tasksel_2.42_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
tasksel_2.42.dsc
tasksel_2.42.tar.gz
tasksel_2.42_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Accepted:
tasksel_2.42.dsc
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.42.dsc
tasksel_2.42.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.42.tar.gz
tasksel_2.42_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.42_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 337161 355120 359750
Thank
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 03:26:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Rather, I think it would mean people would be upset about 2.4 being dropped
with little official notice -- but yes, this should be announced sooner
rather than later.
The announcement of the obscolecence of the 2.4 kernels by the
Frans Pop wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
On Thursday 13 April 2006 00:27, Emmanuel Galatoulas wrote:
snip
1) In the first place after reaching the stage of selecting software
(appearing as participating in the popularity-contest step) I chose
to install Desktop and some other packages and I realised
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 358532 Please make sure that sbus modules make it to initrd on sparc
Bug#358532: Please make sure that sbus modules make it to initrd on sparc32
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Blars Blarson wrote:
This report was about a 64 bit sparc system (with sbus). Please don't
pretend it only affects sparc32. It would also affect sparc32, but I
am no longer trying to support sparc32.
You're absolutely right, somehow it totally slipped my mind that sbus
retitle 358532 Please make sure that sbus modules make it to initrd on sparc
thanks
This report was about a 64 bit sparc system (with sbus). Please don't
pretend it only affects sparc32. It would also affect sparc32, but I
am no longer trying to support sparc32.
--
Blars Blarson
Quoting Davide Viti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Another check I'm playing with is the following:
make sure all the strings containing the comment:
#. Translators, this is a menu choice.MUST BE UNDER xx COLUMNS
are really under xx columns.
The following need to be fixed:
Actually, this check is
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 07:40:52AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Please could you support Valencian (southern Catalan) in localechooser?
It is identified by the [EMAIL PROTECTED] locale, which has been recently
committed
to Debian glibc SVN (pending upload attow).
Patch
I have just uploaded this new version of the ttf-dejavu package to
unstable, on request of Peter Cernak, its maintainer.
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I'm working on the translation, but I thought this ought to be sent first.
Well, in that case, the New Language Process for Valencian should be
used. See http://people.debian.org/~bubulle/d-i/i18n-doc/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
localechooser_1.11_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
localechooser_1.11.dsc
localechooser_1.11.tar.gz
localechooser_1.11_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 09:39:39AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
I'm working on the translation, but I thought this ought to be sent first.
Well, in that case, the New Language Process for Valencian should be
used. See http://people.debian.org/~bubulle/d-i/i18n-doc/
I'll have a look,
Accepted:
localechooser_1.11.dsc
to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_1.11.dsc
localechooser_1.11.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_1.11.tar.gz
localechooser_1.11_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_1.11_all.udeb
Announcing to
On 4/14/06, Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This could
be done by checking all strings preceded by the comment #. Type: select
or #. Type: multiselect and counting the number of , in the original
and translated strings (making sure to skip escaped commas (\, ).
This should be supported by
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 13 Apr 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 10:28:56AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
That is stretching it. The third component of a version is
hardly a major revision.
Why?
Component in a version are major.minor.sub. Now, given
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
I really want to run debian unstable on my new laptop. I tried
installing debian using the Beta 2 installer for etch. Unfortunately, it
won't detect my cdrom. this is lspci -v:
:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile Memory Controller Hub
dann frazier wrote:
If for no other reason, upstream release process changes will likely
make this much more difficult. As I'm sure you know, 2.6 is being
actively developed indefinitely, as opposed to the previous method of
branching off and stabalising a development tree. Since there is no
* Joey Hess:
- Debian's userland has *always* supported at least the previous major
kernel version, and most often the previous two, or sometimes I
think, three major kernel versions.
This isn't a real argument, IMHO, because upstream no longer releases
major kernel versions.
OTOH,
gtk+2.0-directfb_2.0.9.2-14.2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gtk+2.0-directfb_2.0.9.2-14.2.dsc
gtk+2.0-directfb_2.0.9.2-14.2.diff.gz
libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb_2.0.9.2-14.2_i386.udeb
libgtk+2.0-directfb-dev_2.0.9.2-14.2_i386.deb
libcairo-directfb_1.0.4-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libcairo-directfb_1.0.4-1.dsc
libcairo-directfb_1.0.4.orig.tar.gz
libcairo-directfb_1.0.4-1.diff.gz
libcairo2-directfb-udeb_1.0.4-1_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
Accepted:
libcairo-directfb_1.0.4-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/libc/libcairo-directfb/libcairo-directfb_1.0.4-1.diff.gz
libcairo-directfb_1.0.4-1.dsc
to pool/main/libc/libcairo-directfb/libcairo-directfb_1.0.4-1.dsc
libcairo-directfb_1.0.4.orig.tar.gz
to
Accepted:
gtk+2.0-directfb_2.0.9.2-14.2.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gtk+2.0-directfb/gtk+2.0-directfb_2.0.9.2-14.2.diff.gz
gtk+2.0-directfb_2.0.9.2-14.2.dsc
to pool/main/g/gtk+2.0-directfb/gtk+2.0-directfb_2.0.9.2-14.2.dsc
libgtk+2.0-directfb-dev_2.0.9.2-14.2_i386.deb
to
tag 362523 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 00:32:11 +0200
Source: gtk+2.0-directfb
Binary: libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb
netcfg_1.25_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_1.25.dsc
netcfg_1.25.tar.gz
netcfg_1.25_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_1.25_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Accepted:
netcfg-static_1.25_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_1.25_i386.udeb
netcfg_1.25.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.25.dsc
netcfg_1.25.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.25.tar.gz
netcfg_1.25_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.25_i386.udeb
Announcing to
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.14
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version: etch beta 2, amd64, 15 Mar 2006 and daily image 14 april 2006
Date: 14 april 2006, 18:00 MET
Machine: HP xw9300
Partitions: no
Base
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 362633 normal
Bug#362633: installation-report: fails to detect hard drive
Severity set to `normal'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
severity 362633 important
Bug#362633: installation-report: fails to detect hard drive
Severity set to `important'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
On Friday 14 April 2006 18:38, Radim Vocka wrote:
Comments/Problems:
Workstation with LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1030 PCI-X Fusion-MPT
Dual Ultra320 SCSI controler and two SCSI hard drives.
Installer does not issue the error message indicating that the hard
drive is not found (installer of
First off, even though the name of this list is debian-boot, it is not
about solving boot problems, but rather about developing Debian's
installer. You may get more help if you ask on debian-user.
I'll assume that with unable to mount root you're talking about the
reboot after the
On Friday 14 April 2006 15:02, Joseph Smidt wrote:
I really want to run debian unstable on my new laptop. I tried
installing debian using the Beta 2 installer for etch. Unfortunately,
it won't detect my cdrom. this is lspci -v:
Is this a SATA cdrom drive? In that case see:
Bastian was talking on IRC about dropping the modutils patch from busybox,
which apparently is quite large. This would mean we'd lose lsmod.
There are currently two components using lsmod:
./hw-detect/hw-detect.sh:347: ! lsmod | grep -q ^yenta_socket; then
Hello,
I'm another person, but I'm still having the same problem: I've booted
from this cd [
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r1/i386/iso-cd/debian-31r1a-i386-netinst.iso
]. I assume that it's 3.1r1a.
regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
34 matches
Mail list logo
