I personally would prefer to consistently delay disk selection to a second
level in _all_ cases and explain what the next step will be in the
description; something like:
/me feels like some strings are about to be broken soon:-|
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 390180
Bug#390180: partman-crypto fails due to incompatible libdevmapper
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
stop
Stopping
On Thu, October 5, 2006 2:07, Frans Pop said:
I personally would prefer to consistently delay disk selection to a second
level in _all_ cases and explain what the next step will be in the
description; something like:
example
...
Automatic - use the largest continuous free space
Automatic
Hi,
I tried with today's daily i386 netinst (partman-crypto 14) and the
bug is still there. The workaround as described in #390568 works.
--
Miroslav Kure
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
see the attached
(Neoprene Horse boot)
The size : S,M,L and XL
The price : S : USD7.00/pr
M : USD8.00/pr
L : USD9.00/pr
XL : USD10.00/pr
Pls give us your feedback if you are interested in our products.
Thanks,
Winnie
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi
Looking at the PPC database in the wiki, it seems that the proposed
approach to this issue allows running the g-i on many radeon-based Mac
boxes.
May i proceed committing the updated version of the patch proposed for
this bug?
cheers
Attilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 07:23:55PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
reassign 391047 save-logs
thanks
On Wednesday 04 October 2006 16:37, Pierre Machard wrote:
I installed /var/log on a dedicated partition. Once the system
installed I did not find the directory /var/log/debian-installer/ nor
On Thu, October 5, 2006 9:36, Miroslav Kure said:
I tried with today's daily i386 netinst (partman-crypto 14) and the
bug is still there. The workaround as described in #390568 works.
Oh I see, then I misunderstood your bug report.
I assume that you've experienced the same bug as is described
Package: debian-installer
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
Yesterday I installed an opteron at work. This opteron must run in a 32 bits
environnement (binary compatibility issue). I downloaded d-i daily build
(03 oct 06) and d-i rc3 with 2.6 kernel. Once the initrd
Accepted:
linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6_1.00.dsc
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6/linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6_1.00.dsc
linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6_1.00.tar.gz
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6/linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6_1.00.tar.gz
Accepted:
linux-modules-di-sparc-2.6_1.00.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-sparc-2.6/linux-modules-di-sparc-2.6_1.00.dsc
linux-modules-di-sparc-2.6_1.00.tar.gz
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-sparc-2.6/linux-modules-di-sparc-2.6_1.00.tar.gz
Accepted:
linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.00.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.00.dsc
linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.00.tar.gz
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.00.tar.gz
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:16:52AM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Hi
Looking at the PPC database in the wiki, it seems that the proposed
approach to this issue allows running the g-i on many radeon-based Mac
boxes.
May i proceed committing the updated version of the patch proposed for
Accepted:
linux-modules-di-powerpc-2.6_1.00.dsc
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-powerpc-2.6/linux-modules-di-powerpc-2.6_1.00.dsc
linux-modules-di-powerpc-2.6_1.00.tar.gz
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-powerpc-2.6/linux-modules-di-powerpc-2.6_1.00.tar.gz
Accepted:
linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.00.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.00.dsc
linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.00.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.00.tar.gz
loop-aes-modules-2.6.16-2-486-di_1.00_i386.udeb
to
Accepted:
linux-modules-di-arm-2.6_1.01.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-arm-2.6/linux-modules-di-arm-2.6_1.01.dsc
linux-modules-di-arm-2.6_1.01.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-arm-2.6/linux-modules-di-arm-2.6_1.01.tar.gz
loop-aes-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.01_arm.udeb
to
Accepted:
linux-modules-di-hppa-2.6_1.00.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-hppa-2.6/linux-modules-di-hppa-2.6_1.00.dsc
linux-modules-di-hppa-2.6_1.00.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-hppa-2.6/linux-modules-di-hppa-2.6_1.00.tar.gz
loop-aes-modules-2.6.16-2-parisc-di_1.00_hppa.udeb
to
Accepted:
linux-modules-di-arm-2.6_1.00.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-arm-2.6/linux-modules-di-arm-2.6_1.00.dsc
linux-modules-di-arm-2.6_1.00.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-arm-2.6/linux-modules-di-arm-2.6_1.00.tar.gz
loop-aes-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.00_arm.udeb
to
Hi,
Please ignore the override mails w.r.t. linux-foo-di-2.6 packages you
just recieved.
Thanks,
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira wrote:
I added some icons.
Please look now:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianDesktopArtwork/DebianInstallerEtch
Both sets look nice, but I like more the second. Still, I think that the
red of the error icon of the second
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 01:56:45PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Agustin Martin wrote:
I suppose this also means that all packages not having special
pre-dependencies are configured at the end. Otherwise if all ispell dicts
are
configured and a reasonable default selected, if another dict is
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:25:22 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#391047: [debian-installer amd64 20060929] no
/var/log/debian-installer/ when /var/log is on another partition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 06:03:48PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Frans reports that he has seen this for a pretty long time for English
installs, indeed.
~ 6 months, not full sarge lifetime, and he also mentions that the problem
cannot be reproduced at will.
Anyway, is there still a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 02:14:22AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 05:29:47PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Would you be able to do the testing as suggested by Eddy, disabling the
nvidia
module as well as the
Eddy Petrișor wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 02:14:22AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 05:29:47PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Would you be able to do the testing as suggested by Eddy, disabling the nvidia
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 03:36:52PM +0300, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 02:14:22AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 05:29:47PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Would you be able to do the testing as suggested by Eddy, disabling the
nvidia
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 16:33, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
A blue frame around a grey GTK app is not nice to see, so we could turn
DFB background colour to match GTK's one by adding something like
bg-color=AARRGGBB
to /etc/directfbrc.
Can i proceed with this ?
Please provide the correct
On Thursday 05 October 2006 11:16, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
May i proceed committing the updated version of the patch proposed for
this bug?
No, sorry.
No changes should be needed in rootskel for g-i. I will try to create a
patch that has the same end result, but is limited to rootskel-gtk.
On Thursday 05 October 2006 09:48, David Härdeman wrote:
Strange, it sounds familiar...oh yes...it's what I've been suggesting
all along [1]. So I think its safe to say that we fully agree.
:-)
I can whip up a patch or two once I have confirmation that this is the
final decision on this
On Thursday 05 October 2006 16:29, Agustin Martin wrote:
But of course there is no such rationale if you are at the first
installation along with dictionaries-common and your system is not
broken.
I've been meaning to provide more information (like logs from package
installation) on this and
Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 16:33, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
A blue frame around a grey GTK app is not nice to see, so we could turn
DFB background colour to match GTK's one by adding something like
bg-color=AARRGGBB
to /etc/directfbrc.
Can i proceed with this ?
Please
a) Does the problem you describe happens with wordlists too? Code is
similar the the ispell dicts one. The only difference was that
localization-config interfered with the ispell dict code while not with
wordlist. In Frans example, wamerican+dictionaries-common should have
On Thursday 28 September 2006 23:31, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 13:14, Frans Pop wrote:
Yesterday I tried a different implementation: setting
debconf/language=en in debian-installer-startup.d instead of setting
LANGUAGE. However, that did not result in country names being
Hi Philipp,
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 01:27:41AM +0200, Philipp Engel wrote:
Am 03.10.2006 um 15:32 schrieb David Härdeman:
On Tue, October 3, 2006 15:16, Philipp Engel said:
Is that a bug, or is it just not possible?
If memory serves me right, the loop-AES utils do not have support
(yet)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
BTW, no-hardware should be always present, the four cases should be
1)no-hardware only
2)no-hardware + disable-module=linux_input
3)no-hardware + disable-module=chipset specific module, e.g. : radeon,
nvidia..
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# hardware support bugs are not generally RC
severity 391182 important
Bug#391182: debian-installer: Impossible to boot linux 2.6 i386 image on
Opteron (daily build 3 oct 2006 and d-i rc3 with 2.6 kernel)
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netboot, usb drive
Image version: daily installer build from October 5th, 2006
Date: October 5th, 2006
Machine: Dell OptiPlex 745
Processor: Pentium D 3.? GHz
Memory: 1G
Partitions: None
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 381142 rootskel 1.38
Bug#381142: tasksel: Tasks names aren't translated
Bug reassigned from package `pkgsel' to `rootskel'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
David Härdeman wrote:
Strange, it sounds familiar...oh yes...it's what I've been suggesting all
along [1]. So I think its safe to say that we fully agree.
I'm not going to say anything more on this issue, except that I still
think that Kamion and my argument has merit, and if it's ignored now,
installation-report_2.19_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
installation-report_2.19.dsc
installation-report_2.19.tar.gz
save-logs_2.19_all.udeb
installation-report_2.19_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
cdebconf_0.107_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.107.dsc
cdebconf_0.107.tar.gz
cdebconf-priority_0.107_all.udeb
cdebconf_0.107_amd64.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.107_amd64.deb
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.107_amd64.deb
main-menu_1.14_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
main-menu_1.14.dsc
main-menu_1.14.tar.gz
main-menu_1.14_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
mdcfg_1.18_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
mdcfg_1.18.dsc
mdcfg_1.18.tar.gz
mdcfg_1.18_all.udeb
mdcfg-utils_1.18_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
netcfg_1.30_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_1.30.dsc
netcfg_1.30.tar.gz
netcfg_1.30_amd64.udeb
netcfg-static_1.30_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
partman-base_95_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-base_95.dsc
partman-base_95.tar.gz
partman-base_95_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
nobootloader_1.11_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
nobootloader_1.11.dsc
nobootloader_1.11.tar.gz
nobootloader_1.11_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
partman-ext3_42_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-ext3_42.dsc
partman-ext3_42.tar.gz
partman-ext3_42_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
user-setup_1.6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
user-setup_1.6.dsc
user-setup_1.6.tar.gz
user-setup-udeb_1.6_all.udeb
user-setup_1.6_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
rootskel_1.39_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_1.39.dsc
rootskel_1.39.tar.gz
rootskel_1.39_amd64.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.39_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Accepted:
user-setup-udeb_1.6_all.udeb
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup-udeb_1.6_all.udeb
user-setup_1.6.dsc
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.6.dsc
user-setup_1.6.tar.gz
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.6.tar.gz
user-setup_1.6_all.deb
to
Accepted:
mdcfg-utils_1.18_all.udeb
to pool/main/m/mdcfg/mdcfg-utils_1.18_all.udeb
mdcfg_1.18.dsc
to pool/main/m/mdcfg/mdcfg_1.18.dsc
mdcfg_1.18.tar.gz
to pool/main/m/mdcfg/mdcfg_1.18.tar.gz
mdcfg_1.18_all.udeb
to pool/main/m/mdcfg/mdcfg_1.18_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
Accepted:
main-menu_1.14.dsc
to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_1.14.dsc
main-menu_1.14.tar.gz
to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_1.14.tar.gz
main-menu_1.14_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_1.14_amd64.udeb
Override entries for your package:
main-menu_1.14.dsc - source
Accepted:
nobootloader_1.11.dsc
to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_1.11.dsc
nobootloader_1.11.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_1.11.tar.gz
nobootloader_1.11_all.udeb
to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_1.11_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
Accepted:
partman-base_95.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_95.dsc
partman-base_95.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_95.tar.gz
partman-base_95_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_95_amd64.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-base_95.dsc
Accepted:
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.107_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.107_amd64.udeb
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.107_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.107_amd64.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.107_all.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-priority_0.107_all.udeb
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.39_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_1.39_amd64.udeb
rootskel_1.39.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.39.dsc
rootskel_1.39.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.39.tar.gz
rootskel_1.39_amd64.udeb
to
Accepted:
partman-ext3_42.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_42.dsc
partman-ext3_42.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_42.tar.gz
partman-ext3_42_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_42_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-ext3_42.dsc -
Accepted:
installation-report_2.19.dsc
to pool/main/i/installation-report/installation-report_2.19.dsc
installation-report_2.19.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/installation-report/installation-report_2.19.tar.gz
installation-report_2.19_all.deb
to
Accepted:
netcfg-static_1.30_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_1.30_amd64.udeb
netcfg_1.30.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.30.dsc
netcfg_1.30.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.30.tar.gz
netcfg_1.30_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.30_amd64.udeb
Override
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:32:24 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#382357: fixed in cdebconf 0.107
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:32:42 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#381142: fixed in rootskel 1.39
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:32:40 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#358001: fixed in partman-ext3 42
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:32:24 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#382357: fixed in cdebconf 0.107
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:32:36 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#388296: fixed in nobootloader 1.11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:32:24 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#382357: fixed in cdebconf 0.107
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:32:30 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#389079: fixed in mdcfg 1.18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:32:26 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#388159: fixed in installation-report 2.19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
rootskel-gtk_0.12_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel-gtk_0.12.dsc
rootskel-gtk_0.12.tar.gz
rootskel-gtk_0.12_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Accepted:
rootskel-gtk_0.12.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel-gtk/rootskel-gtk_0.12.dsc
rootskel-gtk_0.12.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rootskel-gtk/rootskel-gtk_0.12.tar.gz
rootskel-gtk_0.12_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel-gtk/rootskel-gtk_0.12_i386.udeb
Override entries for your package:
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:17:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390565: fixed in rootskel-gtk 0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:17:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390894: fixed in rootskel-gtk 0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi, We have installed subversion 1.4.0 successfully and now we want to download Ubuntu Breezy Badger installer , we have used , the following command to log in svn co svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/d-i/trunk/packages/po level1-po where urdifolinux is our username we got the following error
Quoting Tahir Abdul Rauf Butt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi,
We have installed subversion 1.4.0 successfully and now we want to download
Ubuntu Breezy Badger installer , we have used , the following command to log
in
svn co svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/d-i/trunk/packages/po level1-po
73 matches
Mail list logo
