On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 11:09:18PM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
During install onto a PowerPC based EFIKA unit the installer complained :
This partitioner doesn't have information about the default type of
partition tables on your architecture.
Hi Denis, ...
The Efika will not be supported
Package: installation-report
Severity: normal
Boot method: Netinst CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_rc1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
downloaded on 2006-12-14
Date: 2006-12-14 15:00:00 GMT+8
Machine: Laptop Asus U5F
Processor: Centrino Core2 Duo
Package: finish-install
Version: 2.6
Severity: normal
Well, while working on the efika support, i found out that more problematic
serial console setups break finish-install. The efika has ttyPSC0 as console.
This is in part due to the fact that rootskel/console-detect uses :
Your message dated Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:47:47 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Closing this bug, as it was fixed earlier in the 2.6 upload.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Package: installation-guide
Severity: normal
In section '2.4.3. Fake or $(B!H(BVirtual$(B!I(B Parity RAM', the
installation
guide states: If you want complete information on AMD64 RAM issues,
and what is the best RAM to buy, see the PC Hardware FAQ, with a link
to
* Rod Whitby [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-12-14 15:33]:
I'm going to continue testing by simply adding it to sata-modules, but
will be happy to migrate to comply with whatever you decide.
This is not etch-critical :-)
Note that this is only relevant for 2.6.19 and higher anyway.
--
Martin
linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.10_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb
scsi-core-modules-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb
scsi-modules-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.17_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64-di_1.17_sparc.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.18-3-sparc64-di_1.17_sparc.udeb
ppp-modules-2.6.18-3-sparc64-di_1.17_sparc.udeb
Your message dated Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:55:38 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#402995:
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Rejected: no source found for linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6 0.10
(md-modules-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb).
Rejected: no source found for linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6 0.10
(xfs-modules-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb).
Rejected: no source found for linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6 0.10
Rejected: no source found for linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 1.17
(scsi-common-modules-2.6.18-3-sparc32-di_1.17_sparc.udeb).
Rejected: no source found for linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 1.17
(kernel-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64-di_1.17_sparc.udeb).
Rejected: no source found for linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 1.17
* Rod Whitby [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-12-14 15:38]:
Could you please apply the attached patch to flash-kernel?
Yes, but after RC2 is out.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.10_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.10.dsc
linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.10.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_1.26_source.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_1.26.dsc
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_1.26.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.17_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.17.dsc
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.17.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.10_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb
scsi-core-modules-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb
scsi-modules-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.17_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64-di_1.17_sparc.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.18-3-sparc64-di_1.17_sparc.udeb
ppp-modules-2.6.18-3-sparc64-di_1.17_sparc.udeb
Rejected: no source found for linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 1.17
(scsi-common-modules-2.6.18-3-sparc32-di_1.17_sparc.udeb).
Rejected: no source found for linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 1.17
(kernel-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64-di_1.17_sparc.udeb).
Rejected: no source found for linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 1.17
Rejected: source only uploads are not supported.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rejected: source only uploads are not supported.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rejected: no source found for linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6 0.10
(md-modules-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb).
Rejected: no source found for linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6 0.10
(xfs-modules-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb).
Rejected: no source found for linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6 0.10
Rejected: source only uploads are not supported.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 12:07:05AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
The original issue appears to be not a problem in network-console, but in
main-menu.
Currently the order of menu items appears to be based on:
- number in installer-menu-item
- dependencies
Maybe a third factor should be taken
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_1.26_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.18-3-powerpc-di_1.26_powerpc.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.18-3-powerpc-di_1.26_powerpc.udeb
nic-extra-modules-2.6.18-3-powerpc-di_1.26_powerpc.udeb
Rejected: no source found for linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6 1.26
(pcmcia-modules-2.6.18-3-powerpc-miboot-di_1.26_powerpc.udeb).
Rejected: no source found for linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6 1.26
(nic-shared-modules-2.6.18-3-powerpc64-di_1.26_powerpc.udeb).
Rejected: no source found for
hallo;ich habe versucht debian auf meinen leptop ( sony vaio VGN FE28H) zu
installieren aber ich hatte immer probleme mit der installation, es will
irgendwie meine festplatte nicht lesen oder erkennen überhaupt dass ich
repartition machen kann.würden sie mir bitte dazu was schreiben,. ich wäre
By updating to kernel 2.6.18 the problem vanished.
Everything now works out of the box.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_1.26_source.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_1.26.dsc
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_1.26.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_1.26_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.18-3-powerpc-di_1.26_powerpc.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.18-3-powerpc-di_1.26_powerpc.udeb
nic-extra-modules-2.6.18-3-powerpc-di_1.26_powerpc.udeb
linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.10_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb
scsi-core-modules-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb
scsi-modules-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb
linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.10_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.10.dsc
linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.10.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.17_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.17.dsc
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.17.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.17_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64-di_1.17_sparc.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.18-3-sparc64-di_1.17_sparc.udeb
ppp-modules-2.6.18-3-sparc64-di_1.17_sparc.udeb
Your message dated Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:48:58 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#399573: Everything ok with kernel 2.6.18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Rejected: source only uploads are not supported.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rejected: no source found for linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6 0.10
(md-modules-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb).
Rejected: no source found for linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6 0.10
(xfs-modules-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb).
Rejected: no source found for linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6 0.10
Rejected: source only uploads are not supported.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rejected: source only uploads are not supported.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rejected: no source found for linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 1.17
(scsi-common-modules-2.6.18-3-sparc32-di_1.17_sparc.udeb).
Rejected: no source found for linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 1.17
(kernel-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64-di_1.17_sparc.udeb).
Rejected: no source found for linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 1.17
Rejected: no source found for linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6 1.26
(pcmcia-modules-2.6.18-3-powerpc-miboot-di_1.26_powerpc.udeb).
Rejected: no source found for linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6 1.26
(nic-shared-modules-2.6.18-3-powerpc64-di_1.26_powerpc.udeb).
Rejected: no source found for
Jorge Rojas wrote:
hi people i want to know if is possible to find a diskette image
from
debian 4.0 (ETCH)
man mkboot
--
Ottavio Caruso
I will not purchase any computing equipment from manufacturers that recommend
Windows Vista or any other Microsoft® products.
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
Hi, ...
Since i am going to reinstalll the XServe G5 which went broken last week, i
investigated why i couldn't boot from CD.
It happens that the generated mini.iso files (powerpc64/netboot), are broken,
and are missing the needed magic
Josef Wolf wrote:
Hello!
I wonder about the reason to use localized values to answer preseed
questions as described on
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/apbs03.html
I don't see anything here about using localised values in preseeding,
except for a note that there might be
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_1.26_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_1.26.dsc
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_1.26.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.18-3-powerpc-di_1.26_powerpc.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.18-3-powerpc-di_1.26_powerpc.udeb
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.17_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.17.dsc
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.17.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64-di_1.17_sparc.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.18-3-sparc64-di_1.17_sparc.udeb
linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.10_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.10.dsc
linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.10.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb
Frans Pop wrote:
The cause is that when tasksel is run within g-i, two basic package
management steps are never executed:
- extracting templates from packages
- preconfiguring packages
One way this could happen is if apt-utils is for some reason not
previously installed. Do you still have
Accepted:
affs-modules-2.6.18-3-powerpc-di_1.26_powerpc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6/affs-modules-2.6.18-3-powerpc-di_1.26_powerpc.udeb
affs-modules-2.6.18-3-powerpc-miboot-di_1.26_powerpc.udeb
to
Accepted:
crypto-modules-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6/crypto-modules-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb
dasd-modules-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6/dasd-modules-2.6.18-3-s390-di_0.10_s390.udeb
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.18-3-sparc32-di_1.17_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.18-3-sparc32-di_1.17_sparc.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.18-3-sparc64-di_1.17_sparc.udeb
to
As the subject line says: message for Olaf van der Spek
Olaf,
the below says there is something wrong with your E-mail configuration.
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failure
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006
Hi
I really wonder what's the difference between the newt and gtk frontend
that causes some questions being asked by gtk frontend and not by newt.
I noticed that when a SELECT question has no options, like this
Name: test/select
Type: select
Default:
Choices:
Description: Choose,man
On Thursday 14 December 2006 17:14, Joey Hess wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
The cause is that when tasksel is run within g-i, two basic package
management steps are never executed:
- extracting templates from packages
- preconfiguring packages
One way this could happen is if apt-utils is for
only exlusive content.
http://berologu3.com
I didn't know it was impossible when I did it
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 09:34:23PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
reassign 401876 cdebconf-gtk-udeb
severity 401876 serious
thanks
..
Right, looks like that is indeed the crucial point: the questions are
asked with the graphical installer and not with the regular one. This
also explains why the
Package: networkmanager
See bug number 402547 (originally filed against debian-installer) for
previous discussion.
The problem does seem to be that NetworkManager doesn't know what to
do with the bmac interface, because it doesn't have carrier detect,
so NetworkManager can't tell when
oh, i almost forgot,
there's one issue i neglected to mention:
the sound card doesn't seem to be detected/supported. previously it was
a cs46xx audio card which afaicr worked fine before installation, though
it's possible i had placed some extra modprobe options long ago and
forgotten about
In the installer (on amd64, RC1) under tasksel there's a laptop task and a
standard-system task. I didn't install the standard-system since I
wanted to know exactly what it wants to put on the box. Once installed
and booting, under aptitude, there's a laptop task but no
standard-system task.
Further details at Bug#403112
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Douglas Tutty wrote:
In the installer (on amd64, RC1) under tasksel there's a laptop task and a
standard-system task. I didn't install the standard-system since I
wanted to know exactly what it wants to put on the box. Once installed
and booting, under aptitude, there's a laptop task but no
On Thursday 14 December 2006 20:47, Douglas Tutty wrote:
Where can I find out what packages the standard-system task would have
installed?
Or would I have been better to install the standard-system from the
installer and then remove anything I don't want later?
Yes, that would have been
Hi Dann,
we used to have miboot-floppies for sarge/powerpc somewhere on
people.debian.org/~luther/ but it seems they are gone. Since these floppies
in etch are also sometimes not working and older hardware might not be
supported by newer kernels, too - it would be very good to have them again.
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 09:47:21PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 14 December 2006 20:47, Douglas Tutty wrote:
Where can I find out what packages the standard-system task would have
installed?
Or would I have been better to install the standard-system from the
installer and then
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 403112 network-manager
Bug#403112: NetworkManager: Workaround for OldWorld beige G3 Macintosh bmac
network interface disabled on reboot
Warning: Unknown package 'networkmanager'
Bug reassigned from
Michael Biebl wrote:
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 403112 network-manager
Bug#403112: NetworkManager: Workaround for OldWorld beige G3 Macintosh bmac
network interface disabled on reboot
Warning: Unknown package 'networkmanager'
Bug
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:06:52PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi Dann,
we used to have miboot-floppies for sarge/powerpc somewhere on
people.debian.org/~luther/ but it seems they are gone. Since these floppies
in etch are also sometimes not working and older hardware might not be
On Dec 14, 2006, at 5:05 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 403112 network-manager
Bug#403112: NetworkManager: Workaround for OldWorld beige G3
Macintosh bmac network interface disabled on reboot
Warning: Unknown
Have you got out of work
--
Mobile Email from a Cingular Wireless Customer http://www.cingular.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
attachment: ChristmasHolidays14.jpg
Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 07:44:14PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
the last upload of iso-codes (0.53-1, frozen because of a udeb) has been
in
unstable for 10 days. If the D-I team has no objections, it could be
hinted
into testing
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 08:08:38AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 07:44:14PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
the last upload of iso-codes (0.53-1, frozen because of a udeb) has
been in
unstable for 10 days. If
71 matches
Mail list logo
