Your message dated Sun, 20 Aug 2006 16:32:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381085: fixed in netcfg 1.29
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
netcfg_1.29_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_1.29.dsc
netcfg_1.29.tar.gz
netcfg_1.29_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_1.29_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
Accepted:
netcfg-static_1.29_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_1.29_i386.udeb
netcfg_1.29.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.29.dsc
netcfg_1.29.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.29.tar.gz
netcfg_1.29_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.29_i386.udeb
Override entries f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 383946 cdebconf-gtk-udeb
Bug#383946: installation-report: Double-click doesn't work in choose country
dialog
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `cdebconf-gtk-udeb'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contac
libdebian-installer_0.44_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libdebian-installer_0.44.dsc
libdebian-installer_0.44.tar.gz
libdebian-installer4_0.44_i386.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.44_i386.deb
libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.44_i386.udeb
libdebian-instal
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 06:39:54PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 09:19:01AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> >
> > We _have_ taken note of your suggestions, but do not feel them relevant
> > enough to keep these reports open.
>
>
> What is the public place w
Accepted:
libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.44_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.44_i386.udeb
libdebian-installer-extra4_0.44_i386.deb
to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.44_i386.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.44_i
> should this not be marked wontfix? actually, wishlist seems quite
> appropriate (for any feature request, and also for any bugs that are
> very difficult to fix due to major design consideration) -- because it
> is a nice, simple feature that i wish to have. i don't think closed
> is appropriat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 383912 partman
Bug#383912: Mount option noexec ignored in the partition manager
Bug reassigned from package `partman-base' to `partman'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trackin
On Sunday 20 August 2006 22:56, David Härdeman wrote:
> >Support in graphical installer would be nice to have before the
> > release.
>
> What needs to be done?
We're missing an entropy plug-in for the gtk frontend.
> >> As for lvm, I don't see any new bugs against partman-lvm, what
> >> issues a
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 03:40:07PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
>
> >Hi,
> >3 days ago Frederik Schueler mentioned the following item for then's
> >today in his Kernel schedule proposal for Etch:
> >
> >>start migration of 2.6.17 kernel and udebs to testing
> >>
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 381085 -1
Bug#381085: portmap: causes freeze during installation
Bug 381085 cloned as bug 383941.
> reassign -1 portmap
Bug#383941: portmap: causes freeze during installation
Bug reassigned from package `netcfg' to `portmap'.
> severity -1 minor
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:23:53PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 20 August 2006 12:15, David Härdeman wrote:
As far as I know, the major outstanding issue is that of keyboard
input. Currently it seems that d-i does not allow UTF8 input which
means that passphrases with non-ascii characters w
Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
Hi,
3 days ago Frederik Schueler mentioned the following item for then's
today in his Kernel schedule proposal for Etch:
start migration of 2.6.17 kernel and udebs to testing
I asked him on #d-kernel precisely what was being done about this but
got no answer. I
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:31:13PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 20 August 2006 11:48, David Härdeman wrote:
The previous suggestion tried to load all methods as soon as crypto was
chosen for any partition. This leads to additional downloads (since you
will probably only want to use one meth
While reading portmap's postinst, I noticed that it calculates a value
for portmap_changed, then if the portmap configuration was changed, uses
rpcinfo to check for services using the portmapper.
Seems to me this is unnecessary for new installs; portmap will not be
running before the postinst gets
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 03:17:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> #342246: [ia64 headers] arch/ia64/modules.lds: No such file or
> directory
This should be fixed by r7212
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Friday 18 August 2006 11:55, Tapio Lehtonen wrote:
> Is it necessary to have the installer guide msgids in po files one
> huge line? It would seem to me they could be indented to make them
> more readable.
I'm afraid it is a "feature" of poxml and the regular podebconf tools. The
reason that t
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 03:17:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> the next 2.6.17 upload, version 2.6.17-7 should become a candidate for
> testing.
> I would like to schedule the upload for Wednesday, Aug. 23.
> amd64 and i386 will go through NEW again, due to the added xen images.
> we have
On Sunday 20 August 2006 20:04, Changwoo Ryu wrote:
> New patch with changelog and error message fix.
Thanks.
One problem. If I try to build a Korean PDF (after installing
latex-hangul-ucs of course), I get endless errors:
kpathsea: Running mktextfm unwmjbc1
mktextfm: Running mf-nowin -progname=
On Sunday 20 August 2006 11:48, David Härdeman wrote:
> On a more general note: is this something that you'd like to see in d-i
> before the Etch release?
Yes, it is. It will help to reduce the minimum required memory a bit.
(Unless Christian keeps adding translations of course ;-)
> I think I'l
Well... That's interesting news. And I'm glad you're having success
with your system.
But, unfortunately, the bottom line for this bug report is still that
nobody has yet succeeded in getting the 2.6.16 kernel to boot under
BootX.
Keep in touch. I'll be particularly interested in hearin
On Sunday 20 August 2006 12:15, David Härdeman wrote:
> As far as I know, the major outstanding issue is that of keyboard
> input. Currently it seems that d-i does not allow UTF8 input which
> means that passphrases with non-ascii characters won't work after
> reboot into the newly installed system
On Saturday 12 August 2006 01:31, Paul Brook wrote:
> The sparc boot image on the etch beta-3 businesscard and netinst CDs
> does not contain the isofs module for 32-bit kernels.
> This makes the cds effectively useless on 32-bit sparc machines as teh
> installer can't mount the cd. The SCSI drive
New patch with changelog and error message fix.
--
Changwoo Ryu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: debian/control
===
--- debian/control (revision 40025)
+++ debian/control (working copy)
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
Maintainer: Debian Install System T
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 383866 cdebconf-gtk-udeb
Bug#383866: first tests ...
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `cdebconf-gtk-udeb'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Your message dated Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:36:22 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383879: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 383912 partman-base
Bug#383912: Mount option noexec ignored in the partition manager
Bug reassigned from package `installation' to `partman-base'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian b
Your message dated Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:37:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382590: fixed in linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 1.13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.17-2-itanium-di_1.9_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.17-2-itanium-di_1.9_ia64.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.17-2-itanium-di_1.9_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.17-2-itanium-di_1.9_ia64.udeb
cr
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.17-2-alpha-generic-di_0.08_alpha.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.17-2-alpha-generic-di_0.08_alpha.udeb
cdrom-modules-2.6.17-2-alpha-generic-di_0.08_alpha.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha-2.6/cdrom-modules-2.6.17-2
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.17-2-sparc32-di_1.13_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.17-2-sparc32-di_1.13_sparc.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.17-2-sparc64-di_1.13_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.17-2-sparc64
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.17-2-amd64-di_1.12_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.17-2-amd64-di_1.12_amd64.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.17-2-amd64-di_1.12_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.17-2-amd64-di_1.12_amd64.udeb
Accepted:
crypto-modules-2.6.17-2-amiga-di_0.77_m68k.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6/crypto-modules-2.6.17-2-amiga-di_0.77_m68k.udeb
crypto-modules-2.6.17-2-mac-di_0.77_m68k.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6/crypto-modules-2.6.17-2-mac-di_0.77_m68k.udeb
fat-modules-2.
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.13_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.13.dsc
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.13.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.17-2-sparc64-di_1.13_sparc.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.17-2-sparc64-di_1.13_sparc.udeb
ppp-modules-2.6.1
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.17-2-sparc32-di_1.13_sparc.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDROM support for the Linux kernel.
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.17-2-sparc64-di_1.13_sparc.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDR
Package: installation
Severity: normal
During netinstall (stable,i386), when I choose the mount option "noexec" for
/tmp in the partition manager, it is ignored:
server:/tmp# cat /etc/fstab | grep /tmp
/dev/hda8/tmpext3defaults02
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
tags 382697 + patch
thanks
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 09:24:26PM +0300, Nick Niktaris wrote:
> Package: kbd-chooser
> Severity: important
> Tags: l10n
>
>
> While trying netinst.iso etch beta 3 I found that during installation
> selection of the Greek keyboard fails,
> the installer can not contin
Re: Aurélien GÉRÔME 2006-08-19 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On a side note, I am also fscked up in
> NM without even starting, because someone in the Front Desk seems to
> dislike me, even though I maintain 11 packages in Debian, so there
> is really no hurry...
I think you mean "even though I only star
Frans discovered a typo in my patch. One 'fi' was missing. Here is a
better one.
--- debian/postinst (revisjon 40022)
+++ debian/postinst (arbeidskopi)
@@ -708,13 +710,13 @@
done
# Install any extra (kernel related) packages
+ EXTRAS=
On Sunday 20 August 2006 14:09, Jerome Lemaire wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
> Severity: normal
>
> hello,
> when installing with french keyboard, the shift key is not recognized
> in my laptop and my other computers.
Hi,
Thanks for your message, but this is an extremely incomplete repor
Package: base-installer
Version: 1.66
Tags: patch
When trying to install usplash before the kernel, to avoid running
update-initramfs more than once, I preseeded the package in the
base-installer/kernel/linux/extra-packages template, expecting this to
solve the issue. It had no effect.
I discov
* Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-19 16:47]:
> Seems this could be worked around easily by just retrying a few
> times if that error is returned (until it is fixed).
Yes.
> Is there a time-out when it really cannot connect to a server?
Yes, that seems to work.
> Installations are rare en
Hello,
the next 2.6.17 upload, version 2.6.17-7 should become a candidate for
testing.
I would like to schedule the upload for Wednesday, Aug. 23.
amd64 and i386 will go through NEW again, due to the added xen images.
we have 4 RC bugs left, of which 2 need immediate attention:
#342246: [ia6
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
Date: 19/08/06 21:00 Spain
Machine: Acer TravelMate 291LCi
Processor: Centrino 1.4
Memory: 256
Partitions: Windows XP, Windows XP data, /, Swap, /boot, /home
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
Sorry, not in front
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
hello,
when installing with french keyboard, the shift key is not recognized in my
laptop and my other computers.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 20/08/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 20 August 2006 01:13, Frans Pop wrote:
> Author: fjp
> Date: Sat Aug 19 23:13:50 2006
> New Revision: 4
^
Another milestone reached...
I still wonder why we don't consider milestones at revisions with
numers rep
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 11:20:03PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Hi David,
Glad to see you back from holidays.
One general note: we really do have to be careful with this. As we are now
working towards RC releases of d-i, we cannot afford to implement really
risky changes.
Understood
The initial
Hi,
I just tried the 2006-08-20 boot.img to install AMD64 Debian from an USB stick
in expertgui mode.
My USB mouse light was on (so somehow detected I guess) but I couldn't move the
cursor on the
screen.
It's a very standard Logitech rodent..
Strange since my USB optical NGS Slim Kit keybord (fa
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 09:25:18PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 19 August 2006 20:41, David Härdeman wrote:
I'm hoping to get some feedback on whether this is a good idea before I
commit anything.
What is missing in the patch IMHO is a check if there is actually enough
free memory to l
Hi Otavio,
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 06:10:15PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> For this to happen, my transition plan is described bellow:
> - A new grub package would be uploaded to unstable having a group of
>wrappers that will call /usr/sbin utilities but warn the user to
>edit his/her
Package: installation-reports
Boot method:
Image version:
Date:
Machine:
Processor:centrino 1.6Ghz
Memory:521Mo
Partitions: <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ df -Tl
Sys. de fich. Type1K-blocs Occupé Disponible Capacité Monté sur
/dev/hda3 ext328835220 22596944 4773528 83% /
tmpfs
52 matches
Mail list logo
