttf
MuktiNarrow_11-0
> PS: Christian, I noticed that hi.po does not contain the "/Choose language"
> in the msgstr;
> now I understand why it is useful
:-)
I am sure I tracked these down. The error probably came back when a
translator committed a work file he was working on while I was
correcting this mistake.
--
Viti,
> bengali: compare [2] with [3]
[3] is way better than [2]. That's a great job!
Regards,
BG
--
Baishampayan Ghose
Free Software Foundation of India
b.ghose at gnu.org.in
Accepted:
base-installer_1.46.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.46.dsc
base-installer_1.46.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.46.tar.gz
base-installer_1.46_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.46_i386.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel-cha
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 17:33, you wrote:
> Can people who experienced spacing problems with former versions test
> that one ?
> http://people.debian.org/~bubulle/ttf-freefont
>
> G-I people, can you also have a look at it?
Davide Viti has just confirmed that the spacing problems we'd already
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 23:13, Takis Diakoumis wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> first tried the 3.1 installer. didn't pick up the network, its a new MB
> using pci express. i then tried the beta installer but this won't
> detect and mount the cdrom. cd drive is a dvd read cdrw. the drive was
> pic
Your message dated Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:37:34 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #301586: [sparc64] [RC3 netinst 2.4.27] Some weird things
happening during boot
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
On Wednesday 15 February 2006 07:19, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Given the recent status update posted by Frans, I think that
> scheduling the D-I team meeting for Feb 22th, as initially proposed in
> the report of the last meeting, would not be wise.
I would suggest March 4. We can celebrate the n
Hello Helen,
On Wednesday 15 February 2006 16:26, Helen Field wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> Very basic install with boot.img floppy, or with Etch CD, give same
> result: system installs as far as:
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 96k freed
There's a few things you could try.
Instead of just press
Jan Willem Stumpel wrote:
> Josh Triplett wrote:
>>No spacing problems either with this version or with the current version
>>in Debian.
>
> Interesting .. I have spacing problems (line spacing, and, with Freemono
> when printed by means of Mozilla/xprint, also character spacing) both
> with this
Christian Perrier wrote:
Oblique is something even more "pending" than italic and the GTK
frontend never uses oblique formatting, so the *oblique*.ttf files can
also be deleted from font packages right now to save up some Kbytes.
So, you actually mean we could remove the below *Oblique files
Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 15 February 2006 17:05, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Oblique is something even more "pending" than italic and the GTK
What do you mean by pending exactly? Slanted maybe?
Hmm. Are you sure that the oblique fonts are not used instead of italic?
Anyway, I'd like to
Hmm. Two errors in my previous mail.
On Thursday 16 February 2006 01:12, Frans Pop wrote:
> There's a few things you could try.
>
> Instead of just pressing at the boot prompt, try entering:
> - install noapic nolocalapic
This should be 'noapic nolapic'
> - install acpi=off
> - install24
> - in
On Sunday 12 February 2006 04:03, Frans Pop wrote:
> It looks very much as if the following udeb is just missing from the
> root floppy:
> floppy-modules-2.6.15-1-powerpc-miboot-di
>
> I've added that udeb. Let's hope that it does not make the size of the
> root floppy too big again.
>
> Could you
On Saturday 11 February 2006 11:48, Julien Louis wrote:
> I've tested the 20060210 iso, and i had some kernel related problems,
> the installer could not load some kernel modules due to a kernel
> version mismatch, the installer boot on a 2.6.14 kernel which is not
> available anymore in testing, a
> in the specific case of freesans fonts, oblique is slanted, while italic
> is slanted and cursive; with other fonts, i noticed the oblique being
> more slanted than italic, while not cursive.
> We should evaluate how much space it's possible saving up if italic ttf
> files are removed, and als
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Wednesday 15 February 2006 07:19, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Given the recent status update posted by Frans, I think that
> > scheduling the D-I team meeting for Feb 22th, as initially proposed in
> > the report of the last meeting, would not be wise.
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
