Bug#402110: successful installation report

2006-12-08 Thread Bruce Perens
Package: installation-reports Boot method: USB stick with usb-hd image and 100M netboot ISO image in the root. Image version: Daily i386 snapshot Date: Thursday December 7, PST Machine: ECS KV2 Extreme motherboard Processor: AMD Athlon 64 3400+ Memory: 1G Partitions: /dev/sda2 1G on SATA as

Re: Previously working LVM setup mysteriously broken.

2006-12-08 Thread Loïc Minier
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006, David Härdeman wrote: Don't mix up boot-on-raid and boot-on-device-mapper, they are two different things using different kernel subsystems (md and dm). Err, md is dm based, right? You mean boot on LVM versus boot on MD? Or did you mean dmraid which is yet something

Re: Previously working LVM setup mysteriously broken.

2006-12-08 Thread David Härdeman
On Fri, December 8, 2006 4:12, Daniel Burrows said: On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 09:33:33AM +0100, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: some trivia first: - Debian's lilo is patched with an unofficial patch for device-mapper support which was not updated since mid 2005 - Debian

Re: Previously working LVM setup mysteriously broken.

2006-12-08 Thread David Härdeman
On Fri, December 8, 2006 10:31, Loïc Minier said: On Fri, Dec 08, 2006, David Härdeman wrote: Don't mix up boot-on-raid and boot-on-device-mapper, they are two different things using different kernel subsystems (md and dm). Err, md is dm based, right? Nope, see

Bug#402127: GTK frontend should build on and X target too

2006-12-08 Thread Attilio Fiandrotti
package: cdebconf-gtk-udeb severity: minor tags: patch This patch is needed to build cdebconf's GTK frontend in an X11 environment; i'm using GDK_WINDOWING_X11 as GDK_WINDOWING_DIRECTFB is currently not available in GTKDFB 2.8.20. I'd like this patch to be applied because - It's necessary if

Bug#402126: GTK frontend should not reload keymap at every frontend_go() call

2006-12-08 Thread Attilio Fiandrotti
package: cdebconf-gtk-udeb severity: minor At every frontend_go() call the GTK frontend forces DirectFB to reload keymap: this causes VT1 pollution and is however not really clean. We should have something like a pipe the GTK frontend should be listening on to reload keymap as soon as command

Bug#402127: GTK frontend should build on and X target too

2006-12-08 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, On Fri, Dec 08, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: This patch is needed to build cdebconf's GTK frontend in an X11 environment; i'm using GDK_WINDOWING_X11 as GDK_WINDOWING_DIRECTFB is currently not available in GTKDFB 2.8.20. I don't understand why it's useful for the udeb, isn't

Bug#402142: flash-kernel: Minor correction to comment in source code

2006-12-08 Thread Phil Endecott
Package: flash-kernel Version: 0.7 Severity: minor Current comment: # See http://www.nslu2-linux.org/wiki/Info/BootFlash -- the NSLU2 uses a # 16 byte MTD header, the first two bytes (big endian) give the length of # the remainder of the image, and the remaining bytes are zero. Generate # this

Bug#402142: flash-kernel: Minor correction to comment in source code

2006-12-08 Thread Martin Michlmayr
tags 402142 + pending thanks * Phil Endecott [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-12-08 13:09]: # the remainder of the image, and the remaining bytes are zero. Generate # this header. should say first *four* bytes. Done in SVN, thanks. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Processed: Re: Bug#402142: flash-kernel: Minor correction to comment in source code

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 402142 + pending Bug#402142: flash-kernel: Minor correction to comment in source code There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Re: Fwd: How do I trim the base installation from within the businesscard cd? (Ultra minimal install)

2006-12-08 Thread Ottavio Caruso
Otavio Salvador wrote: Ottavio Caruso [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thank Otavio, my understanding was that 'base_include' adds extra packages to the installed base, and doesn't replace it. As from a old post: Yes, while base_exclude remove them. So if you want to replace something:

Re: Bug#402127: GTK frontend should build on and X target too

2006-12-08 Thread Otavio Salvador
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The problems you describe are not obvious to me, I currently only see a udeb providing cdebconf-gtk. IIUC, cdebconf-gtk-udeb will always be built against gtk/directfb and perhaps a future new package named cdebconf-gtk will be built against gtk/x11.

Re: Fwd: How do I trim the base installation from within the businesscard cd? (Ultra minimal install)

2006-12-08 Thread Otavio Salvador
Ottavio Caruso [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Otavio Salvador wrote: Ottavio Caruso [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thank Otavio, my understanding was that 'base_include' adds extra packages to the installed base, and doesn't replace it. As from a old post: Yes, while base_exclude remove

Bug#402157: debian-installer: Bad apt command for grub on AMD64

2006-12-08 Thread Bob Apodaca
Package: debian-installer Severity: important Grub fails to install on AMD64, when I check the virtual console the command given is: apt-install grub Starting a shell and using chroot /target apt-get install grub works fine. After that, using the installer grub will install. -- System

Bug#402162: Package: installation-reports

2006-12-08 Thread Hendrixski
Package: installation-reports Boot method: Net install CD onto both VirtualPC and VMWare server Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_rc1/alpha/iso-cd/debian-testing-alpha-netinst.iso Date: 12/08/2006 Machine: Both VirtualPC and VMWare Server on a Dell Latitutde D810

Assistance Request Denied

2006-12-08 Thread TomTom Support
Your request for assistance cannot be accepted because your email address is not registered with an existing account. ===

Bug#402157: debian-installer: Bad apt command for grub on AMD64

2006-12-08 Thread Eddy Petrișor
Bob Apodaca wrote: Package: debian-installer Severity: important Grub fails to install on AMD64, when I check the virtual console the command given is: apt-install grub That command is valid, but if it fails, the installation process will fail(stop) unless the command is ran something like

Processing of partman-auto_62_amd64.changes

2006-12-08 Thread Archive Administrator
partman-auto_62_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-auto_62.dsc partman-auto_62.tar.gz partman-auto_62_amd64.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Processing of partman-auto-raid_3_amd64.changes

2006-12-08 Thread Archive Administrator
partman-auto-raid_3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-auto-raid_3.dsc partman-auto-raid_3.tar.gz partman-auto-raid_3_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#402157: debian-installer: Bad apt command for grub on AMD64

2006-12-08 Thread Apodaca, Bob
Sorry, I was not aware that apt-install is a valid command. No, I did not skip any steps during the installation. Eddy Petrișor wrote: Bob Apodaca wrote: Package: debian-installer Severity: important Grub fails to install on AMD64, when I check the virtual console the command given is:

Bug#402157: debian-installer: Bad apt command for grub on AMD64

2006-12-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 08 December 2006 17:57, Eddy Petrișor wrote: Grub fails to install on AMD64, when I check the virtual console the command given is: apt-install grub That command is valid, but if it fails, the installation process will fail(stop) unless the command is ran something like

partman-auto-raid_3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: partman-auto-raid_3.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-auto-raid/partman-auto-raid_3.dsc partman-auto-raid_3.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-auto-raid/partman-auto-raid_3.tar.gz partman-auto-raid_3_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-auto-raid/partman-auto-raid_3_all.udeb Override entries for

partman-auto_62_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: partman-auto_62.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_62.dsc partman-auto_62.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_62.tar.gz partman-auto_62_amd64.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_62_amd64.udeb Override entries for your package: partman-auto_62.dsc

Bug#402157: debian-installer: Bad apt command for grub on AMD64

2006-12-08 Thread Luca
Frans Pop wrote: On Friday 08 December 2006 17:57, Eddy Petrișor wrote: Grub fails to install on AMD64, when I check the virtual console the command given is: apt-install grub That command is valid, but if it fails, the installation process will fail(stop) unless the command is

Bug#401264: marked as done (partman-auto-lvm: [powerpc, prep] On PReP systems, no separate /boot is needed, since we have the prep partition)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#401271: fixed in partman-auto 62 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#391676: marked as done (cdebconf-newt-udeb: progress bar not displayed correctly)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#391676: fixed in partman-auto 62 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#401271: marked as done (Separate boot partition not needed for prep systems)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#401271: fixed in partman-auto 62 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Re: Bug#402157: debian-installer: Bad apt command for grub on AMD64

2006-12-08 Thread Eddy Petrișor
Frans Pop wrote: On Friday 08 December 2006 17:57, Eddy Petrișor wrote: Grub fails to install on AMD64, when I check the virtual console the command given is: apt-install grub That command is valid, but if it fails, the installation process will fail(stop) unless the command is ran something

Re: Bug#402157: debian-installer: Bad apt command for grub on AMD64

2006-12-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 08 December 2006 20:01, Eddy Petrișor wrote: Hmm, that means the ppp package will be not queued if apt-install is ran in ppp-udeb's postinst, doesn't it? So the the correct place to run apt-install would be in finish-install.d scripts (or at least for ppp-udeb)? No, it can be run

Processing of linux-modules-di-mips-2.6_1.00_mips.changes

2006-12-08 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-modules-di-mips-2.6_1.00_mips.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-modules-di-mips-2.6_1.00.dsc linux-modules-di-mips-2.6_1.00.tar.gz loop-aes-modules-2.6.18-3-r4k-ip22-di_1.00_mips.udeb loop-aes-modules-2.6.18-3-r5k-ip32-di_1.00_mips.udeb

Processing of linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6_1.02_mipsel.changes

2006-12-08 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6_1.02_mipsel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6_1.02.dsc linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6_1.02.tar.gz loop-aes-modules-2.6.18-3-r3k-kn02-di_1.02_mipsel.udeb

linux-modules-di-mips-2.6_1.00_mips.changes is NEW

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Installer
(new) linux-modules-di-mips-2.6_1.00.dsc optional debian-installer (new) linux-modules-di-mips-2.6_1.00.tar.gz optional debian-installer (new) loop-aes-modules-2.6.18-3-qemu-di_1.00_mips.udeb extra debian-installer loop-AES crypto modules This package contains loop-AES crypto modules. (new)

linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6_1.02_mipsel.changes is NEW

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Installer
linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6_1.02.dsc to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6/linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6_1.02.dsc linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6_1.02.tar.gz to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6/linux-modules-di-mipsel-2.6_1.02.tar.gz (new)

Re: No Dell key board

2006-12-08 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Ian White ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I was hoping to upgrade my old Sarge to a Dell Pentium 4 Dimension E520 series but neither the old CDs nor any kind of download interacts with keyboard response to install. I tried the AMD-64 binary CD. I think the problem is that installation does

Re: Bug#402157: debian-installer: Bad apt command for grub on AMD64

2006-12-08 Thread Douglas Tutty
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 06:55:15PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: On Friday 08 December 2006 17:57, Eddy Petri??or wrote: Grub fails to install on AMD64, when I check the virtual console the In short, we need to find out _why_ grub failed here. Bob: Could you try to reproduce the error? Hi

Re: No Dell key board

2006-12-08 Thread Ian White
- Original Message - Subject: Re: No Dell key board From: Christian Perrier ;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, December 8, 2006 5:36 Quoting Ian White ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I was hoping to upgrade my old Sarge to a Dell Pentium 4 Dimension E520 series but neither the old CDs nor any

Re: No Dell key board

2006-12-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 08 December 2006 02:50, Ian White wrote: I was hoping to upgrade my old Sarge to a Dell Pentium 4 Dimension E520 series but neither the old CDs nor any kind of download interacts with keyboard response to install. I tried the AMD-64 binary CD. I think the problem is that installation

Re: Bug#402157: debian-installer: Bad apt command for grub on AMD64

2006-12-08 Thread Luca
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 06:55:15PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: On Friday 08 December 2006 17:57, Eddy Petri??or wrote: Grub fails to install on AMD64, when I check the virtual console the In short, we need to find out _why_ grub failed here. Bob: Could you try to

Bug#402267: PowerPC Netinst CD Invalid Release File

2006-12-08 Thread Rick Thomas
/sid_d-i/20061208-1/powerpc/ iso-cd Trying 130.239.18.138... -rw-r--r--1 1002 1002 143 Dec 08 10:34 MD5SUMS -rw-r--r--1 1002 1002 73390080 Dec 08 10:32 debian- testing-powerpc-businesscard.iso -rw-r--r--1 1002 1002 251055 Dec 08 10:32 debian- testing

Bug#402267: More info

2006-12-08 Thread Rick Thomas
Curiously enough, the netinst CD does appear to have the missing file... $ ls -l dists/etch/main/binary-powerpc/ total 688 -rwxr-xr-x 1 rbthomas rbthomas 209980 Dec 8 10:33 Packages -rwxr-xr-x 1 rbthomas rbthomas 131702 Dec 8 10:33 Packages.gz -rwxr-xr-x 1 rbthomas rbthomas