Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: etch beta3 mipsel netinst. Also tried daily built image (aug 28)
Date: August 28, 2006
Machine: DECstation 5000/200, simulated using gxemul (gxemul -e3max)
Comments:
I did not succeed with the install.
I was trying to follow gxemul i
Your message dated Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
Alexander Petrov wrote:
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
graphical-installer doesn't allow to switch to console using Alt+F2 or
Ctrl+Alt+F2 - it just creates a cloned instance of itselves, which is
hard to differentiate from the first one.
no, that's DFB crashing and restarting at th
Geert Stappers wrote:
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 04:28:33PM +0900, Yukiharu Yabuki wrote:
I take screen shot
If you can see, these images, It is easy to get issue.
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~yabuki/diary/20060828.html#p03
please check red circle in images.
Seems i18n problems to me.
i
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 04:57:19PM +0200, MENEUVRIER Bruno wrote:
> Hi,
> I solved my issue with this post. I downloaded this package:
> ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-qlogic_0.1_all.deb
> During the installation, when the installer indicate it don't find the
This is it not really a bug in the strict sense of the term, as this is
simply the default behaviour of GTK+.
Anyway, i'll try to see if it's possible making the enter key activate
the ok button (and it should be).
Attilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
i belive this was fixed some times ago in GTK+ 2.10 serie (at least,
it's not present in GTK+ 2.10.2)
Attilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 09:27:49PM +0200, Ronny Aasen wrote:
>
> this works interactivly, and can preseed it as normal i expect.
^^^
Is it 'can preseed' or 'can be preseeded' ?
> hope someone can review and judge this
>
> Ronny
>
> --- autopartition-l
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 04:28:33PM +0900, Yukiharu Yabuki wrote:
> I take screen shot
>
> If you can see, these images, It is easy to get issue.
> http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~yabuki/diary/20060828.html#p03
>
> please check red circle in images.
Seems i18n problems to me.
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 384601 moreinfo
Bug#384601: Debian Installer Daily 2006-08-19
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
graphical-installer doesn't allow to switch to console using Alt+F2 or
Ctrl+Alt+F2 - it just creates a cloned instance of itselves, which is
hard to differentiate from the first one.
To reproduce:
1. Using graphical-installer scroll to any step in in the
Holger Wansing wrote:
[Third attempt to send, the first ones yesterday and today didn't
reach the list...]
Hi,
usability/cosmetically issues in daily builds 24.08.06
graphical installer:
- partman: go to Manually edit partition table:
within this menu (and not sure maybe the underlying as we
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:50:30 +0300
"Eddy Petrişor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > snip<<
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=384709
>
> Could you try to produce a verbose syslog like this, but which can
> reporoduce in as few steps as possible the "error" which appears after
> try
Your message dated Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:37:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380191: installation-report Beta2 & AMD64 3200+
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important
Installer was unable to mount second of two JFS volumes
I have 2 JFS volumes: for / and for /home.
Installer had problems with mounting both of them in unpredictible way,
so I ended up with formatting the root partition (sda5) and not mounting
/home i
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:34:47AM -0500, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > My concern about good ideas getting lost, is useless.
> > Good ideas will survive.
> >
> > So
> > > What is the public place where those notes are written down?
> > can be ignored.
>
> Well, even if we actually don't agree ver
Your message dated Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:04:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385016: installation-report: french keyboard badly
supported in graphical installer on laptop
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:47:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384532: fixed in partman-crypto 11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Dear ftpmasters,
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 11:47:14AM -0700, Debian Installer wrote:
> There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
> override file for the following file(s):
>
> partman-crypto-dm_11_all.udeb: package says priority is optional, override
> says standard.
> pa
partman-crypto_11_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-crypto_11.dsc
partman-crypto_11.tar.gz
partman-crypto-dm_11_all.udeb
partman-crypto-loop_11_all.udeb
partman-crypto_11_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRI
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
partman-crypto-dm_11_all.udeb: package says priority is optional, override says
standard.
partman-crypto-loop_11_all.udeb: package says priority is optional, override
says standard.
Eith
Accepted:
partman-crypto-dm_11_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto-dm_11_all.udeb
partman-crypto-loop_11_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto-loop_11_all.udeb
partman-crypto_11.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_11.dsc
partman-crypto_11.tar.gz
> > 1) When I manually configure my network card, I have to press the CAPSLOCK
> > key
> > to be abble to enter numbers of the IP address. The SHIFT key does not work.
Known problem with the French keymap (indeed the problem is more
generic, probably), already reported to cdebconf-gtk-udeb
> >
Hi Patrice,
www-debian is the wrong list, so I added debian-boot.
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:48:15PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hy,
>
> I just downloaded the business card version of Debian Etch Beta3.
>
> I tried the graphical installation. I've got 2 points to tell to you :
> 1) When I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 385026 cdebconf-gtk-udeb
Bug#385026: display issues in chekbox lists
Warning: Unknown package 'cedebconf-gtk-udeb'
Bug reassigned from package `cedebconf-gtk-udeb' to `cdebconf-gtk-udeb'.
> retitle 385026 display issues in checkbox lists (mult
clone 384709 -1
# I haven't analysed the whole bug report, but I'll take this ppp-udeb
# related issues int consideration for bug -1
reassign -1 ppp-udeb
retitle -1 unsanitized output, makes debconf think an error appeared
thanks
On 27/08/06, Abel McClendon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > c
On 27/08/06, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> Indeed, this was discussed many times, but I think the main stopper is
> their real meaning (which in turn is 0 information for a newbie user).
>
> I would suggest:
> businesscard -> keychain
> netinst remains this way or ->
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 384709 -1
Bug#384709: Package: installation-reports
Bug 384709 cloned as bug 385026.
> reassign -1 cedebconf-gtk-udeb
Bug#385026: Package: installation-reports
Warning: Unknown package 'cedebconf-gtk-udeb'
Bug reassigned from package `installatio
clone 384709 -1
reassign -1 cedebconf-gtk-udeb
retitle -1 display issues in chekbox lists
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: installation-report
Severity: normal
Boot method: CD (with libata workaround)
Image version: d-i etch beta 3
Date: 2006/08/28
Machine: Dell Latitute D510 laptop
Processor: Celeron
Memory: 1G
Partitions: -
Output of lspci and lspci -n: -
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E
lilo-installer also need a minor change to cope with
"postinst_hook = update-grub".
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for
spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list.
Index: i386/lilo-installer/debian/postinst
===
Thanks for following up. I don't have that machine anymore so I wouldn't know
if tg3 is better these days or not :).
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Max Vozeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 7:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#255042:
On Fri, Jun 2
Your message dated Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:21:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line installation-reports: success albeit minor glitches
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
> Aug 26 15:53:14 apt-install: Using mkinitramfs-kpkg to build the ramdisk.
> Aug 26 15:53:29 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device dm-0): ext3_readdir: bad
> entry in directory #6751881: inode out of bounds - offset=0,
> inode=1431634516, rec_len=3808, name_len=18
> Aug 26 15:53:29 kernel: Aborting jo
Your message dated Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:21:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:08:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:03:31AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > * Incorrect default keymap:
> > >
> > > Selected "English"
> > > Selected "United States"
> > > Default keymap is "European"; should be "American English"
>
> The default is now "en_US.UTF-8".
Err, this
Your message dated Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:43:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [ia64][20040901][netinst] various issues
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 256067 [i386][20040624] aic7xxx and 3C905C-tx problems
Bug#256067: Installation failure
Changed Bug title.
> tags 256067 + moreinfo
Bug#256067: [i386][20040624] aic7xxx and 3C905C-tx problems
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> than
Your message dated Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:07:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#255892:
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
retitle 256067 [i386][20040624] aic7xxx and 3C905C-tx problems
tags 256067 + moreinfo
thanks
Hello Michael Satterwhite,
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 03:11:51PM -0500, Michael Satterwhite wrote:
> Debian-installer-version: <06/24/2004 Sid Installation 386 / Current >
> uname -a:
> Date: <6/24/2004 1
Your message dated Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:59:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#255042:
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 08:35:11PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Michel Lespinasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-27 06:33]:
> > Any other advice I could use in this situation ?
> I think gxemul has support for Cobalt machines. Can you try the
> Cobalt image rather than DECstation?
I was not a
Hi Geert,
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 11:23:11AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 12:29:57PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 09:36:52AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > At boot there is a message like "hardware detect", I assume it is in
> > > /etc/ini
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 384966 installation-reports
Bug#384966: Different kernel on AMD netinst image - 2.5.17 boots from CD, but
2.6.16 was installed - broken networking after reboot
Warning: Unknown package 'installation-reportsboot'
Warning: Unknown package 'metho
Package: installation-reportsBoot method: CDImage version: netinst CD image
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.isodownloaded
on 28.08.2006Machine: Supermicro 6015P-8RMotherboard: X7DBP-8NIC: Intel
82563EBProcessor: 2xIntel 5
> How much of localechooser's finish-install script really needs to run at
> the very end? Could some/all/the problimatic bits be moved to a
> base-installer.d hook, where they would happen before console-cryillic
> is installed?
Interesting question. We currently have:
-install libfribidi0 for
Package: installation-reportsBoot method: CDImage version: etch beta 3 installerDate: 8/27/2006Machine: Dell 2950Processor: 2 Dual-Core 3.2GhzMemory: 8GBPartitions:
Output of lspci and lspci -n:Base System Installation Checklist:[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try itIn
I take screen shot
If you can see, these images, It is easy to get issue.
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~yabuki/diary/20060828.html#p03
please check red circle in images.
Regards
Yukiharu
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:54:46 +0900
Yukiharu Yabuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Guys.
>
&
49 matches
Mail list logo
