Geert Stappers wrote:
A more constructive way of solving "the greater issue",
could have be done by asking in november a question like
Bug #391451, about a kernel module, is reported as fixed.
What is needed to get in the Debian installer?
One should lead to another, assuming proper ini
On Saturday 13 January 2007 22:10, Steve Langasek wrote:
> "Potentially leading to random breakage" doesn't really justify a
> critical severity when there are a limited number of packages making
> use of busybox (and busybox sort in particular). Does this bug
> actually break d-i, and if so how?
Steve Langasek, le Sat 13 Jan 2007 13:10:25 -0800, a écrit :
> "Potentially leading to random breakage" doesn't really justify a critical
> severity when there are a limited number of packages making use of busybox
> (and busybox sort in particular). Does this bug actually break d-i, and if
> so h
Op 13-01-2007 om 23:00 schreef rob rob:
> Hello,
>
> [ good introduction ]
>
> I get the following message:
>
> No filesystem could mount root, tried cramfs
> Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
> unknown-block(1,0)
>
> Also strange is when I put the image on floppy it'
Op 11-01-2007 om 13:24 schreef Mathew Binkley:
> Frans Pop wrote:
>
> Since the bug report hasn't changed since my initial bug report, you may
> try that. Those blades are now running RHEL 5. Debian lost its
> opportunity.
Mathew Binkley filed bugreport #391451 on friday october 6th 2006.
On mo
Hello,
as some of you may not remember, I posted a few times last year trying to
get the miboot floppies available at
people.debian.org/~wouterd-i/powerpc-miboot/.. to work. For those of you who
don't know, the floppies are used for installing debian on 'old world'
powerpc. The floppies are e
Op 12-01-2007 om 01:19 schreef Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton:
> oh btw i hacked oem-config from ubuntu onto debian, and it works.
> really i should do languagechooser-data as well.
>
> anyone interested let me know.
What does oem-config, what is it?
Consider that a "some one letting know he migh
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 01:50:15PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> severity 373704 critical
> found 373704 1:1.1.3-3
> thanks
> I had meant to look into this much earlier, but unfortunately it slipped
> my mind. Severity critical as this behavior can cause hard to trace
> unpredictable behavior in any
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst.iso CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_rc1/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Date: Sat 13 Jan 07 c. 3pm GMT
Machine: Acer Aspire 2003 WLMI
Processor:Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1600MHz
Memory:512Mb
Partitio
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.1.3-3
Followup-For: Bug #373704
Attached is a patch for the sort issues. A few have croped up while
testing this. Hopefully busybox sort now behaves like coreutils sort.
About the patch (line numbers of result):
Line 65 : Fix -b -f -i -d and trailing spaces.
Try
On 13 Jan 2007, at 14:47, Mark Brown wrote:
[...]
Sven hasn't been banned, he decided of his own accord to take a break
for two months:
[...]
OK so can't everyone "decide of their own accord" to give him a break
for these two months?
--
Arnaud Delobelle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
* Joerg Hoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-12 20:52]:
> ~ # echo $ram
> 58
Thanks.
> Memory: 56976k/65536k available (3412k kernel code, 8500k reserved, 920k
Right, it's probably only 58 because the boot image is so large.
I've changed the lowmem value in SVN.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyri
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 406735 hw-detect
Bug#406735: installation report: HP Workstation Model 712/60
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `hw-detect'.
> retitle 406735 hp-bus scsi modules should be loaded in initrd
Bug#406735: installation report: H
reassign 406735 hw-detect
retitle 406735 hp-bus scsi modules should be loaded in initrd
tags 406735 + pending
thanks
On Saturday 13 January 2007 15:26, root wrote:
> Problem 1:
> The installation seemed to halt after 95% was installed. The latest
> message was "Installed update-inetd". After that
Hi Joey,
Joey Hess [2007-01-12 16:40 -0500]:
> Ok, but post-etch I would prefer it if there were a static package name
> I could put in the task instead of myself tracking minor version numbers
> embedded in package names.
OK, no problem. I can just keep the 'postgresql' binary package and
have i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 405364 moreinfo
Bug#405364: installation-report: does not detect tg3 NIC on Dell Optiplex 745
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 01:06:08PM +, Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
> AFAIK Sven Luther has not contributed to this thread and seems to be
> banned from posting on debian lists. Thus it strikes me that to bring
Sven hasn't been banned, he decided of his own accord to take a break
for two months:
Your message dated Sat, 13 Jan 2007 09:24:50 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sat, 13 Jan 2007 09:24:50 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 13 January 2007 10:42, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Since i810 isn't simply supported by vesafb, a way out for this could
be providing i810fb module in the installer/ in the kernel and loading
it at boot time when i810 chip is detected.
Tests on my laptop showed tha
On Saturday 13 January 2007 13:50, Frans Pop wrote:
> Conclusion: when sorting with delimiter on the last field, the
> last-but-one field is sorted instead.
[...]
> Conclusion: with a leading delimiter, the sort is somehow _always_ done
> on the first field.
The last conclusion is not correct as t
On Saturday 13 January 2007 13:50, Frans Pop wrote:
> The testcase included in the busybox testsuite seems to work only by
> accident as it is a numeric sort and the last field to be sorted is the
> only numerical data in each line.
It turns out the testcase based on the D-I situation is broken in
On 13 Jan 2007, at 08:49, Holger Levsen wrote:
[...]
I dont think _this_ thread is the cause for Bens perception, rather
those
threads which _started_ with these mails (and others):
http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2006/04/msg00407.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2006/08/msg
severity 373704 critical
found 373704 1:1.1.3-3
thanks
I had meant to look into this much earlier, but unfortunately it slipped
my mind. Severity critical as this behavior can cause hard to trace
unpredictable behavior in any script using sort with a delimiter,
potentially leading to random bre
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 373704 critical
Bug#373704: sort -k does not count fields the same as gnu sort
Severity set to `critical' from `normal'
> found 373704 1:1.1.3-3
Bug#373704: sort -k does not count fields the same as gnu sort
Bug marked as found in version 1:1.
On Saturday 13 January 2007 07:53, Benelli Luca wrote:
> I don't know when the server will go into production, so i'm not sure
> how many tests we can do, at the moment it's still a clean install and
> it will probably need to be reinstalled as debian 3.1 (using HPDE
> installers) so i think i shou
On Saturday 13 January 2007 10:42, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Since i810 isn't simply supported by vesafb, a way out for this could
> be providing i810fb module in the installer/ in the kernel and loading
> it at boot time when i810 chip is detected.
Tests on my laptop showed that it is absolutel
Frans Pop wrote:
reassign 405737 cdebconf-gtk-udeb
retitle 405737 G-I does not support some i810 graphics cards
thanks
On Sunday 07 January 2007 15:03, Roy Francis wrote:
If I simply insmod a precompiled i810fb.ko, will it work ?
I've been testing a bit with that, but at least on my laptop
Hi,
On Saturday 13 January 2007 08:47, Joey Hess wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Yes, I've seen various mails/rants etc... and haven't wanted to take
> > part of it neither in the past, but it looks like this has gone too far,
> > and it's more and more looking like even perfectly good
29 matches
Mail list logo
