Quoting Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
bubulle, can you provide a quick translation?
Sure. Note the Glenn Gagné: les rapports de bug Debian devraient de
préférence être envoyés en language anglaise, qui est la langue
commune de tous les développeurs du projet. Si vous avez des
difficultés
On Wed, February 28, 2007 23:01, peter green said:
this sounds like a bug in mke2fs to me, it is not cleaning up
the sectors
before its header and as a result the partition gets misrecognised.
I think it's there because some arches and some partitioning schemes
actually have real data in the
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 03:26:33PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
reassign 411446 clock-setup 0.13
retitle 411446 [powerpc] Should not select UTC for iBooks
thanks
On Monday 19 February 2007 08:12, Todd Partridge wrote:
Comments/Problems:
Used both the x86 and PPC Install Guide. The PPC Guide
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 412295 base-installer 1.13.4sarge1
Bug#412295: Bugs for Debian 3.1 r5
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-installer'.
reassign 412909 base-installer 1.13.4sarge1
Bug#412909: kernel-image n'est pas choisit correctement
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 412295 412909
Bug#412295: Bugs for Debian 3.1 r5
Bug#412909: kernel-image n'est pas choisit correctement à l'installation de
Debian linux26
Merged 412295 412909.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Merci, Je vais attendre la sortie de la nouvelle version !
Thank, I will wait the new version... in few days !
Regards,
Glenn
-Message d'origine-
De : Christian Perrier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 1 mars, 2007 01:12
À : Glenn Gagné; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: Bug#412909:
On Sunday 25 February 2007 11:28, Ong (MIS) wrote:
It’s wrongly install the Kernel version to 2.6.8-3-k7-smp. Since my pc
is intel processor.
Thank you for reporting this. There is indeed an error in the kernel
selection and we will try to correct this as soon as possible in new CD
images.
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 22:26, Glenn Gagné wrote:
L'installation s'est fait normallement jusqu'au premier redémarrage.
Après avoir redémarré, je me suis rendu compte que l'installateur avait
décidé d'installer le noyau kernel-image-2.6.8-3-k7-smp.deb et
c'était le seul choix possible
Unfortunately we seem to have missed a change that was needed because of
the ABI change in 3.1r3. We have not noticed this until now because the
old kernels were still included in the archive and on CD images. With
3.1r5 the old images were removed which brought the issue to the surface.
The
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 04:11:30PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Unfortunately we seem to have missed a change that was needed because of
the ABI change in 3.1r3. We have not noticed this until now because the
old kernels were still included in the archive and on CD images. With
3.1r5 the old images
--- Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Snipped
Fortunately an alternative solution is possible:
correcting the default after it has been read from
the debconf database.
I have implemented this solution in base-installer
(1.13.4sarge2) and uploaded that new version to
stable. As
Hi all,
Does anybody know of a way to preseed the question Do you want to return to
the partitioning menu when no swap space was defined?
Any value for d-i partman-basicfilesystems/no_swap boolean makes d-i enter
a loop... Maybe there are other neat or ugly ways to get rid of the question.
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.66
Severity: normal
During the installation of Debian testing/Etch from the build CD1 binary
20070226-09:38 (newest atm) I was not able to finish it after the step that
runs tasksel if I selected Desktop environment. The installation just hangs
and I was able to
Your message dated Thu, 01 Mar 2007 17:33:38 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#412991: tasksel: Desktop environment task hangs again
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
On Thursday 01 March 2007 06:11, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On further thinking, I realise there are several problems with the
patch:
1. It tries to probe even if open_filesystem is false (already
identified).
2. It can return after maximize_extended_partition() without rolling
that change back.
So the problem is that (aside from the possibility that OS9 is not
being recognized) if the other OS is OS9, the default for hardware
clock should be local time, but if the other OS is OS-X, the
default for the hardware clock should be UTC. Is that a correct
assessment?
I solve it by
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 09:09:38PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
Thanks four your answer, David!
[ ... ]
Any ideas why the filesystem type is considered to be crypto_LUKS even
after it was reformatted with ext3? I even tried to set the volume
label in the installer, but this did not help
Hello!
I'd like to apt-get update; apt-get upgrade from preseed/late_command
causing the first reboot to come up with updated kernel/modules. So I
put this (splitted and commented for readability) into my seed file:
d-i preseed/late_command string \
cp /cdrom/preseed/postinstall.sh
Looking for the signatures seem superflous,
I was suggesting that because of the metion previously in the discussion that
some systems apprently didn't like it being zero'd out, only nuking known
problem partition signatures would be much less likely to cause other issues
than nuking anything
Josef Wolf wrote:
I'd like to apt-get update; apt-get upgrade from preseed/late_command
causing the first reboot to come up with updated kernel/modules. So I
put this (splitted and commented for readability) into my seed file:
d-i preseed/late_command string \
cp
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 03:51:55PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Thanks for the answer, Joey!
Josef Wolf wrote:
I'd like to apt-get update; apt-get upgrade from preseed/late_command
causing the first reboot to come up with updated kernel/modules. So I
put this (splitted and commented for
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
reassign 412948 installation-reports
Bug#412948: Bug in Etch debian-installer
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `installation-reports'.
End of message, stopping
Hi
Sounds very strange that I'd get the same error on two
different images burned to two different discs, but I
ran the CD check anyway and it too says the CD is
perfectly OK. I haven't had any hardware trouble with
the burner before, and it seems unlikely that I'd
error out on the same place
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 01:26:26PM +0100, Josef Wolf wrote:
Hello!
I am trying to create a customized installation disk with the ability
to create encrypted root filesystem. In my test installations, I noticed
that the filesystem type is not set properly when I choose to reformat
filesystems
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 11:07:04PM +0100, Kjell Rune Skaaraas wrote:
Sounds very strange that I'd get the same error on two
different images burned to two different discs, but I
ran the CD check anyway and it too says the CD is
perfectly OK. I haven't had any hardware trouble with
the burner
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.114
Severity: wishlist
In helping a user debug a d-i related problem, I noticed that using
DEBCONF_DEBUG will cause all debconf traffic, including the reply to
password prompts to be printed.
It would be nice if passwords could be special-treated so that the
Also, just to rule out the missing archive signing key bug and the buggy
apt that removed archive signing keys...if you do try the install again,
could you try to boot the installer with the argument
debian-installer/allow_unauthenticated=true
--
David Härdeman
]
==
Installer lsb-release:
==
DISTRIB_ID=Debian
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer
DISTRIB_RELEASE=4.0 (installer build 20070301-12:05)
X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=netboot-2.6
==
Installer hardware
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 11:21:08PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
I am trying to create a customized installation disk with the ability
to create encrypted root filesystem. In my test installations, I noticed
that the filesystem type is not set properly when I choose to reformat
filesystems in
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 17:29 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 01 March 2007 06:11, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On further thinking, I realise there are several problems with the
patch:
1. It tries to probe even if open_filesystem is false (already
identified).
2. It can return after
30 matches
Mail list logo
