> Suggestions for improving the "flow" for font reports are welcome; if
> anyone thinks other Debian MLs would be more appropriate for this,
> please let me know.
The pkg-fonts team on Alioth and its related mailing lists such as
pkg-fonts-devel?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatur
Hi!
I am not very sure if this is the right place for such a claim; if not,
please {politely, flamely} redirect me to the right list...
I'll try to explain the problem.
linux 2.6.16 declares advansys SCSI driver as broken. In recent times
(aka, 2.6.17) there has been some cleanup on this device
As many of you probably know, dejavu fonts have been chosen as default
font for the graphical version of the debian-intaller (g-i); this
means that 48 of the 64 currently supported languages rely on dejavu
fonts for rendering text.
I've started lurking the dejavu IRC channel and mailing list and g
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 11:35:59AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> However,
> after finishing the crippled install without the network, the reboot made
> eth0 to work again. After the reboot the ifup/ifdown commands were available!
Please describe the hardware that you use. Especial the network ha
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 19:48, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > That would work. Can you do a proposal for the names you'd like to
> > use?
>
> I'd like to match the GTK+ names:
> libgtk2.0-directfb0
> libgtk2.0-directfb0-udeb
> libgtk2.0-directfb-dev
Looks fine. Feel free to upload with those names.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> merge 261929 376799
Bug#261929: Can't use tasksel to install multi l10n tasks
Bug#376799: tasksel: Please support multi-language installations
Bug#305150: possible improvements for ta
Le mercredi 05 juillet 2006 à 01:17 +0200, Frans Pop a écrit :
> On Tuesday 04 July 2006 10:18, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > How about uploading these packages with new names for the udebs? This
> > would allow us to fix those names at the same moment.
>
> That would work. Can you do a proposal for
Accepted:
fat-modules-2.6.8-amiga-di_0.66sarge1_m68k.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6/fat-modules-2.6.8-amiga-di_0.66sarge1_m68k.udeb
fat-modules-2.6.8-atari-di_0.66sarge1_m68k.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6/fat-modules-2.6.8-atari-di_0.66sarge1_m68k.udeb
fat-module
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-sparc32-di_0.05sarge1_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-sparc32-di_0.05sarge1_sparc.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-sparc64-di_0.05sarge1_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-itanium-smp-di_1.1sarge1_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-itanium-smp-di_1.1sarge1_ia64.udeb
ext3-modules-2.6.8-3-itanium-smp-di_1.1sarge1_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6/ext3-modules-2.6.8-3-i
Accepted:
brltty-modules-2.4.27-3-itanium-smp-di_1.00sarge1_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64/brltty-modules-2.4.27-3-itanium-smp-di_1.00sarge1_ia64.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-3-itanium-smp-di_1.00sarge1_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-
Accepted:
brltty-modules-2.4.27-3-generic-di_0.65sarge1_alpha.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/brltty-modules-2.4.27-3-generic-di_0.65sarge1_alpha.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-3-generic-di_0.65sarge1_alpha.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-3-gener
Accepted:
affs-modules-2.6.8-3-power3-di_0.78sarge1_powerpc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6/affs-modules-2.6.8-3-power3-di_0.78sarge1_powerpc.udeb
affs-modules-2.6.8-3-power4-di_0.78sarge1_powerpc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6/affs-modules-2.6.8-3-power4-di_
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-3-sparc32-di_0.64sarge1_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-3-sparc32-di_0.64sarge1_sparc.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-3-sparc64-di_0.64sarge1_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.4.27-3-s390-di_0.61sarge1_s390.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390/kernel-image-2.4.27-3-s390-di_0.61sarge1_s390.udeb
kernel-image-2.4.27-3-s390-tape-di_0.61sarge1_s390.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390/kernel-image-2.4.27-3-s390-tape-di_0.61sarge1_s390.u
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-32-di_1.1sarge1_hppa.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-32-di_1.1sarge1_hppa.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-64-di_1.1sarge1_hppa.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-64-di_1.1sarge1_
Hi all,
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 08:15:01PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 02 July 2006 16:58, Miroslav Kure wrote:
> > 7.2.1. loop-AES
> >
> > For partitions encrypted via loop-AES you will be shown the following
> > prompt during the boot:
> >
> > mount: going to use loop device /dev/loo
Hi all,
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 11:28:06PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 11:10:09PM +0200, Miroslav Kure wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 10:33:49PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> >>Also, we may need to add an arch parameter "supports-crypto"? Are
> >>there arches that are kno
Your message dated Wed, 05 Jul 2006 14:45:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376790: Installation Report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 22:40:17 +0200, Gert Stappers wrote
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 09:20:38AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
[ strange network problem on hardware that worked before ]
>>
>> The only command connecting to the network I found is wget. No ping, ssh
>> etc. How to debug using
tags 376819 fixed-upstream
severity 376819 normal
thanks
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 11:31:23AM +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> bb coreutils/tr.c svn r15557/r15560 seems to produce the correct
> results. The attached patch yields identical results (gnu-tr vs.
> bb-tr) on my box, but don't tak
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 376819 fixed-upstream
Bug#376819: busybox-static: 'tr' not ready for prime time
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> severity 376819 normal
Bug#376819: busybox-static: 'tr' not ready for prime time
Severity set to `normal' from `im
Hi,
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 19:08, Frans Pop wrote:
> However, for me the Gnome HIG are not necessarily authoritative for g-i.
Ack.
> After all, g-i is not a Gnome application. It is a fully separate
> application that happens to use the GTK libraries for one of its
> frontends. Consistency betw
Package: busybox-static
Version: 1:1.1.3-2
Severity: important
testsuite/tr/tr-works (which compares the gnu-tr and bb-tr results)
reveals several problems. These are the relevant ones:
--- gnu tr ---
echo 'abc' | tr '[:alpha:]' 'A-ZA-Z': ABC
echo 'abc56' | tr '[:alnum:]' 'A-ZA-Zxx':
Forgot the patch
On 05/07/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: ppp-udeb
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch, d-i, l10n
Hello,
This patch should provide pppoe functionality to the D-I images, if
--
Regards,
EddyP
=
"Imagination is more
I'm newbie to Debian/Linux, just completed an installation and wanted to share this catches.The machine is Dell Dimension 5150 with Pentium 4 with 1 GB memory , Intel 82945G graphics chipset and Dell 2007 Flat Panel display.
Windows XP home Edition is also installed.The Sarge 3.1 R2 version couldn
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 09:25:49AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 04 July 2006 14:22, Sven wrote:
> > 4 month ago was my mothers funerals [...], i cannot say that i really took
> > good notice of stuff asked back then.
>
> Sorry, I didn't think of that.
Also, next time, pleas
Package: ppp-udeb
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch, d-i, l10n
Hello,
This patch should provide pppoe functionality to the D-I images, if
loaded and ran from D-I itself. It also provides a Romanian
translation of the used debconf templates.
It still needs some polishing and some answers[1][2], bu
Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 16:07, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
-If a checkbox inside a row has focus (small circle around it with many
common GTK themes of GTK default theme) or key pressure
toggles the check and, to go forward, the user has to TAB until the
"OK" button receives
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 04/07/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This evening i built a test tarball, similar to those i used to build
when developing the GTK frontend, to test the web frontend with thttpd
in a real d-i environement.
The results were encouraging, even if a lot of
Hi David,
On Sunday 02 July 2006 03:39, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> I did some digging and it appears that the last working hd-media
> install is from 2006-03-30, which is the last day the 2.6.15-1-powerpc
> kernel was used. The odd thing is that the miBoot floppies, which used
> the 2.6.16-1-power
Hi,
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 14:22, Sven wrote:
> 4 month ago was my mothers funerals [...], i cannot say that i really took
> good notice of stuff asked back then.
Sorry, I didn't think of that.
> > I suppose that you were able to fix #301668. Can this bug be closed
> > now?
> Not that i know
Hi,
On Saturday 01 July 2006 17:53, Frans Pop wrote:
> Main reason for the comparison was that the current "lowmem level 1" is 45
> MB and David's tests show that is not nearly enough anymore. So, we
> either need to reduce memory usage or update the lowmem limits.
My ppc 4400 has 48mb of memory
33 matches
Mail list logo
