Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 22 September 2006 23:58, RParr wrote:
Any guidance would be most appreciated; especially any way to capture
the early boot messages; /etc/default/bootlogd enabling does not seem
to help.
Which kernel is being booted? If it is 2.6.16 the cause may be that your
Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> If avahi is install by default though, libnss-mdns should probably be in too.
Good point..
> Although that package needs some work (ensuring automatic setup of nsswitch..)
I thought this was fixed since #348580 is closed, but it seems it's not.
Color me puzzled.
--
see s
Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 22 September 2006 23:58, RParr wrote:
Any guidance would be most appreciated; especially any way to capture
the early boot messages; /etc/default/bootlogd enabling does not seem
to help.
Which kernel is being booted? If it is 2.6.16 the cause may be that your
On Friday 22 September 2006 23:58, RParr wrote:
> Any guidance would be most appreciated; especially any way to capture
> the early boot messages; /etc/default/bootlogd enabling does not seem
> to help.
Which kernel is being booted? If it is 2.6.16 the cause may be that your
hardware needs 2.6.17
Package: installation
Severity: wishlist
I tried to install debian behind an apt-proxy and the installations
hangs when fetching packages during installation (Errormsg on ALT-F4).
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=388769 .
It seems that all Debian etch installations and probabl
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 10:40:34PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 22 September 2006 21:32, Sven Luther wrote:
> > We did never implement the thingy which disables the acceleration in
> > the directfbrc, right ?
>
> I've committed a patch now that always disables it for ppc.
Thanks,
Friendly
Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 05:25:13PM -0700, RParr wrote:
I am still unable to get Debian installed on this machine.
I AM able to boot Knoppix LiveCD and NOT have any device conflicts.
Knoppix (5.0.1) assigns the 3ware /dev/sde and the USB card reader as
/dev/sda, sdb, sd
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 04:10:09PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 22 September 2006 15:12, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> > I think we may want let "icons" PNGs in place because this would allow
> > me to replace the special PNGs used for the "error" (error_icon.png)
> > and "warning" (note_icon.
I also tried to install debian behind an apt-proxy and the installations hangs
when fetching packages during installation (Errormsg on ALT-F4).
It seems that all Debian etch installations behind a sarge apt-proxy
fail because of apt-proxy bug 374405:
> Incompatible with full URL HTTP requests fr
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
I tried to install debian behind an apt-proxy and the installations
hangs when fetching packages during installation (Errormsg on ALT-F4).
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=388769 .
It seems that all Debian etch installations behind
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 09:37:28AM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Last times the g-i was tested on PPC, it turned tout that
>
> Known good : radeonfb, vesafb (or whatever x86 uses).
> Known bad : atyfb, nvidiafb
>
> when acceleration was enabled.
> But that was with GTKDFB 2.0.9 and DFB 0
On Friday 22 September 2006 22:03, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Yes, i think the patch by davide should be applied: when we switch to
> GTKDFB later, we'll have the chance to re-enable the check on the GDK
> backend used, so that the GTK frontend works again with GTKX.
You did not read the patch I
On Friday 22 September 2006 21:32, Sven Luther wrote:
> We did never implement the thingy which disables the acceleration in
> the directfbrc, right ?
I've committed a patch now that always disables it for ppc.
pgpu2hF2ZnaR2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:31:43PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> (Reply-to set to debian-boot; please only add relevant port if needed.)
>
> /me wonders why there have been almost no reactions to this mail
> The first part is mostly information (though a "cool" or "thanks" would be
> appreciated), bu
Davide Viti wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:04:47AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 18 September 2006 23:45, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
I did not test this by myself, but davide did it and the patch proved
to work (Davide, any hint about how to reproduce a correct keymap
change in the g-i
Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 21 September 2006 23:32, Davide Viti wrote:
I have just tested keymap switching with a slightly modified patch
(attached) with the current 2.8 GTK libs.
Attilio: is this patch OK with you?
Yes, i think the patch by davide should be applied: when we switch to
GTKD
Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:52:24PM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
Last times the g-i was tested on PPC, it turned tout that
Known good : radeonfb, vesafb (or whatever x86 uses).
vesafb is not built on powerpc, and the laptop we had in extremadura u
Well,
My first naive test with the unstable g-i, gives just a blue screen. I can
alt-ctr-f2 away, and check a bit.
We did never implement the thingy which disables the acceleration in the
directfbrc, right ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 11:00, Loïc Minier wrote:
Gtk 2.10.1-1 was uploaded yesterday to experimental (and 2.10.3-1
after dinstall). This new upstream release is not compatible with
modules built with prior Gtk versions. Some longstanding issues have
been addressed in
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 12:14:09PM +0100, stephen mulcahy wrote:
> Hi Geert,
>
> Thanks for your response - I hope the installation report is useful to
> someone.
>
> I'm replying off-bug because I'm not sure any of the following is
> relevant/useful - feel free to add in if you wish.
Because we
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:46:06AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> The ia64/xen folks here think so too - I'm not too familiar with Xen,
> but if you want to enable ia64/xen in linux-2.6 I should be able to
> get help from HP people if we run into ia64-specific problems.
The question is, do we want/c
Hi Geert,
Thanks for your response - I hope the installation report is useful to
someone.
I'm replying off-bug because I'm not sure any of the following is
relevant/useful - feel free to add in if you wish.
See some comments below,
Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 06:31:00PM +010
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 11:56:30PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 11:24:17PM +0200, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
> > Another question : where I post this kind of report ?
> > If debian-boot is not the good place, ok, sorry for the disturb, but where ?
>
> I assume that the pointer t
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 06:51:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Xen should be okay. According to the maintainer of this tree, ia64
> should work fine also.
The ia64/xen folks here think so too - I'm not too familiar with Xen,
but if you want to enable ia64/xen in linux-2.6 I should be able to
get
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 05:03:09PM -0500, Nicolas Valcarcel wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 13:03 +0530, Deepak Kumar Tripathi wrote:
> > From: Rajasekaran J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Mon 9/18/2006 4:30 PM
> >
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > >I am Rajasekaran J.
> > > I am using debi
Hi Attilio,
With the new GTK 2.8 upload by Loïc [1] and the changes in keymap support,
we now have only one RC problem remaining in G-I: the disappearing text
on the current line in multi-select lists.
I do not think that 2.10 will be in unstable in time for the RC1 release,
so it would be gr
Accepted:
oldsys-preseed_0.4.dsc
to pool/main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_0.4.dsc
oldsys-preseed_0.4.tar.gz
to pool/main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_0.4.tar.gz
oldsys-preseed_0.4_i386.udeb
to pool/main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_0.4_i386.udeb
Override entries for your package:
Sorry if this is getting out of hand; I'm not experienced with reporting
bugs.
In reply to Don Wright:
> The secret is to scroll to the top of the list of countries
> and pick "enter information manually".
That's not the issue. The issue is that it expects me to enter a
"server" and a "path" par
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 03:01:19PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > I've been thinking that the best way here is to just nuke the
> > configuration of the retriever before (or while) running
> > customization-modules in some way. We'll be assuming that there is at
> > least one
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 11:00, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Gtk 2.10.1-1 was uploaded yesterday to experimental (and 2.10.3-1
> after dinstall). This new upstream release is not compatible with
> modules built with prior Gtk versions. Some longstanding issues have
> been addressed in this relea
On Friday 22 September 2006 15:12, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> I think we may want let "icons" PNGs in place because this would allow
> me to replace the special PNGs used for the "error" (error_icon.png)
> and "warning" (note_icon.png) questions with PNGs belonging to the
> current theme in use (e
Package: debian-installer
Version: no idea. Netinstall image was DL'ed on 22-Sep-2006
During the installation step "Select and install software", progress
ground to a halt. It said "running tasksel", the progress bar remained
at 1% for several minutes.
A motionless progress bar doesn't convey muc
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:13:14PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > And exactly this is what it is all about: find a way to satisfy BOTH
> > priorities, not just one.
>
> No. It is about the definition of "our users".
>
> If "our users" are dependent on non-free software, then we indir
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:52:24PM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >>Last times the g-i was tested on PPC, it turned tout that
> >>
> >> Known good : radeonfb, vesafb (or whatever x86 uses).
> >
> >
> >vesafb is not built on powerpc, and the laptop we had in extremadura u
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:31:43PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> (Reply-to set to debian-boot; please only add relevant port if needed.)
>
> /me wonders why there have been almost no reactions to this mail
> The first part is mostly information (though a "cool" or "thanks" would be
> appreciated), bu
Arrgh!
Please ignore my post a moment ago. In a moment of carelessness I
forgot my promise of throwing no more flames in this thread :-(
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
- Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eo
Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 22 September 2006 14:39, Luca Bruno wrote:
Frans Pop scrisse:
Question: are all the PNGs currently included in your tarball
actually used? Could any of them be left out?
IIRC there are still some of them which can be stripped down, but
first I need to see which ic
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:16:02 +0200 Frederik Schueler wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:53:21PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > I honestly believe that moving linux-2.6 to non-free hurts our users
> > more than stripping non-free parts of the Debian-precompiled kernel.
>
> of course.
>
> >
Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 22 September 2006 09:42, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
any progress in packaging the Bladr and HighContrastLarge GTK themes
for g-i ? IIRC it was proposed to pack them into rootskel-gtk package.
Yes, I'm working on it. We need some other changes first, but those are in
On Thursday 21 September 2006 23:32, Davide Viti wrote:
I have just tested keymap switching with a slightly modified patch
(attached) with the current 2.8 GTK libs.
Attilio: is this patch OK with you?
The testresults:
- keymap switching works now :-)
- VT1 does get quite a few messages "Reloading
Sven Luther wrote:
Last times the g-i was tested on PPC, it turned tout that
Known good : radeonfb, vesafb (or whatever x86 uses).
vesafb is not built on powerpc, and the laptop we had in extremadura used a
radeon chipset, altough of the R300 variety.
isn't "fbonly" the PPC equivalent to
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 09:37:28AM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 03:32:28PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> >
> >>severity 342053 important
> >>thanks
> >>
> >>Lowering the severity of this bug to important.
> >>This issue is the main reason that g-i is
On Friday 22 September 2006 14:39, Luca Bruno wrote:
> Frans Pop scrisse:
> > Question: are all the PNGs currently included in your tarball
> > actually used? Could any of them be left out?
>
> IIRC there are still some of them which can be stripped down, but
> first I need to see which icons and p
Frans Pop scrisse:
> Question: are all the PNGs currently included in your tarball
> actually used? Could any of them be left out?
IIRC there are still some of them which can be stripped down, but
first I need to see which icons and pixmaps are needed by the new
graphical partitioner.
Cheers, Lu
reassign 388464 debian-installer
tags 388464 + unreproducible
thanks
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 16:34, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> Installing a Dell 1950 Server (x86_64), LVM support is broken as there
> is no LVM support in the kernel (-8 or -9, I believe), and no LVM
> modules available.
>
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 388464 debian-installer
Bug#388464: debian-installer: ~2.6.17-2 amd64 kernel appears to be missing
lvm-mod
Bug reassigned from package `linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6' to `debian-installer'.
> tags 388464 + unreproducible
Bug#388464: debian-instal
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:25:12AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> [Dropping -release from cc anyway; there's no possible reason this needs to
> be cross-posted to 4 lists]
>
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 07:12:53AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:58:31AM -0500, Bill Allombert
(Reply-to set to debian-boot; please only add relevant port if needed.)
/me wonders why there have been almost no reactions to this mail
The first part is mostly information (though a "cool" or "thanks" would be
appreciated), but the second part has some issues that need attention.
Have D-I port
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:19:28AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 12:20:43PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:24:41AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > ofpathname is part of the ibm-powerpc-utils package (not the same as the
> > > package currentl
On Friday 22 September 2006 09:42, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> any progress in packaging the Bladr and HighContrastLarge GTK themes
> for g-i ? IIRC it was proposed to pack them into rootskel-gtk package.
Yes, I'm working on it. We need some other changes first, but those are in
progress. I can f
On Thursday 21 September 2006 19:01, Frans Pop wrote:
> It will only hit the mirrors tonight or maybe even tomorrow (not sure).
> I will try to run an installation test tomorrow to see if 2.6.17 is
> picked up correctly.
Tested and OK.
pgpcD2wdz1o73.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Am Freitag, den 22.09.2006, 00:53 +0200 schrieb Sjoerd Simons:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:50:23PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Ross, since you maintain it, I'd appreciate any thoughts you have about
> > whether avahi should be included in the default desktop install. IMHO,
> > you should have veto
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 388591 pending
Bug#388591: nobootloader: [powerpc]
Tags were: d-i patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 383946 388671
Bug#383946: installation-report: Double-click doesn't work in choose country
dialog
Bug#388671: cdebconf-gtk-udeb: should support double click and pressing enter
in partitioner menu
Bug#382357: double click on leaf item in lis
I just tried a root-on-RAID1 setup and the only issue was that GRUB was
only installed to the MBR of the first hard disk, so when I simulated
the failure of the first disk, the system would not boot.
--
Sam Morris
http://robots.org.uk/
PGP key id 1024D/5EA01078
3412 EA18 1277 354B 991B C869 B21
[Dropping -release from cc anyway; there's no possible reason this needs to
be cross-posted to 4 lists]
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 07:12:53AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:58:31AM -0500, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 08:52:15AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 00:53 +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:50:23PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Ross, since you maintain it, I'd appreciate any thoughts you have about
> > whether avahi should be included in the default desktop install. IMHO,
> > you should have veto power
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:53:21PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I honestly believe that moving linux-2.6 to non-free hurts our users
> more than stripping non-free parts of the Debian-precompiled kernel.
of course.
> Also, section 4 of the SC talks equally about users and free softwa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 12:58:14 +0200 Frederik Schueler wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 06:16:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:38:50PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > > Second: this release contains ALL binary firmwar
Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 03:32:28PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
severity 342053 important
thanks
Lowering the severity of this bug to important.
This issue is the main reason that g-i is only provided as experimental
mini.iso for powerpc. However, that does not make RC for the p
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Hi
Luca Bruno has just finished polishing up his nice "Bladr" GTK+ theme,
that i propose as default GTK theme for use in the g-i.
A tarball can be found here [1] and i suggest (at least for the short
period) to package Bladr in the rootskel-gtk theme like it was propo
61 matches
Mail list logo
